← Slough (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Slough 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 42 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 27,646 | 46.3% | 21 | 50.0% | 20 | 47.6% | +1 |
| Labour Party | 25,507 | 42.8% | 18 | 42.9% | 19 | 45.2% | -1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 2,712 | 4.5% | 3 | 7.1% | 2 | 4.8% | +1 |
| Independent | 1,967 | 3.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.4% | -1 |
| Independent Network | 955 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Green Party | 763 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Heritage Party | 100 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 59,650 | 100.0% | 42 | 100.0% | 42 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Cippenham Village · 2 seats · won at 29.5% · −3.8 pts below quota
- Langley Foxborough · 2 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- Elliman · 2 seats · won at 43.8% · above quota
- Langley St Mary's · 2 seats · won at 44.2% · above quota
- Wexham Court · 2 seats · won at 45.3% · above quota
- Langley Marish · 2 seats · won at 45.3% · above quota
- Cippenham Manor · 2 seats · won at 46.5% · above quota
- Britwell · 2 seats · won at 49.5% · above quota
- Colnbrook and Poyle · 2 seats · won at 50.1% · above quota
- Northborough and Lynch Hill Valley · 2 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- Manor Park and Stoke · 2 seats · won at 50.5% · above quota
- Upton Lea · 2 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Cippenham Green · 2 seats · won at 52.1% · above quota
- Farnham · 2 seats · won at 52.3% · above quota
- Chalvey · 2 seats · won at 55.0% · above quota
- Slough Central · 2 seats · won at 55.3% · above quota
- Herschel Park · 2 seats · won at 55.7% · above quota
- Haymill · 2 seats · won at 58.5% · above quota
- Langley Meads · 2 seats · won at 59.4% · above quota
- Baylis and Salt Hill · 2 seats · won at 64.5% · above quota
- Upton · 2 seats · won at 66.9% · above quota
Race results
Cippenham Village · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 29.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −3.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,425
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gill, B. | Labour Party | 469 | 16.5% | 32.9% | −0.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | O'Kelly, F. | Liberal Democrats | 420 | 14.7% | 29.5% | −3.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taylor, M. | Liberal Democrats | 405 | 14.2% | 28.4% | — | |
| 4 | Kimani, J. | Labour Party | 394 | 13.8% | 27.7% | — | |
| 5 | Ahmad, H. | Conservative Party | 394 | 13.8% | 27.7% | — | |
| 6 | Raja, Y. | Conservative Party | 389 | 13.7% | 27.3% | — | |
| 7 | Enam, S. | Green Party | 378 | 13.3% | 26.5% | — |
Langley Foxborough · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,209
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qaseem, N. | Labour Party | 557 | 23.0% | 46.1% | +12.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Instone, M. | Labour Party | 525 | 21.7% | 43.4% | +10.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sudhakaran, S. | Independent Network | 481 | 19.9% | 39.8% | — | |
| 4 | Gillingwater, S. | Conservative Party | 393 | 16.3% | 32.5% | — | |
| 5 | Hassan, J. | Conservative Party | 284 | 11.7% | 23.5% | — | |
| 6 | Rau, P. | Green Party | 178 | 7.4% | 14.7% | — |
Elliman · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,050
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abbasi, A. | Liberal Democrats | 534 | 25.4% | 50.9% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Naveed, A. | Liberal Democrats | 460 | 21.9% | 43.8% | +10.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Malik, M. | Labour Party | 388 | 18.5% | 37.0% | — | |
| 4 | Nematali, N. | Labour Party | 344 | 16.4% | 32.8% | — | |
| 5 | Singh, A. | Conservative Party | 187 | 8.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 6 | Bhakar, R. | Conservative Party | 187 | 8.9% | 17.8% | — |
Langley St Mary's · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,645
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manku, G. | Conservative Party | 783 | 23.8% | 47.6% | +14.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Iftakhar, A. | Conservative Party | 727 | 22.1% | 44.2% | +10.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Grewal, G. | Labour Party | 563 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 4 | Bains, S. | Labour Party | 535 | 16.3% | 32.5% | — | |
| 5 | Dhother, S. | Independent Network | 474 | 14.4% | 28.8% | — | |
| 6 | Edmonds, J. | Green Party | 207 | 6.3% | 12.6% | — |
Wexham Court · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,799
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gahir, H. | Labour Party | 826 | 23.0% | 45.9% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ahmed, I. | Conservative Party | 815 | 22.7% | 45.3% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jandu, H. | Conservative Party | 647 | 18.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 4 | Jeynes, G. | Labour Party | 641 | 17.8% | 35.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ahmed, M. | Independent | 539 | 15.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 6 | Donachy, P. | Independent | 129 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — |
Langley Marish · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,781
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muvvala, C. | Conservative Party | 1,114 | 31.3% | 62.6% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chahal, W. | Conservative Party | 807 | 22.7% | 45.3% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kaur, K. | Labour Party | 505 | 14.2% | 28.4% | — | |
| 4 | Brooker, P. | Labour Party | 491 | 13.8% | 27.6% | — | |
| 5 | Mohammed, A. | Independent | 263 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 6 | O'Reilly, S. | Independent | 245 | 6.9% | 13.8% | — | |
| 7 | Hanney, J. | Liberal Democrats | 136 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — |
Cippenham Manor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,426
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parmar, D. | Labour Party | 663 | 23.3% | 46.5% | +13.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Khawar, N. | Conservative Party | 663 | 23.3% | 46.5% | +13.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Begum, R. | Labour Party | 635 | 22.3% | 44.5% | — | |
| 4 | Usmani, A. | Conservative Party | 583 | 20.4% | 40.9% | — | |
| 5 | Singh, M. | Liberal Democrats | 307 | 10.8% | 21.5% | — |
Britwell · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,236
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anderson, R. | Labour Party | 685 | 27.7% | 55.4% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mann, P. | Labour Party | 612 | 24.8% | 49.5% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | French, D. | Conservative Party | 502 | 20.3% | 40.6% | — | |
| 4 | Mishra, A. | Conservative Party | 467 | 18.9% | 37.8% | — | |
| 5 | Isernia, O. | Independent | 206 | 8.3% | 16.7% | — |
Colnbrook and Poyle · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,357
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, D. | Conservative Party | 701 | 25.8% | 51.7% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bedi, P. | Conservative Party | 679 | 25.0% | 50.1% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cheema, A. | Labour Party | 615 | 22.7% | 45.3% | — | |
| 4 | Hayer, G. | Labour Party | 408 | 15.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 5 | John, J. | Independent | 310 | 11.4% | 22.9% | — |
Northborough and Lynch Hill Valley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,071
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carter, M. | Labour Party | 580 | 27.1% | 54.2% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dauti, S. | Conservative Party | 537 | 25.1% | 50.2% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gillingwater, S. | Conservative Party | 512 | 23.9% | 47.8% | — | |
| 4 | Dendie, A. | Labour Party | 512 | 23.9% | 47.8% | — |
Manor Park and Stoke · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,646
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nazir, M. | Labour Party | 913 | 27.7% | 55.5% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sabah, J. | Labour Party | 832 | 25.3% | 50.5% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Khan, S. | Conservative Party | 805 | 24.5% | 48.9% | — | |
| 4 | Janjua, S. | Conservative Party | 742 | 22.5% | 45.1% | — |
Upton Lea · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,880
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dar, H. | Labour Party | 1,105 | 29.4% | 58.8% | +25.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Escott, A. | Labour Party | 957 | 25.5% | 50.9% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fayyaz, R. | Conservative Party | 856 | 22.8% | 45.5% | — | |
| 4 | Dhaliwal, A. | Conservative Party | 842 | 22.4% | 44.8% | — |
Cippenham Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,719
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shah, I. | Conservative Party | 911 | 26.5% | 53.0% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stedmond, R. | Conservative Party | 895 | 26.0% | 52.1% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davis, J. | Labour Party | 581 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — | |
| 4 | Swindlehurst, J. | Labour Party | 478 | 13.9% | 27.8% | — | |
| 5 | Strutton, W. | Independent | 275 | 8.0% | 16.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hothi, G. | Liberal Democrats | 198 | 5.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 7 | Smith, N. | Heritage Party | 100 | 2.9% | 5.8% | — |
Farnham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,044
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akram, S. | Labour Party | 560 | 26.8% | 53.7% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sabah, M. | Labour Party | 546 | 26.2% | 52.3% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hussain, A. | Conservative Party | 491 | 23.5% | 47.1% | — | |
| 4 | Sahota, D. | Conservative Party | 490 | 23.5% | 47.0% | — |
Chalvey · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,225
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zarait, R. | Conservative Party | 707 | 28.9% | 57.7% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Satti, Z. | Conservative Party | 674 | 27.5% | 55.0% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sandhu, M. | Labour Party | 538 | 22.0% | 43.9% | — | |
| 4 | Akbar, S. | Labour Party | 531 | 21.7% | 43.3% | — |
Slough Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 975
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahmed, E. | Conservative Party | 547 | 28.1% | 56.1% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tomar, D. | Conservative Party | 539 | 27.7% | 55.3% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ali, S. | Labour Party | 447 | 22.9% | 45.9% | — | |
| 4 | Rusin, K. | Labour Party | 416 | 21.3% | 42.7% | — |
Herschel Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,099
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hulme, C. | Labour Party | 650 | 29.6% | 59.1% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ajaib, Z. | Labour Party | 612 | 27.8% | 55.7% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | King, T. | Conservative Party | 513 | 23.3% | 46.7% | — | |
| 4 | Lobo, R. | Conservative Party | 423 | 19.2% | 38.5% | — |
Haymill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,373
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright, A. | Conservative Party | 809 | 29.5% | 58.9% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kelly, P. | Conservative Party | 803 | 29.3% | 58.5% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Malik, S. | Labour Party | 457 | 16.6% | 33.3% | — | |
| 4 | Parmar, S. | Labour Party | 424 | 15.4% | 30.9% | — | |
| 5 | Parkes, C. | Liberal Democrats | 252 | 9.2% | 18.4% | — |
Langley Meads · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,388
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rana, N. | Conservative Party | 904 | 32.6% | 65.2% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shaik, M. | Conservative Party | 824 | 29.7% | 59.4% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kaur, K. | Labour Party | 542 | 19.5% | 39.1% | — | |
| 4 | Basra, S. | Labour Party | 505 | 18.2% | 36.4% | — |
Baylis and Salt Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,660
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matloob, F. | Labour Party | 1,247 | 37.6% | 75.1% | +41.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mohammad, M. | Labour Party | 1,070 | 32.2% | 64.5% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chaggar, S. | Conservative Party | 535 | 16.1% | 32.2% | — | |
| 4 | Hussaini, M. | Conservative Party | 468 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — |
Upton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,823
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dhillon, B. | Conservative Party | 1,277 | 35.0% | 70.1% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mohindra, S. | Conservative Party | 1,220 | 33.5% | 66.9% | +33.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bains, B. | Labour Party | 603 | 16.5% | 33.1% | — | |
| 4 | Basra, J. | Labour Party | 545 | 15.0% | 29.9% | — |