← Middlesbrough (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Middlesbrough 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 46 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 25,504 | 46.5% | 25 | 54.3% | 22 | 47.8% | +3 |
| Independent | 16,481 | 30.1% | 15 | 32.6% | 14 | 30.4% | +1 |
| Conservative Party | 8,044 | 14.7% | 4 | 8.7% | 7 | 15.2% | -3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 3,910 | 7.1% | 2 | 4.3% | 3 | 6.5% | -1 |
| Green Party | 862 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 54,801 | 100.0% | 46 | 100.0% | 46 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Stainton and Thornton · 1 seat · won at 54.0% · above quota
- North Ormesby · 1 seat · won at 54.1% · above quota
- Acklam · 2 seats · won at 38.5% · above quota
- Nunthorpe · 2 seats · won at 41.3% · above quota
- Marton West · 2 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Ladgate · 2 seats · won at 45.2% · above quota
- Trimdon · 2 seats · won at 45.9% · above quota
- Kader · 2 seats · won at 49.8% · above quota
- Marton East · 2 seats · won at 51.1% · above quota
- Coulby Newham · 3 seats · won at 43.7% · above quota
- Ayresome · 2 seats · won at 52.1% · above quota
- Brambles and Thorntree · 3 seats · won at 49.4% · above quota
- Hemlington · 2 seats · won at 58.2% · above quota
- Berwick Hills and Pallister · 3 seats · won at 50.5% · above quota
- Longlands and Beechwood · 3 seats · won at 52.4% · above quota
- Linthorpe · 2 seats · won at 61.4% · above quota
- Park End and Beckfield · 3 seats · won at 61.0% · above quota
- Park · 3 seats · won at 62.0% · above quota
- Central · 3 seats · won at 71.0% · above quota
- Newport · 3 seats · won at 73.8% · above quota
Race results
Stainton and Thornton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,158
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coupe, D. | Conservative Party | 625 | 54.0% | +4.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McKenna, J. | Labour Party | 533 | 46.0% | — |
North Ormesby · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 414
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ryles, J. | Labour Party | 224 | 54.1% | +4.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mcullooch, S. | Independent | 161 | 38.9% | — | |
| 3 | Morgan, D. | Conservative Party | 29 | 7.0% | — |
Acklam · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,674
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Livingstone, T. | Liberal Democrats | 867 | 25.9% | 51.8% | +18.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dean, S. | Labour Party | 644 | 19.2% | 38.5% | +5.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carey, J. | Liberal Democrats | 637 | 19.0% | 38.1% | — | |
| 4 | Henman, L. | Labour Party | 566 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — | |
| 5 | Polano, E. | Independent | 276 | 8.2% | 16.5% | — | |
| 6 | Welsh, P. | Independent | 224 | 6.7% | 13.4% | — | |
| 7 | Barton, K. | Conservative Party | 134 | 4.0% | 8.0% | — |
Nunthorpe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,664
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McClintock, M. | Liberal Democrats | 712 | 21.4% | 42.8% | +9.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smiles, M. | Conservative Party | 687 | 20.6% | 41.3% | +8.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bailey, T. | Liberal Democrats | 509 | 15.3% | 30.6% | — | |
| 4 | Lyon, M. | Conservative Party | 397 | 11.9% | 23.9% | — | |
| 5 | Tovey, W. | Independent | 367 | 11.0% | 22.1% | — | |
| 6 | Rathmell, J. | Independent | 333 | 10.0% | 20.0% | — | |
| 7 | Drumm, D. | Labour Party | 196 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 8 | McGee, J. | Labour Party | 126 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — |
Marton West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,341
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morrish, I. | Independent | 612 | 22.8% | 45.7% | +12.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jackson, D. | Independent | 603 | 22.5% | 45.0% | +11.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Murphy-Brown, A. | Conservative Party | 531 | 19.8% | 39.6% | — | |
| 4 | Austin, P. | Conservative Party | 468 | 17.5% | 34.9% | — | |
| 5 | Ewan, P. | Labour Party | 306 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 6 | Paul, J. | Liberal Democrats | 161 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — |
Ladgate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 898
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grainge, T. | Independent | 605 | 33.7% | 67.4% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hurst, L. | Conservative Party | 406 | 22.6% | 45.2% | +11.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mohan, T. | Labour Party | 367 | 20.4% | 40.9% | — | |
| 4 | Rushton, G. | Labour Party | 352 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — | |
| 5 | Middleton, S. | Liberal Democrats | 66 | 3.7% | 7.3% | — |
Trimdon · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,122
