← North East Derbyshire (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
North East Derbyshire 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 53 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 26,219 | 43.1% | 28 | 52.8% | 23 | 43.4% | +5 |
| Conservative Party | 23,316 | 38.3% | 19 | 35.8% | 21 | 39.6% | -2 |
| Liberal Democrats | 6,572 | 10.8% | 3 | 5.7% | 5 | 9.4% | -2 |
| Independent | 2,462 | 4.0% | 2 | 3.8% | 2 | 3.8% | 0 |
| Green Party | 2,208 | 3.6% | 1 | 1.9% | 2 | 3.8% | -1 |
| C & ND IND | 100 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 60,877 | 100.0% | 53 | 100.0% | 53 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Dronfield Woodhouse · 1 seat · won at 46.9% · −3.1 pts below quota
- Ashover · 1 seat · won at 49.6% · −0.4 pts below quota
- Unstone · 1 seat · won at 54.2% · above quota
- Coal Aston · 2 seats · won at 38.2% · above quota
- Ridgeway and Marsh Lane · 1 seat · won at 56.8% · above quota
- Barlow and Holmesfield · 1 seat · won at 63.3% · above quota
- Wingerworth · 3 seats · won at 38.9% · above quota
- Killamarsh East · 2 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Tupton · 3 seats · won at 40.0% · above quota
- Dronfield South · 3 seats · won at 43.2% · above quota
- Dronfield North · 2 seats · won at 51.8% · above quota
- Killamarsh West · 3 seats · won at 44.0% · above quota
- Eckington North · 2 seats · won at 53.4% · above quota
- Shirland · 3 seats · won at 46.9% · above quota
- Sutton · 2 seats · won at 56.2% · above quota
- Holmewood and Heath · 2 seats · won at 56.2% · above quota
- Clay Cross North · 3 seats · won at 48.5% · above quota
- Gosforth Valley · 3 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Pilsley and Morton · 3 seats · won at 49.5% · above quota
- Eckington South and Renishaw · 3 seats · won at 52.4% · above quota
- Brampton and Walton · 2 seats · won at 61.3% · above quota
- Clay Cross South · 2 seats · won at 61.4% · above quota
- Grassmoor · 2 seats · won at 67.7% · above quota
- North Wingfield Central · 3 seats · won at 65.3% · above quota
Race results
Dronfield Woodhouse · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 46.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −3.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 633
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tait, K. | Conservative Party | 297 | 46.9% | −3.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lovatt, R. | Labour Party | 209 | 33.0% | — | |
| 3 | Hall, R. | Independent | 68 | 10.7% | — | |
| 4 | Harpham, E. | Liberal Democrats | 59 | 9.3% | — |
Ashover · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 49.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −0.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 780
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wetherall, H. | Independent | 387 | 49.6% | −0.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Armitage, J. | Conservative Party | 244 | 31.3% | — | |
| 3 | Blamire, G. | Labour Party | 75 | 9.6% | — | |
| 4 | Clarke, L. | Liberal Democrats | 74 | 9.5% | — |
Unstone · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 568
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dale, A. | Conservative Party | 308 | 54.2% | +4.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hill, J. | Labour Party | 230 | 40.5% | — | |
| 3 | Cantrell, J. | Liberal Democrats | 30 | 5.3% | — |
Coal Aston · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,244
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foster, M. | Conservative Party | 559 | 22.5% | 45.0% | +11.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Spooner, R. | Conservative Party | 475 | 19.1% | 38.2% | +4.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hutchinson, A. | Independent | 473 | 19.0% | 38.0% | — | |
| 4 | Steele, R. | Labour Party | 342 | 13.8% | 27.5% | — | |
| 5 | Williams, J. | Labour Party | 300 | 12.1% | 24.1% | — | |
| 6 | Parkin, P. | Independent | 276 | 11.1% | 22.2% | — | |
| 7 | Marriott, P. | Liberal Democrats | 37 | 1.5% | 3.0% | — | |
| 8 | Ramshaw, T. | Liberal Democrats | 25 | 1.0% | 2.0% | — |
Ridgeway and Marsh Lane · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 56.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 549
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Renwick, C. | Conservative Party | 312 | 56.8% | +6.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Back, T. | Labour Party | 130 | 23.7% | — | |
| 3 | Marsh, S. | Liberal Democrats | 107 | 19.5% | — |
Barlow and Holmesfield · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 63.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 586
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, P. | Conservative Party | 371 | 63.3% | +13.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Allenby, S. | Labour Party | 141 | 24.1% | — | |
| 3 | Wilcock, J. | Liberal Democrats | 74 | 12.6% | — |
Wingerworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,819
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adlington-Stringer, F. | Green Party | 1,004 | 18.4% | 55.2% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Antcliff, P. | Conservative Party | 710 | 13.0% | 39.0% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Baker, N. | Conservative Party | 707 | 13.0% | 38.9% | +13.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ruff, D. | Conservative Party | 628 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 5 | Kovasch Whetton, L. | Green Party | 606 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 6 | Kesteven, D. | Green Party | 598 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 7 | Addison, P. | Labour Party | 311 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 8 | Quinn, C. | Labour Party | 278 | 5.1% | 15.3% | — | |
| 9 | Styles, G. | Labour Party | 198 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — | |
| 10 | Murphy, D. | Liberal Democrats | 114 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — | |
| 11 | Smith, N. | Liberal Democrats | 109 | 2.0% | 6.0% | — | |
| 12 | Yeomans, J. | C & ND IND | 100 | 1.8% | 5.5% | — | |
| 13 | Lancey, K. | Liberal Democrats | 95 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — |
Killamarsh East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 771
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lacey, T. | Labour Party | 379 | 24.6% | 49.2% | +15.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reed, S. | Conservative Party | 367 | 23.8% | 47.6% | +14.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Windle, J. | Labour Party | 359 | 23.3% | 46.6% | — | |
| 4 | Tinley, W. | Conservative Party | 359 | 23.3% | 46.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hancock, J. | Liberal Democrats | 50 | 3.2% | 6.5% | — | |
| 6 | Windley, K. | Liberal Democrats | 27 | 1.8% | 3.5% | — |
Tupton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,271
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shipman, R. | Liberal Democrats | 609 | 16.0% | 47.9% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hancock, D. | Liberal Democrats | 582 | 15.3% | 45.8% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Windley, P. | Liberal Democrats | 508 | 13.3% | 40.0% | +15.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cooper, J. | Labour Party | 506 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Peters, S. | Labour Party | 497 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 6 | Griffin, R. | Labour Party | 424 | 11.1% | 33.4% | — | |
| 7 | Faulkner, M. | Conservative Party | 258 | 6.8% | 20.3% | — | |
| 8 | Green, G. | Conservative Party | 220 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — | |
| 9 | Smith, H. | Conservative Party | 209 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — |
Dronfield South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,704
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cheetham, D. | Labour Party | 779 | 15.2% | 45.7% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, C. | Labour Party | 752 | 14.7% | 44.1% | +19.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jones, W. | Conservative Party | 736 | 14.4% | 43.2% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Foster, A. | Conservative Party | 730 | 14.3% | 42.8% | — | |
| 5 | Ireland, M. | Conservative Party | 716 | 14.0% | 42.0% | — | |
| 6 | Yates, J. | Labour Party | 671 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 7 | Ball, A. | Liberal Democrats | 349 | 6.8% | 20.5% | — | |
| 8 | Moore, R. | Liberal Democrats | 191 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 9 | Ramshaw, C. | Liberal Democrats | 188 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — |
Dronfield North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 828
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baxter, G. | Labour Party | 445 | 26.9% | 53.7% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, C. | Labour Party | 429 | 25.9% | 51.8% | +18.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hanrahan, M. | Conservative Party | 315 | 19.0% | 38.0% | — | |
| 4 | Wright, P. | Conservative Party | 312 | 18.8% | 37.7% | — | |
| 5 | Temple, W. | Liberal Democrats | 93 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — | |
| 6 | Wilcock, A. | Liberal Democrats | 62 | 3.7% | 7.5% | — |
Killamarsh West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,004
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fletcher, C. | Labour Party | 504 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lacey, C. | Labour Party | 496 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clough, S. | Conservative Party | 442 | 14.7% | 44.0% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Morris, B. | Labour Party | 406 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 5 | Drabble, D. | Conservative Party | 384 | 12.8% | 38.3% | — | |
| 6 | Platts, A. | Conservative Party | 343 | 11.4% | 34.2% | — | |
| 7 | Potts, M. | Independent | 242 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 8 | Firth, M. | Liberal Democrats | 111 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 9 | Kehoe, K. | Liberal Democrats | 83 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — |
Eckington North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 942
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beech, R. | Labour Party | 516 | 27.4% | 54.8% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gare, C. | Labour Party | 503 | 26.7% | 53.4% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gomez Reaney, C. | Conservative Party | 439 | 23.3% | 46.6% | — | |
| 4 | Kenyon, J. | Conservative Party | 425 | 22.6% | 45.1% | — |
Shirland · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,338
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cupit, C. | Conservative Party | 819 | 20.4% | 61.2% | +36.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Liggett, H. | Conservative Party | 649 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Roe, M. | Conservative Party | 628 | 15.6% | 46.9% | +21.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hacz, J. | Labour Party | 597 | 14.9% | 44.6% | — | |
| 5 | Barnes, B. | Labour Party | 549 | 13.7% | 41.0% | — | |
| 6 | Arnold, C. | Labour Party | 463 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 7 | Barfield, I. | Liberal Democrats | 156 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 8 | Rusbridge, N. | Liberal Democrats | 89 | 2.2% | 6.7% | — | |
| 9 | Murphy, D. | Liberal Democrats | 64 | 1.6% | 4.8% | — |
Sutton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 880
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Birkin, J. | Labour Party | 499 | 28.4% | 56.7% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kerry, P. | Labour Party | 494 | 28.1% | 56.2% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lewis, B. | Conservative Party | 318 | 18.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 4 | Sen, S. | Conservative Party | 293 | 16.7% | 33.3% | — | |
| 5 | McPheely, L. | Liberal Democrats | 104 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 6 | Pollendine, C. | Liberal Democrats | 51 | 2.9% | 5.8% | — |
Holmewood and Heath · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 732
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cornwell Ball, S. | Labour Party | 460 | 31.4% | 62.9% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stone, L. | Labour Party | 411 | 28.1% | 56.2% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wharmby, Z. | Conservative Party | 216 | 14.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 4 | Berry, C. | Conservative Party | 204 | 13.9% | 27.9% | — | |
| 5 | VonGyer, J. | Liberal Democrats | 88 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 6 | VonGyer, M. | Liberal Democrats | 84 | 5.7% | 11.5% | — |
Clay Cross North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,566
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morley, G. | Labour Party | 842 | 17.9% | 53.8% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rouse, K. | Labour Party | 765 | 16.3% | 48.9% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Morley, N. | Labour Party | 759 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Clark, J. | Conservative Party | 684 | 14.6% | 43.7% | — | |
| 5 | Nolan, C. | Conservative Party | 631 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 6 | Sankey, D. | Conservative Party | 591 | 12.6% | 37.7% | — | |
| 7 | Shafik, L. | Liberal Democrats | 147 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 8 | Ahern, J. | Liberal Democrats | 143 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 9 | Howard, C. | Liberal Democrats | 136 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — |
Gosforth Valley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,877
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emmens, M. | Conservative Party | 985 | 17.5% | 52.5% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Deighton, L. | Conservative Party | 944 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Welton, R. | Conservative Party | 922 | 16.4% | 49.1% | +24.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Laxton, J. | Labour Party | 631 | 11.2% | 33.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ohene, S. | Labour Party | 628 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 6 | Whiteley, J. | Labour Party | 601 | 10.7% | 32.0% | — | |
| 7 | Temple, S. | Liberal Democrats | 361 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 8 | Kay, R. | Liberal Democrats | 294 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 9 | Kay, S. | Liberal Democrats | 264 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — |
Pilsley and Morton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,159
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gillott, K. | Labour Party | 1,031 | 29.7% | 89.0% | +64.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Higgon, D. | Labour Party | 775 | 22.3% | 66.9% | +41.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cooper, A. | Independent | 573 | 16.5% | 49.5% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Funnell, J. | Independent | 443 | 12.7% | 38.2% | — | |
| 5 | Knowles, R. | Conservative Party | 208 | 6.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 6 | Miller, J. | Conservative Party | 175 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 7 | Temperton, S. | Conservative Party | 144 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 8 | Ramshaw, W. | Liberal Democrats | 127 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — |
Eckington South and Renishaw · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,025
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clegg, K. | Labour Party | 670 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pickering, S. | Labour Party | 600 | 19.5% | 58.6% | +33.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fawcett, S. | Labour Party | 537 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wheelhouse, P. | Conservative Party | 383 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 5 | Archer, J. | Conservative Party | 363 | 11.8% | 35.4% | — | |
| 6 | Allan, P. | Conservative Party | 349 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 7 | Gent, L. | Liberal Democrats | 63 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — | |
| 8 | Kay, P. | Liberal Democrats | 55 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — | |
| 9 | Degen, G. | Liberal Democrats | 54 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — |
Brampton and Walton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,134
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thacker, M. | Conservative Party | 735 | 32.4% | 64.8% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Elliott, P. | Conservative Party | 695 | 30.7% | 61.3% | +28.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gordon, M. | Labour Party | 325 | 14.3% | 28.7% | — | |
| 4 | Bazley, H. | Labour Party | 300 | 13.2% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Evans, S. | Liberal Democrats | 133 | 5.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 6 | Maude, P. | Liberal Democrats | 79 | 3.5% | 7.0% | — |
Clay Cross South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 764
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skinner, D. | Labour Party | 476 | 31.2% | 62.3% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Petersen, F. | Labour Party | 469 | 30.7% | 61.4% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shaw, Y. | Conservative Party | 238 | 15.6% | 31.2% | — | |
| 4 | Ball, D. | Conservative Party | 232 | 15.2% | 30.4% | — | |
| 5 | Rogerson, R. | Liberal Democrats | 57 | 3.7% | 7.5% | — | |
| 6 | Marshall, A. | Liberal Democrats | 55 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — |
Grassmoor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 755
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartshorne, L. | Labour Party | 545 | 36.1% | 72.2% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Durrant, M. | Labour Party | 511 | 33.9% | 67.7% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Turner, F. | Conservative Party | 156 | 10.3% | 20.7% | — | |
| 4 | Willmot, D. | Conservative Party | 149 | 9.9% | 19.7% | — | |
| 5 | Bingham, A. | Liberal Democrats | 75 | 5.0% | 9.9% | — | |
| 6 | Dart, N. | Liberal Democrats | 73 | 4.8% | 9.7% | — |
North Wingfield Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,128
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barker, N. | Labour Party | 860 | 25.4% | 76.3% | +51.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barry, J. | Labour Party | 805 | 23.8% | 71.4% | +46.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 736 | 21.8% | 65.3% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Markwell, A. | Conservative Party | 285 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 5 | Burrow, K. | Conservative Party | 238 | 7.0% | 21.1% | — | |
| 6 | Embrey, R. | Conservative Party | 216 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 7 | Bingham, M. | Liberal Democrats | 108 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 8 | Smalley, W. | Liberal Democrats | 72 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 9 | Maude, E. | Liberal Democrats | 63 | 1.9% | 5.6% | — |