← Newport (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort

Newport 2022

Local elections held 5 May 2022.

21 ward races
51 seats
11 unfairly awarded seats
21.6% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 51 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party44,89249.1%3568.6%2651.0%+9
Conservative Party25,92828.3%713.7%1529.4%-8
Independent10,96712.0%713.7%611.8%+1
Liberal Democrats7,3148.0%12.0%47.8%-3
Green Party1,6211.8%12.0%00.0%+1
Plaid Cymru4850.5%00.0%00.0%0
PROP2810.3%00.0%00.0%0
Total91,488100.0%51100.0%51100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2022)
Previous (2021)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Rogerstone North · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,215

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Reeks C.Conservative Party66754.9%+4.9 ptsElected
2Gibbons J.Labour Party54845.1%

Electorate 2,402 · EC ward code W05001641 · Back to ward index

Shaftesbury · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,135

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cockeram P.Labour Party50322.2%44.3%+11.0 ptsElected
2James L.Green Party47520.9%41.9%+8.5 ptsElected
3Vignoli N.Labour Party40117.7%35.3%
4Sinnett T.Green Party35815.8%31.5%
5Gilligan J.Conservative Party2059.0%18.1%
6Bhullar K.Conservative Party1677.4%14.7%
7Richards R.Independent1617.1%14.2%

Electorate 3,794 · EC ward code W05001643 · Back to ward index

Graig · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,508

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jones J.Conservative Party65721.8%43.6%+10.2 ptsElected
2Harris J.Labour Party65421.7%43.4%+10.0 ptsElected
3Hopkins K.Labour Party65121.6%43.2%
4Williams D.Conservative Party63921.2%42.4%
5Tarr N.Liberal Democrats41513.8%27.5%

Electorate 4,184 · EC ward code W05001634 · Back to ward index

Rogerstone East · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 62.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 803

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Davies B.Labour Party50362.6%+12.6 ptsElected
2Jones T.Conservative Party24330.3%
3Chowdhury S.Liberal Democrats577.1%

Electorate 2,411 · EC ward code W05001640 · Back to ward index

Llanwern · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 63.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,031

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kellaway M.Conservative Party65863.8%+13.8 ptsElected
2Chowdhury A.Labour Party31330.4%
3Kennard-Smith C.Liberal Democrats605.8%

Electorate 2,696 · EC ward code W05001636 · Back to ward index

Pillgwenlly · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,515

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Adan S.Labour Party84027.7%55.4%+22.1 ptsElected
2Jenkins D.Labour Party75925.0%50.1%+16.8 ptsElected
3Ravenscroft M.Independent34711.5%22.9%
4Taylor W.Independent2989.8%19.7%
5Islam S.Liberal Democrats2708.9%17.8%
6Rahman K.Plaid Cymru1515.0%10.0%
7Cox B.Conservative Party1334.4%8.8%
8Davies J.Conservative Party1294.3%8.5%
9Munteanu M.Liberal Democrats1033.4%6.8%

Electorate 4,768 · EC ward code W05001638 · Back to ward index

Malpas · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,006

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mudd J.Labour Party97816.3%48.8%+23.8 ptsElected
2Clarke J.Labour Party93315.5%46.5%+21.5 ptsElected
3Mayer D.Labour Party86714.4%43.2%+18.2 ptsElected
4Brunnock M.Conservative Party74512.4%37.1%
5Manley S.Conservative Party69211.5%34.5%
6Hollins J.Conservative Party5619.3%28.0%
7Cox M.Independent5268.7%26.2%
8Reaney R.Independent4828.0%24.0%
9Lockyer S.Liberal Democrats1472.4%7.3%
10Ahmed K.Liberal Democrats871.4%4.3%

Electorate 6,053 · EC ward code W05001637 · Back to ward index

Victoria · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,806

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Horton G.Labour Party98227.2%54.4%+21.0 ptsElected
2Hussain F.Labour Party93325.8%51.7%+18.3 ptsElected
3Meah B.Conservative Party44912.4%24.9%
4Rahman F.Conservative Party42611.8%23.6%
5Miller J.Liberal Democrats3509.7%19.4%
6Islam N.Liberal Democrats2938.1%16.2%
7Farmer A.Independent1795.0%9.9%

Electorate 5,535 · EC ward code W05001647 · Back to ward index

Tredegar Park and Marshfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,109

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Howells R.Labour Party1,14818.1%54.4%+29.4 ptsElected
2Screen A.Labour Party99315.7%47.1%+22.1 ptsElected
3Watkins T.Labour Party91714.5%43.5%+18.5 ptsElected
4Nurse S.Conservative Party85513.5%40.5%
5Miles B.Conservative Party84613.4%40.1%
6Cresswell W.Conservative Party84613.4%40.1%
7Linstrum C.Green Party4407.0%20.9%
8Jones C.PROP1562.5%7.4%
9Williams S.PROP1252.0%5.9%

Electorate 8,334 · EC ward code W05001646 · Back to ward index

St. Julians · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,057

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bright P.Labour Party1,00416.3%48.8%+23.8 ptsElected
2Hourahine P.Labour Party96315.6%46.8%+21.8 ptsElected
3Townsend C.Liberal Democrats89814.6%43.7%+18.7 ptsElected
4Mahmood A.Labour Party84413.7%41.0%
5Hamilton M.Liberal Democrats72611.8%35.3%
6Townsend O.Liberal Democrats71811.6%34.9%
7Enea M.Conservative Party4186.8%20.3%
8Jermyn M.Conservative Party3385.5%16.4%
9Tariq M.Conservative Party2624.2%12.7%

Electorate 6,484 · EC ward code W05001644 · Back to ward index

Allt-Yr-Yn · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,865

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Drewett P.Labour Party1,36615.9%47.7%+22.7 ptsElected
2Evans M.Conservative Party1,32415.4%46.2%+21.2 ptsElected
3Fouweather D.Conservative Party1,25314.6%43.7%+18.7 ptsElected
4Ferris C.Conservative Party1,21614.1%42.4%
5Worrad J.Labour Party1,13013.1%39.4%
6Hayat I.Labour Party1,12313.1%39.2%
7Schmidt C.Green Party3484.0%12.1%
8Clark J.Plaid Cymru3343.9%11.7%
9Mudd K.Liberal Democrats1912.2%6.7%
10Stallard R.Liberal Democrats1641.9%5.7%
11Sharmin R.Liberal Democrats1471.7%5.1%

Electorate 7,082 · EC ward code W05001627 · Back to ward index

Bettws · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,281

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Whitehead K.Independent67317.5%52.5%+27.5 ptsElected
2Cleverly J.Independent63316.5%49.4%+24.4 ptsElected
3Jordan J.Independent59415.5%46.4%+21.4 ptsElected
4Griffiths N.Labour Party52813.7%41.2%
5Aksoy O.Labour Party48712.7%38.0%
6Houtman C.Labour Party46012.0%35.9%
7Foster C.Conservative Party1644.3%12.8%
8Fouweather P.Conservative Party1574.1%12.3%
9Hall D.Conservative Party1483.9%11.6%

Electorate 5,707 · EC ward code W05001630 · Back to ward index

Rogerstone West · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,660

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Forsey Y.Labour Party1,13334.1%68.3%+34.9 ptsElected
2Reynolds J.Labour Party91627.6%55.2%+21.8 ptsElected
3Hill A.Conservative Party53216.0%32.0%
4Berry M.Conservative Party53016.0%31.9%
5Newton L.Liberal Democrats2096.3%12.6%

Electorate 5,907 · EC ward code W05001642 · Back to ward index

Caerleon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,484

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hughes J.Labour Party1,33417.9%53.7%+28.7 ptsElected
2Baker-Westhead C.Labour Party1,27117.1%51.2%+26.2 ptsElected
3Cocks S.Labour Party1,20016.1%48.3%+23.3 ptsElected
4Watkins J.Conservative Party1,14115.3%45.9%
5Davies H.Conservative Party1,05114.1%42.3%
6Weeks H.Conservative Party1,03413.9%41.6%
7L'Allier P.Liberal Democrats2283.1%9.2%
8Khan B.Liberal Democrats1922.6%7.7%

Electorate 6,479 · EC ward code W05001632 · Back to ward index

Bishton and Langstone · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,762

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Routley W.Conservative Party1,05229.9%59.7%+26.4 ptsElected
2Mogford R.Conservative Party1,04229.6%59.2%+25.8 ptsElected
3Hando J.Labour Party58016.5%32.9%
4Bettridge A.Labour Party53015.0%30.1%
5Townsend S.Liberal Democrats1945.5%11.0%
6Ahmed M.Liberal Democrats1253.5%7.1%

Electorate 5,448 · EC ward code W05001631 · Back to ward index

Stow Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,294

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Thomas K.Labour Party87934.0%67.9%+34.6 ptsElected
2Al-Nuaimi M.Labour Party80431.1%62.1%+28.8 ptsElected
3Baqi S.Conservative Party36614.1%28.3%
4Baneswell N.Independent30511.8%23.6%
5Jones B.Conservative Party2349.0%18.1%

Electorate 4,540 · EC ward code W05001645 · Back to ward index

Gaer · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,879

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Marshall S.Labour Party1,19921.3%63.8%+38.8 ptsElected
2Perkins B.Labour Party1,14520.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
3Batrouni D.Labour Party1,10619.6%58.9%+33.9 ptsElected
4Clark N.Conservative Party70912.6%37.7%
5Walsh L.Conservative Party64611.5%34.4%
6Shwartz J.Conservative Party58710.4%31.2%
7Hossain A.Liberal Democrats2464.4%13.1%

Electorate 6,663 · EC ward code W05001633 · Back to ward index

Ringland · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,293

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Corten E.Labour Party90123.2%69.7%+44.7 ptsElected
2Lacey L.Labour Party88422.8%68.4%+43.4 ptsElected
3Linton M.Labour Party80920.9%62.6%+37.6 ptsElected
4Evans T.Conservative Party3749.6%28.9%
5Hobbs N.Conservative Party3489.0%26.9%
6Webb G.Conservative Party3198.2%24.7%
7Lord R.Independent2436.3%18.8%

Electorate 5,945 · EC ward code W05001639 · Back to ward index

Beechwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,604

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Davies D.Labour Party1,11323.1%69.4%+44.4 ptsElected
2Pimm M.Labour Party1,03021.4%64.2%+39.2 ptsElected
3Spencer M.Labour Party1,00620.9%62.7%+37.7 ptsElected
4Townsend H.Liberal Democrats4188.7%26.1%
5Evans J.Liberal Democrats3637.5%22.6%
6Shwartz M.Conservative Party3377.0%21.0%
7Zafar S.Conservative Party2865.9%17.8%
8Rashid H.Liberal Democrats2605.4%16.2%

Electorate 5,772 · EC ward code W05001629 · Back to ward index

Alway · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,363

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Harvey D.Labour Party99624.4%73.1%+48.1 ptsElected
2Harvey T.Labour Party89721.9%65.8%+40.8 ptsElected
3Pimm A.Labour Party88421.6%64.9%+39.9 ptsElected
4Ballard K.Conservative Party45311.1%33.2%
5Mainwaring P.Conservative Party4059.9%29.7%
6Petty H.Liberal Democrats2556.2%18.7%
7Uddin S.Liberal Democrats1984.8%14.5%

Electorate 6,093 · EC ward code W05001628 · Back to ward index

Lliswerry · 4-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~4× smaller. 61.0% Proportional quota 20.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 4 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,564

This is a 4-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 4 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~4×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 4, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 4 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 4. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Morris A.Independent1,72316.8%67.2%+47.2 ptsElected
2Sterry A.Independent1,62315.8%63.3%+43.3 ptsElected
3Howells M.Independent1,61615.8%63.0%+43.0 ptsElected
4Peterson J.Independent1,56415.2%61.0%+41.0 ptsElected
5Jeavons R.Labour Party9028.8%35.2%
6Richards J.Labour Party8648.4%33.7%
7Alom S.Labour Party8488.3%33.1%
8Hayat R.Labour Party8338.1%32.5%
9Thompson L.Conservative Party2842.8%11.1%

Electorate 9,310 · EC ward code W05001635 · Back to ward index