← Nottingham (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Nottingham 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 55 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 87,480 | 61.7% | 51 | 92.7% | 36 | 65.5% | +15 |
| Conservative Party | 21,277 | 15.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 8 | 14.5% | -8 |
| NOTT IND | 14,790 | 10.4% | 3 | 5.5% | 6 | 10.9% | -3 |
| Green Party | 8,981 | 6.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 5.5% | -3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 6,711 | 4.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 3.6% | -2 |
| Independent | 2,053 | 1.4% | 1 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | +1 |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 210 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 187 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 141,689 | 100.0% | 55 | 100.0% | 55 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Clifton West · 2 seats · won at 36.0% · above quota
- Castle · 2 seats · won at 42.4% · above quota
- Meadows · 2 seats · won at 52.9% · above quota
- Clifton East · 3 seats · won at 47.1% · above quota
- Mapperley · 3 seats · won at 49.0% · above quota
- Bulwell Forest · 3 seats · won at 49.4% · above quota
- Wollaton West · 3 seats · won at 50.8% · above quota
- Sherwood · 3 seats · won at 54.5% · above quota
- Bestwood · 3 seats · won at 55.8% · above quota
- Leen Valley · 2 seats · won at 64.7% · above quota
- St Ann's · 3 seats · won at 59.7% · above quota
- Bulwell · 3 seats · won at 59.7% · above quota
- Radford · 2 seats · won at 69.7% · above quota
- Basford · 3 seats · won at 64.3% · above quota
- Lenton and Wollaton East · 3 seats · won at 65.7% · above quota
- Dales · 3 seats · won at 67.0% · above quota
- Hyson Green and Arboretum · 3 seats · won at 68.2% · above quota
- Bilborough · 3 seats · won at 71.4% · above quota
- Berridge · 3 seats · won at 75.2% · above quota
- Aspley · 3 seats · won at 77.9% · above quota
Race results
Clifton West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 36.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,759
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spain, H. | Labour Party | 1,042 | 18.9% | 37.8% | +4.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rule, A. | Independent | 994 | 18.0% | 36.0% | +2.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilkins, S. | Labour Party | 909 | 16.5% | 33.0% | — | |
| 4 | Steel, R. | Independent | 849 | 15.4% | 30.8% | — | |
| 5 | Atherton, D. | Conservative Party | 710 | 12.9% | 25.7% | — | |
| 6 | Nawaz, A. | Conservative Party | 483 | 8.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 7 | Crane, E. | NOTT IND | 212 | 3.8% | 7.7% | — | |
| 8 | Bradshaw, P. | NOTT IND | 212 | 3.8% | 7.7% | — | |
| 9 | Vandersluis, M. | Liberal Democrats | 106 | 1.9% | 3.8% | — |
Castle · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,879
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lux, S. | Labour Party | 897 | 23.9% | 47.7% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shannon, M. | Labour Party | 796 | 21.2% | 42.4% | +9.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lloyd, L. | Liberal Democrats | 734 | 19.5% | 39.1% | — | |
| 4 | Procter, R. | Liberal Democrats | 665 | 17.7% | 35.4% | — | |
| 5 | Kelsey, K. | Green Party | 278 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 6 | Scott, J. | Conservative Party | 218 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — | |
| 7 | Morrell, C. | Green Party | 170 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — |
Meadows · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,019
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edwards, M. | Labour Party | 1,107 | 27.4% | 54.8% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Regan, E. | Labour Party | 1,069 | 26.5% | 52.9% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rashid, N. | NOTT IND | 527 | 13.1% | 26.1% | — | |
| 4 | Bohacz, M. | NOTT IND | 525 | 13.0% | 26.0% | — | |
| 5 | Pryke-Hendy, C. | Green Party | 271 | 6.7% | 13.4% | — | |
| 6 | Crofts, F. | Conservative Party | 209 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — | |
| 7 | Packham, N. | Conservative Party | 205 | 5.1% | 10.2% | — | |
| 8 | Thomas, M. | Liberal Democrats | 125 | 3.1% | 6.2% | — |
Clifton East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,697
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watson, M. | NOTT IND | 1,331 | 16.4% | 49.3% | +24.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clarke, K. | NOTT IND | 1,309 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jones, K. | NOTT IND | 1,271 | 15.7% | 47.1% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Spear, P. | Labour Party | 1,236 | 15.3% | 45.8% | — | |
| 5 | Hussain, R. | Labour Party | 1,005 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 6 | Maqsood, A. | Labour Party | 973 | 12.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 7 | Scott, W. | Conservative Party | 422 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 8 | Sullivan, D. | Conservative Party | 386 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 9 | Stevens, B. | Liberal Democrats | 159 | 2.0% | 5.9% | — |
Mapperley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,357
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ayoola, L. | Labour Party | 1,909 | 19.0% | 56.9% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jones, K. | Labour Party | 1,907 | 18.9% | 56.8% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mohammed, S. | Labour Party | 1,646 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Coulson, B. | Green Party | 898 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 5 | McGregor, A. | Green Party | 679 | 6.7% | 20.2% | — | |
| 6 | Sutherland, C. | Green Party | 668 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 7 | Kilbourne, G. | Conservative Party | 656 | 6.5% | 19.5% | — | |
| 8 | Shepherd, M. | Conservative Party | 639 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 9 | Quraishi, Z. | Conservative Party | 518 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 10 | Mendenhall, P. | Liberal Democrats | 340 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 11 | King, N. | Independent | 210 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — |
Bulwell Forest · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,707
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnard, C. | Labour Party | 1,573 | 19.4% | 58.1% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gardiner, S. | Labour Party | 1,477 | 18.2% | 54.6% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rehman-Wall, S. | Labour Party | 1,338 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kampila, C. | Conservative Party | 849 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 5 | Adejuyigbe, E. | Conservative Party | 840 | 10.3% | 31.0% | — | |
| 6 | Ruane, P. | Conservative Party | 815 | 10.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 7 | Buckland, D. | Green Party | 378 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — | |
| 8 | Awolola, S. | NOTT IND | 359 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 9 | Sutherland, P. | NOTT IND | 306 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 10 | Taylor, C. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 187 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — |
Wollaton West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,511
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Battlemuch, S. | Labour Party | 2,815 | 20.8% | 62.4% | +37.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Khan, Z. | Labour Party | 2,375 | 17.5% | 52.6% | +27.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ahmad, S. | Labour Party | 2,290 | 16.9% | 50.8% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Frost, S. | Conservative Party | 1,696 | 12.5% | 37.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hussain, K. | Conservative Party | 1,312 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 6 | Salim, A. | Conservative Party | 1,182 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 7 | Procter, M. | Liberal Democrats | 813 | 6.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 8 | Griffiths, C. | NOTT IND | 499 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 9 | Prem, J. | NOTT IND | 327 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — | |
| 10 | Sehra, B. | NOTT IND | 224 | 1.7% | 5.0% | — |
Sherwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,807
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams, A. | Labour Party | 2,367 | 20.7% | 62.2% | +37.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Matsiko, A. | Labour Party | 2,275 | 19.9% | 59.8% | +34.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Patel, N. | Labour Party | 2,075 | 18.2% | 54.5% | +29.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barratt, C. | NOTT IND | 1,035 | 9.1% | 27.2% | — | |
| 5 | Green, R. | NOTT IND | 752 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 6 | Scrimshaw, A. | NOTT IND | 651 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 7 | Richards, R. | Green Party | 629 | 5.5% | 16.5% | — | |
| 8 | Burgess, J. | Green Party | 554 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 9 | Eaton, S. | Conservative Party | 448 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 10 | Hart, I. | Conservative Party | 392 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 11 | Freeland, S. | Liberal Democrats | 243 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — |
Bestwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,477
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Power, G. | Labour Party | 1,523 | 20.5% | 61.5% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hayes, J. | Labour Party | 1,453 | 19.6% | 58.7% | +33.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wynter, A. | Labour Party | 1,383 | 18.6% | 55.8% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lari, F. | NOTT IND | 710 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — | |
| 5 | Foulkes-Mills, P. | NOTT IND | 557 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — | |
| 6 | Loi, F. | NOTT IND | 508 | 6.8% | 20.5% | — | |
| 7 | Grainger, T. | Conservative Party | 366 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — | |
| 8 | Jarvis, C. | Conservative Party | 332 | 4.5% | 13.4% | — | |
| 9 | Hussain, R. | Conservative Party | 277 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 10 | Taylor, A. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 126 | 1.7% | 5.1% | — | |
| 11 | Rotherham, D. | Liberal Democrats | 111 | 1.5% | 4.5% | — | |
| 12 | Marriott, I. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 84 | 1.1% | 3.4% | — |
Leen Valley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,068
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dinnall, A. | Labour Party | 1,416 | 34.2% | 68.5% | +35.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Farhat, N. | Labour Party | 1,338 | 32.4% | 64.7% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gibson, D. | Conservative Party | 476 | 11.5% | 23.0% | — | |
| 4 | Stancliffe, G. | Conservative Party | 372 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 5 | Long, G. | Liberal Democrats | 309 | 7.5% | 14.9% | — | |
| 6 | Morgan-Danvers, C. | Liberal Democrats | 224 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — |
St Ann's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,294
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jenkins, C. | Labour Party | 1,636 | 23.8% | 71.3% | +46.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Khan, A. | Labour Party | 1,412 | 20.5% | 61.5% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Okure, D. | Labour Party | 1,369 | 19.9% | 59.7% | +34.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Crofts, J. | Conservative Party | 339 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — | |
| 5 | Barrett, N. | Green Party | 323 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — | |
| 6 | Sullivan, G. | Conservative Party | 291 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — | |
| 7 | Thomas, B. | Conservative Party | 287 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 8 | Walker, J. | Green Party | 280 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Sobarasua, G. | NOTT IND | 269 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 10 | Bah, R. | NOTT IND | 250 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — | |
| 11 | Njie, S. | NOTT IND | 225 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 12 | Housley, J. | Liberal Democrats | 202 | 2.9% | 8.8% | — |
Bulwell · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,056
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radford, E. | Labour Party | 1,633 | 26.5% | 79.4% | +54.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Joannou, M. | Labour Party | 1,368 | 22.2% | 66.5% | +41.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Savage, M. | Labour Party | 1,228 | 19.9% | 59.7% | +34.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Horan, T. | NOTT IND | 768 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 5 | Kovacevic, A. | Conservative Party | 424 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 6 | Jabarkhyl, M. | Conservative Party | 384 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — | |
| 7 | Genn, M. | Liberal Democrats | 362 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — |
Radford · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 965
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mahmood, F. | Labour Party | 759 | 39.3% | 78.7% | +45.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mubashar, F. | Labour Party | 672 | 34.8% | 69.7% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ellis, W. | Green Party | 249 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 4 | Pike, M. | Conservative Party | 135 | 7.0% | 14.0% | — | |
| 5 | Procter, T. | Liberal Democrats | 114 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — |
Basford · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,507
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woodings, L. | Labour Party | 1,644 | 21.9% | 65.6% | +40.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mumtaz, S. | Labour Party | 1,621 | 21.6% | 64.7% | +39.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Raine, N. | Labour Party | 1,612 | 21.4% | 64.3% | +39.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Boden, R. | Conservative Party | 648 | 8.6% | 25.9% | — | |
| 5 | Jones, A. | Green Party | 608 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 6 | Unczur, W. | NOTT IND | 584 | 7.8% | 23.3% | — | |
| 7 | Yarde, C. | NOTT IND | 496 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 8 | Minkley, R. | Liberal Democrats | 307 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — |
Lenton and Wollaton East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,035
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Riaz, S. | Labour Party | 1,399 | 22.9% | 68.7% | +43.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kotsonis, P. | Labour Party | 1,384 | 22.7% | 68.0% | +43.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jalil, I. | Labour Party | 1,336 | 21.9% | 65.7% | +40.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fairey, O. | Green Party | 663 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hopkins, T. | Conservative Party | 447 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 6 | Dieppe, D. | Conservative Party | 445 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — | |
| 7 | Sutton, T. | Liberal Democrats | 431 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — |
Dales · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,096
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mellen, D. | Labour Party | 2,287 | 24.6% | 73.9% | +48.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Khan, N. | Labour Party | 2,125 | 22.9% | 68.6% | +43.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Khan, G. | Labour Party | 2,075 | 22.3% | 67.0% | +42.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Marsh, L. | Green Party | 530 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 5 | Harbinson, N. | Conservative Party | 523 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — | |
| 6 | Messenger, P. | Conservative Party | 481 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 7 | Trueman, M. | Conservative Party | 463 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 8 | Bourke, A. | Liberal Democrats | 303 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 9 | Wong, W. | NOTT IND | 268 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — | |
| 10 | Jamil, M. | NOTT IND | 234 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — |
Hyson Green and Arboretum · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,195
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nasir, S. | Labour Party | 1,692 | 25.7% | 77.1% | +52.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ali, L. | Labour Party | 1,676 | 25.4% | 76.3% | +51.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Salim, N. | Labour Party | 1,497 | 22.7% | 68.2% | +43.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hanson, J. | Green Party | 439 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 5 | Foster, A. | Liberal Democrats | 301 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 6 | Sutton, R. | Green Party | 300 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 7 | Stott, C. | Conservative Party | 300 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 8 | Qazi, M. | NOTT IND | 200 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 9 | Singh, P. | NOTT IND | 181 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — |
Bilborough · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,225
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris, S. | Labour Party | 1,872 | 28.0% | 84.1% | +59.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kalsi, H. | Labour Party | 1,731 | 25.9% | 77.8% | +52.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gakanje-Ajala, F. | Labour Party | 1,589 | 23.8% | 71.4% | +46.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Pryor, A. | Conservative Party | 806 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 5 | Morgan-Danvers, L. | Liberal Democrats | 678 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — |
Berridge · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,670
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kandola, A. | Labour Party | 2,343 | 29.2% | 87.7% | +62.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Quddoos, S. | Labour Party | 2,123 | 26.5% | 79.5% | +54.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mahmood, S. | Labour Party | 2,007 | 25.1% | 75.2% | +50.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mitchell, E. | Green Party | 1,064 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Parsons, P. | Conservative Party | 474 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — |
Aspley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 77.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +52.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,136
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chapman, G. | Labour Party | 1,796 | 28.0% | 84.1% | +59.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McCulloch, C. | Labour Party | 1,736 | 27.1% | 81.3% | +56.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ifediora, P. | Labour Party | 1,664 | 26.0% | 77.9% | +52.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Culley, I. | Conservative Party | 357 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 5 | Slane, N. | Conservative Party | 356 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 6 | Wroughton, M. | Conservative Party | 314 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 7 | Rotherham, S. | Liberal Democrats | 184 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — |