← Oldham (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Oldham 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 60 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 69,794 | 45.9% | 32 | 53.3% | 29 | 48.3% | +3 |
| Conservative Party | 26,453 | 17.4% | 11 | 18.3% | 11 | 18.3% | 0 |
| Liberal Democrats | 26,388 | 17.4% | 10 | 16.7% | 10 | 16.7% | 0 |
| Independent | 23,442 | 15.4% | 4 | 6.7% | 9 | 15.0% | -5 |
| FAIL IND | 3,096 | 2.0% | 3 | 5.0% | 1 | 1.7% | +2 |
| NH | 1,762 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 739 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| NHP | 205 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| FFS-FA | 71 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 151,950 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Saddleworth North · 3 seats · won at 38.1% · above quota
- St James' · 3 seats · won at 39.7% · above quota
- Saddleworth South · 3 seats · won at 40.0% · above quota
- Royton South · 3 seats · won at 43.3% · above quota
- Hollinwood · 3 seats · won at 43.3% · above quota
- Royton North · 3 seats · won at 43.8% · above quota
- Failsworth West · 3 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Coldhurst · 3 seats · won at 47.3% · above quota
- Shaw · 3 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Chadderton North · 3 seats · won at 48.2% · above quota
- Crompton · 3 seats · won at 53.4% · above quota
- St Mary's · 3 seats · won at 53.5% · above quota
- Waterhead · 3 seats · won at 54.3% · above quota
- Saddleworth West and Lees · 3 seats · won at 56.3% · above quota
- Failsworth East · 3 seats · won at 56.9% · above quota
- Chadderton Central · 3 seats · won at 60.5% · above quota
- Werneth · 3 seats · won at 63.6% · above quota
- Chadderton South · 3 seats · won at 65.0% · above quota
- Alexandra · 3 seats · won at 73.9% · above quota
- Medlock Vale · 3 seats · won at 74.0% · above quota
Race results
Saddleworth North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,756
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Byrne, P. | Conservative Party | 1,134 | 13.7% | 41.1% | +16.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lancaster, L. | Conservative Party | 1,064 | 12.9% | 38.6% | +13.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harkness, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,050 | 12.7% | 38.1% | +13.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Thompson, L. | Liberal Democrats | 912 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 5 | Shipp, P. | Labour Party | 858 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 6 | Pyefinch, S. | Conservative Party | 767 | 9.3% | 27.8% | — | |
| 7 | Powell, M. | Liberal Democrats | 767 | 9.3% | 27.8% | — | |
| 8 | Ford, G. | Labour Party | 733 | 8.9% | 26.6% | — | |
| 9 | Kershaw, G. | Independent | 451 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — | |
| 10 | Hodgson, S. | Independent | 282 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 11 | Stevenson, P. | Independent | 251 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — |
St James' · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,870
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharp, B. | Conservative Party | 871 | 15.5% | 46.6% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cosgrove, A. | Labour Party | 848 | 15.1% | 45.4% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Charters, J. | Labour Party | 743 | 13.2% | 39.7% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Munroe, L. | Labour Party | 731 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 5 | Craig-Weston, J. | Conservative Party | 709 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 6 | Sharp, J. | Conservative Party | 705 | 12.6% | 37.7% | — | |
| 7 | Lindo Crooks, A. | Independent | 522 | 9.3% | 27.9% | — | |
| 8 | Dawson, K. | Liberal Democrats | 238 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — | |
| 9 | Gloster, J. | Liberal Democrats | 124 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 10 | Hindle, R. | Liberal Democrats | 118 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — |
Saddleworth South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,937
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheldon, G. | Conservative Party | 1,449 | 16.4% | 49.3% | +24.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bishop, H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,225 | 13.9% | 41.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Woodvine, M. | Conservative Party | 1,176 | 13.3% | 40.0% | +15.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Blackmore, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,019 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 5 | McManus, C. | Conservative Party | 997 | 11.3% | 34.0% | — | |
| 6 | Wall, D. | Labour Party | 858 | 9.7% | 29.2% | — | |
| 7 | Javed, T. | Labour Party | 750 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 8 | Beeston, J. | Liberal Democrats | 673 | 7.6% | 22.9% | — | |
| 9 | Tarbuck, G. | Independent | 663 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — |
Royton South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,179
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hurley, M. | Independent | 1,039 | 15.9% | 47.7% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bashforth, M. | Labour Party | 978 | 15.0% | 44.9% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bashforth, S. | Labour Party | 944 | 14.4% | 43.3% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Chadderton, A. | Labour Party | 923 | 14.1% | 42.4% | — | |
| 5 | Hughes, J. | Independent | 837 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — | |
| 6 | Ratcliffe, D. | Independent | 757 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 7 | Prince, A. | Independent | 427 | 6.5% | 19.6% | — | |
| 8 | Gosling, R. | Liberal Democrats | 215 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 9 | Penketh, T. | Liberal Democrats | 199 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 10 | Garner, J. | Liberal Democrats | 148 | 2.3% | 6.8% | — | |
| 11 | Omeltschenko, A. | FFS-FA | 71 | 1.1% | 3.3% | — |
Hollinwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,224
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ghafoor, K. | Conservative Party | 1,085 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wahid, A. | Conservative Party | 972 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Irfan, M. | Conservative Party | 964 | 14.4% | 43.3% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Roberts, H. | Labour Party | 944 | 14.1% | 42.4% | — | |
| 5 | Phythian, K. | Labour Party | 924 | 13.8% | 41.5% | — | |
| 6 | Williams, S. | Labour Party | 876 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 7 | Whitehead, B. | Independent | 279 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 8 | Whitehead, I. | Independent | 221 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 9 | Lawrence, J. | NHP | 205 | 3.1% | 9.2% | — | |
| 10 | Barton, K. | Liberal Democrats | 202 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — |
Royton North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,700
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arnott, D. | Conservative Party | 1,289 | 15.9% | 47.7% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Adams, C. | Conservative Party | 1,255 | 15.5% | 46.5% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Quigg, L. | Conservative Party | 1,182 | 14.6% | 43.8% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harwood, M. | Labour Party | 1,142 | 14.1% | 42.3% | — | |
| 5 | Phythian, C. | Labour Party | 1,046 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — | |
| 6 | Shuttleworth, S. | Labour Party | 981 | 12.1% | 36.3% | — | |
| 7 | Burrows, C. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 273 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 8 | Mills, J. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 235 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — | |
| 9 | Goldring, P. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 231 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — | |
| 10 | Lord, B. | Liberal Democrats | 168 | 2.1% | 6.2% | — | |
| 11 | Flores, E. | Liberal Democrats | 158 | 2.0% | 5.9% | — | |
| 12 | Swift, K. | Liberal Democrats | 141 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — |
Failsworth West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,897
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ball, S. | Independent | 1,010 | 17.8% | 53.3% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davis, P. | Labour Party | 929 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fryer, P. | Labour Party | 854 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brady, A. | Independent | 769 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 5 | Wilkinson, M. | Independent | 751 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 6 | Linton, D. | Labour Party | 671 | 11.8% | 35.4% | — | |
| 7 | Cashinella-Vaughan, J. | FAIL IND | 409 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 8 | Hurley, A. | Conservative Party | 191 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 9 | Powell, E. | Liberal Democrats | 106 | 1.9% | 5.6% | — |
Coldhurst · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,453
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jabbar, A. | Labour Party | 2,775 | 20.8% | 62.3% | +37.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Malik, A. | Labour Party | 2,255 | 16.9% | 50.6% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Surjan, R. | Labour Party | 2,107 | 15.8% | 47.3% | +22.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Azad, M. | Independent | 1,935 | 14.5% | 43.5% | — | |
| 5 | Abu Taleb, M. | Independent | 1,275 | 9.5% | 28.6% | — | |
| 6 | Akmol, N. | Independent | 915 | 6.8% | 20.5% | — | |
| 7 | Amin, B. | Liberal Democrats | 309 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 8 | Pendlebury, R. | Liberal Democrats | 262 | 2.0% | 5.9% | — | |
| 9 | Uddin, A. | Independent | 259 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — | |
| 10 | Malik, A. | Independent | 214 | 1.6% | 4.8% | — | |
| 11 | Ali, M. | Independent | 181 | 1.4% | 4.1% | — | |
| 12 | Ahmed, S. | Conservative Party | 167 | 1.3% | 3.8% | — | |
| 13 | Ali, A. | Independent | 166 | 1.2% | 3.7% | — | |
| 14 | Uddin, H. | Liberal Democrats | 141 | 1.1% | 3.2% | — | |
| 15 | Alam, S. | Conservative Party | 134 | 1.0% | 3.0% | — | |
| 16 | Hannan, M. | Conservative Party | 132 | 1.0% | 3.0% | — | |
| 17 | Mustak, M. | Independent | 131 | 1.0% | 2.9% | — |
Shaw · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,913
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hince, M. | Independent | 998 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sykes, H. | Liberal Democrats | 938 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gloster, H. | Liberal Democrats | 911 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gloster, C. | Liberal Democrats | 895 | 15.6% | 46.8% | — | |
| 5 | Navesey, L. | Independent | 872 | 15.2% | 45.6% | — | |
| 6 | Birchall, M. | Labour Party | 381 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 7 | Ali, S. | Labour Party | 297 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 8 | Rashid, D. | Labour Party | 256 | 4.5% | 13.4% | — | |
| 9 | Kayum, M. | Conservative Party | 67 | 1.2% | 3.5% | — | |
| 10 | Rahman, M. | Conservative Party | 63 | 1.1% | 3.3% | — | |
| 11 | Rahman, S. | Conservative Party | 62 | 1.1% | 3.2% | — |
Chadderton North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,527
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brownridge, B. | Labour Party | 1,299 | 17.1% | 51.4% | +26.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McLaren, C. | Labour Party | 1,242 | 16.4% | 49.2% | +24.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Moores, E. | Labour Party | 1,218 | 16.1% | 48.2% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bardsley, K. | Conservative Party | 1,076 | 14.2% | 42.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ford, J. | Conservative Party | 1,067 | 14.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 6 | Ahmed, M. | Conservative Party | 992 | 13.1% | 39.3% | — | |
| 7 | Cadman, D. | Liberal Democrats | 318 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 8 | Gloster, K. | Liberal Democrats | 203 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — | |
| 9 | Scholes, M. | Liberal Democrats | 165 | 2.2% | 6.5% | — |
Crompton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,036
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murphy, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,136 | 18.6% | 55.8% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hamblett, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,109 | 18.2% | 54.5% | +29.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williamson, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,087 | 17.8% | 53.4% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Navesey, L. | Independent | 736 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 5 | Barker, D. | Labour Party | 490 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 6 | Rustidge, K. | Labour Party | 466 | 7.6% | 22.9% | — | |
| 7 | Choudhary, L. | Labour Party | 358 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — | |
| 8 | Stockton, M. | Conservative Party | 329 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 9 | Ahmed, M. | Conservative Party | 200 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 10 | Chowdhury, M. | Conservative Party | 196 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — |
St Mary's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,600
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shah, A. | Labour Party | 2,743 | 25.4% | 76.2% | +51.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Aftab, H. | Independent | 2,361 | 21.9% | 65.6% | +40.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Salamat, A. | Labour Party | 1,926 | 17.8% | 53.5% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kouser, A. | Independent | 1,658 | 15.4% | 46.1% | — | |
| 5 | Rana, G. | Labour Party | 1,336 | 12.4% | 37.1% | — | |
| 6 | Rowlinson, Z. | Liberal Democrats | 236 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 7 | Hussain, M. | Liberal Democrats | 209 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — | |
| 8 | Ahmed, M. | Conservative Party | 141 | 1.3% | 3.9% | — | |
| 9 | Begum, A. | Conservative Party | 107 | 1.0% | 3.0% | — | |
| 10 | Khatun, H. | Conservative Party | 84 | 0.8% | 2.3% | — |
Waterhead · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,309
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iqbal, N. | Labour Party | 1,448 | 20.9% | 62.7% | +37.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dean, P. | Labour Party | 1,304 | 18.8% | 56.5% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Birch, R. | Labour Party | 1,253 | 18.1% | 54.3% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hussain, S. | Conservative Party | 849 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 5 | Dawson, L. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 6 | Allsopp, S. | Independent | 346 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 7 | Taylor, P. | NH | 329 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — | |
| 8 | Fiander-Taylor, A. | NH | 282 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Wild, R. | Liberal Democrats | 268 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 10 | Vance, R. | NH | 246 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 11 | Miah, I. | Independent | 208 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Saddleworth West and Lees · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,636
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al-Hamdani, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,600 | 20.2% | 60.7% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Marland, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,564 | 19.8% | 59.3% | +34.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kenyon, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,483 | 18.8% | 56.3% | +31.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Shilton, P. | Independent | 660 | 8.3% | 25.0% | — | |
| 5 | Barter, D. | Labour Party | 446 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — | |
| 6 | Battye, J. | Labour Party | 445 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — | |
| 7 | Marshall, C. | Independent | 430 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 8 | Johnson, S. | Independent | 420 | 5.3% | 15.9% | — | |
| 9 | Leach, V. | Labour Party | 382 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 10 | Hopkinson, T. | Conservative Party | 192 | 2.4% | 7.3% | — | |
| 11 | Walker, G. | Conservative Party | 175 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 12 | Rahman, M. | Conservative Party | 110 | 1.4% | 4.2% | — |
Failsworth East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,523
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hobin, B. | FAIL IND | 944 | 20.7% | 62.0% | +37.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hindle, N. | FAIL IND | 877 | 19.2% | 57.6% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rea, L. | FAIL IND | 866 | 19.0% | 56.9% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fryer, A. | Labour Party | 848 | 18.6% | 55.7% | — | |
| 5 | Haque, F. | Labour Party | 560 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 6 | Holt, B. | Conservative Party | 246 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 7 | Beeley, B. | Liberal Democrats | 227 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — |
Chadderton Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,625
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ali, M. | Labour Party | 1,843 | 23.4% | 70.2% | +45.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Islam, M. | Labour Party | 1,786 | 22.7% | 68.0% | +43.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taylor, E. | Labour Party | 1,587 | 20.2% | 60.5% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Razon, M. | Conservative Party | 781 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 5 | Qurashi, M. | Conservative Party | 430 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — | |
| 6 | Miah, T. | Conservative Party | 370 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — | |
| 7 | Jackson, C. | NH | 248 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 8 | Gartside, J. | NH | 243 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — | |
| 9 | Basit, A. | NH | 184 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 10 | Cator, C. | Liberal Democrats | 168 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 11 | Mayall, S. | Liberal Democrats | 152 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — | |
| 12 | Rahim, F. | Liberal Democrats | 82 | 1.0% | 3.1% | — |
Werneth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,297
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akhtar, S. | Labour Party | 2,923 | 22.7% | 68.0% | +43.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hussain, F. | Labour Party | 2,788 | 21.6% | 64.9% | +39.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ibrahim, N. | Labour Party | 2,731 | 21.2% | 63.6% | +38.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ali, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,700 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 5 | Abdul, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,496 | 11.6% | 34.8% | — | |
| 6 | Chowdhury, F. | Conservative Party | 476 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 7 | Pendlebury, K. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 3.1% | 9.2% | — | |
| 8 | Miah, M. | Conservative Party | 204 | 1.6% | 4.7% | — | |
| 9 | Khan, S. | Conservative Party | 179 | 1.4% | 4.2% | — |
Chadderton South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,833
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shuttleworth, G. | Labour Party | 1,228 | 22.3% | 67.0% | +42.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Goodwin, C. | Labour Party | 1,219 | 22.2% | 66.5% | +41.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harrison, H. | Labour Party | 1,192 | 21.7% | 65.0% | +40.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bates, W. | Independent | 529 | 9.6% | 28.9% | — | |
| 5 | Alom, M. | Conservative Party | 367 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hussain, J. | Conservative Party | 301 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — | |
| 7 | Miah, M. | Conservative Party | 259 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — | |
| 8 | Lord, A. | Liberal Democrats | 246 | 4.5% | 13.4% | — | |
| 9 | Habib, M. | Liberal Democrats | 157 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — |
Alexandra · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 73.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +48.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,796
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chauhan, Z. | Labour Party | 1,462 | 27.1% | 81.4% | +56.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mushtaq, S. | Labour Party | 1,358 | 25.2% | 75.6% | +50.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harrison, J. | Labour Party | 1,327 | 24.6% | 73.9% | +48.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dinoff, M. | Liberal Democrats | 250 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 5 | Yasir, M. | Independent | 246 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 6 | Brophy, S. | NH | 230 | 4.3% | 12.8% | — | |
| 7 | Thompson, R. | Liberal Democrats | 225 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 8 | Ahmed, J. | Conservative Party | 157 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — | |
| 9 | Chowdhury, M. | Conservative Party | 134 | 2.5% | 7.5% | — |
Medlock Vale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,540
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hussain, S. | Labour Party | 1,997 | 26.2% | 78.6% | +53.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hussain, J. | Labour Party | 1,906 | 25.0% | 75.0% | +50.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nasheen, U. | Labour Party | 1,879 | 24.7% | 74.0% | +49.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Birchall, M. | Independent | 532 | 7.0% | 20.9% | — | |
| 5 | Farnworth, L. | Liberal Democrats | 301 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 6 | Farnworth, S. | Liberal Democrats | 297 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 7 | Akhtar, T. | Conservative Party | 213 | 2.8% | 8.4% | — | |
| 8 | Rahman, M. | Conservative Party | 212 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — | |
| 9 | Hussain, A. | Conservative Party | 171 | 2.2% | 6.7% | — | |
| 10 | Raza, W. | Independent | 111 | 1.5% | 4.4% | — |