← Reading (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Reading 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 48 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 55,803 | 48.9% | 32 | 66.7% | 24 | 50.0% | +8 |
| Conservative Party | 29,153 | 25.5% | 6 | 12.5% | 12 | 25.0% | -6 |
| Green Party | 18,663 | 16.3% | 7 | 14.6% | 8 | 16.7% | -1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 10,178 | 8.9% | 3 | 6.3% | 4 | 8.3% | -1 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 199 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 180 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 114,176 | 100.0% | 48 | 100.0% | 48 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Caversham Heights · 3 seats · won at 37.5% · above quota
- Kentwood · 3 seats · won at 42.9% · above quota
- Emmer Green · 3 seats · won at 44.0% · above quota
- Redlands · 3 seats · won at 44.4% · above quota
- Katesgrove · 3 seats · won at 45.1% · above quota
- Tilehurst · 3 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- Church · 3 seats · won at 51.7% · above quota
- Park · 3 seats · won at 52.5% · above quota
- Caversham · 3 seats · won at 53.4% · above quota
- Thames · 3 seats · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Southcote · 3 seats · won at 58.4% · above quota
- Abbey · 3 seats · won at 60.3% · above quota
- Coley · 3 seats · won at 60.3% · above quota
- Whitley · 3 seats · won at 60.6% · above quota
- Norcot · 3 seats · won at 61.1% · above quota
- Battle · 3 seats · won at 64.5% · above quota
Race results
Caversham Heights · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,570
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ballsdon I. | Conservative Party | 1,629 | 15.2% | 45.6% | +20.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kitchingham S. | Labour Party | 1,343 | 12.5% | 37.6% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carnell P. | Conservative Party | 1,340 | 12.5% | 37.5% | +12.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Luckett D. | Conservative Party | 1,283 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 5 | Buckley M. | Labour Party | 1,141 | 10.7% | 32.0% | — | |
| 6 | Duhan V. | Labour Party | 974 | 9.1% | 27.3% | — | |
| 7 | Ramsay J. | Liberal Democrats | 937 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 8 | McNamara D. | Green Party | 901 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 9 | Burden C. | Liberal Democrats | 741 | 6.9% | 20.8% | — | |
| 10 | Weir T. | Liberal Democrats | 421 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
Kentwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,611
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dennis G. | Labour Party | 1,322 | 16.9% | 50.6% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Keeping M. | Labour Party | 1,236 | 15.8% | 47.3% | +22.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Singh R. | Conservative Party | 1,120 | 14.3% | 42.9% | +17.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rynn J. | Conservative Party | 1,105 | 14.1% | 42.3% | — | |
| 5 | Stevens D. | Labour Party | 1,091 | 13.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 6 | Fudge N. | Conservative Party | 1,017 | 13.0% | 39.0% | — | |
| 7 | Hearst C. | Green Party | 357 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 8 | Barker J. | Liberal Democrats | 316 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — | |
| 9 | Smith B. | Green Party | 268 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — |
Emmer Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,951
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitchell C. | Conservative Party | 1,380 | 15.6% | 46.8% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Robinson S. | Conservative Party | 1,372 | 15.5% | 46.5% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kretchmer H. | Conservative Party | 1,299 | 14.7% | 44.0% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dimmick R. | Labour Party | 1,235 | 14.0% | 41.9% | — | |
| 5 | Jones R. | Labour Party | 1,123 | 12.7% | 38.1% | — | |
| 6 | Abdalla M. | Green Party | 888 | 10.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 7 | Middleton L. | Labour Party | 858 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 8 | De Boiserie P. | Liberal Democrats | 698 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — |
Redlands · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,685
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCann K. | Green Party | 1,308 | 16.2% | 48.7% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McElroy D. | Green Party | 1,246 | 15.5% | 46.4% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cross W. | Labour Party | 1,193 | 14.8% | 44.4% | +19.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Whitham J. | Green Party | 1,156 | 14.4% | 43.1% | — | |
| 5 | Cobb M. | Labour Party | 1,148 | 14.3% | 42.8% | — | |
| 6 | Tarar A. | Labour Party | 1,057 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 7 | Carnell A. | Conservative Party | 282 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 8 | Holden S. | Conservative Party | 243 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 9 | Hawaldar S. | Conservative Party | 242 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — | |
| 10 | Jakeman F. | Liberal Democrats | 180 | 2.2% | 6.7% | — |
Katesgrove · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,223
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keane L. | Green Party | 1,177 | 17.6% | 52.9% | +27.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Challenger L. | Labour Party | 1,025 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cresswell D. | Green Party | 1,002 | 15.0% | 45.1% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kikulina K. | Green Party | 952 | 14.3% | 42.8% | — | |
| 5 | Naz M. | Labour Party | 801 | 12.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 6 | Mathew G. | Labour Party | 789 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 7 | Belderbos E. | Conservative Party | 260 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 8 | Hughes D. | Conservative Party | 243 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — | |
| 9 | Milner M. | Conservative Party | 238 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 10 | McNeill M. | Liberal Democrats | 182 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — |
Tilehurst · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,352
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Connell M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,427 | 20.2% | 60.7% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Moore J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,160 | 16.4% | 49.3% | +24.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thompson A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,129 | 16.0% | 48.0% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Vickers S. | Conservative Party | 634 | 9.0% | 27.0% | — | |
| 5 | Byrne C. | Conservative Party | 633 | 9.0% | 26.9% | — | |
| 6 | Frain R. | Conservative Party | 586 | 8.3% | 24.9% | — | |
| 7 | Perry-Stone B. | Labour Party | 410 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 8 | Powers M. | Labour Party | 406 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — | |
| 9 | Hayat S. | Labour Party | 400 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 10 | Berry-Khan G. | Green Party | 272 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — |
Church · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,236
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McEwan R. | Labour Party | 1,337 | 19.9% | 59.8% | +34.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hornsby-Smith A. | Labour Party | 1,277 | 19.0% | 57.1% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Woodward P. | Labour Party | 1,156 | 17.2% | 51.7% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mugo J. | Conservative Party | 842 | 12.6% | 37.7% | — | |
| 5 | Phelps A. | Conservative Party | 755 | 11.3% | 33.8% | — | |
| 6 | Seville A. | Conservative Party | 663 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 7 | Harling M. | Green Party | 381 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 8 | Boardley P. | Liberal Democrats | 296 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — |
Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,867
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White R. | Green Party | 1,736 | 20.2% | 60.6% | +35.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McGonigle B. | Green Party | 1,607 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams J. | Green Party | 1,504 | 17.5% | 52.5% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Allen S. | Labour Party | 1,083 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 5 | Gilpin A. | Labour Party | 982 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 6 | Williamson O. | Labour Party | 950 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 7 | Haywood N. | Conservative Party | 224 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 8 | O'Brien N. | Conservative Party | 200 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 9 | Patel S. | Conservative Party | 195 | 2.3% | 6.8% | — | |
| 10 | Dodson C. | Liberal Democrats | 120 | 1.4% | 4.2% | — |
Caversham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,039
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lanzoni J. | Labour Party | 1,915 | 21.0% | 63.0% | +38.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Yeo M. | Labour Party | 1,793 | 19.7% | 59.0% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gavin J. | Labour Party | 1,622 | 17.8% | 53.4% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ballsdon A. | Conservative Party | 895 | 9.8% | 29.4% | — | |
| 5 | Newman S. | Green Party | 873 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — | |
| 6 | Binge I. | Conservative Party | 771 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 7 | Saadat S. | Conservative Party | 704 | 7.7% | 23.2% | — | |
| 8 | England J. | Liberal Democrats | 545 | 6.0% | 17.9% | — |
Thames · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,834
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnett-Ward A. | Labour Party | 1,272 | 23.1% | 69.4% | +44.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davies R. | Labour Party | 1,143 | 20.8% | 62.3% | +37.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sultan N. | Labour Party | 1,027 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | West A. | Green Party | 507 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 5 | Cozens D. | Conservative Party | 466 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 6 | Parsons D. | Conservative Party | 438 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 7 | Sow A. | Conservative Party | 354 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 8 | Costa-Krol V. | Liberal Democrats | 294 | 5.3% | 16.0% | — |
Southcote · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,321
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edwards D. | Labour Party | 1,569 | 22.5% | 67.6% | +42.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brock J. | Labour Party | 1,424 | 20.5% | 61.4% | +36.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ennis J. | Labour Party | 1,356 | 19.5% | 58.4% | +33.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kirkby G. | Conservative Party | 651 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 5 | Vickers R. | Conservative Party | 609 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 6 | Blackmore B. | Conservative Party | 578 | 8.3% | 24.9% | — | |
| 7 | Watchman S. | Green Party | 408 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — | |
| 8 | Mancuso-Marcello R. | Liberal Democrats | 283 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Adams N. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 85 | 1.2% | 3.7% | — |
Abbey · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,428
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rowland K. | Labour Party | 936 | 21.8% | 65.5% | +40.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Page T. | Labour Party | 876 | 20.4% | 61.3% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ayub M. | Labour Party | 861 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Darby H. | Green Party | 450 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Brennan J. | Conservative Party | 314 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 6 | Ward C. | Liberal Democrats | 291 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — | |
| 7 | Goss S. | Conservative Party | 288 | 6.7% | 20.2% | — | |
| 8 | Bazley S. | Conservative Party | 269 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — |
Coley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,213
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emberson E. | Labour Party | 1,529 | 23.0% | 69.1% | +44.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Terry L. | Labour Party | 1,368 | 20.6% | 61.8% | +36.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gittings P. | Labour Party | 1,335 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hoskins I. | Green Party | 529 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 5 | McMahon D. | Conservative Party | 509 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor G. | Conservative Party | 508 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 7 | Shepherd M. | Conservative Party | 457 | 6.9% | 20.7% | — | |
| 8 | Sims B. | Liberal Democrats | 403 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — |
Whitley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,794
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eden R. | Labour Party | 1,285 | 23.9% | 71.6% | +46.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Leng M. | Labour Party | 1,153 | 21.4% | 64.3% | +39.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mpofu-Coles A. | Labour Party | 1,087 | 20.2% | 60.6% | +35.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brown N. | Conservative Party | 484 | 9.0% | 27.0% | — | |
| 5 | Afolabi F. | Conservative Party | 450 | 8.4% | 25.1% | — | |
| 6 | Goel V. | Conservative Party | 406 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 7 | Smith K. | Green Party | 300 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 8 | Westby I. | Liberal Democrats | 217 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — |
Norcot · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,104
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lovelock J. | Labour Party | 1,390 | 22.0% | 66.1% | +41.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hoskin G. | Labour Party | 1,319 | 20.9% | 62.7% | +37.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dennis C. | Labour Party | 1,286 | 20.4% | 61.1% | +36.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ellis L. | Conservative Party | 473 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — | |
| 5 | Rowe S. | Conservative Party | 439 | 7.0% | 20.9% | — | |
| 6 | Okeyo Z. | Conservative Party | 422 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 7 | Walkem R. | Green Party | 419 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 8 | Gibert D. | Liberal Democrats | 271 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 9 | Gulliver A. | Independent | 180 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — | |
| 10 | Bottom J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 114 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Battle · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,831
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hacker S. | Labour Party | 1,410 | 25.7% | 77.0% | +52.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Griffith W. | Labour Party | 1,330 | 24.2% | 72.7% | +47.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Khan G. | Labour Party | 1,180 | 21.5% | 64.5% | +39.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harling C. | Green Party | 422 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 5 | Hey M. | Conservative Party | 308 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 6 | Sheppard L. | Conservative Party | 288 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 7 | Murray J. | Conservative Party | 287 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 8 | Grout J. | Liberal Democrats | 267 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — |