← Mole Valley (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Mole Valley 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 13 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 39 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 38,140 | 48.4% | 30 | 76.9% | 20 | 51.3% | +10 |
| Conservative Party | 21,700 | 27.5% | 3 | 7.7% | 11 | 28.2% | -8 |
| Green Party | 8,130 | 10.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 10.3% | -4 |
| ASHT IND | 8,075 | 10.2% | 6 | 15.4% | 4 | 10.3% | +2 |
| Labour Party | 1,544 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 1,241 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 78,830 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Capel, Leigh, Newdigate and Charlwood · 3 seats · won at 36.8% · above quota
- Ashtead Park · 3 seats · won at 44.6% · above quota
- Leatherhead South · 3 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Holmwoods and Beare Green · 3 seats · won at 46.4% · above quota
- Dorking North · 3 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Mickleham, Westcott and Okewood · 3 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- Brockham, Betchworth, Buckland, Box Hill and Headley · 3 seats · won at 54.6% · above quota
- Fetcham · 3 seats · won at 57.1% · above quota
- Leatherhead North · 3 seats · won at 57.8% · above quota
- Dorking South · 3 seats · won at 58.3% · above quota
- Bookham East and Eastwick Park · 3 seats · won at 58.7% · above quota
- Bookham West · 3 seats · won at 60.0% · above quota
- Ashtead Lanes and Common · 3 seats · won at 67.2% · above quota
Race results
Capel, Leigh, Newdigate and Charlwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,959
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bushnell, L. | Liberal Democrats | 894 | 15.2% | 45.6% | +20.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Farrar-Astrop, J. | Liberal Democrats | 810 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Loach, A. | Liberal Democrats | 720 | 12.3% | 36.8% | +11.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Osborne-Patterson, C. | Conservative Party | 698 | 11.9% | 35.6% | — | |
| 5 | Baldwin, T. | Conservative Party | 620 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 6 | Saunders, M. | Conservative Party | 619 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 7 | Scott, L. | Green Party | 604 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 8 | Abbott, R. | Green Party | 438 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 9 | Hollis, K. | Green Party | 409 | 7.0% | 20.9% | — | |
| 10 | Nasskau, L. | Labour Party | 64 | 1.1% | 3.3% | — |
Ashtead Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,176
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooper, M. | ASHT IND | 1,242 | 19.0% | 57.1% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stansfield, G. | ASHT IND | 1,140 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sevenoaks, G. | ASHT IND | 970 | 14.9% | 44.6% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Patel, R. | Independent | 706 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 5 | Harper, D. | Independent | 535 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 6 | Cutler, K. | Conservative Party | 269 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 7 | Brown, P. | Green Party | 264 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — | |
| 8 | Smith, A. | Conservative Party | 253 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 9 | MacLeod, V. | Liberal Democrats | 245 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 10 | Wray, M. | Conservative Party | 236 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — | |
| 11 | Waugh, J. | Liberal Democrats | 215 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 12 | Cressy, A. | Liberal Democrats | 200 | 3.1% | 9.2% | — | |
| 13 | Eagle, S. | Labour Party | 136 | 2.1% | 6.2% | — | |
| 14 | Smith, G. | Green Party | 118 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Leatherhead South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,845
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kendrick, B. | Liberal Democrats | 960 | 17.3% | 52.0% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Slater, J. | Conservative Party | 852 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chambers, J. | Conservative Party | 831 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Parsons, G. | Liberal Democrats | 779 | 14.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 5 | Elcock-Haskins, H. | Conservative Party | 754 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 6 | O'Shea, N. | Liberal Democrats | 700 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 7 | Awcock, M. | Green Party | 301 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 8 | Clark, A. | Labour Party | 207 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 9 | Sherring, J. | Green Party | 151 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — |
Holmwoods and Beare Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,686
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hobbs, R. | Liberal Democrats | 979 | 19.4% | 58.1% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Malcomson, C. | Liberal Democrats | 879 | 17.4% | 52.1% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wellman, C. | Liberal Democrats | 782 | 15.5% | 46.4% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Maruziva, L. | Conservative Party | 607 | 12.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 5 | Botting, L. | Conservative Party | 546 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 6 | Mir, D. | Conservative Party | 524 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 7 | Roche, J. | Green Party | 224 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 8 | Auckland, E. | Green Party | 198 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 9 | Case, F. | Green Party | 162 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 10 | Foster, C. | Labour Party | 158 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — |
Dorking North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,271
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watson, H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,301 | 19.1% | 57.3% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Draper, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,207 | 17.7% | 53.1% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rosam, E. | Liberal Democrats | 1,082 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Crook, C. | Green Party | 778 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Smith, P. | Green Party | 642 | 9.4% | 28.3% | — | |
| 6 | Holland, S. | Green Party | 627 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 7 | Mansfield, C. | Labour Party | 339 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 8 | Foulston, M. | Conservative Party | 316 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 9 | Cude, P. | Conservative Party | 264 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 10 | Frost, S. | Conservative Party | 257 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — |
Mickleham, Westcott and Okewood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,061
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Budleigh, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,180 | 19.1% | 57.3% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Magesh, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,108 | 17.9% | 53.8% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mursaleen-Plank, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,106 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hebberd, M. | Conservative Party | 769 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 5 | Irvine, D. | Conservative Party | 703 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 6 | Musgrave, G. | Conservative Party | 684 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 7 | Poke, J. | Green Party | 372 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 8 | Szachno-Hodgkinson, D. | Green Party | 260 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — |
Brockham, Betchworth, Buckland, Box Hill and Headley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,996
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potter, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,217 | 20.3% | 61.0% | +36.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Budd, S. | Conservative Party | 1,139 | 19.0% | 57.1% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Keay, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,089 | 18.2% | 54.6% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Nelson, B. | Liberal Democrats | 868 | 14.5% | 43.5% | — | |
| 5 | Austin, R. | Conservative Party | 645 | 10.8% | 32.3% | — | |
| 6 | Tiley, C. | Conservative Party | 576 | 9.6% | 28.9% | — | |
| 7 | Green, P. | Green Party | 285 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 8 | Humphrey, N. | Labour Party | 168 | 2.8% | 8.4% | — |
Fetcham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,298
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haque, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,426 | 20.7% | 62.1% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hammond, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,402 | 20.3% | 61.0% | +36.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Joseph, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,311 | 19.0% | 57.1% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Chambers, S. | Conservative Party | 853 | 12.4% | 37.1% | — | |
| 5 | Austin, P. | Conservative Party | 755 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 6 | McCorquodale, D. | Conservative Party | 617 | 9.0% | 26.9% | — | |
| 7 | Crook, J. | Green Party | 219 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — | |
| 8 | Creber, D. | Green Party | 159 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 9 | Heath, B. | Labour Party | 151 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — |
Leatherhead North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,080
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vyvyan-Robinson, K. | Liberal Democrats | 689 | 21.3% | 63.8% | +38.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wall, B. | Liberal Democrats | 661 | 20.4% | 61.2% | +36.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wear, B. | Liberal Democrats | 624 | 19.3% | 57.8% | +32.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gibbs, A. | Conservative Party | 368 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 5 | Gibbs, A. | Conservative Party | 330 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 6 | Ali, M. | Conservative Party | 302 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 7 | Stewart, S. | Green Party | 267 | 8.2% | 24.7% | — |
Dorking South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,032
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooksey, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,301 | 21.3% | 64.0% | +39.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooksey, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,219 | 20.0% | 60.0% | +35.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wright, N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,185 | 19.4% | 58.3% | +33.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Crook, M. | Green Party | 445 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — | |
| 5 | Jones, R. | Conservative Party | 413 | 6.8% | 20.3% | — | |
| 6 | Barford, L. | Green Party | 395 | 6.5% | 19.4% | — | |
| 7 | Gunn, B. | Conservative Party | 386 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 8 | Sharpe, L. | Conservative Party | 384 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 9 | Bolton, G. | Green Party | 368 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — |
Bookham East and Eastwick Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,499
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daly, E. | Liberal Democrats | 1,577 | 21.0% | 63.1% | +38.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kennedy, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,568 | 20.9% | 62.8% | +37.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Matthews, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,467 | 19.6% | 58.7% | +33.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Chambers, S. | Conservative Party | 994 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Swinbank, R. | Conservative Party | 834 | 11.1% | 33.4% | — | |
| 6 | Morrish, P. | Conservative Party | 800 | 10.7% | 32.0% | — | |
| 7 | Stewart, E. | Green Party | 176 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 8 | Mansfield, B. | Labour Party | 80 | 1.1% | 3.2% | — |
Bookham West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,092
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weller, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,408 | 22.4% | 67.3% | +42.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Adams, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,390 | 22.2% | 66.5% | +41.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Miller, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,256 | 20.0% | 60.0% | +35.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cracknell, T. | Conservative Party | 725 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 5 | Moyse, R. | Conservative Party | 664 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 6 | Zharova-Berbner, D. | Conservative Party | 564 | 9.0% | 27.0% | — | |
| 7 | Suggett, E. | Green Party | 268 | 4.3% | 12.8% | — |
Ashtead Lanes and Common · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,283
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hunt, C. | ASHT IND | 1,636 | 23.9% | 71.7% | +46.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wiltshire, P. | ASHT IND | 1,553 | 22.7% | 68.0% | +43.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hawksworth, D. | ASHT IND | 1,534 | 22.4% | 67.2% | +42.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Shimmin, P. | Liberal Democrats | 488 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 5 | Hartwell, A. | Liberal Democrats | 425 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — | |
| 6 | Moncur, R. | Liberal Democrats | 422 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 7 | Cook, D. | Conservative Party | 284 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 8 | Newton, G. | Conservative Party | 265 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 9 | Gilchrist, S. | Labour Party | 241 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — |