← South Norfolk (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
South Norfolk 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 26 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 46 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 28,432 | 39.2% | 24 | 52.2% | 19 | 41.3% | +5 |
| Labour Party | 19,203 | 26.5% | 9 | 19.6% | 12 | 26.1% | -3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 15,945 | 22.0% | 11 | 23.9% | 10 | 21.7% | +1 |
| Green Party | 7,259 | 10.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 8.7% | -4 |
| Independent | 1,514 | 2.1% | 2 | 4.3% | 1 | 2.2% | +1 |
| Reform UK | 110 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 72,463 | 100.0% | 46 | 100.0% | 46 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Forncett · 1 seat · won at 38.0% · −12.0 pts below quota
- Thurlton · 1 seat · won at 40.0% · −10.0 pts below quota
- Rockland · 1 seat · won at 40.7% · −9.3 pts below quota
- Newton Flotman · 1 seat · won at 41.3% · −8.7 pts below quota
- Bunwell · 1 seat · won at 48.0% · −2.0 pts below quota
- Bressingham and Burston · 1 seat · won at 50.8% · above quota
- Brooke · 1 seat · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Beck Vale, Dickleburgh and Scole · 2 seats · won at 34.3% · above quota
- Wicklewood · 1 seat · won at 51.3% · above quota
- Central Wymondham · 2 seats · won at 36.5% · above quota
- New Costessey · 2 seats · won at 36.9% · above quota
- Hempnall · 1 seat · won at 53.6% · above quota
- Ditchingham and Earsham · 2 seats · won at 37.1% · above quota
- Hingham and Deopham · 1 seat · won at 53.8% · above quota
- Harleston · 2 seats · won at 39.9% · above quota
- Old Costessey · 3 seats · won at 33.6% · above quota
- Easton · 1 seat · won at 59.6% · above quota
- Cringleford · 2 seats · won at 43.2% · above quota
- South Wymondham · 2 seats · won at 45.3% · above quota
- Stratton · 2 seats · won at 47.2% · above quota
- Diss and Roydon · 3 seats · won at 40.0% · above quota
- Loddon and Chedgrave · 2 seats · won at 49.6% · above quota
- Hethersett · 3 seats · won at 42.0% · above quota
- North Wymondham · 2 seats · won at 51.8% · above quota
- Mulbarton and Stoke Holy Cross · 3 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Poringland, Framinghams and Trowse · 3 seats · won at 50.7% · above quota
Race results
Forncett · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 38.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −12.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 949
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carsok, K. | Conservative Party | 361 | 38.0% | −12.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McClenning, R. | Liberal Democrats | 274 | 28.9% | — | |
| 3 | Reason, P. | Labour Party | 168 | 17.7% | — | |
| 4 | Sharp, C. | Green Party | 146 | 15.4% | — |
Thurlton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 40.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −10.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,013
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evans, G. | Conservative Party | 405 | 40.0% | −10.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harrison, P. | Liberal Democrats | 398 | 39.3% | — | |
| 3 | Blaikie, S. | Labour Party | 210 | 20.7% | — |
Rockland · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 40.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −9.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,160
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomson, V. | Conservative Party | 472 | 40.7% | −9.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | White, M. | Labour Party | 418 | 36.0% | — | |
| 3 | Harkin, J. | Green Party | 270 | 23.3% | — |
Newton Flotman · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 41.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −8.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,003
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cook, M. | Independent | 414 | 41.3% | −8.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Webster, L. | Conservative Party | 335 | 33.4% | — | |
| 3 | Sewell, S. | Labour Party | 254 | 25.3% | — |
Bunwell · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 48.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −2.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 871
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ridley, S. | Conservative Party | 418 | 48.0% | −2.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chapman, J. | Labour Party | 197 | 22.6% | — | |
| 3 | Rissmann, B. | Liberal Democrats | 157 | 18.0% | — | |
| 4 | Gooch, M. | Green Party | 99 | 11.4% | — |
Bressingham and Burston · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 50.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 997
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Easter, J. | Conservative Party | 506 | 50.8% | +0.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Norman, B. | Liberal Democrats | 166 | 16.6% | — | |
| 3 | Rocholl, D. | Labour Party | 163 | 16.3% | — | |
| 4 | Reynolds, D. | Green Party | 162 | 16.2% | — |
Brooke · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 50.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,197
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fuller, J. | Conservative Party | 609 | 50.9% | +0.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Treby, J. | Green Party | 295 | 24.6% | — | |
| 3 | Fowler, T. | Labour Party | 293 | 24.5% | — |
Beck Vale, Dickleburgh and Scole · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,663
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hudson, C. | Independent | 870 | 26.2% | 52.3% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thompson, D. | Conservative Party | 570 | 17.1% | 34.3% | +0.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tuck, V. | Conservative Party | 501 | 15.1% | 30.1% | — | |
| 4 | Hardy, H. | Green Party | 485 | 14.6% | 29.2% | — | |
| 5 | Reekie, P. | Labour Party | 429 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 6 | Wenman, F. | Liberal Democrats | 269 | 8.1% | 16.2% | — | |
| 7 | Boreham, I. | Green Party | 202 | 6.1% | 12.1% | — |
Wicklewood · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 51.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,086
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elliott, R. | Conservative Party | 557 | 51.3% | +1.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barrett, R. | Green Party | 270 | 24.9% | — | |
| 3 | Crouch, M. | Labour Party | 259 | 23.8% | — |
Central Wymondham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 36.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,806
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hurn, K. | Conservative Party | 697 | 19.3% | 38.6% | +5.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Savage, R. | Conservative Party | 659 | 18.2% | 36.5% | +3.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barrett, J. | Green Party | 579 | 16.0% | 32.1% | — | |
| 4 | Baker, T. | Labour Party | 571 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | Walters, V. | Green Party | 542 | 15.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 6 | Doheny, L. | Labour Party | 454 | 12.6% | 25.1% | — | |
| 7 | Pond, A. | Reform UK | 110 | 3.0% | 6.1% | — |
New Costessey · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 36.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,227
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blundell, G. | Liberal Democrats | 558 | 22.7% | 45.5% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McCloskey, J. | Labour Party | 452 | 18.4% | 36.9% | +3.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hardy, P. | Conservative Party | 335 | 13.7% | 27.3% | — | |
| 4 | James, A. | Liberal Democrats | 308 | 12.6% | 25.1% | — | |
| 5 | Gauthier, H. | Conservative Party | 306 | 12.5% | 24.9% | — | |
| 6 | Shepherd, G. | Labour Party | 260 | 10.6% | 21.2% | — | |
| 7 | Watkins, O. | Green Party | 234 | 9.5% | 19.1% | — |
Hempnall · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 53.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 948
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hooton, M. | Conservative Party | 508 | 53.6% | +3.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Katz, E. | Labour Party | 440 | 46.4% | — |
Ditchingham and Earsham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,730
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bernard, B. | Liberal Democrats | 745 | 21.5% | 43.1% | +9.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brown, C. | Liberal Democrats | 641 | 18.5% | 37.1% | +3.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clitheroe, O. | Conservative Party | 567 | 16.4% | 32.8% | — | |
| 4 | Wilby, M. | Conservative Party | 534 | 15.4% | 30.9% | — | |
| 5 | Connor, J. | Green Party | 407 | 11.8% | 23.5% | — | |
| 6 | Hobson, S. | Green Party | 337 | 9.7% | 19.5% | — | |
| 7 | Kirk, C. | Labour Party | 228 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — |
Hingham and Deopham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 53.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 838
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woolliscroft, J. | Conservative Party | 451 | 53.8% | +3.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Nobes, G. | Labour Party | 223 | 26.6% | — | |
| 3 | Willmoth, C. | Green Party | 164 | 19.6% | — |
Harleston · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,370
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graham, T. | Conservative Party | 583 | 21.3% | 42.6% | +9.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Eddy, J. | Labour Party | 547 | 20.0% | 39.9% | +6.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Potterton, B. | Conservative Party | 512 | 18.7% | 37.4% | — | |
| 4 | Kuzmic, S. | Liberal Democrats | 468 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 5 | Newby, A. | Green Party | 372 | 13.6% | 27.2% | — | |
| 6 | Browne, S. | Green Party | 257 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — |
Old Costessey · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,683
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blundell, S. | Liberal Democrats | 879 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Laidlaw, T. | Liberal Democrats | 675 | 13.4% | 40.1% | +15.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cork, J. | Labour Party | 565 | 11.2% | 33.6% | +8.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fiaz, B. | Labour Party | 557 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 5 | Mascall, C. | Labour Party | 522 | 10.3% | 31.0% | — | |
| 6 | Toms, D. | Liberal Democrats | 426 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 7 | Dale, L. | Conservative Party | 399 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 8 | Mulhall, J. | Conservative Party | 377 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 9 | Fisher, J. | Conservative Party | 362 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — | |
| 10 | Evans, D. | Green Party | 288 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — |
Easton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 59.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 510
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dewsbury, M. | Conservative Party | 304 | 59.6% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McKinna, E. | Labour Party | 206 | 40.4% | — |
Cringleford · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,629
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sacks, D. | Labour Party | 744 | 22.8% | 45.7% | +12.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Elmer, D. | Conservative Party | 704 | 21.6% | 43.2% | +9.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kemp, W. | Conservative Party | 694 | 21.3% | 42.6% | — | |
| 4 | Vail, D. | Labour Party | 682 | 20.9% | 41.9% | — | |
| 5 | Harris, E. | Liberal Democrats | 433 | 13.3% | 26.6% | — |
South Wymondham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,459
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuri-Nixon, S. | Liberal Democrats | 752 | 25.8% | 51.6% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Halls, J. | Liberal Democrats | 661 | 22.7% | 45.3% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lemon, M. | Conservative Party | 443 | 15.2% | 30.4% | — | |
| 4 | Greene, C. | Labour Party | 392 | 13.4% | 26.9% | — | |
| 5 | Powell, A. | Conservative Party | 356 | 12.2% | 24.4% | — | |
| 6 | McCarthy, J. | Labour Party | 313 | 10.7% | 21.5% | — |
Stratton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 743
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Race, G. | Labour Party | 361 | 24.3% | 48.6% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Carver, J. | Conservative Party | 351 | 23.6% | 47.2% | +13.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Scarborough-Taylor, E. | Conservative Party | 328 | 22.1% | 44.1% | — | |
| 4 | Reekie, D. | Labour Party | 271 | 18.2% | 36.5% | — | |
| 5 | Sparkes, C. | Green Party | 175 | 11.8% | 23.6% | — |
Diss and Roydon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,263
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minshull, G. | Conservative Party | 1,056 | 15.6% | 46.7% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kiddie, K. | Conservative Party | 1,024 | 15.1% | 45.2% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Murphy, K. | Conservative Party | 906 | 13.3% | 40.0% | +15.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Browne, S. | Liberal Democrats | 598 | 8.8% | 26.4% | — | |
| 5 | Wenman, T. | Liberal Democrats | 553 | 8.1% | 24.4% | — | |
| 6 | Daniel, T. | Labour Party | 452 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 7 | McGinty, A. | Green Party | 444 | 6.5% | 19.6% | — | |
| 8 | Reeder, A. | Labour Party | 438 | 6.5% | 19.4% | — | |
| 9 | Howard, A. | Liberal Democrats | 410 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 10 | Copple, I. | Labour Party | 394 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 11 | Roe, M. | Green Party | 262 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 12 | Williamson, T. | Green Party | 253 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — |
Loddon and Chedgrave · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,616
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rowe, J. | Labour Party | 1,031 | 31.9% | 63.8% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Billig, K. | Conservative Party | 802 | 24.8% | 49.6% | +16.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brown, C. | Labour Party | 422 | 13.1% | 26.1% | — | |
| 4 | Melling, M. | Conservative Party | 412 | 12.7% | 25.5% | — | |
| 5 | Wareham, E. | Green Party | 373 | 11.5% | 23.1% | — | |
| 6 | Lewis, T. | Liberal Democrats | 192 | 5.9% | 11.9% | — |
Hethersett · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,135
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bills-Everett, D. | Conservative Party | 1,001 | 15.6% | 46.9% | +21.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cross, K. | Conservative Party | 922 | 14.4% | 43.2% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Morland, J. | Labour Party | 896 | 14.0% | 42.0% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dawson, S. | Conservative Party | 847 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 5 | Marshall, J. | Labour Party | 690 | 10.8% | 32.3% | — | |
| 6 | Barrett, P. | Green Party | 643 | 10.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 7 | Palmer, S. | Labour Party | 592 | 9.2% | 27.7% | — | |
| 8 | Blathwayt, P. | Liberal Democrats | 584 | 9.1% | 27.4% | — | |
| 9 | Paco, F. | Independent | 230 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — |
North Wymondham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,261
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosen, M. | Labour Party | 715 | 28.4% | 56.7% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Roberts, D. | Liberal Democrats | 653 | 25.9% | 51.8% | +18.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Holden, A. | Conservative Party | 643 | 25.5% | 51.0% | — | |
| 4 | Hornby, J. | Conservative Party | 510 | 20.2% | 40.5% | — |
Mulbarton and Stoke Holy Cross · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,746
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spratt, I. | Liberal Democrats | 1,460 | 17.7% | 53.2% | +28.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fulcher, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,342 | 16.3% | 48.9% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Webber, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,307 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Legg, N. | Conservative Party | 1,055 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — | |
| 5 | Irving, J. | Conservative Party | 893 | 10.8% | 32.5% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor, D. | Conservative Party | 819 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 7 | Smith-Cullen, G. | Labour Party | 497 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 8 | Cutting, M. | Labour Party | 467 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 9 | Tracey, N. | Labour Party | 399 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — |
Poringland, Framinghams and Trowse · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,135
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overton, J. | Conservative Party | 1,151 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Neal, L. | Conservative Party | 1,110 | 17.3% | 52.0% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fowler, N. | Labour Party | 1,082 | 16.9% | 50.7% | +25.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Spruce, T. | Conservative Party | 1,077 | 16.8% | 50.4% | — | |
| 5 | Bingham, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,036 | 16.2% | 48.5% | — | |
| 6 | Knight, A. | Labour Party | 949 | 14.8% | 44.4% | — |