← South Gloucestershire (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
South Gloucestershire 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 28 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 61 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 58,239 | 35.9% | 23 | 37.7% | 23 | 37.7% | 0 |
| Liberal Democrats | 55,012 | 33.9% | 20 | 32.8% | 21 | 34.4% | -1 |
| Labour Party | 39,147 | 24.1% | 17 | 27.9% | 15 | 24.6% | +2 |
| Green Party | 6,847 | 4.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 3.3% | -2 |
| Independent | 2,346 | 1.4% | 1 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | +1 |
| Reform UK | 329 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| NHP | 228 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 162,148 | 100.0% | 61 | 100.0% | 61 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Patchway Coniston · 1 seat · won at 35.3% · −14.7 pts below quota
- Pilning and Severn Beach · 1 seat · won at 40.8% · −9.2 pts below quota
- Stoke Park and Cheswick · 1 seat · won at 46.8% · −3.2 pts below quota
- Bradley Stoke North · 2 seats · won at 36.1% · above quota
- Winterbourne · 2 seats · won at 41.1% · above quota
- Bitton and Oldland Common · 2 seats · won at 41.8% · above quota
- Bradley Stoke South · 2 seats · won at 44.7% · above quota
- Filton · 2 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Stoke Gifford · 3 seats · won at 38.2% · above quota
- Frenchay and Downend · 3 seats · won at 38.3% · above quota
- Chipping Sodbury and Cotswold Edge · 2 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- Parkwall and Warmley · 2 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- Severn Vale · 2 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- Charlton and Cribbs · 3 seats · won at 40.3% · above quota
- Boyd Valley · 2 seats · won at 48.9% · above quota
- Longwell Green · 2 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Emersons Green · 3 seats · won at 42.1% · above quota
- Hanham · 3 seats · won at 44.0% · above quota
- Woodstock · 2 seats · won at 52.5% · above quota
- New Cheltenham · 2 seats · won at 53.2% · above quota
- Charfield · 1 seat · won at 70.7% · above quota
- Kingswood · 2 seats · won at 57.0% · above quota
- Frampton Cotterell · 3 seats · won at 50.8% · above quota
- Yate Central · 2 seats · won at 64.5% · above quota
- Dodington · 2 seats · won at 68.6% · above quota
- Staple Hill and Mangotsfield · 3 seats · won at 65.4% · above quota
- Thornbury · 3 seats · won at 67.4% · above quota
- Yate North · 3 seats · won at 74.5% · above quota
Race results
Patchway Coniston · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 35.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 929
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker, I. | Independent | 328 | 35.3% | −14.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lawrence, D. | Labour Party | 323 | 34.8% | — | |
| 3 | Jones, S. | Conservative Party | 186 | 20.0% | — | |
| 4 | Pash, M. | Green Party | 55 | 5.9% | — | |
| 5 | Wallis, J. | Liberal Democrats | 37 | 4.0% | — |
Pilning and Severn Beach · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 40.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −9.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,173
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson, S. | Liberal Democrats | 479 | 40.8% | −9.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Begbey, S. | Conservative Party | 447 | 38.1% | — | |
| 3 | Segal, A. | Labour Party | 247 | 21.1% | — |
Stoke Park and Cheswick · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 46.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −3.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 996
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pocock, A. | Liberal Democrats | 466 | 46.8% | −3.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Coyle-Larner, R. | Labour Party | 318 | 31.9% | — | |
| 3 | Ramarathnam, P. | Conservative Party | 212 | 21.3% | — |
Bradley Stoke North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 36.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,585
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cullen, T. | Conservative Party | 1,062 | 20.5% | 41.1% | +7.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Owusu-Antwi, F. | Conservative Party | 932 | 18.0% | 36.1% | +2.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Goldsmith, N. | Labour Party | 765 | 14.8% | 29.6% | — | |
| 4 | Rosenberg, G. | Labour Party | 731 | 14.1% | 28.3% | — | |
| 5 | Pomfret, S. | Independent | 483 | 9.3% | 18.7% | — | |
| 6 | Nelson, J. | Green Party | 457 | 8.8% | 17.7% | — | |
| 7 | Clayton, D. | Liberal Democrats | 354 | 6.8% | 13.7% | — | |
| 8 | Tomasin, W. | Liberal Democrats | 211 | 4.1% | 8.2% | — | |
| 9 | Crawley, T. | Reform UK | 174 | 3.4% | 6.7% | — |
Winterbourne · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,994
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Labuschagne, N. | Conservative Party | 889 | 22.3% | 44.6% | +11.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jones, T. | Conservative Party | 819 | 20.5% | 41.1% | +7.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bruce, P. | Liberal Democrats | 678 | 17.0% | 34.0% | — | |
| 4 | Goodwin, D. | Liberal Democrats | 572 | 14.3% | 28.7% | — | |
| 5 | Lloyd, J. | Labour Party | 342 | 8.6% | 17.2% | — | |
| 6 | McKinlay, B. | Labour Party | 290 | 7.3% | 14.5% | — | |
| 7 | Lankester, A. | Green Party | 240 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 8 | Vernon, D. | Green Party | 158 | 4.0% | 7.9% | — |
Bitton and Oldland Common · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,993
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hughes, P. | Conservative Party | 899 | 22.6% | 45.1% | +11.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, E. | Conservative Party | 833 | 20.9% | 41.8% | +8.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Langley, D. | Labour Party | 711 | 17.8% | 35.7% | — | |
| 4 | Hallett, P. | Green Party | 521 | 13.1% | 26.1% | — | |
| 5 | Boon, K. | Liberal Democrats | 373 | 9.4% | 18.7% | — | |
| 6 | Freeman, S. | Green Party | 361 | 9.1% | 18.1% | — | |
| 7 | Perry, S. | Liberal Democrats | 288 | 7.2% | 14.5% | — |
Bradley Stoke South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,046
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bradbury, J. | Labour Party | 969 | 23.7% | 47.4% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Randles, B. | Conservative Party | 915 | 22.4% | 44.7% | +11.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Avenin, R. | Conservative Party | 895 | 21.9% | 43.7% | — | |
| 4 | Sappal, K. | Labour Party | 764 | 18.7% | 37.3% | — | |
| 5 | Moller, A. | Liberal Democrats | 285 | 7.0% | 13.9% | — | |
| 6 | Rawlinson, G. | Liberal Democrats | 264 | 6.5% | 12.9% | — |
Filton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,135
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monk, A. | Labour Party | 1,114 | 26.1% | 52.2% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Doyle, A. | Labour Party | 961 | 22.5% | 45.0% | +11.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Boardman, D. | Green Party | 485 | 11.4% | 22.7% | — | |
| 4 | Adjeivi, E. | Conservative Party | 476 | 11.1% | 22.3% | — | |
| 5 | Contenot, F. | Conservative Party | 424 | 9.9% | 19.9% | — | |
| 6 | Vernon, J. | Green Party | 299 | 7.0% | 14.0% | — | |
| 7 | Robinson, A. | Independent | 219 | 5.1% | 10.3% | — | |
| 8 | Joinson, M. | Liberal Democrats | 185 | 4.3% | 8.7% | — | |
| 9 | Emmerson, R. | Liberal Democrats | 107 | 2.5% | 5.0% | — |
Stoke Gifford · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,611
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Addison, D. | Labour Party | 1,530 | 14.1% | 42.4% | +17.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cranney, K. | Conservative Party | 1,440 | 13.3% | 39.9% | +14.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gupta, N. | Conservative Party | 1,379 | 12.7% | 38.2% | +13.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mead, B. | Labour Party | 1,358 | 12.5% | 37.6% | — | |
| 5 | Griffiths, T. | Conservative Party | 1,349 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 6 | Harris, D. | Labour Party | 1,289 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 7 | Williams, J. | Liberal Democrats | 927 | 8.6% | 25.7% | — | |
| 8 | Stansfield, K. | Liberal Democrats | 867 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 9 | Tomasin, K. | Liberal Democrats | 693 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — |
Frenchay and Downend · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,386
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sood, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,994 | 15.2% | 45.5% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Burton, B. | Conservative Party | 1,780 | 13.5% | 40.6% | +15.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brennan, L. | Conservative Party | 1,678 | 12.8% | 38.3% | +13.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Eldridge, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,673 | 12.7% | 38.1% | — | |
| 5 | Griffiths, J. | Conservative Party | 1,622 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 6 | Tansey, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,487 | 11.3% | 33.9% | — | |
| 7 | Dockerty, J. | Labour Party | 1,034 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — | |
| 8 | Richards, M. | Labour Party | 1,033 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — | |
| 9 | Smith, A. | Labour Party | 858 | 6.5% | 19.6% | — |
Chipping Sodbury and Cotswold Edge · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,514
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rush, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,687 | 24.0% | 48.0% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Romaine, B. | Conservative Party | 1,680 | 23.9% | 47.8% | +14.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hall, R. | Conservative Party | 1,678 | 23.9% | 47.8% | — | |
| 4 | Trull, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,647 | 23.4% | 46.9% | — | |
| 5 | Lowe, I. | Labour Party | 336 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — |
Parkwall and Warmley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,855
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bromiley, E. | Conservative Party | 914 | 24.6% | 49.3% | +15.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bromiley, S. | Conservative Party | 890 | 24.0% | 48.0% | +14.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Farmer, M. | Labour Party | 801 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — | |
| 4 | Rabone, K. | Labour Party | 699 | 18.8% | 37.7% | — | |
| 5 | Marsden, P. | Liberal Democrats | 213 | 5.7% | 11.5% | — | |
| 6 | Pirooz, H. | Liberal Democrats | 193 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — |
Severn Vale · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,181
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams, T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,537 | 24.2% | 48.3% | +15.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Riddle, M. | Conservative Party | 1,528 | 24.0% | 48.0% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Oaten, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,435 | 22.6% | 45.1% | — | |
| 4 | Burchell, K. | Conservative Party | 1,325 | 20.8% | 41.7% | — | |
| 5 | Curtis, A. | Labour Party | 307 | 4.8% | 9.7% | — | |
| 6 | Carroll, N. | Labour Party | 229 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — |
Charlton and Cribbs · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,523
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scott, S. | Labour Party | 695 | 15.2% | 45.6% | +20.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shambhu, S. | Conservative Party | 683 | 14.9% | 44.8% | +19.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Buddharaju, J. | Conservative Party | 614 | 13.4% | 40.3% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hopkinson, B. | Conservative Party | 603 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ravi, R. | Labour Party | 507 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 6 | Wilding, V. | Labour Party | 437 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — | |
| 7 | Knight, P. | Independent | 375 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 8 | Loveridge, R. | Independent | 315 | 6.9% | 20.7% | — | |
| 9 | Ford, J. | Liberal Democrats | 119 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 10 | Stringer, M. | Liberal Democrats | 117 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 11 | Hockey, D. | Liberal Democrats | 104 | 2.3% | 6.8% | — |
Boyd Valley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,523
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Palmer, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,316 | 26.1% | 52.2% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stokes, B. | Conservative Party | 1,234 | 24.5% | 48.9% | +15.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Reade, S. | Conservative Party | 1,211 | 24.0% | 48.0% | — | |
| 4 | Willmott, N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,130 | 22.4% | 44.8% | — | |
| 5 | Banwell, A. | Reform UK | 155 | 3.1% | 6.1% | — |
Longwell Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,383
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strange, C. | Conservative Party | 1,442 | 30.3% | 60.5% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Murphy, K. | Conservative Party | 1,170 | 24.6% | 49.1% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Allinson, E. | Liberal Democrats | 906 | 19.0% | 38.0% | — | |
| 4 | Price, C. | Independent | 626 | 13.1% | 26.3% | — | |
| 5 | Allard, C. | Liberal Democrats | 621 | 13.0% | 26.1% | — |
Emersons Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,582
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al-Hassan, K. | Labour Party | 1,614 | 15.0% | 45.1% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hunt, R. | Conservative Party | 1,532 | 14.3% | 42.8% | +17.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hardie, R. | Labour Party | 1,508 | 14.0% | 42.1% | +17.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Al-Hassan, S. | Labour Party | 1,498 | 13.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 5 | Hunt, C. | Conservative Party | 1,482 | 13.8% | 41.4% | — | |
| 6 | Mehta-Graham, A. | Conservative Party | 1,183 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 7 | Harris, S. | Green Party | 876 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 8 | Miron, G. | Liberal Democrats | 424 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 9 | Walker, S. | Liberal Democrats | 324 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — | |
| 10 | Walker, L. | Liberal Democrats | 306 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — |
Hanham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,035
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bamford, J. | Conservative Party | 1,525 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Langley, B. | Conservative Party | 1,455 | 16.0% | 47.9% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Begley, A. | Labour Party | 1,336 | 14.7% | 44.0% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Pitts, M. | Conservative Party | 1,314 | 14.4% | 43.3% | — | |
| 5 | Newman, M. | Labour Party | 1,195 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 6 | Allen, K. | Green Party | 651 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 7 | Huddy, W. | Green Party | 543 | 6.0% | 17.9% | — | |
| 8 | Johnston, D. | Green Party | 385 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — | |
| 9 | Gawn, J. | Liberal Democrats | 275 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 10 | Marshall, M. | Liberal Democrats | 254 | 2.8% | 8.4% | — | |
| 11 | Thoyts, P. | Liberal Democrats | 172 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — |
Woodstock · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,767
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evans, A. | Labour Party | 1,039 | 29.4% | 58.8% | +25.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Scott, I. | Labour Party | 928 | 26.3% | 52.5% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Groenewald, J. | Conservative Party | 545 | 15.4% | 30.9% | — | |
| 4 | Shambhu, K. | Conservative Party | 477 | 13.5% | 27.0% | — | |
| 5 | Corrigan, J. | Liberal Democrats | 335 | 9.5% | 19.0% | — | |
| 6 | Davis, T. | Liberal Democrats | 209 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — |
New Cheltenham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,705
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Palmer, M. | Labour Party | 936 | 27.5% | 54.9% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davis, S. | Labour Party | 907 | 26.6% | 53.2% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Adams, I. | Conservative Party | 664 | 19.5% | 39.0% | — | |
| 4 | Singh, G. | Conservative Party | 546 | 16.0% | 32.0% | — | |
| 5 | Davis, R. | Liberal Democrats | 204 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 6 | Parkinson, R. | Liberal Democrats | 152 | 4.5% | 8.9% | — |
Charfield · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,277
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Neill, J. | Liberal Democrats | 903 | 70.7% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Crumpton, M. | Conservative Party | 288 | 22.6% | — | |
| 3 | Watts, P. | Green Party | 86 | 6.7% | — |
Kingswood · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,487
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ingham, L. | Labour Party | 901 | 30.3% | 60.6% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rhodes, S. | Labour Party | 848 | 28.5% | 57.0% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dando, K. | Conservative Party | 469 | 15.8% | 31.5% | — | |
| 4 | Chandar, J. | Conservative Party | 361 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Hope, S. | Liberal Democrats | 202 | 6.8% | 13.6% | — | |
| 6 | Poarch, M. | Liberal Democrats | 193 | 6.5% | 13.0% | — |
Frampton Cotterell · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,307
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Young, C. | Liberal Democrats | 2,556 | 19.8% | 59.3% | +34.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clark, T. | Liberal Democrats | 2,331 | 18.0% | 54.1% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lean, J. | Liberal Democrats | 2,190 | 16.9% | 50.8% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Howell, T. | Conservative Party | 1,664 | 12.9% | 38.6% | — | |
| 5 | Niblett, T. | Conservative Party | 1,615 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 6 | Pullen, A. | Conservative Party | 1,592 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 7 | Echegaray, C. | Green Party | 444 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 8 | Millard, R. | Labour Party | 283 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 9 | Trollope, J. | Labour Party | 247 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — |
Yate Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,910
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emms, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,269 | 33.2% | 66.4% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davis, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,231 | 32.2% | 64.5% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gilpin, M. | Conservative Party | 584 | 15.3% | 30.6% | — | |
| 4 | Lewis, J. | Conservative Party | 470 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — | |
| 5 | Jackson, C. | Green Party | 266 | 7.0% | 13.9% | — |
Dodington · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,086
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,479 | 35.5% | 70.9% | +37.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kirkby, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,432 | 34.3% | 68.6% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Welch, R. | Conservative Party | 517 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — | |
| 4 | Nicholson, J. | Conservative Party | 516 | 12.4% | 24.7% | — | |
| 5 | Leat, C. | NHP | 228 | 5.5% | 10.9% | — |
Staple Hill and Mangotsfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,078
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boulton, I. | Labour Party | 2,331 | 25.2% | 75.7% | +50.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bell, M. | Labour Party | 2,153 | 23.3% | 69.9% | +44.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cooper, K. | Labour Party | 2,014 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | O'Hara, A. | Conservative Party | 789 | 8.5% | 25.6% | — | |
| 5 | Shore, A. | Conservative Party | 604 | 6.5% | 19.6% | — | |
| 6 | Mishra, A. | Conservative Party | 556 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 7 | Daer, A. | Liberal Democrats | 337 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — | |
| 8 | Allen, B. | Liberal Democrats | 228 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — | |
| 9 | Davis, G. | Liberal Democrats | 222 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — |
Thornbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,972
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tyrrell, M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,718 | 22.8% | 68.4% | +43.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davies, C. | Liberal Democrats | 2,682 | 22.5% | 67.5% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stansfield, J. | Liberal Democrats | 2,679 | 22.5% | 67.4% | +42.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gash, J. | Green Party | 1,020 | 8.6% | 25.7% | — | |
| 5 | Weeks, A. | Labour Party | 761 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 6 | Owusu-Antwi, O. | Conservative Party | 704 | 5.9% | 17.7% | — | |
| 7 | Buxton, J. | Conservative Party | 680 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 8 | Buxton, J. | Conservative Party | 672 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — |
Yate North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,989
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Drew, M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,282 | 25.5% | 76.4% | +51.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Willmore, C. | Liberal Democrats | 2,230 | 24.9% | 74.6% | +49.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nutland, B. | Liberal Democrats | 2,228 | 24.8% | 74.5% | +49.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Williams, S. | Conservative Party | 759 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 5 | Lewis, M. | Conservative Party | 734 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 6 | Williams, D. | Conservative Party | 733 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — |