← Rushcliffe (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Rushcliffe 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 44 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 33,097 | 40.7% | 25 | 56.8% | 18 | 40.9% | +7 |
| Labour Party | 26,266 | 32.3% | 9 | 20.5% | 15 | 34.1% | -6 |
| Independent | 9,778 | 12.0% | 5 | 11.4% | 5 | 11.4% | 0 |
| Green Party | 5,953 | 7.3% | 2 | 4.5% | 3 | 6.8% | -1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 4,135 | 5.1% | 1 | 2.3% | 2 | 4.5% | -1 |
| RUSH IND | 2,028 | 2.5% | 2 | 4.5% | 1 | 2.3% | +1 |
| Reform UK | 107 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 81,364 | 100.0% | 44 | 100.0% | 44 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Lutterell · 1 seat · won at 39.3% · −10.7 pts below quota
- Bingham South · 2 seats · won at 31.2% · −2.1 pts below quota
- East Bridgford · 1 seat · won at 48.4% · −1.6 pts below quota
- Bunny · 1 seat · won at 51.7% · above quota
- Cropwell · 1 seat · won at 54.3% · above quota
- Tollerton · 1 seat · won at 54.4% · above quota
- Soar Valley · 1 seat · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Cranmer · 1 seat · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Musters · 2 seats · won at 39.9% · above quota
- Newton · 1 seat · won at 58.0% · above quota
- Bingham North · 2 seats · won at 44.3% · above quota
- Nevile and Langar · 1 seat · won at 61.6% · above quota
- Trent Bridge · 1 seat · won at 64.7% · above quota
- Gamston · 2 seats · won at 49.9% · above quota
- Radcliffe on Trent · 3 seats · won at 42.3% · above quota
- Gotham · 2 seats · won at 51.4% · above quota
- Keyworth and Wolds · 3 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- Cotgrave · 3 seats · won at 43.7% · above quota
- Compton Acres · 2 seats · won at 54.4% · above quota
- Lady Bay · 2 seats · won at 59.0% · above quota
- Abbey · 3 seats · won at 52.4% · above quota
- Edwalton · 2 seats · won at 62.6% · above quota
- Ruddington · 3 seats · won at 58.2% · above quota
- Leake · 3 seats · won at 59.4% · above quota
Race results
Lutterell · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 39.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −10.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,081
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matthews, P. | Conservative Party | 425 | 39.3% | −10.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Begum, N. | Labour Party | 334 | 30.9% | — | |
| 3 | Gray, B. | Green Party | 322 | 29.8% | — |
Bingham South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 31.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −2.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,681
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bird, R. | Independent | 768 | 22.8% | 45.7% | +12.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Georgiou, E. | Independent | 525 | 15.6% | 31.2% | −2.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams, C. | Conservative Party | 447 | 13.3% | 26.6% | — | |
| 4 | Simpson, P. | Conservative Party | 406 | 12.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 5 | Vallelly, P. | Labour Party | 395 | 11.7% | 23.5% | — | |
| 6 | Wood, A. | Liberal Democrats | 290 | 8.6% | 17.3% | — | |
| 7 | Stockwood, M. | Independent | 277 | 8.2% | 16.5% | — | |
| 8 | Shelton, A. | Independent | 254 | 7.6% | 15.1% | — |
East Bridgford · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 48.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −1.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,060
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simms, D. | Conservative Party | 513 | 48.4% | −1.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kilduff, S. | Labour Party | 316 | 29.8% | — | |
| 3 | Monni, M. | Independent | 231 | 21.8% | — |
Bunny · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 51.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,167
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edyvean, A. | Conservative Party | 603 | 51.7% | +1.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Coyle, J. | Labour Party | 286 | 24.5% | — | |
| 3 | Birch, W. | RUSH IND | 278 | 23.8% | — |
Cropwell · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 893
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Birch, T. | RUSH IND | 485 | 54.3% | +4.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Moore, G. | Conservative Party | 408 | 45.7% | — |
Tollerton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 726
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mason, D. | Conservative Party | 395 | 54.4% | +4.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Beaumont, A. | Labour Party | 245 | 33.7% | — | |
| 3 | Jones, P. | Green Party | 65 | 9.0% | — | |
| 4 | Birch, N. | RUSH IND | 21 | 2.9% | — |
Soar Valley · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 782
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barney, M. | Conservative Party | 428 | 54.7% | +4.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Matthews, S. | RUSH IND | 211 | 27.0% | — | |
| 3 | Wright, D. | Liberal Democrats | 143 | 18.3% | — |
Cranmer · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 56.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,107
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grocock, C. | Labour Party | 620 | 56.0% | +6.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bailey, S. | Conservative Party | 487 | 44.0% | — |
Musters · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,834
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Polenta, D. | Labour Party | 796 | 21.7% | 43.4% | +10.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dellar, S. | Liberal Democrats | 732 | 20.0% | 39.9% | +6.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, R. | Labour Party | 711 | 19.4% | 38.8% | — | |
| 4 | Price, V. | Liberal Democrats | 697 | 19.0% | 38.0% | — | |
| 5 | Godkin, R. | Conservative Party | 386 | 10.5% | 21.1% | — | |
| 6 | Furmonaviciene, R. | Conservative Party | 345 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — |
Newton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 58.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 641
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Soloman, D. | Conservative Party | 372 | 58.0% | +8.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barton, P. | Labour Party | 157 | 24.5% | — | |
| 3 | Lakin, R. | Green Party | 112 | 17.5% | — |
Bingham North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,325
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Regan, N. | Conservative Party | 593 | 22.4% | 44.8% | +11.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, G. | Conservative Party | 587 | 22.2% | 44.3% | +11.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stapleton, W. | Independent | 399 | 15.1% | 30.1% | — | |
| 4 | Jejna, N. | Independent | 379 | 14.3% | 28.6% | — | |
| 5 | Perkins, S. | Independent | 355 | 13.4% | 26.8% | — | |
| 6 | Purdue-Horan, F. | Independent | 336 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — |
Nevile and Langar · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 61.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 989
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Combellack, T. | Conservative Party | 609 | 61.6% | +11.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Irving, M. | Independent | 380 | 38.4% | — |
Trent Bridge · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 836
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plant, L. | Labour Party | 541 | 64.7% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Coe, P. | Conservative Party | 186 | 22.2% | — | |
| 3 | Baker, T. | Green Party | 109 | 13.0% | — |
Gamston · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,728
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wheeler, J. | Conservative Party | 970 | 28.1% | 56.1% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Virdi, D. | Conservative Party | 862 | 24.9% | 49.9% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bannister, J. | Labour Party | 603 | 17.4% | 34.9% | — | |
| 4 | Geeson, C. | Labour Party | 580 | 16.8% | 33.6% | — | |
| 5 | Mollatt, E. | Green Party | 237 | 6.9% | 13.7% | — | |
| 6 | Morrell, T. | Liberal Democrats | 204 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — |
Radcliffe on Trent · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,759
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Upton, R. | Conservative Party | 1,346 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brennan, A. | Conservative Party | 1,342 | 16.2% | 48.6% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clarke, N. | Conservative Party | 1,167 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Tomlinson, A. | Labour Party | 1,150 | 13.9% | 41.7% | — | |
| 5 | Culshaw, M. | Labour Party | 1,104 | 13.3% | 40.0% | — | |
| 6 | Rotheram, P. | Labour Party | 956 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 7 | Fulford, J. | Green Party | 470 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 8 | Kupfer, K. | Green Party | 325 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 9 | Witko, A. | Liberal Democrats | 310 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 10 | Concannon, L. | Reform UK | 107 | 1.3% | 3.9% | — |
Gotham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 850
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker, R. | Conservative Party | 561 | 33.0% | 66.0% | +32.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brown, A. | Conservative Party | 437 | 25.7% | 51.4% | +18.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McAulay, L. | Labour Party | 336 | 19.8% | 39.6% | — | |
| 4 | Aldridge, G. | Labour Party | 276 | 16.2% | 32.5% | — | |
| 5 | Wright, M. | Liberal Democrats | 89 | 5.2% | 10.5% | — |
Keyworth and Wolds · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,782
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cottee, J. | Conservative Party | 1,653 | 19.8% | 59.4% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Inglis, R. | Conservative Party | 1,417 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wells, T. | Conservative Party | 1,207 | 14.5% | 43.4% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Millband, S. | Independent | 992 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 5 | Abbey, L. | Liberal Democrats | 973 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — | |
| 6 | Clarke, D. | Labour Party | 792 | 9.5% | 28.5% | — | |
| 7 | Fitzgerald, K. | Labour Party | 674 | 8.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 8 | Lowe, K. | Labour Party | 639 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — |
Cotgrave · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,713
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chewings, K. | RUSH IND | 1,033 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Butler, R. | Conservative Party | 1,033 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ellis, S. | Conservative Party | 748 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Healy, L. | Conservative Party | 713 | 13.9% | 41.6% | — | |
| 5 | Clements, J. | Labour Party | 612 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 6 | Naslas, A. | Labour Party | 526 | 10.2% | 30.7% | — | |
| 7 | Stothard, D. | Independent | 475 | 9.2% | 27.7% | — |
Compton Acres · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,149
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phillips, A. | Conservative Party | 1,188 | 27.6% | 55.3% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Om, H. | Conservative Party | 1,169 | 27.2% | 54.4% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carmichael, C. | Labour Party | 742 | 17.3% | 34.5% | — | |
| 4 | Johnson, G. | Labour Party | 671 | 15.6% | 31.2% | — | |
| 5 | Jones, R. | Liberal Democrats | 192 | 4.5% | 8.9% | — | |
| 6 | Richardson, W. | Green Party | 174 | 4.0% | 8.1% | — | |
| 7 | Holmes, R. | Green Party | 161 | 3.7% | 7.5% | — |
Lady Bay · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,318
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mallender, S. | Green Party | 1,452 | 31.3% | 62.7% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mallender, R. | Green Party | 1,367 | 29.5% | 59.0% | +25.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wright, K. | Labour Party | 679 | 14.6% | 29.3% | — | |
| 4 | Crouch, R. | Labour Party | 672 | 14.5% | 29.0% | — | |
| 5 | Dorian, L. | Conservative Party | 249 | 5.4% | 10.7% | — | |
| 6 | Smith, J. | Conservative Party | 216 | 4.7% | 9.3% | — |
Abbey · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,002
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gowland, P. | Labour Party | 1,730 | 19.2% | 57.6% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chaplain, J. | Labour Party | 1,626 | 18.1% | 54.2% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Calvert, S. | Labour Party | 1,572 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Furmonavicius, D. | Conservative Party | 1,012 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 5 | Duckworth, S. | Conservative Party | 1,010 | 11.2% | 33.6% | — | |
| 6 | Garg, A. | Conservative Party | 935 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 7 | Lee, S. | Green Party | 416 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 8 | Whitehead, I. | Green Party | 366 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Jamieson, K. | Liberal Democrats | 340 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — |
Edwalton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,460
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parekh, H. | Conservative Party | 980 | 33.6% | 67.1% | +33.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wheeler, G. | Conservative Party | 913 | 31.3% | 62.6% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robinson, B. | Labour Party | 461 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 4 | Standring, C. | Labour Party | 400 | 13.7% | 27.4% | — | |
| 5 | Smith-Mitsch, N. | Liberal Democrats | 165 | 5.7% | 11.3% | — |
Ruddington · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,453
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker, J. | Labour Party | 1,578 | 21.4% | 64.3% | +39.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gaunt, M. | Labour Party | 1,531 | 20.8% | 62.4% | +37.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fletcher, G. | Labour Party | 1,427 | 19.4% | 58.2% | +33.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kemp, A. | Conservative Party | 850 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 5 | Dickman, G. | Conservative Party | 821 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 6 | Atack, B. | Conservative Party | 776 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 7 | Nicholson-Cole, D. | Green Party | 377 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — |
Leake · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,422
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas, C. | Independent | 1,518 | 20.9% | 62.7% | +37.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Billin, J. | Independent | 1,449 | 19.9% | 59.8% | +34.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Way, L. | Independent | 1,440 | 19.8% | 59.4% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mercer, P. | Conservative Party | 852 | 11.7% | 35.2% | — | |
| 5 | Smith, S. | Conservative Party | 749 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 6 | Singh, S. | Conservative Party | 731 | 10.1% | 30.2% | — | |
| 7 | Roberts, R. | Labour Party | 528 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — |