← North Tyneside (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort

North Tyneside 2024

Local elections held 2 May 2024.

20 ward races
60 seats
14 unfairly awarded seats
23.3% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 60 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party81,19058.0%5185.0%3761.7%+14
Conservative Party25,31518.1%813.3%1118.3%-3
Green Party19,50613.9%00.0%813.3%-8
Independent7,9815.7%11.7%35.0%-2
Reform UK2,8032.0%00.0%11.7%-1
Liberal Democrats1,9811.4%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition8220.6%00.0%00.0%0
Workers Party of Britain3410.2%00.0%00.0%0
Total139,939100.0%60100.0%60100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2024)
Previous (2023)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

St Mary's · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,842

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1McAlpine, I.Conservative Party1,51013.1%39.3%+14.3 ptsElected
2Holdsworth, A.Labour Party1,37311.9%35.7%+10.7 ptsElected
3Wallace, J.Independent1,32011.5%34.4%+9.4 ptsElected
4Slater, D.Labour Party1,23210.7%32.1%
5McIntyre, P.Independent1,22210.6%31.8%
6Gargett, T.Conservative Party1,18210.3%30.8%
7Robinson, S.Conservative Party1,17910.2%30.7%
8Westwater, G.Labour Party9478.2%24.6%
9Murray, S.Independent8187.1%21.3%
10Parry, V.Green Party4033.5%10.5%
11Appleby, J.Liberal Democrats3413.0%8.9%

Electorate 8,101 · EC ward code E05015879 · Back to ward index

Tynemouth · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,716

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bartoli, L.Conservative Party1,87616.8%50.5%+25.5 ptsElected
2Bailey, T.Labour Party1,75715.8%47.3%+22.3 ptsElected
3Day, J.Labour Party1,71215.4%46.1%+21.1 ptsElected
4Johnston, C.Conservative Party1,68815.1%45.4%
5Ord, J.Conservative Party1,65914.9%44.6%
6Gray, D.Labour Party1,38012.4%37.1%
7Williams, M.Green Party6926.2%18.6%
8Smith, H.Independent3853.5%10.4%

Electorate 7,888 · EC ward code E05015880 · Back to ward index

Cullercoats and Whitley Bay South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,722

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Shaw, J.Labour Party2,22219.9%59.7%+34.7 ptsElected
2Samuel, W.Labour Party2,03618.2%54.7%+29.7 ptsElected
3Spowart, A.Labour Party1,73015.5%46.5%+21.5 ptsElected
4Appleby, I.Green Party1,20410.8%32.4%
5Barrie, K.Conservative Party8847.9%23.8%
6Steven, D.Conservative Party8577.7%23.0%
7Wedderman, C.Green Party7426.6%19.9%
8McGlinn, S.Green Party7256.5%19.5%
9Pearson, R.Independent5655.1%15.2%
10Hoare, J.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2001.8%5.4%

Electorate 8,941 · EC ward code E05015869 · Back to ward index

Preston with Preston Grange · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,970

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bones, L.Conservative Party1,71719.3%57.8%+32.8 ptsElected
2Johnsson, J.Conservative Party1,55717.5%52.4%+27.4 ptsElected
3Lilly, D.Conservative Party1,39415.6%46.9%+21.9 ptsElected
4Ellis, M.Labour Party1,13612.8%38.3%
5Morris, M.Labour Party1,01311.4%34.1%
6Davis, C.Independent8219.2%27.6%
7Razaq, R.Labour Party7738.7%26.0%
8Fitzimons, N.Green Party4985.6%16.8%

Electorate 7,501 · EC ward code E05015877 · Back to ward index

New York and Murton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,750

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Scargill, O.Conservative Party1,34625.6%76.9%+51.9 ptsElected
2McGinty, C.Conservative Party96118.3%54.9%+29.9 ptsElected
3Bartoli, J.Conservative Party90217.2%51.5%+26.5 ptsElected
4Martin, P.Labour Party61611.7%35.2%
5Avery, O.Labour Party60911.6%34.8%
6Carter, R.Labour Party59911.4%34.2%
7Remfry, P.Green Party2174.1%12.4%

Electorate 6,094 · EC ward code E05015875 · Back to ward index

North Shields · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,370

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lott, W.Labour Party1,31618.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
2Mudzingwa, J.Labour Party1,28918.1%54.4%+29.4 ptsElected
3Lott, F.Labour Party1,24517.5%52.5%+27.5 ptsElected
4Osborne, M.Green Party5838.2%24.6%
5Weech, K.Independent4906.9%20.7%
6Graham, S.Independent4726.6%19.9%
7Johnston, C.Independent4696.6%19.8%
8Thewlis, A.Conservative Party3905.5%16.5%
9Office, D.Conservative Party3675.2%15.5%
10Pollard, C.Liberal Democrats3224.5%13.6%
11Jarrett, W.Workers Party of Britain1672.3%7.0%

Electorate 8,089 · EC ward code E05015876 · Back to ward index

Forest Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,440

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hunter, J.Labour Party1,79724.5%73.6%+48.6 ptsElected
2Earley, P.Labour Party1,56921.4%64.3%+39.3 ptsElected
3Sharp, J.Labour Party1,34418.4%55.1%+30.1 ptsElected
4Hill, S.Independent88612.1%36.3%
5Appleby, J.Liberal Democrats4115.6%16.8%
6Altman, D.Green Party4065.5%16.6%
7Clark, J.Conservative Party3935.4%16.1%
8Florentine, J.Green Party2893.9%11.8%
9Martinez, M.Green Party2263.1%9.3%

Electorate 7,676 · EC ward code E05015870 · Back to ward index

Whitley Bay North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,629

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kirwan, J.Labour Party2,23320.5%61.5%+36.5 ptsElected
2O'Shea, J.Labour Party2,16119.8%59.5%+34.5 ptsElected
3Graham, S.Labour Party2,01818.5%55.6%+30.6 ptsElected
4Steele, A.Green Party1,58014.5%43.5%
5Bell, H.Green Party1,22611.3%33.8%
6Smithson, R.Green Party9889.1%27.2%
7Nisbet, D.Liberal Democrats5074.7%14.0%
8Bell, G.Workers Party of Britain1741.6%4.8%

Electorate 8,637 · EC ward code E05015884 · Back to ward index

Chirton and Percy Main · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,575

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1O'Keefe, R.Labour Party1,11623.6%70.9%+45.9 ptsElected
2Johnson, H.Labour Party1,07922.8%68.5%+43.5 ptsElected
3Pickard, C.Labour Party89619.0%56.9%+31.9 ptsElected
4Harrigan, M.Reform UK4369.2%27.7%
5Bones, S.Conservative Party3607.6%22.9%
6Fawcett Reilly, C.Green Party3387.2%21.5%
7Mellor, J.Green Party2916.2%18.5%
8Robson, P.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2094.4%13.3%

Electorate 8,956 · EC ward code E05015868 · Back to ward index

Shiremoor · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,776

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Burdis, B.Labour Party1,31824.7%74.2%+49.2 ptsElected
2Mulvenna, T.Labour Party1,18922.3%66.9%+41.9 ptsElected
3Nott, K.Labour Party1,01819.1%57.3%+32.3 ptsElected
4Kirkham, C.Green Party63311.9%35.6%
5Fletcher, G.Reform UK5159.7%29.0%
6Nissen, C.Green Party3626.8%20.4%
7Maier, R.Green Party2935.5%16.5%

Electorate 7,726 · EC ward code E05015878 · Back to ward index

Monkseaton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,020

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Drummond, D.Labour Party2,23824.7%74.1%+49.1 ptsElected
2Day, S.Labour Party1,96721.7%65.1%+40.1 ptsElected
3Murphy, M.Labour Party1,77219.6%58.7%+33.7 ptsElected
4Ray, S.Conservative Party1,07311.8%35.5%
5Percival, K.Green Party6056.7%20.0%
6Dehler, T.Green Party4735.2%15.7%
7Elliott, V.Liberal Democrats4004.4%13.2%
8Percival, N.Green Party3764.1%12.4%
9Dickson, L.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1571.7%5.2%

Electorate 8,756 · EC ward code E05015874 · Back to ward index

Backworth and Holystone · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,542

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bell, L.Labour Party1,16725.2%75.7%+50.7 ptsElected
2Huscroft, N.Labour Party96420.8%62.5%+37.5 ptsElected
3Webster, J.Labour Party92620.0%60.0%+35.0 ptsElected
4Amos, A.Conservative Party53311.5%34.6%
5Anieto, C.Conservative Party53111.5%34.4%
6Jones, A.Green Party50610.9%32.8%

Electorate 6,632 · EC ward code E05015865 · Back to ward index

Howdon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,716

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bell, L.Labour Party1,28124.9%74.7%+49.7 ptsElected
2Harrison, J.Labour Party1,27324.7%74.2%+49.2 ptsElected
3Thirlaway, M.Labour Party1,06120.6%61.8%+36.8 ptsElected
4Madden, M.Independent53310.4%31.1%
5Richardson, J.Reform UK4288.3%24.9%
6Renner, M.Green Party3226.3%18.8%
7Bones, C.Conservative Party2504.9%14.6%

Electorate 9,159 · EC ward code E05015871 · Back to ward index

Wallsend North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,943

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Newman, A.Labour Party1,41624.3%72.9%+47.9 ptsElected
2Montague, J.Labour Party1,35823.3%69.9%+44.9 ptsElected
3Neira, T.Labour Party1,23621.2%63.6%+38.6 ptsElected
4Elliott, R.Reform UK5719.8%29.4%
5Jones, I.Green Party5539.5%28.5%
6Wilson Craw, A.Green Party3806.5%19.6%
7Morley, J.Green Party3155.4%16.2%

Electorate 8,764 · EC ward code E05015882 · Back to ward index

Weetslade · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,114

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Burtenshaw, S.Labour Party1,42622.5%67.4%+42.4 ptsElected
2McMullen, A.Labour Party1,37821.7%65.2%+40.2 ptsElected
3McMullen, L.Labour Party1,35621.4%64.1%+39.1 ptsElected
4Pickering, C.Conservative Party78512.4%37.1%
5Amos, H.Conservative Party78412.4%37.1%
6Newton, M.Green Party6149.7%29.0%

Electorate 7,936 · EC ward code E05015883 · Back to ward index

Wallsend Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,917

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Marshall, L.Labour Party1,32923.1%69.3%+44.3 ptsElected
2Gray, C.Labour Party1,26722.0%66.1%+41.1 ptsElected
3Grayson, I.Labour Party1,23321.4%64.3%+39.3 ptsElected
4Collins, M.Green Party59010.3%30.8%
5Oliver, R.Reform UK4838.4%25.2%
6Hayward, J.Green Party4477.8%23.3%
7Hayward-Pattison, S.Green Party4017.0%20.9%

Electorate 7,894 · EC ward code E05015881 · Back to ward index

Longbenton and Benton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,870

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Clark, K.Labour Party1,61028.7%86.1%+61.1 ptsElected
2Darke, E.Labour Party1,44525.8%77.3%+52.3 ptsElected
3Darke, L.Labour Party1,31123.4%70.1%+45.1 ptsElected
4Gray, F.Green Party61911.0%33.1%
5Smith, B.Reform UK3706.6%19.8%
6George, D.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2564.6%13.7%

Electorate 7,603 · EC ward code E05015873 · Back to ward index

Killingworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 72.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +47.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,660

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Oliver, P.Labour Party1,35627.2%81.7%+56.7 ptsElected
2Bunyan, P.Labour Party1,28725.8%77.5%+52.5 ptsElected
3Clark, B.Labour Party1,20924.3%72.8%+47.8 ptsElected
4Sarin, D.Conservative Party61712.4%37.2%
5Ford, I.Green Party51010.2%30.7%

Electorate 6,560 · EC ward code E05015872 · Back to ward index

Battle Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 73.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +48.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,784

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cruddas, J.Labour Party1,61430.2%90.5%+65.5 ptsElected
2Johnson, C.Labour Party1,42726.7%80.0%+55.0 ptsElected
3Phillips, S.Labour Party1,31424.6%73.7%+48.7 ptsElected
4Ilderton, J.Conservative Party5209.7%29.1%
5Martin, N.Green Party4778.9%26.7%

Electorate 7,848 · EC ward code E05015866 · Back to ward index

Camperdown · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 77.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +52.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,289

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hallway, T.Labour Party1,13629.4%88.1%+63.1 ptsElected
2Cox, S.Labour Party1,11128.7%86.2%+61.2 ptsElected
3Walker, J.Labour Party99925.8%77.5%+52.5 ptsElected
4Greenwold, A.Green Party62216.1%48.2%

Electorate 7,352 · EC ward code E05015867 · Back to ward index