← Rochdale (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Rochdale 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 60 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 73,971 | 49.9% | 41 | 68.3% | 31 | 51.7% | +10 |
| Conservative Party | 30,060 | 20.3% | 10 | 16.7% | 12 | 20.0% | -2 |
| Liberal Democrats | 25,569 | 17.3% | 3 | 5.0% | 10 | 16.7% | -7 |
| MIP | 14,313 | 9.7% | 6 | 10.0% | 6 | 10.0% | 0 |
| Green Party | 3,233 | 2.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.7% | -1 |
| ND | 431 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 424 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| FREE | 142 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 148,143 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- North Middleton · 3 seats · won at 45.7% · above quota
- South Middleton · 3 seats · won at 46.0% · above quota
- Littleborough Lakeside · 3 seats · won at 46.8% · above quota
- East Middleton · 3 seats · won at 49.0% · above quota
- Bamford · 3 seats · won at 50.0% · above quota
- Castleton · 3 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- West Middleton · 3 seats · won at 50.4% · above quota
- Hopwood Hall · 3 seats · won at 50.8% · above quota
- Norden · 3 seats · won at 52.3% · above quota
- Milkstone and Deeplish · 3 seats · won at 53.3% · above quota
- Spotland and Falinge · 3 seats · won at 54.4% · above quota
- Central Rochdale · 3 seats · won at 56.1% · above quota
- Smallbridge and Firgrove · 3 seats · won at 56.8% · above quota
- West Heywood · 3 seats · won at 57.6% · above quota
- Wardle, Shore and West Littleborough · 3 seats · won at 59.9% · above quota
- Balderstone and Kirkholt · 3 seats · won at 60.5% · above quota
- Milnrow and Deeplish · 3 seats · won at 63.6% · above quota
- Healey · 3 seats · won at 65.6% · above quota
- Kingsway · 3 seats · won at 69.7% · above quota
- North Heywood · 3 seats · won at 75.3% · above quota
Race results
North Middleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,318
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allonby P. | MIP | 1,140 | 16.4% | 49.2% | +24.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rowbotham S. | Labour Party | 1,118 | 16.1% | 48.2% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wolf L. | MIP | 1,059 | 15.2% | 45.7% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | O'Mara K. | MIP | 1,059 | 15.2% | 45.7% | — | |
| 5 | Williams D. | Labour Party | 1,029 | 14.8% | 44.4% | — | |
| 6 | Butterworth N. | Labour Party | 886 | 12.7% | 38.2% | — | |
| 7 | Bold D. | Conservative Party | 381 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — | |
| 8 | Godson A. | Green Party | 282 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — |
South Middleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,049
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams P. | Labour Party | 1,540 | 16.8% | 50.5% | +25.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | West J. | Labour Party | 1,473 | 16.1% | 48.3% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dale P. | Labour Party | 1,404 | 15.3% | 46.0% | +21.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cornett A. | MIP | 1,350 | 14.8% | 44.3% | — | |
| 5 | Hezelgrave-Whitworth E. | MIP | 1,046 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 6 | Hezelgrave-Whitworth J. | MIP | 959 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 7 | Braiden B. | Conservative Party | 809 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 8 | Slack A. | Conservative Party | 567 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — |
Littleborough Lakeside · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,531
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emsley J. | Labour Party | 1,349 | 17.8% | 53.3% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Besford T. | Labour Party | 1,287 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Reed P. | Conservative Party | 1,185 | 15.6% | 46.8% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Butterworth L. | Conservative Party | 1,083 | 14.3% | 42.8% | — | |
| 5 | Nuttall D. | Conservative Party | 931 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 6 | Farnell J. | Labour Party | 889 | 11.7% | 35.1% | — | |
| 7 | Otten G. | Green Party | 434 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 8 | Clegg K. | Liberal Democrats | 434 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — |
East Middleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,540
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beswick P. | MIP | 1,300 | 17.1% | 51.2% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams D. | MIP | 1,257 | 16.5% | 49.5% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wynne B. | MIP | 1,245 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bromfield K. | Labour Party | 1,193 | 15.7% | 47.0% | — | |
| 5 | Atewologun E. | Labour Party | 1,189 | 15.6% | 46.8% | — | |
| 6 | Smith T. | Labour Party | 1,166 | 15.3% | 45.9% | — | |
| 7 | Hibbert C. | Green Party | 269 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — |
Bamford · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,098
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith A. | Conservative Party | 1,683 | 18.1% | 54.3% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sullivan P. | Conservative Party | 1,553 | 16.7% | 50.1% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Anstee S. | Conservative Party | 1,549 | 16.7% | 50.0% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Choudhury R. | Labour Party | 1,066 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 5 | Ali S. | Labour Party | 1,066 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 6 | Meredith B. | Labour Party | 1,014 | 10.9% | 32.7% | — | |
| 7 | Cunnane S. | Liberal Democrats | 406 | 4.4% | 13.1% | — | |
| 8 | Diestler P. | Liberal Democrats | 380 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 9 | Whittaker E. | Green Party | 307 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 10 | Kauser Z. | Liberal Democrats | 269 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — |
Castleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,180
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheerin B. | Labour Party | 1,424 | 21.8% | 65.3% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gallagher A. | Labour Party | 1,214 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rashid A. | Labour Party | 1,095 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jones D. | Conservative Party | 664 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 5 | Sanderson S. | Conservative Party | 629 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — | |
| 6 | Bayman D. | Conservative Party | 584 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 7 | Heyworth B. | Liberal Democrats | 401 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 8 | Kisa-Smith S. | Liberal Democrats | 294 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 9 | Hashmi S. | Liberal Democrats | 236 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — |
West Middleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,619
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burke P. | Labour Party | 1,029 | 21.2% | 63.5% | +38.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith S. | Labour Party | 937 | 19.3% | 57.9% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Emmott N. | Labour Party | 816 | 16.8% | 50.4% | +25.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Aspinall J. | MIP | 656 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 5 | Shore P. | MIP | 587 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 6 | Footitt S. | MIP | 549 | 11.3% | 33.9% | — | |
| 7 | Short J. | Conservative Party | 206 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — | |
| 8 | Edwards N. | Liberal Democrats | 78 | 1.6% | 4.8% | — |
Hopwood Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,380
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emmott S. | Labour Party | 1,304 | 18.3% | 54.8% | +29.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wardle C. | MIP | 1,226 | 17.2% | 51.5% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hodgkinson P. | Labour Party | 1,209 | 16.9% | 50.8% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Beswick J. | Conservative Party | 755 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 5 | McCarthy A. | Conservative Party | 674 | 9.4% | 28.3% | — | |
| 6 | Roughsedge M. | Conservative Party | 669 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 7 | Glaysher M. | MIP | 447 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — | |
| 8 | O'Mara C. | MIP | 433 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — | |
| 9 | Vitler G. | Independent | 424 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — |
Norden · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,889
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gartside J. | Conservative Party | 1,704 | 19.7% | 59.0% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Winkler P. | Conservative Party | 1,579 | 18.2% | 54.7% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Holly M. | Conservative Party | 1,511 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bennett T. | Labour Party | 913 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | MacDonald I. | Labour Party | 840 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 6 | Kazmi F. | Labour Party | 637 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 7 | Robertson S. | Liberal Democrats | 568 | 6.6% | 19.7% | — | |
| 8 | Colgan A. | Liberal Democrats | 482 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 9 | Duszczyk C. | Liberal Democrats | 433 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — |
Milkstone and Deeplish · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,887
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arshad M. | Labour Party | 1,726 | 19.9% | 59.8% | +34.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mohammed S. | Labour Party | 1,642 | 19.0% | 56.9% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rashid A. | Labour Party | 1,539 | 17.8% | 53.3% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Zaman M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,192 | 13.8% | 41.3% | — | |
| 5 | Javid S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,182 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 6 | Ali H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,107 | 12.8% | 38.3% | — | |
| 7 | Ellison P. | Conservative Party | 141 | 1.6% | 4.9% | — | |
| 8 | Holt J. | Conservative Party | 131 | 1.5% | 4.5% | — |
Spotland and Falinge · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,087
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Faisal I. | Labour Party | 1,832 | 19.8% | 59.3% | +34.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rana F. | Labour Party | 1,815 | 19.6% | 58.8% | +33.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nisa A. | Labour Party | 1,681 | 18.1% | 54.4% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Asghar R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,053 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 5 | Swarbrick J. | Liberal Democrats | 743 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 6 | Majid H. | Liberal Democrats | 678 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 7 | Faulkner C. | ND | 431 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — | |
| 8 | Coats M. | Green Party | 388 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 9 | Kershaw J. | Conservative Party | 372 | 4.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 10 | Rutter N. | Green Party | 269 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — |
Central Rochdale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,908
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahmed I. | Labour Party | 2,598 | 22.2% | 66.5% | +41.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ahmed A. | Labour Party | 2,518 | 21.5% | 64.4% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Zaheer S. | Labour Party | 2,193 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Sheraz M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,499 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — | |
| 5 | Ali Z. | Liberal Democrats | 1,306 | 11.1% | 33.4% | — | |
| 6 | Abbas Z. | Liberal Democrats | 1,280 | 10.9% | 32.8% | — | |
| 7 | Branton L. | Conservative Party | 170 | 1.5% | 4.4% | — | |
| 8 | Scholes S. | Conservative Party | 159 | 1.4% | 4.1% | — |
Smallbridge and Firgrove · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,235
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hussain A. | Labour Party | 1,343 | 20.0% | 60.1% | +35.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Blundell J. | Labour Party | 1,312 | 19.6% | 58.7% | +33.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mir A. | Labour Party | 1,269 | 18.9% | 56.8% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hussain L. | Liberal Democrats | 812 | 12.1% | 36.3% | — | |
| 5 | Kelly E. | Liberal Democrats | 798 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 6 | Larder D. | Liberal Democrats | 695 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 7 | Taylor E. | Conservative Party | 476 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — |
West Heywood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,774
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown A. | Labour Party | 1,241 | 23.3% | 70.0% | +45.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Malcolm P. | Labour Party | 1,102 | 20.7% | 62.1% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robinson L. | Labour Party | 1,021 | 19.2% | 57.6% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harris C. | Conservative Party | 706 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Kilgannon I. | Conservative Party | 630 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 6 | Orson M. | Conservative Party | 621 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — |
Wardle, Shore and West Littleborough · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,476
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dearnley A. | Conservative Party | 1,881 | 25.3% | 76.0% | +51.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Paolucci R. | Conservative Party | 1,493 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taylor J. | Conservative Party | 1,482 | 20.0% | 59.9% | +34.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Miller B. | Labour Party | 652 | 8.8% | 26.3% | — | |
| 5 | Radanovic M. | Labour Party | 564 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 6 | Islam M. | Labour Party | 454 | 6.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 7 | Howliston J. | Green Party | 375 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 8 | Mason V. | Liberal Democrats | 275 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 9 | Macguire H. | Green Party | 252 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — |
Balderstone and Kirkholt · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,756
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massey P. | Labour Party | 1,225 | 23.3% | 69.8% | +44.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Meredith D. | Labour Party | 1,224 | 23.2% | 69.7% | +44.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wraighte E. | Labour Party | 1,062 | 20.2% | 60.5% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Razzaq M. | Conservative Party | 505 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — | |
| 5 | Smith M. | Conservative Party | 473 | 9.0% | 26.9% | — | |
| 6 | Eves J. | Green Party | 324 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 7 | Jones J. | Liberal Democrats | 313 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 8 | Grabowska L. | FREE | 142 | 2.7% | 8.1% | — |
Milnrow and Deeplish · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,608
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davidson I. | Liberal Democrats | 1,942 | 24.8% | 74.5% | +49.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kelly A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,903 | 24.3% | 73.0% | +48.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bamford D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,660 | 21.2% | 63.6% | +38.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brett A. | Labour Party | 741 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 5 | Greenwood L. | Labour Party | 583 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 6 | Royle A. | Labour Party | 509 | 6.5% | 19.5% | — | |
| 7 | Endacott S. | Conservative Party | 487 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — |
Healey · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,338
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Neill S. | Labour Party | 1,582 | 22.6% | 67.7% | +42.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wazir S. | Labour Party | 1,562 | 22.3% | 66.8% | +41.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ayrton T. | Labour Party | 1,533 | 21.9% | 65.6% | +40.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Neilson A. | Conservative Party | 962 | 13.7% | 41.2% | — | |
| 5 | Alcock M. | Liberal Democrats | 563 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 6 | Ingram S. | Liberal Democrats | 446 | 6.4% | 19.1% | — | |
| 7 | Kauser S. | Liberal Democrats | 365 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — |
Kingsway · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,220
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahmed S. | Labour Party | 1,737 | 26.1% | 78.2% | +53.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ali D. | Labour Party | 1,584 | 23.8% | 71.4% | +46.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Massey R. | Labour Party | 1,548 | 23.2% | 69.7% | +44.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Khalil I. | Conservative Party | 655 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 5 | Taylor S. | Liberal Democrats | 355 | 5.3% | 16.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hollinrake M. | Green Party | 333 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 7 | Nicholson B. | Liberal Democrats | 251 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 8 | Peacock C. | Liberal Democrats | 197 | 3.0% | 8.9% | — |
North Heywood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,488
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Rourke L. | Labour Party | 1,205 | 27.0% | 81.0% | +56.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rush P. | Labour Party | 1,166 | 26.1% | 78.3% | +53.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Place B. | Labour Party | 1,121 | 25.1% | 75.3% | +50.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kelly J. | Liberal Democrats | 368 | 8.2% | 24.7% | — | |
| 5 | Donaldson I. | Liberal Democrats | 325 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — | |
| 6 | Eden-Maughan R. | Liberal Democrats | 280 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — |