← Rother (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Rother 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 38 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 16,852 | 37.4% | 10 | 26.3% | 15 | 39.5% | -5 |
| Liberal Democrats | 7,038 | 15.6% | 7 | 18.4% | 6 | 15.8% | +1 |
| Labour Party | 6,400 | 14.2% | 8 | 21.1% | 6 | 15.8% | +2 |
| RAIC | 5,968 | 13.2% | 7 | 18.4% | 5 | 13.2% | +2 |
| Independent | 4,309 | 9.6% | 3 | 7.9% | 4 | 10.5% | -1 |
| Green Party | 3,064 | 6.8% | 3 | 7.9% | 2 | 5.3% | +1 |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 1,047 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent Network | 406 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 45,084 | 100.0% | 38 | 100.0% | 38 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Catsfield and Crowhurst · 1 seat · won at 48.4% · −1.6 pts below quota
- Bexhill St Marks · 2 seats · won at 33.8% · above quota
- Bexhill Pebsham and St. Michaels · 2 seats · won at 40.6% · above quota
- Brede and Udimore · 1 seat · won at 58.3% · above quota
- Bexhill Old Town and Worsham · 2 seats · won at 42.0% · above quota
- Rye and Winchelsea · 2 seats · won at 42.4% · above quota
- Bexhill Kewhurst · 2 seats · won at 44.2% · above quota
- Southern Rother · 2 seats · won at 44.9% · above quota
- Eastern Rother · 2 seats · won at 46.0% · above quota
- Bexhill Sidley · 2 seats · won at 47.3% · above quota
- South Battle and Telham · 1 seat · won at 64.8% · above quota
- Hurst Green and Ticehurst · 2 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Bexhill St Stephens · 2 seats · won at 51.3% · above quota
- Bexhill Sackville · 2 seats · won at 52.6% · above quota
- Bexhill Central · 2 seats · won at 53.4% · above quota
- Burwash and the Weald · 2 seats · won at 54.9% · above quota
- Robertsbridge · 1 seat · won at 73.1% · above quota
- Bexhill Collington · 2 seats · won at 63.2% · above quota
- Sedlescombe and Westfield · 2 seats · won at 64.8% · above quota
- Northern Rother · 2 seats · won at 67.4% · above quota
- North Battle, Netherfield and Whatlington · 2 seats · won at 70.4% · above quota
Race results
Catsfield and Crowhurst · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 48.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −1.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 832
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pearce, C. | Liberal Democrats | 403 | 48.4% | −1.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Curtis, G. | Conservative Party | 275 | 33.1% | — | |
| 3 | MacPherson, T. | Labour Party | 154 | 18.5% | — |
Bexhill St Marks · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 33.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,561
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winter, C. | Independent | 630 | 20.2% | 40.4% | +7.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stanger, J. | RAIC | 527 | 16.9% | 33.8% | +0.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Foster, T. | Conservative Party | 474 | 15.2% | 30.4% | — | |
| 4 | Jacklin, N. | Independent Network | 406 | 13.0% | 26.0% | — | |
| 5 | Lake, N. | Conservative Party | 315 | 10.1% | 20.2% | — | |
| 6 | Dash, W. | Liberal Democrats | 241 | 7.7% | 15.4% | — | |
| 7 | Hillier-Palmer, P. | Labour Party | 239 | 7.7% | 15.3% | — | |
| 8 | Pierce, J. | Labour Party | 191 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Zipser, C. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 99 | 3.2% | 6.3% | — |
Bexhill Pebsham and St. Michaels · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,056
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clark, C. | Independent | 754 | 35.7% | 71.4% | +38.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Delany, G. | Labour Party | 429 | 20.3% | 40.6% | +7.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brewerton, J. | Conservative Party | 391 | 18.5% | 37.0% | — | |
| 4 | Rustem, C. | Independent | 268 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — | |
| 5 | Robertson, G. | Conservative Party | 180 | 8.5% | 17.0% | — | |
| 6 | Dicker, J. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 90 | 4.3% | 8.5% | — |
Brede and Udimore · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 58.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 710
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gordon, N. | Conservative Party | 414 | 58.3% | +8.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Griffiths, M. | Liberal Democrats | 239 | 33.7% | — | |
| 3 | Sandra, M. | Labour Party | 57 | 8.0% | — |
Bexhill Old Town and Worsham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 892
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gray, P. | Green Party | 535 | 30.0% | 60.0% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Legg, M. | Labour Party | 374 | 21.0% | 42.0% | +8.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Madeley, C. | RAIC | 323 | 18.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 4 | Clark, B. | Conservative Party | 282 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | Fisher, H. | Conservative Party | 190 | 10.7% | 21.3% | — | |
| 6 | Phillips, M. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 79 | 4.4% | 8.9% | — |
Rye and Winchelsea · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,431
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Creaser, C. | Labour Party | 608 | 21.3% | 42.5% | +9.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McGurk, S. | Labour Party | 606 | 21.2% | 42.4% | +9.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harris, G. | Liberal Democrats | 506 | 17.7% | 35.4% | — | |
| 4 | Stevens, G. | Conservative Party | 435 | 15.2% | 30.4% | — | |
| 5 | Stevens, J. | Conservative Party | 371 | 13.0% | 25.9% | — | |
| 6 | Hoggart, C. | RAIC | 335 | 11.7% | 23.4% | — |
Bexhill Kewhurst · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,443
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Drayson, B. | RAIC | 671 | 23.3% | 46.5% | +13.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hayward, A. | RAIC | 637 | 22.1% | 44.2% | +10.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Johnson, G. | Conservative Party | 528 | 18.3% | 36.6% | — | |
| 4 | Kenward, M. | Conservative Party | 469 | 16.3% | 32.5% | — | |
| 5 | Goddard, B. | Liberal Democrats | 440 | 15.3% | 30.5% | — | |
| 6 | Phillips, A. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 140 | 4.9% | 9.7% | — |
Southern Rother · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,438
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mier, A. | Liberal Democrats | 770 | 26.8% | 53.6% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Grohne, T. | Conservative Party | 645 | 22.4% | 44.9% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bradley, J. | Conservative Party | 569 | 19.8% | 39.6% | — | |
| 4 | Warren, N. | Labour Party | 489 | 17.0% | 34.0% | — | |
| 5 | Learoyd-Smith, S. | Labour Party | 402 | 14.0% | 28.0% | — |
Eastern Rother · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,256
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hacking, L. | Conservative Party | 605 | 24.1% | 48.2% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Osborne, P. | Conservative Party | 578 | 23.0% | 46.0% | +12.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Manning, D. | Green Party | 563 | 22.4% | 44.8% | — | |
| 4 | Glover, C. | Green Party | 466 | 18.6% | 37.1% | — | |
| 5 | Whymark, L. | Labour Party | 300 | 11.9% | 23.9% | — |
Bexhill Sidley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 889
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coleman, S. | Labour Party | 507 | 28.5% | 57.1% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chowdhury, F. | Labour Party | 420 | 23.6% | 47.3% | +13.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carroll, J. | Conservative Party | 377 | 21.2% | 42.4% | — | |
| 4 | Blagrove, S. | Independent | 209 | 11.8% | 23.5% | — | |
| 5 | McLean, B. | Conservative Party | 203 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 6 | Zipser, J. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 61 | 3.4% | 6.9% | — |
South Battle and Telham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 599
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cook, V. | Liberal Democrats | 388 | 64.8% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brown, B. | Conservative Party | 211 | 35.2% | — |
Hurst Green and Ticehurst · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,295
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Killeen, T. | Liberal Democrats | 740 | 28.6% | 57.2% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barnes, M. | Conservative Party | 635 | 24.5% | 49.1% | +15.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hardy, S. | Liberal Democrats | 611 | 23.6% | 47.2% | — | |
| 4 | Browne, G. | Conservative Party | 603 | 23.3% | 46.6% | — |
Bexhill St Stephens · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,068
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ariel, A. | Green Party | 561 | 26.3% | 52.6% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thomas, R. | Liberal Democrats | 548 | 25.7% | 51.3% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Azad, A. | Conservative Party | 462 | 21.6% | 43.3% | — | |
| 4 | Carroll, R. | Conservative Party | 425 | 19.9% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Ammoun, G. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 139 | 6.5% | 13.0% | — |
Bexhill Sackville · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,196
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Timpe, H. | RAIC | 643 | 26.9% | 53.8% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Byrne, T. | RAIC | 629 | 26.3% | 52.6% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thomas, S. | Conservative Party | 392 | 16.4% | 32.8% | — | |
| 4 | Basham, B. | Labour Party | 313 | 13.1% | 26.2% | — | |
| 5 | Mogg, C. | Conservative Party | 293 | 12.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 6 | Allen-Rodgers, S. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 122 | 5.1% | 10.2% | — |
Bexhill Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,084
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bayliss, C. | Labour Party | 732 | 33.8% | 67.6% | +34.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McCourt, R. | Labour Party | 579 | 26.7% | 53.4% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Amin, N. | Conservative Party | 250 | 11.5% | 23.1% | — | |
| 4 | Webb, P. | Conservative Party | 224 | 10.3% | 20.7% | — | |
| 5 | Crotty, A. | Independent | 208 | 9.6% | 19.2% | — | |
| 6 | Voyce, A. | Independent | 98 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — | |
| 7 | Sullivan, C. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 76 | 3.5% | 7.0% | — |
Burwash and the Weald · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,102
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnes, A. | Conservative Party | 610 | 27.7% | 55.4% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Green, E. | Conservative Party | 605 | 27.5% | 54.9% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Varrall, M. | Liberal Democrats | 541 | 24.5% | 49.1% | — | |
| 4 | Love, H. | Independent | 448 | 20.3% | 40.7% | — |
Robertsbridge · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 73.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 710
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prochak, S. | Liberal Democrats | 519 | 73.1% | +23.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Redstone, P. | Conservative Party | 191 | 26.9% | — |
Bexhill Collington · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,668
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oliver, D. | RAIC | 1,148 | 34.4% | 68.8% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jeeawon, A. | RAIC | 1,055 | 31.6% | 63.2% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hollingsworth, B. | Conservative Party | 560 | 16.8% | 33.6% | — | |
| 4 | Khaira, B. | Conservative Party | 397 | 11.9% | 23.8% | — | |
| 5 | Davies, J. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 176 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — |
Sedlescombe and Westfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,102
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coupar, B. | Independent | 843 | 38.2% | 76.5% | +43.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Maynard, C. | Conservative Party | 714 | 32.4% | 64.8% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ludden, K. | Conservative Party | 647 | 29.4% | 58.7% | — |
Northern Rother · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,306
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ganly, T. | Conservative Party | 881 | 33.7% | 67.5% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Biggs, T. | Conservative Party | 880 | 33.7% | 67.4% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Vine-Hall, P. | Independent | 851 | 32.6% | 65.2% | — |
North Battle, Netherfield and Whatlington · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 70.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,334
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Field, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,092 | 40.9% | 81.9% | +48.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Burton, S. | Green Party | 939 | 35.2% | 70.4% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Beaumont, M. | Conservative Party | 305 | 11.4% | 22.9% | — | |
| 4 | Curtis, K. | Conservative Party | 266 | 10.0% | 19.9% | — | |
| 5 | Mabon, B. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 65 | 2.4% | 4.9% | — |