← North Northamptonshire (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

North Northamptonshire 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

26 ward races
78 seats
18 unfairly awarded seats
23.1% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 26 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 78 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party124,53752.6%6076.9%4253.8%+18
Labour Party69,97229.6%1417.9%2430.8%-10
Green Party16,7017.1%33.8%56.4%-2
Liberal Democrats16,3486.9%00.0%56.4%-5
Independent8,4853.6%11.3%22.6%-1
Reform UK4980.2%00.0%00.0%0
Alliance for Democracy and Freedom1000.0%00.0%00.0%0
Total236,641100.0%78100.0%78100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2021 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2021 election (current) and on the eve of it (2020), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2021)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Oakley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,209

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Armour R.Labour Party1,49115.5%46.5%+21.5 ptsElected
2Rielly S.Labour Party1,48215.4%46.2%+21.2 ptsElected
3Buckingham L.N.L.Labour Party1,33413.9%41.6%+16.6 ptsElected
4Garner L.M.R.Conservative Party1,17712.2%36.7%
5Curtis O.Conservative Party1,17612.2%36.6%
6Wellings A.K.Conservative Party1,11611.6%34.8%
7Stanbra C.Liberal Democrats96910.1%30.2%
8Smith P.Liberal Democrats4444.6%13.8%
9O'Donovan A.Liberal Democrats4394.6%13.7%

Electorate 10,803 · EC ward code E05013230 · Back to ward index

Burton and Broughton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,677

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1O'Hara J.Conservative Party1,54319.2%57.6%+32.6 ptsElected
2Currall J.R.Conservative Party1,54119.2%57.6%+32.6 ptsElected
3Smith-Haynes C.Conservative Party1,12013.9%41.8%+16.8 ptsElected
4Watts A.Green Party1,00412.5%37.5%
5Groome C.Liberal Democrats92011.5%34.4%
6Davies J.Liberal Democrats7869.8%29.4%
7MacDonald F.Independent5987.4%22.3%
8Sales M.A.Labour Party5196.5%19.4%

Electorate 9,746 · EC ward code E05013214 · Back to ward index

Wicksteed · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,257

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Edwards S.A.Conservative Party1,69517.3%52.0%+27.0 ptsElected
2Roberts R.Conservative Party1,62116.6%49.8%+24.8 ptsElected
3Henson L.Conservative Party1,50415.4%46.2%+21.2 ptsElected
4Dutton A.R.G.Liberal Democrats9709.9%29.8%
5Balmer A.Labour Party8198.4%25.1%
6Marshall G.Labour Party8148.3%25.0%
7Ivaova K.Labour Party7998.2%24.5%
8McGlynn C.G.Liberal Democrats7607.8%23.3%
9Nelson C.Liberal Democrats5906.0%18.1%
10Aburamadan J.S.Reform UK1982.0%6.1%

Electorate 10,284 · EC ward code E05013237 · Back to ward index

Brickhill and Queensway · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,499

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bell P.A.Conservative Party1,45519.4%58.2%+33.2 ptsElected
2Binley M.Conservative Party1,37418.3%55.0%+30.0 ptsElected
3Lawal K.B.O.Conservative Party1,19916.0%48.0%+23.0 ptsElected
4Henley A.W.Labour Party1,01513.5%40.6%
5Erskine S.R.Labour Party95612.8%38.3%
6Watts A.J.Labour Party86811.6%34.7%
7Ramsbottom C.F.Liberal Democrats3164.2%12.6%
8Coop G.Green Party3134.2%12.5%

Electorate 9,710 · EC ward code E05013213 · Back to ward index

Northall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,738

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Thurland K.N.Conservative Party1,39417.0%50.9%+25.9 ptsElected
2Pandey A.K.Conservative Party1,39216.9%50.8%+25.8 ptsElected
3Jelley I.F.Conservative Party1,32616.1%48.4%+23.4 ptsElected
4Watts K.R.Labour Party1,30915.9%47.8%
5Byatt A.Labour Party1,24915.2%45.6%
6Pavitt C.P.M.Labour Party1,10713.5%40.4%
7Silver S.M.Liberal Democrats4385.3%16.0%

Electorate 10,279 · EC ward code E05013229 · Back to ward index

Windmill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,137

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Carter R.J.Conservative Party1,18418.5%55.4%+30.4 ptsElected
2Lee A.M.B.Labour Party1,06316.6%49.7%+24.7 ptsElected
3Marks P.Conservative Party1,03716.2%48.5%+23.5 ptsElected
4Skinner C.Conservative Party1,01415.8%47.4%
5Mitchell C.J.Labour Party91514.3%42.8%
6Wrighting A.C.Labour Party82812.9%38.7%
7Binley G.Independent1862.9%8.7%
8Gosliga M.Liberal Democrats1852.9%8.7%

Electorate 8,682 · EC ward code E05013238 · Back to ward index

Thrapston · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,318

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brackenbury W.J.Conservative Party2,74621.2%63.6%+38.6 ptsElected
2Brackenbury D.H.G.Conservative Party2,52619.5%58.5%+33.5 ptsElected
3Shacklock G.Conservative Party2,11716.3%49.0%+24.0 ptsElected
4Carter V.Independent1,71213.2%39.6%
5Kirkpatrick P.G.Labour Party7826.0%18.1%
6Carpenter H.Green Party7085.5%16.4%
7Hawkins J.Labour Party6475.0%15.0%
8Chikoto T.Labour Party5994.6%13.9%
9Duckworth J.Liberal Democrats3983.1%9.2%
10Smoker J.A.Independent3702.9%8.6%
11Lerse I.A.Liberal Democrats3492.7%8.1%

Electorate 11,380 · EC ward code E05013236 · Back to ward index

Finedon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,884

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ekins J.Conservative Party1,49117.2%51.7%+26.7 ptsElected
2Ward M.J.S.Conservative Party1,45716.8%50.5%+25.5 ptsElected
3Weatherill A.J.Conservative Party1,42416.5%49.4%+24.4 ptsElected
4Aslam T.Labour Party1,31415.2%45.6%
5Francis E.Labour Party1,09612.7%38.0%
6Dady A.D.Labour Party1,01711.8%35.3%
7Pearson S.Green Party5085.9%17.6%
8Ramsborrom J.G.Liberal Democrats3454.0%12.0%

Electorate 10,988 · EC ward code E05013221 · Back to ward index

Rothwell and Mawsley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,958

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hakewill J.Independent1,94021.9%65.6%+40.6 ptsElected
2Brown C.M.Conservative Party1,84720.8%62.4%+37.4 ptsElected
3Smyth J.J.Conservative Party1,48916.8%50.3%+25.3 ptsElected
4Moreton C.Conservative Party1,42416.0%48.1%
5Musselwhite S.Green Party8279.3%28.0%
6Stevenson I.V.Labour Party7268.2%24.5%
7Newby R.C.Labour Party6207.0%21.0%

Electorate 9,545 · EC ward code E05013233 · Back to ward index

Croyland and Swanspool · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,289

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Allebone T.Conservative Party1,20417.5%52.6%+27.6 ptsElected
2Anslow V.F.Labour Party1,18017.2%51.6%+26.6 ptsElected
3Irwin P.T.Conservative Party1,16216.9%50.8%+25.8 ptsElected
4Shoesmith S.L.Labour Party1,01214.7%44.2%
5Skittrall B.K.Conservative Party99814.5%43.6%
6Scarborough A.M.J.Labour Party98814.4%43.2%
7McMaster N.R.W.Liberal Democrats3234.7%14.1%

Electorate 9,829 · EC ward code E05013218 · Back to ward index

Desborough · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,526

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Tebbutt M.Conservative Party2,01119.0%57.0%+32.0 ptsElected
2Dearing M.R.Conservative Party1,98118.7%56.2%+31.2 ptsElected
3Howes D.A.Conservative Party1,79116.9%50.8%+25.8 ptsElected
4Sawford P.Labour Party1,39313.2%39.5%
5Coleman A.Labour Party9569.0%27.1%
6Scarrott Y.C.Labour Party7917.5%22.4%
7Burnham L.V.Independent7076.7%20.1%
8Window A.J.Liberal Democrats4934.7%14.0%
9Lawless S.Green Party4554.3%12.9%

Electorate 10,602 · EC ward code E05013219 · Back to ward index

Clover Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,388

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dell D.Green Party2,18421.5%64.5%+39.5 ptsElected
2Fedorowycz E.Green Party1,78017.5%52.5%+27.5 ptsElected
3Tubbs S.Green Party1,72617.0%50.9%+25.9 ptsElected
4Thurland L.A.Conservative Party1,08710.7%32.1%
5Davies A.Conservative Party1,0029.9%29.6%
6Titcombe G.Conservative Party8878.7%26.2%
7Parker B.Independent4804.7%14.2%
8Massie B.B.Labour Party4424.3%13.0%
9Reuby M.Labour Party3553.5%10.5%
10Hilling D.Independent1201.2%3.5%
11Brogan S.Alliance for Democracy and Freedom1001.0%3.0%

Electorate 9,125 · EC ward code E05013215 · Back to ward index

Oundle · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,122

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1De Capell Brooke A.L.Conservative Party2,83122.9%68.7%+43.7 ptsElected
2Harrison H.J.Conservative Party2,28118.4%55.3%+30.3 ptsElected
3Smithers J.Conservative Party2,13317.2%51.7%+26.7 ptsElected
4Best C.Liberal Democrats1,60613.0%39.0%
5Yeo C.C.Liberal Democrats1,2129.8%29.4%
6James H.E.Labour Party9367.6%22.7%
7Jones L.Green Party8677.0%21.0%
8Peel P.D.Independent2832.3%6.9%
9Stearn P.M.Independent2171.8%5.3%

Electorate 10,178 · EC ward code E05013231 · Back to ward index

Corby Rural · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,516

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sims D.J.Conservative Party1,99518.9%56.7%+31.7 ptsElected
2Watt K.G.S.Conservative Party1,88817.9%53.7%+28.7 ptsElected
3Nichol M.A.Conservative Party1,85717.6%52.8%+27.8 ptsElected
4Wallington A.Labour Party1,50614.3%42.8%
5Beeby R.Labour Party1,37613.0%39.1%
6Longfoot-Finch G.Labour Party1,10210.4%31.3%
7Jones S.Green Party4844.6%13.8%
8Brown J.A.Liberal Democrats3413.2%9.7%

Electorate 10,525 · EC ward code E05013216 · Back to ward index

Irthlingborough · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,190

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Maxwell D.Conservative Party1,81719.0%57.0%+32.0 ptsElected
2Harrison K.W.O.Conservative Party1,77018.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
3Powell R.S.Conservative Party1,76318.4%55.3%+30.3 ptsElected
4Cross C.Labour Party1,28813.5%40.4%
5Gray J.Labour Party1,13711.9%35.6%
6Smith C.Labour Party7888.2%24.7%
7Wylie J.Green Party5906.2%18.5%
8Smith S.Liberal Democrats2672.8%8.4%
9Davies M.Reform UK1511.6%4.7%

Electorate 10,112 · EC ward code E05013225 · Back to ward index

Higham Ferrers · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,934

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jackson B.Conservative Party1,85421.1%63.2%+38.2 ptsElected
2Bone J.Conservative Party1,68319.1%57.4%+32.4 ptsElected
3Pentland H.J.F.Conservative Party1,68119.1%57.3%+32.3 ptsElected
4Gell R.J.Independent7088.0%24.1%
5Caine J.D.Labour Party6367.2%21.7%
6Baker D.L.Labour Party6137.0%20.9%
7Tomas P.Independent5876.7%20.0%
8Fedorowycz M.Green Party4875.5%16.6%
9Hooton D.Liberal Democrats4054.6%13.8%
10Lever S.R.J.Reform UK1491.7%5.1%

Electorate 9,800 · EC ward code E05013223 · Back to ward index

Ise · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,982

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bunday L.Conservative Party1,87120.9%62.7%+37.7 ptsElected
2Rowley M.E.Conservative Party1,81720.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
3Prentice E.K.Conservative Party1,73119.3%58.0%+33.0 ptsElected
4Padwick J.D.Labour Party1,04811.7%35.1%
5Pettit J.Labour Party8169.1%27.4%
6Lomasney D.Green Party6747.5%22.6%
7Sharman T.Labour Party6527.3%21.9%
8White R.J.Liberal Democrats3383.8%11.3%

Electorate 8,637 · EC ward code E05013226 · Back to ward index

Irchester · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,159

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Carr J.Conservative Party2,10822.2%66.7%+41.7 ptsElected
2Partridge-Underwood T.Conservative Party2,10522.2%66.6%+41.6 ptsElected
3Griffiths M.J.Conservative Party1,83719.4%58.2%+33.2 ptsElected
4Maguire T.Labour Party1,03710.9%32.8%
5Milroy M.A.Labour Party5876.2%18.6%
6Beirne J.Independent5776.1%18.3%
7Farrar J.E.Labour Party5525.8%17.5%
8Morris W.Green Party3934.1%12.4%
9Brown D.M.Liberal Democrats2803.0%8.9%

Electorate 8,732 · EC ward code E05013224 · Back to ward index

Hatton Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,036

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Harrington K.Conservative Party2,13723.5%70.4%+45.4 ptsElected
2Lawman G.M.Conservative Party2,06222.6%67.9%+42.9 ptsElected
3Waters M.Conservative Party1,77819.5%58.6%+33.6 ptsElected
4Thomson C.M.A.Labour Party1,02911.3%33.9%
5Inskip W.Labour Party97610.7%32.2%
6Scott S.G.Labour Party7938.7%26.1%
7Simons S.J.Liberal Democrats3323.6%10.9%

Electorate 10,600 · EC ward code E05013222 · Back to ward index

Lloyds · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,057

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Pengelly M.Labour Party2,33825.5%76.5%+51.5 ptsElected
2Buckingham L.Labour Party2,21224.1%72.4%+47.4 ptsElected
3Colquhoun W.G.Labour Party1,85220.2%60.6%+35.6 ptsElected
4Clarke C.S.A.Conservative Party7838.5%25.6%
5Watts J.Conservative Party6917.5%22.6%
6Marinaro C.Conservative Party6427.0%21.0%
7Forster L.Green Party4915.4%16.1%
8Meechan T.Liberal Democrats1621.8%5.3%

Electorate 10,925 · EC ward code E05013228 · Back to ward index

Kingswood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,362

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1McGhee J.A.Labour Party1,61922.9%68.6%+43.6 ptsElected
2McGhee Z.C.Labour Party1,47720.8%62.5%+37.5 ptsElected
3McEwan P.W.Labour Party1,44720.4%61.3%+36.3 ptsElected
4Boyd R.Conservative Party72410.2%30.7%
5Jackson R.G.Conservative Party71110.0%30.1%
6Tustin R.J.Conservative Party6429.1%27.2%
7Mahon M.Green Party3124.4%13.2%
8McGeown J.E.Liberal Democrats1532.2%6.5%

Electorate 10,327 · EC ward code E05013227 · Back to ward index

Rushden South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,679

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jenney D.Conservative Party1,89423.6%70.7%+45.7 ptsElected
2North S.J.B.Conservative Party1,81022.5%67.6%+42.6 ptsElected
3Mercer A.Conservative Party1,68020.9%62.7%+37.7 ptsElected
4Rolfe L.Labour Party84910.6%31.7%
5Ash D.J.Labour Party7148.9%26.7%
6Farrow K.Green Party5757.2%21.5%
7Wilson L.Liberal Democrats5146.4%19.2%

Electorate 11,692 · EC ward code E05013235 · Back to ward index

Rushden Pemberton West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,718

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jenney B.Conservative Party1,98124.3%72.9%+47.9 ptsElected
2Tye M.Conservative Party1,94323.8%71.5%+46.5 ptsElected
3Mercer G.Conservative Party1,76621.7%65.0%+40.0 ptsElected
4McDade G.Labour Party6878.4%25.3%
5Day G.H.Labour Party6668.2%24.5%
6Norris J.Liberal Democrats5817.1%21.4%
7Siddington G.Green Party5306.5%19.5%

Electorate 9,639 · EC ward code E05013234 · Back to ward index

Corby West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,936

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Addison J.G.Labour Party2,06223.4%70.2%+45.2 ptsElected
2Dalziel A.Labour Party2,04423.2%69.6%+44.6 ptsElected
3Keane M.Labour Party1,94622.1%66.3%+41.3 ptsElected
4Beattie R.S.Conservative Party8539.7%29.0%
5Greenwood-Smith G.Conservative Party7768.8%26.4%
6Wathen P.Conservative Party7548.6%25.7%
7Scannell L.Green Party2252.6%7.7%
8Bromhall P.C.Liberal Democrats1491.7%5.1%

Electorate 8,131 · EC ward code E05013217 · Back to ward index

Raunds · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,768

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Howell H.V.M.Conservative Party2,09525.2%75.7%+50.7 ptsElected
2Levell R.J.K.Conservative Party1,94923.5%70.4%+45.4 ptsElected
3Wilkes L.R.C.Conservative Party1,87322.6%67.7%+42.7 ptsElected
4Ellis P.M.Labour Party6147.4%22.2%
5Harvey N.Labour Party5406.5%19.5%
6Harvey S.E.Labour Party5196.2%18.7%
7Thorley J.Green Party4084.9%14.7%
8Ratcliffe G.Liberal Democrats3073.7%11.1%

Electorate 9,545 · EC ward code E05013232 · Back to ward index

Earls Barton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,541

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hallam C.F.Conservative Party2,55124.0%72.0%+47.0 ptsElected
2Brown S.P.Conservative Party2,46823.2%69.7%+44.7 ptsElected
3Lawman L.Conservative Party2,44023.0%68.9%+43.9 ptsElected
4Mitchell O.Green Party1,16010.9%32.8%
5Stroud I.P.Labour Party1,0289.7%29.0%
6Addison-Pettit P.J.Liberal Democrats9769.2%27.6%

Electorate 10,695 · EC ward code E05013220 · Back to ward index