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCabe, D. | Independent | 673 | 30.0% | 60.0% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooper, C. | Independent | 515 | 23.0% | 45.9% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harris, C. | Labour Party | 472 | 21.0% | 42.1% | — | |
| 4 | Watson, J. | Labour Party | 364 | 16.2% | 32.4% | — | |
| 5 | Symon, S. | Conservative Party | 220 | 9.8% | 19.6% | — |
Kader · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,469
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Platt, J. | Independent | 944 | 32.1% | 64.3% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Platt, S. | Independent | 732 | 24.9% | 49.8% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Walkington, V. | Labour Party | 537 | 18.3% | 36.6% | — | |
| 4 | Curtis, D. | Conservative Party | 284 | 9.7% | 19.3% | — | |
| 5 | Lyon, C. | Conservative Party | 241 | 8.2% | 16.4% | — | |
| 6 | Livingstone, M. | Liberal Democrats | 200 | 6.8% | 13.6% | — |
Marton East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,342
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davison, D. | Independent | 784 | 29.2% | 58.4% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McConnell, J. | Independent | 685 | 25.5% | 51.1% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | O'Donnell, M. | Labour Party | 336 | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | |
| 4 | Soudani, F. | Conservative Party | 295 | 11.0% | 22.0% | — | |
| 5 | Symon, P. | Conservative Party | 261 | 9.7% | 19.5% | — | |
| 6 | Hellaoui, A. | Labour Party | 247 | 9.2% | 18.4% | — | |
| 7 | Paul, R. | Liberal Democrats | 75 | 2.8% | 5.6% | — |
Coulby Newham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,615
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Branson, D. | Labour Party | 899 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mason, L. | Conservative Party | 840 | 17.3% | 52.0% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nicholson, J. | Labour Party | 706 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Nicholson, G. | Labour Party | 673 | 13.9% | 41.7% | — | |
| 5 | Biswas, S. | Conservative Party | 566 | 11.7% | 35.1% | — | |
| 6 | Walker, S. | Independent | 544 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 7 | Sands, R. | Independent | 214 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 8 | Jobson, B. | Green Party | 209 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 9 | Whitmore, A. | Independent | 193 | 4.0% | 12.0% | — |
Ayresome · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 878
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High, A. | Labour Party | 611 | 34.8% | 69.6% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thompson, J. | Labour Party | 457 | 26.0% | 52.1% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hill, A. | Independent | 344 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — | |
| 4 | Biswas, P. | Conservative Party | 236 | 13.4% | 26.9% | — | |
| 5 | Drumm, S. | Liberal Democrats | 107 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — |
Brambles and Thorntree · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 660
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tranter, S. | Labour Party | 364 | 18.4% | 55.2% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Banks, J. | Labour Party | 362 | 18.3% | 54.8% | +29.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilson, G. | Independent | 326 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mcgrath, P. | Labour Party | 319 | 16.1% | 48.3% | — | |
| 5 | Gallienne, K. | Independent | 256 | 12.9% | 38.8% | — | |
| 6 | Towers, M. | Independent | 211 | 10.7% | 32.0% | — | |
| 7 | Longstaff, P. | Conservative Party | 99 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 8 | Tyndall, R. | Green Party | 43 | 2.2% | 6.5% | — |
Hemlington · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 991
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker, J. | Labour Party | 620 | 31.3% | 62.6% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walker, N. | Labour Party | 577 | 29.1% | 58.2% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bell, A. | Independent | 207 | 10.4% | 20.9% | — | |
| 4 | Lovell, C. | Independent | 181 | 9.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 5 | Hussain, S. | Conservative Party | 153 | 7.7% | 15.4% | — | |
| 6 | Beadnall, V. | Conservative Party | 145 | 7.3% | 14.6% | — | |
| 7 | Thompson, H. | Independent | 99 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — |
Berwick Hills and Pallister · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 775
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blades, I. | Labour Party | 451 | 19.4% | 58.2% | +33.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooke, J. | Labour Party | 416 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jones, D. | Independent | 391 | 16.8% | 50.5% | +25.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | James, S. | Independent | 346 | 14.9% | 44.6% | — | |
| 5 | Thompson, M. | Labour Party | 336 | 14.5% | 43.4% | — | |
| 6 | Walker, A. | Independent | 303 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 7 | Blyth, A. | Conservative Party | 82 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — |
Longlands and Beechwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,074
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nugent, M. | Labour Party | 647 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gavigan, P. | Labour Party | 572 | 17.8% | 53.3% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McTigue, J. | Independent | 563 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Sewell, S. | Labour Party | 491 | 15.2% | 45.7% | — | |
| 5 | Fovargue, J. | Independent | 350 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 6 | Hossain, A. | Independent | 200 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — | |
| 7 | Tumilty, N. | Conservative Party | 163 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — | |
| 8 | Smith, S. | Conservative Party | 156 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 9 | Livingstone, N. | Liberal Democrats | 79 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — |
Linthorpe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,341
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Storey, P. | Labour Party | 975 | 36.4% | 72.7% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hussain, N. | Labour Party | 823 | 30.7% | 61.4% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | King, J. | Independent | 535 | 20.0% | 39.9% | — | |
| 4 | Hamilton, P. | Liberal Democrats | 118 | 4.4% | 8.8% | — | |
| 5 | Pugh, G. | Conservative Party | 116 | 4.3% | 8.7% | — | |
| 6 | Connett, O. | Conservative Party | 114 | 4.3% | 8.5% | — |
Park End and Beckfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 932
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hubbard, B. | Independent | 640 | 22.9% | 68.7% | +43.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Saunders, M. | Independent | 609 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hill, S. | Independent | 568 | 20.3% | 61.0% | +36.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Williamson, C. | Labour Party | 328 | 11.7% | 35.2% | — | |
| 5 | Dryden, E. | Labour Party | 261 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 6 | Caisley, J. | Labour Party | 249 | 8.9% | 26.7% | — | |
| 7 | Blyth, M. | Conservative Party | 82 | 2.9% | 8.8% | — | |
| 8 | Howes, R. | Conservative Party | 58 | 2.1% | 6.2% | — |
Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,815
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Furness, T. | Labour Party | 1,240 | 22.8% | 68.3% | +43.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rostron, J. | Labour Party | 1,191 | 21.9% | 65.6% | +40.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clynch, E. | Labour Party | 1,126 | 20.7% | 62.0% | +37.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McIntyre, C. | Independent | 460 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 5 | McIntyre, F. | Independent | 435 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 6 | Ndhlovu, E. | Independent | 335 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 7 | Harris, M. | Green Party | 274 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 8 | Symon, V. | Conservative Party | 264 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 9 | Stoker, J. | Liberal Democrats | 119 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — |
Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,235
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lewis, L. | Labour Party | 1,053 | 28.4% | 85.3% | +60.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Storey, M. | Labour Party | 925 | 25.0% | 74.9% | +49.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Uddin, Z. | Labour Party | 876 | 23.7% | 71.0% | +46.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Young, J. | Independent | 331 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 5 | Bradburn, P. | Conservative Party | 218 | 5.9% | 17.7% | — | |
| 6 | Sturrock, I. | Green Party | 156 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 7 | Jones, I. | Liberal Democrats | 145 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — |
Newport · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 73.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +48.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,160
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kabuye, J. | Labour Party | 919 | 26.4% | 79.2% | +54.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ewan, J. | Labour Party | 911 | 26.2% | 78.5% | +53.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Romaine, A. | Labour Party | 856 | 24.6% | 73.8% | +48.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cooper, B. | Independent | 326 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 5 | Revett, D. | Green Party | 180 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 6 | Pugh, J. | Conservative Party | 174 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 7 | Maddula, D. | Liberal Democrats | 115 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — |