← Oadby & Wigston (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Oadby & Wigston 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 10 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 26 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 18,320 | 51.1% | 19 | 73.1% | 13 | 50.0% | +6 |
| Conservative Party | 15,909 | 44.4% | 7 | 26.9% | 12 | 46.2% | -5 |
| Labour Party | 1,605 | 4.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.8% | -1 |
| Total | 35,834 | 100.0% | 26 | 100.0% | 26 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Oadby Uplands · 2 seats · won at 35.1% · above quota
- Oadby St. Peters · 2 seats · won at 40.3% · above quota
- Oadby Woodlands · 2 seats · won at 54.9% · above quota
- Oadby Grange · 3 seats · won at 47.7% · above quota
- Oadby Brocks Hill · 2 seats · won at 58.2% · above quota
- South Wigston · 3 seats · won at 50.3% · above quota
- Wigston St. Wolstans · 3 seats · won at 55.9% · above quota
- Wigston All Saints · 3 seats · won at 61.9% · above quota
- Wigston Fields · 3 seats · won at 64.0% · above quota
- Wigston Meadowcourt · 3 seats · won at 67.2% · above quota
Race results
Oadby Uplands · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,552
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haq, S. | Liberal Democrats | 616 | 19.8% | 39.7% | +6.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Joshi, R. | Conservative Party | 545 | 17.6% | 35.1% | +1.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kaufman, V. | Liberal Democrats | 530 | 17.1% | 34.1% | — | |
| 4 | Boodhoo, M. | Conservative Party | 529 | 17.0% | 34.1% | — | |
| 5 | Piranie, H. | Labour Party | 457 | 14.7% | 29.4% | — | |
| 6 | Mercer, J. | Labour Party | 427 | 13.8% | 27.5% | — |
Oadby St. Peters · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,218
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ridley, I. | Liberal Democrats | 525 | 21.6% | 43.1% | +9.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chohan, J. | Liberal Democrats | 491 | 20.2% | 40.3% | +7.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thind, A. | Conservative Party | 488 | 20.0% | 40.1% | — | |
| 4 | Solanki, M. | Conservative Party | 479 | 19.7% | 39.3% | — | |
| 5 | Britten, J. | Labour Party | 226 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — | |
| 6 | Ahmed, R. | Labour Party | 226 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — |
Oadby Woodlands · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,238
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gamble, D. | Liberal Democrats | 707 | 28.6% | 57.1% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Athwal, S. | Liberal Democrats | 680 | 27.5% | 54.9% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dave, D. | Conservative Party | 556 | 22.5% | 44.9% | — | |
| 4 | Rai, H. | Conservative Party | 532 | 21.5% | 43.0% | — |
Oadby Grange · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,408
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alam, N. | Conservative Party | 757 | 17.9% | 53.8% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ghattoraya, K. | Conservative Party | 673 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Joshi, P. | Conservative Party | 672 | 15.9% | 47.7% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Durrani, M. | Liberal Democrats | 651 | 15.4% | 46.2% | — | |
| 5 | Kang, J. | Liberal Democrats | 636 | 15.1% | 45.2% | — | |
| 6 | Bartfield, R. | Liberal Democrats | 565 | 13.4% | 40.1% | — | |
| 7 | Smith, N. | Labour Party | 269 | 6.4% | 19.1% | — |
Oadby Brocks Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,265
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaufman, J. | Liberal Democrats | 792 | 31.3% | 62.6% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Darr, M. | Liberal Democrats | 736 | 29.1% | 58.2% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chander, R. | Conservative Party | 531 | 21.0% | 42.0% | — | |
| 4 | Alam, M. | Conservative Party | 471 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — |
South Wigston · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,230
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adams, R. | Liberal Democrats | 685 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walter, C. | Liberal Democrats | 645 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Morris, R. | Liberal Democrats | 619 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Darling, Y. | Conservative Party | 601 | 16.3% | 48.8% | — | |
| 5 | Stokes, K. | Conservative Party | 580 | 15.7% | 47.1% | — | |
| 6 | Stokes, T. | Conservative Party | 561 | 15.2% | 45.6% | — |
Wigston St. Wolstans · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,495
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broadley, L. | Liberal Democrats | 888 | 19.8% | 59.4% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Broadley, F. | Liberal Democrats | 876 | 19.5% | 58.6% | +33.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kozlowski, C. | Liberal Democrats | 836 | 18.6% | 55.9% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Darling, A. | Conservative Party | 637 | 14.2% | 42.6% | — | |
| 5 | Dave, M. | Conservative Party | 630 | 14.0% | 42.1% | — | |
| 6 | Ford, M. | Conservative Party | 618 | 13.8% | 41.3% | — |
Wigston All Saints · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,394
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charlesworth, M. | Liberal Democrats | 916 | 21.9% | 65.7% | +40.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bentley, L. | Liberal Democrats | 905 | 21.6% | 64.9% | +39.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hunt, G. | Liberal Democrats | 863 | 20.6% | 61.9% | +36.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McGee, M. | Conservative Party | 515 | 12.3% | 36.9% | — | |
| 5 | Wills, C. | Conservative Party | 503 | 12.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 6 | Tibbetts, J. | Conservative Party | 481 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — |
Wigston Fields · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,297
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boulter, B. | Liberal Democrats | 910 | 23.4% | 70.2% | +45.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Loydall, K. | Liberal Democrats | 888 | 22.8% | 68.5% | +43.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Martin, C. | Liberal Democrats | 830 | 21.3% | 64.0% | +39.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Agar, N. | Conservative Party | 478 | 12.3% | 36.9% | — | |
| 5 | Junak, M. | Conservative Party | 396 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 6 | Nandha, S. | Conservative Party | 388 | 10.0% | 29.9% | — |
Wigston Meadowcourt · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,606
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darling, L. | Conservative Party | 1,117 | 23.2% | 69.6% | +44.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gore, C. | Conservative Party | 1,091 | 22.6% | 67.9% | +42.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ford, J. | Conservative Party | 1,080 | 22.4% | 67.2% | +42.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Phipps, M. | Liberal Democrats | 531 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 5 | Loydall, D. | Liberal Democrats | 520 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 6 | White, M. | Liberal Democrats | 479 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — |