← North Lincolnshire (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
North Lincolnshire 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 43 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 41,514 | 51.4% | 27 | 62.8% | 23 | 53.5% | +4 |
| Labour Party | 33,138 | 41.0% | 16 | 37.2% | 18 | 41.9% | -2 |
| Green Party | 4,562 | 5.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 4.7% | -2 |
| Independent | 1,361 | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Heritage Party | 119 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 112 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 80,806 | 100.0% | 43 | 100.0% | 43 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Burringham and Gunness · 1 seat · won at 50.7% · above quota
- Messingham · 1 seat · won at 61.4% · above quota
- Barton · 3 seats · won at 41.1% · above quota
- Ridge · 2 seats · won at 51.1% · above quota
- Broughton and Scawby · 2 seats · won at 55.9% · above quota
- Ashby Central · 2 seats · won at 59.8% · above quota
- Bottesford · 3 seats · won at 51.9% · above quota
- Axholme North · 2 seats · won at 61.7% · above quota
- Ferry · 3 seats · won at 54.3% · above quota
- Ashby Lakeside · 2 seats · won at 63.9% · above quota
- Kingsway with Lincoln Gardens · 2 seats · won at 64.6% · above quota
- Axholme Central · 2 seats · won at 66.7% · above quota
- Burton upon Stather and Winterton · 3 seats · won at 59.5% · above quota
- Frodingham · 2 seats · won at 70.9% · above quota
- Town · 2 seats · won at 72.6% · above quota
- Crosby and Park · 3 seats · won at 68.1% · above quota
- Axholme South · 2 seats · won at 76.5% · above quota
- Brumby · 3 seats · won at 69.0% · above quota
- Brigg and Wolds · 3 seats · won at 69.5% · above quota
Race results
Burringham and Gunness · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 50.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,134
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walshe, J. | Conservative Party | 575 | 50.7% | +0.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hart, D. | Labour Party | 336 | 29.6% | — | |
| 3 | Oldfield, D. | Independent | 223 | 19.7% | — |
Messingham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 61.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,165
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poole, N. | Conservative Party | 715 | 61.4% | +11.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shaw, S. | Labour Party | 450 | 38.6% | — |
Barton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,677
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vickers, P. | Conservative Party | 1,568 | 19.5% | 58.6% | +33.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Vickers, K. | Conservative Party | 1,252 | 15.6% | 46.8% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Patterson, C. | Conservative Party | 1,101 | 13.7% | 41.1% | +16.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jacques, N. | Green Party | 1,037 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — | |
| 5 | Thornton, C. | Green Party | 820 | 10.2% | 30.6% | — | |
| 6 | Watson, A. | Green Party | 709 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 7 | Turner, N. | Labour Party | 558 | 6.9% | 20.8% | — | |
| 8 | Turner, S. | Labour Party | 530 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 9 | Tchernych, D. | Labour Party | 455 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — |
Ridge · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,465
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garritt, D. | Conservative Party | 817 | 27.9% | 55.8% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Foster, T. | Conservative Party | 748 | 25.5% | 51.1% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davies, M. | Labour Party | 558 | 19.1% | 38.1% | — | |
| 4 | Cossey, G. | Labour Party | 496 | 16.9% | 33.9% | — | |
| 5 | Stirling, J. | Green Party | 198 | 6.8% | 13.5% | — | |
| 6 | Talliss, A. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 112 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — |
Broughton and Scawby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 940
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ross, C. | Conservative Party | 528 | 28.1% | 56.2% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lee, J. | Conservative Party | 525 | 27.9% | 55.9% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Campion, M. | Labour Party | 367 | 19.5% | 39.0% | — | |
| 4 | Whittingham, C. | Labour Party | 355 | 18.9% | 37.8% | — | |
| 5 | Bannister, M. | Green Party | 105 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — |
Ashby Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,301
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grant, M. | Labour Party | 784 | 30.1% | 60.3% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davison, A. | Labour Party | 778 | 29.9% | 59.8% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Knight, J. | Conservative Party | 521 | 20.0% | 40.0% | — | |
| 4 | Broughton, K. | Conservative Party | 519 | 19.9% | 39.9% | — |
Bottesford · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,929
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armiger, M. | Conservative Party | 1,582 | 18.0% | 54.0% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Longcake, J. | Conservative Party | 1,535 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davison, J. | Conservative Party | 1,520 | 17.3% | 51.9% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Williams, G. | Labour Party | 1,348 | 15.3% | 46.0% | — | |
| 5 | Shearer, P. | Labour Party | 1,280 | 14.6% | 43.7% | — | |
| 6 | Humphreys, S. | Labour Party | 1,232 | 14.0% | 42.1% | — | |
| 7 | Wilsea, S. | Green Party | 171 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — | |
| 8 | Curtis, S. | Heritage Party | 119 | 1.4% | 4.1% | — |
Axholme North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,925
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reed, J. | Conservative Party | 1,207 | 31.4% | 62.7% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Briggs, J. | Conservative Party | 1,187 | 30.8% | 61.7% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chaplin, L. | Labour Party | 663 | 17.2% | 34.5% | — | |
| 4 | O'Rourke, S. | Labour Party | 589 | 15.3% | 30.6% | — | |
| 5 | Bones, N. | Green Party | 203 | 5.3% | 10.5% | — |
Ferry · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,287
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clark, P. | Conservative Party | 1,479 | 21.6% | 64.7% | +39.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hannigan, R. | Conservative Party | 1,362 | 19.8% | 59.5% | +34.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wells, D. | Conservative Party | 1,243 | 18.1% | 54.3% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wilkinson, P. | Labour Party | 824 | 12.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 5 | Swann, P. | Labour Party | 821 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 6 | Rayner, S. | Labour Party | 611 | 8.9% | 26.7% | — | |
| 7 | Stephenson, S. | Green Party | 522 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — |
Ashby Lakeside · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,060
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bell, M. | Labour Party | 687 | 32.4% | 64.8% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Matthews, J. | Labour Party | 677 | 31.9% | 63.9% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Saunby, J. | Conservative Party | 416 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — | |
| 4 | Sykes, A. | Conservative Party | 340 | 16.0% | 32.1% | — |
Kingsway with Lincoln Gardens · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,632
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gosling, A. | Labour Party | 1,100 | 33.7% | 67.4% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rayner, H. | Labour Party | 1,055 | 32.3% | 64.6% | +31.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mewis, P. | Conservative Party | 598 | 18.3% | 36.6% | — | |
| 4 | Marper, J. | Conservative Party | 511 | 15.7% | 31.3% | — |
Axholme Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,711
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitchell, T. | Conservative Party | 1,265 | 37.0% | 73.9% | +40.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Robinson, D. | Conservative Party | 1,141 | 33.3% | 66.7% | +33.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Allen, P. | Labour Party | 574 | 16.8% | 33.5% | — | |
| 4 | Jones, A. | Labour Party | 442 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — |
Burton upon Stather and Winterton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,317
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ogg, R. | Conservative Party | 2,037 | 20.5% | 61.4% | +36.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Marper, E. | Conservative Party | 1,975 | 19.8% | 59.5% | +34.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rowson, H. | Conservative Party | 1,974 | 19.8% | 59.5% | +34.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jarvis, S. | Labour Party | 1,305 | 13.1% | 39.3% | — | |
| 5 | Davey, T. | Labour Party | 1,200 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 6 | Brown, W. | Labour Party | 1,158 | 11.6% | 34.9% | — | |
| 7 | Baker, J. | Green Party | 301 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — |
Frodingham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 70.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 943
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ellerby, A. | Labour Party | 742 | 39.3% | 78.7% | +45.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Southern, D. | Labour Party | 669 | 35.5% | 70.9% | +37.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Foster, A. | Conservative Party | 259 | 13.7% | 27.5% | — | |
| 4 | Allen, M. | Conservative Party | 216 | 11.5% | 22.9% | — |
Town · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 72.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,163
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yeadon, L. | Labour Party | 870 | 37.4% | 74.8% | +41.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ali, M. | Labour Party | 844 | 36.3% | 72.6% | +39.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ahmed, J. | Conservative Party | 323 | 13.9% | 27.8% | — | |
| 4 | Anjum, C. | Conservative Party | 288 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — |
Crosby and Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,416
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Sullivan, C. | Labour Party | 1,147 | 27.0% | 81.0% | +56.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ahmed, N. | Labour Party | 999 | 23.5% | 70.5% | +45.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Yates, H. | Labour Party | 965 | 22.7% | 68.1% | +43.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kirk, M. | Independent | 524 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 5 | Rahman, L. | Independent | 327 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 6 | Chowdhury, M. | Independent | 287 | 6.8% | 20.3% | — |
Axholme South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 76.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,751
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rose, D. | Conservative Party | 1,364 | 38.9% | 77.9% | +44.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kennedy, J. | Conservative Party | 1,340 | 38.3% | 76.5% | +43.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Southern, L. | Labour Party | 400 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 4 | Parkinson, N. | Labour Party | 398 | 11.4% | 22.7% | — |
Brumby · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,318
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foster, L. | Labour Party | 993 | 25.1% | 75.3% | +50.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Armitage, S. | Labour Party | 920 | 23.3% | 69.8% | +44.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Swift, S. | Labour Party | 909 | 23.0% | 69.0% | +44.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mikkonen, L. | Conservative Party | 397 | 10.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 5 | Sherwood, S. | Conservative Party | 369 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hannigan, A. | Conservative Party | 366 | 9.3% | 27.8% | — |
Brigg and Wolds · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,965
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Waltham, R. | Conservative Party | 2,181 | 24.5% | 73.5% | +48.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sherwood, C. | Conservative Party | 2,108 | 23.7% | 71.1% | +46.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sherwood, N. | Conservative Party | 2,062 | 23.2% | 69.5% | +44.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Walker, G. | Labour Party | 769 | 8.6% | 25.9% | — | |
| 5 | Rayner, L. | Labour Party | 654 | 7.4% | 22.1% | — | |
| 6 | Whitaker-Clark, M. | Labour Party | 626 | 7.0% | 21.1% | — | |
| 7 | Haynes, J. | Green Party | 496 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — |