← Redcar & Cleveland (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Redcar & Cleveland 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 59 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 23,542 | 31.6% | 23 | 39.0% | 19 | 32.2% | +4 |
| Conservative Party | 19,339 | 25.9% | 12 | 20.3% | 16 | 27.1% | -4 |
| Independent | 16,661 | 22.3% | 12 | 20.3% | 13 | 22.0% | -1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 13,196 | 17.7% | 11 | 18.6% | 11 | 18.6% | 0 |
| Green Party | 1,076 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| EC IND | 491 | 0.7% | 1 | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | +1 |
| Reform UK | 257 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 74,562 | 100.0% | 59 | 100.0% | 59 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Longbeck · 2 seats · won at 34.3% · above quota
- Wheatlands · 2 seats · won at 37.1% · above quota
- Belmont · 2 seats · won at 40.9% · above quota
- Skelton East · 2 seats · won at 40.9% · above quota
- Teesville · 3 seats · won at 33.5% · above quota
- Skelton West · 2 seats · won at 44.4% · above quota
- Dormanstown · 2 seats · won at 44.9% · above quota
- Coatham · 2 seats · won at 45.6% · above quota
- Zetland · 2 seats · won at 45.8% · above quota
- Saltburn · 3 seats · won at 39.0% · above quota
- Guisborough · 3 seats · won at 39.6% · above quota
- Hutton · 3 seats · won at 39.8% · above quota
- Kirkleatham · 3 seats · won at 42.7% · above quota
- Normanby · 3 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- Newcomen · 2 seats · won at 52.8% · above quota
- Lockwood · 1 seat · won at 71.4% · above quota
- St Germain's · 3 seats · won at 46.6% · above quota
- West Dyke · 3 seats · won at 47.1% · above quota
- Loftus · 3 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Eston · 3 seats · won at 54.1% · above quota
- South Bank · 2 seats · won at 65.8% · above quota
- Ormesby · 3 seats · won at 63.9% · above quota
- Brotton · 3 seats · won at 68.2% · above quota
- Grangetown · 2 seats · won at 76.7% · above quota
Race results
Longbeck · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,205
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Myer, L. | Labour Party | 707 | 29.3% | 58.7% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rider, V. | Independent | 413 | 17.1% | 34.3% | +0.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Turner, A. | Conservative Party | 409 | 17.0% | 33.9% | — | |
| 4 | Jeffries, V. | Independent | 342 | 14.2% | 28.4% | — | |
| 5 | Turner, S. | Conservative Party | 293 | 12.2% | 24.3% | — | |
| 6 | Crane, S. | Independent | 246 | 10.2% | 20.4% | — |
Wheatlands · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,076
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hargreaves, N. | Conservative Party | 448 | 20.8% | 41.6% | +8.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Symon, J. | Conservative Party | 399 | 18.5% | 37.1% | +3.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lax-Keeler, Y. | Liberal Democrats | 363 | 16.9% | 33.7% | — | |
| 4 | Moody, S. | Liberal Democrats | 336 | 15.6% | 31.2% | — | |
| 5 | Sillett, D. | Labour Party | 265 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — | |
| 6 | Wimble, D. | Labour Party | 261 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 7 | Peacock, S. | Independent | 80 | 3.7% | 7.4% | — |
Belmont · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,231
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berry, P. | Independent | 515 | 20.9% | 41.8% | +8.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Curr, C. | Conservative Party | 503 | 20.4% | 40.9% | +7.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jupp, M. | Conservative Party | 426 | 17.3% | 34.6% | — | |
| 4 | Watts, A. | Independent | 393 | 16.0% | 31.9% | — | |
| 5 | Robson, A. | Labour Party | 290 | 11.8% | 23.6% | — | |
| 6 | Fairley, P. | Labour Party | 241 | 9.8% | 19.6% | — | |
| 7 | Smith, J. | Liberal Democrats | 94 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — |
Skelton East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 902
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oliver, A. | Conservative Party | 419 | 23.2% | 46.5% | +13.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thompson, J. | Conservative Party | 369 | 20.5% | 40.9% | +7.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pratt, S. | Labour Party | 315 | 17.5% | 34.9% | — | |
| 4 | MacLeod, N. | Labour Party | 289 | 16.0% | 32.1% | — | |
| 5 | Craig, D. | Independent | 229 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — | |
| 6 | Barker, D. | Independent | 153 | 8.5% | 17.0% | — | |
| 7 | Jacobs, T. | Liberal Democrats | 29 | 1.6% | 3.2% | — |
Teesville · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,365
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chaney, P. | Labour Party | 597 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clark, R. | Labour Party | 576 | 14.1% | 42.2% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | O'Donoghue, M. | Labour Party | 457 | 11.2% | 33.5% | +8.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cargill, S. | Conservative Party | 425 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 5 | Blackburn, L. | Conservative Party | 412 | 10.1% | 30.2% | — | |
| 6 | Cargill, C. | Conservative Party | 394 | 9.6% | 28.9% | — | |
| 7 | Higgins, A. | Independent | 319 | 7.8% | 23.4% | — | |
| 8 | Smith, V. | Independent | 281 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 9 | Higgins, J. | Independent | 250 | 6.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 10 | Turner, P. | Independent | 186 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 11 | Fisher, D. | Independent | 160 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 12 | Lax-Keeler, C. | Liberal Democrats | 37 | 0.9% | 2.7% | — |
Skelton West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,081
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Earl, U. | Labour Party | 542 | 25.1% | 50.1% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McCue, J. | Labour Party | 480 | 22.2% | 44.4% | +11.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Holmes, C. | Conservative Party | 470 | 21.7% | 43.5% | — | |
| 4 | Holmes, L. | Conservative Party | 384 | 17.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 5 | Craig, J. | Independent | 180 | 8.3% | 16.7% | — | |
| 6 | Marshall, E. | Independent | 78 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — | |
| 7 | Sykes, K. | Liberal Democrats | 16 | 0.7% | 1.5% | — | |
| 8 | Thompson, J. | Liberal Democrats | 12 | 0.6% | 1.1% | — |
Dormanstown · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 790
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Powlay, D. | Independent | 392 | 24.8% | 49.6% | +16.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cawley, C. | Labour Party | 355 | 22.5% | 44.9% | +11.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Powlay, C. | Independent | 338 | 21.4% | 42.8% | — | |
| 4 | Long, C. | Labour Party | 306 | 19.4% | 38.7% | — | |
| 5 | Storey, P. | Conservative Party | 117 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 6 | Hall, E. | Liberal Democrats | 72 | 4.6% | 9.1% | — |
Coatham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 812
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quartermain, C. | Labour Party | 437 | 26.9% | 53.8% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rynn, L. | Labour Party | 370 | 22.8% | 45.6% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Baldwin, N. | Independent | 264 | 16.3% | 32.5% | — | |
| 4 | Tabner, D. | Conservative Party | 178 | 11.0% | 21.9% | — | |
| 5 | Fardon, N. | Conservative Party | 167 | 10.3% | 20.6% | — | |
| 6 | Haw, E. | Independent | 120 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 7 | Thompson, S. | Liberal Democrats | 88 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — |
Zetland · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,079
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lavan, J. | Labour Party | 525 | 24.3% | 48.7% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Neal, J. | Labour Party | 494 | 22.9% | 45.8% | +12.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barnes, A. | Liberal Democrats | 396 | 18.4% | 36.7% | — | |
| 4 | Westbury, L. | Liberal Democrats | 356 | 16.5% | 33.0% | — | |
| 5 | Gibson, R. | Conservative Party | 201 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — | |
| 6 | Pugsley, W. | Conservative Party | 185 | 8.6% | 17.2% | — |
Saltburn · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,066
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, S. | Independent | 1,385 | 22.3% | 67.0% | +42.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thomson, P. | Independent | 1,041 | 16.8% | 50.4% | +25.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hannaway, C. | Independent | 805 | 13.0% | 39.0% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Sainsbury, K. | Labour Party | 763 | 12.3% | 36.9% | — | |
| 5 | Wilkinson, G. | Labour Party | 675 | 10.9% | 32.7% | — | |
| 6 | McLaughlin, R. | Green Party | 342 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 7 | Rauf, A. | Green Party | 319 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 8 | Graham, I. | Conservative Party | 311 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 9 | Asker, S. | Conservative Party | 304 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 10 | Dooley, K. | Green Party | 253 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — |
Guisborough · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,562
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belshaw, L. | Labour Party | 691 | 14.7% | 44.2% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Suthers, B. | Labour Party | 625 | 13.3% | 40.0% | +15.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clarke, B. | Independent | 619 | 13.2% | 39.6% | +14.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Leon, A. | Labour Party | 571 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hixon, A. | Conservative Party | 558 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 6 | Thrower, A. | Conservative Party | 539 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 7 | Oakley, L. | Independent | 223 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 8 | Page, F. | Independent | 186 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 9 | Bunn, J. | Independent | 166 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — | |
| 10 | Welch, C. | Green Party | 162 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 11 | Thompson, C. | Reform UK | 137 | 2.9% | 8.8% | — | |
| 12 | Bunn, D. | Independent | 122 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 13 | Cree, C. | Liberal Democrats | 87 | 1.9% | 5.6% | — |
Hutton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,040
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joy, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,030 | 16.8% | 50.5% | +25.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hart, J. | Conservative Party | 846 | 13.8% | 41.5% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jeffery, G. | Liberal Democrats | 812 | 13.3% | 39.8% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kidd, G. | Liberal Democrats | 789 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — | |
| 5 | Hadfield, K. | Conservative Party | 757 | 12.4% | 37.1% | — | |
| 6 | Waterfield, S. | Conservative Party | 750 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 7 | Hampton, F. | Labour Party | 351 | 5.7% | 17.2% | — | |
| 8 | Moore, V. | Labour Party | 281 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — | |
| 9 | Dakin, M. | Independent | 209 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 10 | Griffiths, M. | Independent | 174 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — | |
| 11 | Mann, K. | Reform UK | 120 | 2.0% | 5.9% | — |
Kirkleatham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,234
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grogan, P. | Conservative Party | 596 | 16.1% | 48.3% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brown, A. | Labour Party | 559 | 15.1% | 45.3% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fairley, M. | Labour Party | 527 | 14.2% | 42.7% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brady, C. | Labour Party | 514 | 13.9% | 41.7% | — | |
| 5 | Sayer, J. | Conservative Party | 442 | 11.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 6 | Cave, T. | Independent | 296 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 7 | Lockwood, M. | Independent | 242 | 6.5% | 19.6% | — | |
| 8 | Dunn, R. | Independent | 187 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — | |
| 9 | Hannon, J. | Liberal Democrats | 138 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 10 | Hannon, M. | Liberal Democrats | 108 | 2.9% | 8.8% | — | |
| 11 | Wilson, W. | Liberal Democrats | 93 | 2.5% | 7.5% | — |
Normanby · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,641
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salvin, P. | Conservative Party | 789 | 16.0% | 48.1% | +23.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McInnes, P. | Conservative Party | 758 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pugh, C. | Conservative Party | 712 | 14.5% | 43.4% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ayre, B. | Labour Party | 694 | 14.1% | 42.3% | — | |
| 5 | Garland, P. | Labour Party | 642 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 6 | Meech-Simpson, S. | Labour Party | 564 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 7 | Richardson, R. | Independent | 421 | 8.6% | 25.7% | — | |
| 8 | Gallacher, C. | Independent | 250 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — | |
| 9 | Saunders, S. | Liberal Democrats | 93 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — |
Newcomen · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,002
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Craven, J. | Labour Party | 535 | 26.7% | 53.4% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Richardson, C. | Labour Party | 529 | 26.4% | 52.8% | +19.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wells, B. | Independent | 328 | 16.4% | 32.8% | — | |
| 4 | Appleby, M. | Independent | 216 | 10.8% | 21.6% | — | |
| 5 | Himsworth, H. | Conservative Party | 201 | 10.0% | 20.1% | — | |
| 6 | Kirke, M. | Conservative Party | 194 | 9.7% | 19.4% | — |
Lockwood · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 71.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 688
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kay, S. | EC IND | 491 | 71.4% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Solomon, I. | Labour Party | 164 | 23.8% | — | |
| 3 | Hutchinson, G. | Conservative Party | 33 | 4.8% | — |
St Germain's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,756
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Learoyd, T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,275 | 24.2% | 72.6% | +47.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | King, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,260 | 23.9% | 71.7% | +46.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Evans, K. | Liberal Democrats | 819 | 15.5% | 46.6% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Finlinson, P. | Independent | 561 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — | |
| 5 | Mahan, P. | Labour Party | 412 | 7.8% | 23.5% | — | |
| 6 | Riley, N. | Conservative Party | 353 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 7 | Estensen, J. | Conservative Party | 308 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 8 | Iceton, G. | Conservative Party | 281 | 5.3% | 16.0% | — |
West Dyke · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,468
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, C. | Liberal Democrats | 705 | 16.0% | 48.0% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ovens, M. | Liberal Democrats | 695 | 15.8% | 47.3% | +22.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Head, M. | Liberal Democrats | 691 | 15.7% | 47.1% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Atkinson, A. | Labour Party | 444 | 10.1% | 30.2% | — | |
| 5 | Dixon, M. | Labour Party | 439 | 10.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 6 | Dooley, N. | Labour Party | 407 | 9.2% | 27.7% | — | |
| 7 | Phillips, J. | Conservative Party | 349 | 7.9% | 23.8% | — | |
| 8 | Charlton, K. | Conservative Party | 342 | 7.8% | 23.3% | — | |
| 9 | Maddison, M. | Conservative Party | 333 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — |
Loftus · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,001
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davies, W. | Independent | 570 | 19.0% | 56.9% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | White, L. | Labour Party | 540 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gray, T. | Independent | 491 | 16.4% | 49.1% | +24.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Greening, A. | Conservative Party | 453 | 15.1% | 45.3% | — | |
| 5 | Lanigan, M. | Independent | 405 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 6 | Gray, I. | Conservative Party | 313 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 7 | Peroznejad, R. | Labour Party | 231 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — |
Eston · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,036
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin, S. | Conservative Party | 636 | 20.5% | 61.4% | +36.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, D. | Conservative Party | 632 | 20.3% | 61.0% | +36.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Massey, C. | Labour Party | 561 | 18.0% | 54.1% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rees, D. | Labour Party | 555 | 17.9% | 53.6% | — | |
| 5 | Williams, G. | Labour Party | 554 | 17.8% | 53.5% | — | |
| 6 | Lax-Keeler, S. | Liberal Democrats | 171 | 5.5% | 16.5% | — |
South Bank · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 759
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bendelow, N. | Labour Party | 563 | 37.1% | 74.2% | +40.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Attwood, I. | Labour Party | 499 | 32.9% | 65.8% | +32.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, S. | Independent | 192 | 12.7% | 25.3% | — | |
| 4 | Harper, L. | Independent | 155 | 10.2% | 20.4% | — | |
| 5 | Pentland, L. | Conservative Party | 108 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — |
Ormesby · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,332
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan, C. | Liberal Democrats | 914 | 22.9% | 68.6% | +43.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hart, I. | Liberal Democrats | 865 | 21.6% | 64.9% | +39.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nightingale, G. | Liberal Democrats | 852 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Reed, L. | Labour Party | 270 | 6.8% | 20.3% | — | |
| 5 | Norrie, C. | Labour Party | 259 | 6.5% | 19.4% | — | |
| 6 | Wood, M. | Labour Party | 250 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — | |
| 7 | Elders, J. | Conservative Party | 216 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 8 | Smith, K. | Conservative Party | 194 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 9 | Siner, G. | Conservative Party | 177 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — |
Brotton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,137
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cutler, G. | Independent | 882 | 25.8% | 77.5% | +52.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hunt, B. | Independent | 820 | 24.0% | 72.1% | +47.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fletcher, M. | Independent | 776 | 22.7% | 68.2% | +43.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Urwin, I. | Labour Party | 306 | 9.0% | 26.9% | — | |
| 5 | Henderson, L. | Conservative Party | 244 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — | |
| 6 | Suthers, A. | Labour Party | 224 | 6.6% | 19.7% | — | |
| 7 | Hinson, S. | Conservative Party | 160 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — |
Grangetown · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 76.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 544
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brook, A. | Labour Party | 419 | 38.5% | 77.1% | +43.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pallister, L. | Labour Party | 417 | 38.4% | 76.7% | +43.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Booth, A. | Conservative Party | 135 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — | |
| 4 | King, L. | Conservative Party | 116 | 10.7% | 21.3% | — |