← Rotherham (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Rotherham 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 25 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 59 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 51,002 | 42.8% | 33 | 55.9% | 26 | 44.1% | +7 |
| Conservative Party | 32,422 | 27.2% | 13 | 22.0% | 16 | 27.1% | -3 |
| Independent | 15,438 | 13.0% | 10 | 16.9% | 8 | 13.6% | +2 |
| Liberal Democrats | 10,550 | 8.9% | 3 | 5.1% | 5 | 8.5% | -2 |
| Green Party | 5,801 | 4.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 5.1% | -3 |
| Reform UK | 2,109 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.7% | -1 |
| Yorkshire Party | 749 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 674 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 345 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 119,090 | 100.0% | 59 | 100.0% | 59 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Wales · 2 seats · won at 39.1% · above quota
- Sitwell · 3 seats · won at 35.1% · above quota
- Boston Castle · 3 seats · won at 35.2% · above quota
- Dalton and Thrybergh · 2 seats · won at 44.3% · above quota
- Rotherham West · 3 seats · won at 36.1% · above quota
- Aughton and Swallownest · 2 seats · won at 44.7% · above quota
- Bramley and Ravenfield · 2 seats · won at 45.6% · above quota
- Anston and Woodsetts · 3 seats · won at 39.3% · above quota
- Hellaby and Maltby West · 2 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- Aston and Todwick · 2 seats · won at 49.7% · above quota
- Rother Vale · 2 seats · won at 50.0% · above quota
- Maltby East · 2 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- Dinnington · 3 seats · won at 43.3% · above quota
- Keppel · 3 seats · won at 46.8% · above quota
- Brinsworth · 2 seats · won at 56.9% · above quota
- Rawmarsh West · 2 seats · won at 56.9% · above quota
- Greasbrough · 2 seats · won at 58.4% · above quota
- Rawmarsh East · 2 seats · won at 59.5% · above quota
- Wath · 2 seats · won at 60.4% · above quota
- Thurcroft and Wickersley South · 2 seats · won at 60.5% · above quota
- Rotherham East · 3 seats · won at 53.5% · above quota
- Wickersley North · 3 seats · won at 53.9% · above quota
- Hoober · 3 seats · won at 57.0% · above quota
- Kilnhurst and Swinton East · 2 seats · won at 71.1% · above quota
- Swinton Rockingham · 2 seats · won at 76.3% · above quota
Race results
Wales · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,233
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beck, D. | Independent | 1,184 | 26.5% | 53.0% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Havard, M. | Independent | 873 | 19.5% | 39.1% | +5.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barton, C. | Conservative Party | 671 | 15.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 4 | Nicholson, J. | Conservative Party | 547 | 12.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 5 | Law, J. | Labour Party | 533 | 11.9% | 23.9% | — | |
| 6 | Walsh, B. | Labour Party | 397 | 8.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 7 | Martin, P. | Green Party | 177 | 4.0% | 7.9% | — | |
| 8 | Boddye, O. | Liberal Democrats | 84 | 1.9% | 3.8% | — |
Sitwell · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,261
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fisher, D. | Conservative Party | 1,357 | 13.9% | 41.6% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thorp, P. | Conservative Party | 1,186 | 12.1% | 36.4% | +11.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bower, M. | Independent | 1,145 | 11.7% | 35.1% | +10.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Freeman-Keel, P. | Conservative Party | 1,023 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 5 | Calton, M. | Labour Party | 1,019 | 10.4% | 31.2% | — | |
| 6 | Spence, D. | Labour Party | 971 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 7 | Tammewar, S. | Labour Party | 765 | 7.8% | 23.5% | — | |
| 8 | Hussain, M. | Green Party | 588 | 6.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 9 | Cowles, A. | Reform UK | 519 | 5.3% | 15.9% | — | |
| 10 | Turner, J. | Reform UK | 461 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — | |
| 11 | Taylor, C. | Liberal Democrats | 443 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 12 | Shawcroft, G. | Reform UK | 307 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — |
Boston Castle · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,198
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yasseen, T. | Independent | 1,389 | 14.5% | 43.4% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hussain, A. | Independent | 1,166 | 12.2% | 36.5% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Alam, S. | Labour Party | 1,126 | 11.7% | 35.2% | +10.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mallinder, J. | Labour Party | 986 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 5 | Saleh, F. | Labour Party | 729 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 6 | Malik, A. | Green Party | 693 | 7.2% | 21.7% | — | |
| 7 | Mabbott, T. | Green Party | 656 | 6.8% | 20.5% | — | |
| 8 | Kumar, T. | Conservative Party | 477 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 9 | Lilleker, S. | Independent | 449 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — | |
| 10 | Jones, C. | Liberal Democrats | 365 | 3.8% | 11.4% | — | |
| 11 | Singh, A. | Conservative Party | 341 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 12 | Satyawadi, P. | Conservative Party | 341 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 13 | Ramzan, M. | Independent | 328 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 14 | Potholes, P. | Independent | 328 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 15 | Bingham, C. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 221 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — |
Dalton and Thrybergh · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,419
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bennett-Sylvester, M. | Independent | 930 | 32.8% | 65.5% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ryalls, J. | Independent | 628 | 22.1% | 44.3% | +10.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lancashire, C. | Labour Party | 527 | 18.6% | 37.1% | — | |
| 4 | Spencer, C. | Labour Party | 491 | 17.3% | 34.6% | — | |
| 5 | Kay, P. | Conservative Party | 116 | 4.1% | 8.2% | — | |
| 6 | Stables, P. | Conservative Party | 77 | 2.7% | 5.4% | — | |
| 7 | Watson, J. | Liberal Democrats | 69 | 2.4% | 4.9% | — |
Rotherham West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,157
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, I. | Independent | 1,495 | 23.1% | 69.3% | +44.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Keenan, E. | Labour Party | 939 | 14.5% | 43.5% | +18.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McKiernan, C. | Labour Party | 779 | 12.0% | 36.1% | +11.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Khan, T. | Labour Party | 693 | 10.7% | 32.1% | — | |
| 5 | Mills, R. | Green Party | 571 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 6 | Ashiq, M. | Independent | 562 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 7 | Ahmad, I. | Independent | 454 | 7.0% | 21.1% | — | |
| 8 | Marsh, B. | Conservative Party | 268 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 9 | Freeman-Keel, P. | Conservative Party | 248 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 10 | Marsh, R. | Conservative Party | 234 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — | |
| 11 | Miro, F. | Liberal Democrats | 227 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — |
Aughton and Swallownest · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,632
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pitchley, L. | Labour Party | 879 | 26.9% | 53.9% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, R. | Labour Party | 730 | 22.4% | 44.7% | +11.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lunness, C. | Conservative Party | 587 | 18.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 4 | Short, N. | Independent | 435 | 13.3% | 26.7% | — | |
| 5 | Elsey, L. | Reform UK | 285 | 8.7% | 17.5% | — | |
| 6 | Robinson, G. | Green Party | 185 | 5.7% | 11.3% | — | |
| 7 | Lindley, P. | Liberal Democrats | 106 | 3.2% | 6.5% | — | |
| 8 | Marshall, P. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 56 | 1.7% | 3.4% | — |
Bramley and Ravenfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,917
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reynolds, G. | Conservative Party | 910 | 23.7% | 47.5% | +14.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Duncan, L. | Labour Party | 875 | 22.8% | 45.6% | +12.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mills, L. | Conservative Party | 844 | 22.0% | 44.0% | — | |
| 4 | Woodland, J. | Labour Party | 703 | 18.3% | 36.7% | — | |
| 5 | Oxley, R. | Green Party | 269 | 7.0% | 14.0% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor, F. | Liberal Democrats | 233 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — |
Anston and Woodsetts · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,095
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baum-Dixon, T. | Conservative Party | 1,325 | 14.3% | 42.8% | +17.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tarmey, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,227 | 13.2% | 39.6% | +14.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Blackham, J. | Conservative Party | 1,217 | 13.1% | 39.3% | +14.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smallwood, K. | Conservative Party | 1,142 | 12.3% | 36.9% | — | |
| 5 | Thornley, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,023 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 6 | Stringer, C. | Labour Party | 745 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 7 | Wilson, D. | Liberal Democrats | 743 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 8 | Alam, N. | Labour Party | 712 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 9 | Stringer, K. | Labour Party | 681 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 10 | Jepson, C. | Independent | 469 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — |
Hellaby and Maltby West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,905
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ball, S. | Conservative Party | 994 | 26.1% | 52.2% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stables, L. | Conservative Party | 911 | 23.9% | 47.8% | +14.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Andrews, J. | Labour Party | 863 | 22.7% | 45.3% | — | |
| 4 | Ozyer-Key, F. | Labour Party | 697 | 18.3% | 36.6% | — | |
| 5 | Franckeiss, D. | Reform UK | 232 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 6 | Barber, K. | Liberal Democrats | 113 | 3.0% | 5.9% | — |
Aston and Todwick · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,191
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bacon, J. | Conservative Party | 1,234 | 28.2% | 56.3% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Allen, S. | Labour Party | 1,090 | 24.9% | 49.7% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Collins, P. | Conservative Party | 990 | 22.6% | 45.2% | — | |
| 4 | Frost, G. | Labour Party | 809 | 18.5% | 36.9% | — | |
| 5 | Lambert, M. | Liberal Democrats | 259 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — |
Rother Vale · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,679
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adair, T. | Labour Party | 841 | 25.0% | 50.1% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Baggaley, J. | Labour Party | 840 | 25.0% | 50.0% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hoult, T. | Liberal Democrats | 617 | 18.4% | 36.7% | — | |
| 4 | O'Sullivan, L. | Liberal Democrats | 553 | 16.5% | 32.9% | — | |
| 5 | Thorp, J. | Conservative Party | 208 | 6.2% | 12.4% | — | |
| 6 | Thullimalli, S. | Conservative Party | 153 | 4.6% | 9.1% | — | |
| 7 | Adshead, N. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 146 | 4.3% | 8.7% | — |
Maltby East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,497
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sutton, D. | Labour Party | 796 | 26.6% | 53.2% | +19.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tinsley, A. | Conservative Party | 751 | 25.1% | 50.2% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Webster, J. | Labour Party | 698 | 23.3% | 46.6% | — | |
| 4 | Hunter, L. | Conservative Party | 664 | 22.2% | 44.4% | — | |
| 5 | Towler, M. | Liberal Democrats | 85 | 2.8% | 5.7% | — |
Dinnington · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,759
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall, J. | Conservative Party | 1,397 | 16.9% | 50.6% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dack, S. | Conservative Party | 1,252 | 15.1% | 45.4% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clarke, A. | Labour Party | 1,196 | 14.4% | 43.3% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mellor, M. | Labour Party | 1,131 | 13.7% | 41.0% | — | |
| 5 | Whomersley, B. | Conservative Party | 1,120 | 13.5% | 40.6% | — | |
| 6 | Vjestica, J. | Labour Party | 1,009 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 7 | Barkley, I. | Green Party | 372 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 8 | Tweed, S. | Independent | 306 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 9 | Harrison, T. | Reform UK | 305 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 10 | Mears, M. | Liberal Democrats | 190 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — |
Keppel · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,283
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garnett, G. | Labour Party | 1,179 | 17.2% | 51.6% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Foster, C. | Labour Party | 1,092 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Currie, S. | Independent | 1,068 | 15.6% | 46.8% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hall, R. | Labour Party | 892 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 5 | Collett, N. | Independent | 634 | 9.3% | 27.8% | — | |
| 6 | Key, P. | Yorkshire Party | 406 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 7 | Currey, E. | Conservative Party | 378 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 8 | Williams, S. | Green Party | 352 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 9 | Rodgers, K. | Conservative Party | 331 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 10 | Townrow, N. | Conservative Party | 299 | 4.4% | 13.1% | — | |
| 11 | Ghanem, K. | Liberal Democrats | 151 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 12 | Lynn, T. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 67 | 1.0% | 2.9% | — |
Brinsworth · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,958
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carter, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,190 | 30.4% | 60.8% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Carter, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,114 | 28.4% | 56.9% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jackson, S. | Labour Party | 667 | 17.0% | 34.1% | — | |
| 4 | Roche, D. | Labour Party | 369 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — | |
| 5 | Crowe, J. | Green Party | 267 | 6.8% | 13.6% | — | |
| 6 | Hall, A. | Conservative Party | 161 | 4.1% | 8.2% | — | |
| 7 | Penn, G. | Conservative Party | 148 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — |
Rawmarsh West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,304
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker-Rogers, J. | Labour Party | 945 | 36.2% | 72.5% | +39.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Steele, B. | Labour Party | 742 | 28.5% | 56.9% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stafford, N. | Conservative Party | 323 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — | |
| 4 | Race, R. | Conservative Party | 293 | 11.2% | 22.5% | — | |
| 5 | Price, W. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 184 | 7.1% | 14.1% | — | |
| 6 | Sturgess, T. | Liberal Democrats | 120 | 4.6% | 9.2% | — |
Greasbrough · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,056
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beresford, L. | Labour Party | 636 | 30.1% | 60.3% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Elliott, R. | Independent | 616 | 29.2% | 58.4% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Blake, S. | Labour Party | 508 | 24.1% | 48.1% | — | |
| 4 | Mitchell, J. | Conservative Party | 138 | 6.5% | 13.1% | — | |
| 5 | Singleton, W. | Conservative Party | 128 | 6.1% | 12.1% | — | |
| 6 | Moseley, D. | Liberal Democrats | 85 | 4.0% | 8.1% | — |
Rawmarsh East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,189
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheppard, D. | Labour Party | 825 | 34.7% | 69.4% | +36.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hughes, R. | Labour Party | 707 | 29.7% | 59.5% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Atkinson, D. | Yorkshire Party | 343 | 14.4% | 28.9% | — | |
| 4 | Birch, W. | Conservative Party | 186 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — | |
| 5 | Wightman, V. | Conservative Party | 126 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — | |
| 6 | West, E. | Green Party | 118 | 5.0% | 9.9% | — | |
| 7 | Dawson, E. | Liberal Democrats | 72 | 3.0% | 6.1% | — |
Wath · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,348
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cowen, S. | Labour Party | 928 | 34.4% | 68.9% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jackson, D. | Labour Party | 814 | 30.2% | 60.4% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chambers, M. | Social Democratic Party | 345 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 4 | House, I. | Liberal Democrats | 218 | 8.1% | 16.2% | — | |
| 5 | Burnett, L. | Conservative Party | 201 | 7.5% | 14.9% | — | |
| 6 | Burnett, S. | Conservative Party | 189 | 7.0% | 14.0% | — |
Thurcroft and Wickersley South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,921
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collingham, T. | Conservative Party | 1,300 | 33.8% | 67.7% | +34.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Collingham, Z. | Conservative Party | 1,163 | 30.3% | 60.5% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Akid, J. | Labour Party | 742 | 19.3% | 38.6% | — | |
| 4 | Rashid, A. | Labour Party | 414 | 10.8% | 21.6% | — | |
| 5 | Tarmey, P. | Liberal Democrats | 223 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — |
Rotherham East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,870
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahmed, A. | Labour Party | 1,072 | 19.1% | 57.3% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rashid, H. | Labour Party | 1,037 | 18.5% | 55.4% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Haleem, R. | Labour Party | 1,001 | 17.8% | 53.5% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Penycate, R. | Green Party | 725 | 12.9% | 38.8% | — | |
| 5 | Reeder, K. | Independent | 507 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 6 | Green, D. | Conservative Party | 400 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 7 | Downs, G. | Conservative Party | 380 | 6.8% | 20.3% | — | |
| 8 | Shah, A. | Liberal Democrats | 262 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — | |
| 9 | Meharban, N. | Conservative Party | 227 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — |
Wickersley North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,069
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mault, J. | Labour Party | 1,273 | 20.5% | 61.5% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Marshall, L. | Labour Party | 1,177 | 19.0% | 56.9% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Knight, S. | Labour Party | 1,116 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gorman, A. | Conservative Party | 493 | 7.9% | 23.8% | — | |
| 5 | Garside, S. | Green Party | 485 | 7.8% | 23.4% | — | |
| 6 | Marshall, K. | Conservative Party | 478 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 7 | Napper, A. | Independent | 472 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 8 | Marshall, M. | Conservative Party | 470 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — | |
| 9 | Read, J. | Liberal Democrats | 244 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
Hoober · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,719
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lelliott, D. | Labour Party | 1,347 | 26.1% | 78.3% | +53.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, J. | Labour Party | 1,240 | 24.0% | 72.1% | +47.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brent, R. | Labour Party | 980 | 19.0% | 57.0% | +32.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ball, C. | Conservative Party | 350 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — | |
| 5 | Hill, T. | Green Party | 343 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 6 | Ball, V. | Conservative Party | 341 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 7 | Dennis, M. | Conservative Party | 298 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — | |
| 8 | Scutt, S. | Liberal Democrats | 259 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — |
Kilnhurst and Swinton East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 71.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,346
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cusworth, V. | Labour Party | 1,046 | 38.9% | 77.7% | +44.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harper, N. | Labour Party | 957 | 35.6% | 71.1% | +37.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barker, A. | Conservative Party | 294 | 10.9% | 21.9% | — | |
| 4 | Wiseman, A. | Conservative Party | 244 | 9.1% | 18.1% | — | |
| 5 | Gelder, J. | Liberal Democrats | 150 | 5.6% | 11.1% | — |
Swinton Rockingham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 76.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,335
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monk, G. | Labour Party | 1,028 | 38.5% | 77.0% | +43.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Read, C. | Labour Party | 1,018 | 38.1% | 76.3% | +42.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harrison Le Neve, D. | Conservative Party | 264 | 9.9% | 19.8% | — | |
| 4 | Webb, S. | Conservative Party | 234 | 8.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 5 | Read, L. | Liberal Democrats | 125 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — |