← Melton (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Melton 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 28 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 9,567 | 44.5% | 11 | 39.3% | 13 | 46.4% | -2 |
| Independent | 6,838 | 31.8% | 10 | 35.7% | 9 | 32.1% | +1 |
| Labour Party | 3,768 | 17.5% | 5 | 17.9% | 5 | 17.9% | 0 |
| Green Party | 734 | 3.4% | 1 | 3.6% | 1 | 3.6% | 0 |
| Liberal Democrats | 574 | 2.7% | 1 | 3.6% | 0 | 0.0% | +1 |
| Total | 21,481 | 100.0% | 28 | 100.0% | 28 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Croxton Kerrial · 1 seat · won at 55.6% · above quota
- Somerby · 1 seat · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Old Dalby · 1 seat · won at 56.7% · above quota
- Melton Craven · 2 seats · won at 40.6% · above quota
- Melton Egerton · 2 seats · won at 41.9% · above quota
- Melton Dorian · 3 seats · won at 36.4% · above quota
- Waltham-on-the-Wolds · 1 seat · won at 62.2% · above quota
- Long Clawson and Stathern · 2 seats · won at 46.0% · above quota
- Frisby-ON-the-Wreake · 1 seat · won at 65.8% · above quota
- Asfordby · 2 seats · won at 49.4% · above quota
- Melton Newport · 3 seats · won at 42.0% · above quota
- Melton Warwick · 2 seats · won at 50.4% · above quota
- Melton Sysonby · 3 seats · won at 46.5% · above quota
- Wymondham · 1 seat · won at 71.7% · above quota
- Gaddesby · 1 seat · won at 74.7% · above quota
- Bottesford · 2 seats · won at 65.1% · above quota
Race results
Croxton Kerrial · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 55.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 520
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hewson, A. | Independent | 289 | 55.6% | +5.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, J. | Conservative Party | 231 | 44.4% | — |
Somerby · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 56.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 711
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higgins, L. | Independent | 398 | 56.0% | +6.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taruvinga, V. | Conservative Party | 200 | 28.1% | — | |
| 3 | McAuley, H. | Liberal Democrats | 113 | 15.9% | — |
Old Dalby · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 56.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 616
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orson, J. | Conservative Party | 349 | 56.7% | +6.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holmes, E. | Independent | 179 | 29.1% | — | |
| 3 | Cliff, S. | Independent | 88 | 14.3% | — |
Melton Craven · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 616
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, S. | Independent | 277 | 22.5% | 45.0% | +11.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Atherton, I. | Conservative Party | 250 | 20.3% | 40.6% | +7.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Freer, L. | Independent | 239 | 19.4% | 38.8% | — | |
| 4 | Douglas, J. | Conservative Party | 237 | 19.2% | 38.5% | — | |
| 5 | Litt, T. | Labour Party | 229 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — |
Melton Egerton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 620
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allnatt, P. | Labour Party | 278 | 22.4% | 44.8% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brown, M. | Labour Party | 260 | 21.0% | 41.9% | +8.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sharman, J. | Conservative Party | 179 | 14.4% | 28.9% | — | |
| 4 | Faulkner, P. | Independent | 176 | 14.2% | 28.4% | — | |
| 5 | Faulkner, E. | Independent | 175 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 6 | Winters, J. | Conservative Party | 172 | 13.9% | 27.7% | — |
Melton Dorian · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 825
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cox, S. | Labour Party | 402 | 16.2% | 48.7% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gordon, M. | Independent | 305 | 12.3% | 37.0% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cumbers, P. | Independent | 300 | 12.1% | 36.4% | +11.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gray, C. | Conservative Party | 283 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Beaken, T. | Independent | 277 | 11.2% | 33.6% | — | |
| 6 | McQuillan, A. | Green Party | 255 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 7 | Lockwood, J. | Conservative Party | 239 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — | |
| 8 | Thompson, S. | Conservative Party | 234 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 9 | Taylor, I. | Green Party | 180 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — |
Waltham-on-the-Wolds · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 62.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 519
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharp, R. | Independent | 323 | 62.2% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Townley, B. | Conservative Party | 196 | 37.8% | — |
Long Clawson and Stathern · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,114
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evans, C. | Conservative Party | 565 | 25.4% | 50.7% | +17.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Orson, S. | Conservative Party | 512 | 23.0% | 46.0% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McQuillan, M. | Labour Party | 492 | 22.1% | 44.2% | — | |
| 4 | Hall, N. | Independent | 469 | 21.1% | 42.1% | — | |
| 5 | Birch, D. | Independent | 116 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — | |
| 6 | Birch, L. | Independent | 73 | 3.3% | 6.6% | — |
Frisby-ON-the-Wreake · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 65.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 707
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Browne, R. | Conservative Party | 465 | 65.8% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clay, M. | Labour Party | 139 | 19.7% | — | |
| 3 | Brown, E. | Independent | 103 | 14.6% | — |
Asfordby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 605
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carter, S. | Independent | 454 | 37.5% | 75.0% | +41.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Miller, C. | Green Party | 299 | 24.7% | 49.4% | +16.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Burle, R. | Conservative Party | 239 | 19.8% | 39.5% | — | |
| 4 | Putnam, N. | Conservative Party | 218 | 18.0% | 36.0% | — |
Melton Newport · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,092
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glancy, M. | Independent | 629 | 19.2% | 57.6% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lumley, S. | Independent | 609 | 18.6% | 55.8% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Webster, T. | Conservative Party | 459 | 14.0% | 42.0% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bindloss, R. | Conservative Party | 425 | 13.0% | 38.9% | — | |
| 5 | Jackson, V. | Labour Party | 413 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 6 | Smith, R. | Conservative Party | 404 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 7 | Midgley, B. | Independent | 336 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — |
Melton Warwick · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 685
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Freer, A. | Conservative Party | 360 | 26.3% | 52.6% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thwaites, A. | Independent | 345 | 25.2% | 50.4% | +17.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ellis, S. | Conservative Party | 337 | 24.6% | 49.2% | — | |
| 4 | Hammond, S. | Labour Party | 327 | 23.9% | 47.8% | — |
Melton Sysonby · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 942
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adcock, J. | Liberal Democrats | 461 | 16.3% | 48.9% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cliff, H. | Labour Party | 457 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Atherton, S. | Conservative Party | 438 | 15.5% | 46.5% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Illingworth, J. | Conservative Party | 423 | 15.0% | 44.9% | — | |
| 5 | Wilkinson, J. | Conservative Party | 370 | 13.1% | 39.3% | — | |
| 6 | Godber, R. | Independent | 261 | 9.2% | 27.7% | — | |
| 7 | Digby, C. | Independent | 240 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 8 | Panter, K. | Independent | 177 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — |
Wymondham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 71.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 421
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graham, M. | Conservative Party | 302 | 71.7% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bett, G. | Labour Party | 119 | 28.3% | — |
Gaddesby · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 74.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 577
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Child, B. | Conservative Party | 431 | 74.7% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holland, A. | Labour Party | 146 | 25.3% | — |
Bottesford · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 778
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pritchett, D. | Conservative Party | 602 | 38.7% | 77.4% | +44.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mason, J. | Labour Party | 506 | 32.5% | 65.1% | +31.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kilburn, M. | Conservative Party | 447 | 28.7% | 57.5% | — |