← Nuneaton and Bedworth (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Nuneaton and Bedworth 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 38 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 22,388 | 45.0% | 20 | 52.6% | 18 | 47.4% | +2 |
| Conservative Party | 21,906 | 44.1% | 16 | 42.1% | 17 | 44.7% | -1 |
| Green Party | 3,837 | 7.7% | 2 | 5.3% | 3 | 7.9% | -1 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 816 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 613 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| CCP | 110 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Liberal Democrats | 42 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 49,712 | 100.0% | 38 | 100.0% | 38 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Slough · 2 seats · won at 42.9% · above quota
- Exhall · 2 seats · won at 44.9% · above quota
- Poplar · 2 seats · won at 45.2% · above quota
- Eastboro · 2 seats · won at 45.5% · above quota
- Arbury · 2 seats · won at 47.7% · above quota
- Heath · 2 seats · won at 49.2% · above quota
- Attleborough · 2 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Galley Common · 2 seats · won at 51.4% · above quota
- Chilvers Coton · 2 seats · won at 51.5% · above quota
- St Nicolas · 2 seats · won at 51.8% · above quota
- Milby · 2 seats · won at 52.3% · above quota
- Weddington · 2 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- Camp Hill · 2 seats · won at 56.4% · above quota
- Bulkington · 2 seats · won at 57.3% · above quota
- Stockingford East · 2 seats · won at 59.6% · above quota
- Stockingford West · 2 seats · won at 59.8% · above quota
- Bede · 2 seats · won at 62.2% · above quota
- Whitestone · 2 seats · won at 63.4% · above quota
- St Mary's · 2 seats · won at 70.7% · above quota
Race results
Slough · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,607
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Markham, S. | Conservative Party | 750 | 23.3% | 46.7% | +13.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walsh, M. | Conservative Party | 690 | 21.5% | 42.9% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Garratt, M. | Labour Party | 674 | 21.0% | 41.9% | — | |
| 4 | Waldron, R. | Labour Party | 596 | 18.5% | 37.1% | — | |
| 5 | Margrave, S. | Independent | 413 | 12.9% | 25.7% | — | |
| 6 | Burdett, M. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 91 | 2.8% | 5.7% | — |
Exhall · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,399
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, D. | Conservative Party | 717 | 25.6% | 51.3% | +17.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jenkins, T. | Labour Party | 628 | 22.5% | 44.9% | +11.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sinclair, H. | Labour Party | 598 | 21.4% | 42.8% | — | |
| 4 | Walsh, S. | Conservative Party | 526 | 18.8% | 37.6% | — | |
| 5 | Gering, M. | Green Party | 152 | 5.4% | 10.9% | — | |
| 6 | Hunter, M. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 66 | 2.4% | 4.7% | — | |
| 7 | Frampton, A. | CCP | 59 | 2.1% | 4.2% | — | |
| 8 | Frampton, M. | CCP | 51 | 1.8% | 3.6% | — |
Poplar · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,371
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pandher, B. | Conservative Party | 674 | 24.6% | 49.2% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Khangura, A. | Conservative Party | 619 | 22.6% | 45.2% | +11.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Charles, L. | Labour Party | 576 | 21.0% | 42.0% | — | |
| 4 | Copland, R. | Labour Party | 563 | 20.5% | 41.1% | — | |
| 5 | Cope, K. | Green Party | 162 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 6 | Cope, R. | Green Party | 147 | 5.4% | 10.7% | — |
Eastboro · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,044
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooper, A. | Conservative Party | 591 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Etienne, M. | Conservative Party | 475 | 22.7% | 45.5% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Walmsley, B. | Labour Party | 408 | 19.5% | 39.1% | — | |
| 4 | Ajayi, S. | Labour Party | 383 | 18.3% | 36.7% | — | |
| 5 | Vernon, S. | Green Party | 231 | 11.1% | 22.1% | — |
Arbury · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,375
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hughes, B. | Labour Party | 695 | 25.3% | 50.5% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, C. | Labour Party | 656 | 23.9% | 47.7% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Golby, C. | Conservative Party | 651 | 23.7% | 47.3% | — | |
| 4 | Green, M. | Conservative Party | 602 | 21.9% | 43.8% | — | |
| 5 | Miller, E. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 146 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — |
Heath · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,343
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Markham, W. | Labour Party | 788 | 29.3% | 58.7% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Roze, R. | Labour Party | 661 | 24.6% | 49.2% | +15.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Singh, J. | Conservative Party | 647 | 24.1% | 48.2% | — | |
| 4 | Downs, L. | Conservative Party | 590 | 22.0% | 43.9% | — |
Attleborough · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,227
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phillips, C. | Labour Party | 644 | 26.2% | 52.5% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hey, S. | Labour Party | 624 | 25.4% | 50.9% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Baxter-Payne, R. | Conservative Party | 529 | 21.6% | 43.1% | — | |
| 4 | Thiara, K. | Conservative Party | 457 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — | |
| 5 | Ahmed, K. | Independent | 200 | 8.1% | 16.3% | — |
Galley Common · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,273
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hickling, P. | Labour Party | 722 | 28.4% | 56.7% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Croft, S. | Conservative Party | 654 | 25.7% | 51.4% | +18.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ratcliffe, A. | Labour Party | 621 | 24.4% | 48.8% | — | |
| 4 | Palamattom, P. | Conservative Party | 548 | 21.5% | 43.1% | — |
Chilvers Coton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,095
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheppard, T. | Labour Party | 680 | 31.1% | 62.1% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Venson, C. | Labour Party | 564 | 25.8% | 51.5% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fletcher, D. | Green Party | 299 | 13.7% | 27.3% | — | |
| 4 | Harbison, S. | Conservative Party | 222 | 10.1% | 20.3% | — | |
| 5 | Gran, S. | Conservative Party | 220 | 10.0% | 20.1% | — | |
| 6 | Quinn, B. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 205 | 9.4% | 18.7% | — |
St Nicolas · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,627
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarke, J. | Conservative Party | 1,002 | 30.8% | 61.6% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hartshorn, J. | Conservative Party | 842 | 25.9% | 51.8% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McDonagh, J. | Labour Party | 475 | 14.6% | 29.2% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 434 | 13.3% | 26.7% | — | |
| 5 | Heritage, A. | Green Party | 429 | 13.2% | 26.4% | — | |
| 6 | Webb, D. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 71 | 2.2% | 4.4% | — |
Milby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 883
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bird, M. | Conservative Party | 524 | 29.7% | 59.3% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Collett, J. | Conservative Party | 462 | 26.2% | 52.3% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brookes, L. | Labour Party | 289 | 16.4% | 32.7% | — | |
| 4 | Brookes, T. | Green Party | 277 | 15.7% | 31.4% | — | |
| 5 | Fowler, M. | Labour Party | 214 | 12.1% | 24.2% | — |
Weddington · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,577
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kondakor, M. | Green Party | 1,037 | 32.9% | 65.8% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wright, M. | Green Party | 847 | 26.9% | 53.7% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Curtis, G. | Conservative Party | 363 | 11.5% | 23.0% | — | |
| 4 | Pilkington, L. | Conservative Party | 344 | 10.9% | 21.8% | — | |
| 5 | Badhan, S. | Labour Party | 261 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — | |
| 6 | Watkins, C. | Labour Party | 259 | 8.2% | 16.4% | — | |
| 7 | Salaja, J. | Liberal Democrats | 42 | 1.3% | 2.7% | — |
Camp Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 927
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dhillon, S. | Labour Party | 575 | 31.0% | 62.0% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Amaechi, E. | Labour Party | 523 | 28.2% | 56.4% | +23.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cape, C. | Conservative Party | 346 | 18.7% | 37.3% | — | |
| 4 | Tabet, R. | Conservative Party | 293 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | Reilly, P. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 117 | 6.3% | 12.6% | — |
Bulkington · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,422
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cvetkovic, L. | Conservative Party | 980 | 34.5% | 68.9% | +35.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, R. | Conservative Party | 814 | 28.6% | 57.3% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Beaumont, J. | Labour Party | 601 | 21.1% | 42.3% | — | |
| 4 | McKee, C. | Labour Party | 448 | 15.8% | 31.5% | — |
Stockingford East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,197
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bonner, J. | Labour Party | 736 | 30.7% | 61.5% | +28.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | King, N. | Labour Party | 713 | 29.8% | 59.6% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Collins, C. | Conservative Party | 510 | 21.3% | 42.6% | — | |
| 4 | Underhill, S. | Conservative Party | 435 | 18.2% | 36.3% | — |
Stockingford West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,240
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watkins, C. | Labour Party | 747 | 30.1% | 60.2% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Price, K. | Labour Party | 742 | 29.9% | 59.8% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Evans, E. | Conservative Party | 445 | 17.9% | 35.9% | — | |
| 4 | Kennaugh, J. | Conservative Party | 426 | 17.2% | 34.4% | — | |
| 5 | Mosey, C. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 120 | 4.8% | 9.7% | — |
Bede · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,281
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hancox, W. | Labour Party | 799 | 31.2% | 62.4% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bull, A. | Labour Party | 796 | 31.1% | 62.2% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Downs, H. | Conservative Party | 490 | 19.1% | 38.3% | — | |
| 4 | Gilbert, P. | Conservative Party | 476 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — |
Whitestone · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,844
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson, K. | Conservative Party | 1,173 | 31.8% | 63.6% | +30.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gutteridge, J. | Conservative Party | 1,170 | 31.7% | 63.4% | +30.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Blakemore, J. | Labour Party | 568 | 15.4% | 30.8% | — | |
| 4 | Fowler, D. | Labour Party | 521 | 14.1% | 28.3% | — | |
| 5 | Bonner, S. | Green Party | 256 | 6.9% | 13.9% | — |
St Mary's · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 70.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,128
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saru, B. | Labour Party | 809 | 35.9% | 71.8% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sheppard, J. | Labour Party | 797 | 35.3% | 70.7% | +37.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Aston, C. | Conservative Party | 355 | 15.7% | 31.5% | — | |
| 4 | Aucott, P. | Conservative Party | 294 | 13.0% | 26.1% | — |