← South Oxfordshire (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
South Oxfordshire 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 36 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 27,852 | 35.9% | 21 | 58.3% | 14 | 38.9% | +7 |
| Conservative Party | 23,751 | 30.6% | 1 | 2.8% | 11 | 30.6% | -10 |
| Green Party | 12,241 | 15.8% | 8 | 22.2% | 6 | 16.7% | +2 |
| Labour Party | 6,597 | 8.5% | 3 | 8.3% | 3 | 8.3% | 0 |
| HEN RES | 5,143 | 6.6% | 3 | 8.3% | 2 | 5.6% | +1 |
| Independent | 1,154 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 515 | 0.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 257 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 77,510 | 100.0% | 36 | 100.0% | 36 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Garsington and Horspath · 1 seat · won at 38.9% · −11.1 pts below quota
- Didcot West · 2 seats · won at 34.5% · above quota
- Haseley Brook · 1 seat · won at 59.7% · above quota
- Didcot South · 3 seats · won at 37.3% · above quota
- Kidmore End and Whitchurch · 1 seat · won at 62.5% · above quota
- Cholsey · 2 seats · won at 49.4% · above quota
- Wheatley · 1 seat · won at 66.6% · above quota
- Watlington · 1 seat · won at 69.6% · above quota
- Sonning Common · 2 seats · won at 53.2% · above quota
- Forest Hill and Holton · 1 seat · won at 71.9% · above quota
- Woodcote and Rotherfield · 2 seats · won at 55.5% · above quota
- Goring · 1 seat · won at 73.3% · above quota
- Didcot North East · 3 seats · won at 48.4% · above quota
- Chinnor · 2 seats · won at 56.9% · above quota
- Sandford and the Wittenhams · 1 seat · won at 74.0% · above quota
- Henley-on-Thames · 3 seats · won at 52.2% · above quota
- Berinsfield · 1 seat · won at 80.0% · above quota
- Benson and Crowmarsh · 2 seats · won at 66.1% · above quota
- Thame · 3 seats · won at 61.2% · above quota
- Chalgrove · 1 seat · won at 86.3% · above quota
- Wallingford · 2 seats · won at 73.9% · above quota
Race results
Garsington and Horspath · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 38.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −11.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,065
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James-Lawrie, S. | Liberal Democrats | 414 | 38.9% | −11.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ardern, F. | Conservative Party | 257 | 24.1% | — | |
| 3 | Lawson, S. | Independent | 242 | 22.7% | — | |
| 4 | Macbeth, S. | Labour Party | 109 | 10.2% | — | |
| 5 | Meyer-Bejol, J. | Green Party | 43 | 4.0% | — |
Didcot West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,824
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Snowdon, I. | Conservative Party | 791 | 21.7% | 43.4% | +10.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Worgan, A. | Liberal Democrats | 630 | 17.3% | 34.5% | +1.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Grindey, A. | Green Party | 577 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 4 | Marsden, L. | Conservative Party | 574 | 15.7% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Broadbent, J. | Labour Party | 566 | 15.5% | 31.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hards, N. | Labour Party | 509 | 14.0% | 27.9% | — |
Haseley Brook · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 59.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,242
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heritage, G. | Liberal Democrats | 741 | 59.7% | +9.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Newman, R. | Conservative Party | 501 | 40.3% | — |
Didcot South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,485
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Khan, M. | Labour Party | 1,237 | 16.6% | 49.8% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Macdonald, D. | Labour Party | 1,056 | 14.2% | 42.5% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | MacDonald, A. | Labour Party | 926 | 12.4% | 37.3% | +12.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dearlove, A. | Conservative Party | 765 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 5 | Nohre, S. | Green Party | 702 | 9.4% | 28.2% | — | |
| 6 | Loder, J. | Liberal Democrats | 635 | 8.5% | 25.6% | — | |
| 7 | Wiltshire, T. | Conservative Party | 611 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 8 | Skuse, T. | Conservative Party | 590 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 9 | Macdonald, H. | Liberal Democrats | 500 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 10 | Edwards, O. | Social Democratic Party | 327 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 11 | Shields, P. | Reform UK | 106 | 1.4% | 4.3% | — |
Kidmore End and Whitchurch · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 62.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,147
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dragonetti, P. | Green Party | 717 | 62.5% | +12.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Donahue, J. | Conservative Party | 430 | 37.5% | — |
Cholsey · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,808
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simpson, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,624 | 28.9% | 57.8% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Manning, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,387 | 24.7% | 49.4% | +16.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Roberts, S. | Independent | 912 | 16.2% | 32.5% | — | |
| 4 | Murphy, J. | Conservative Party | 808 | 14.4% | 28.8% | — | |
| 5 | Jackson, P. | Conservative Party | 697 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — | |
| 6 | Pomlett, K. | Social Democratic Party | 188 | 3.3% | 6.7% | — |
Wheatley · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 66.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,163
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kantor, A. | Liberal Democrats | 774 | 66.6% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tully, E. | Conservative Party | 389 | 33.4% | — |
Watlington · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 69.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,316
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Van Mierlo, F. | Liberal Democrats | 916 | 69.6% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Petano-Heathcote, H. | Conservative Party | 400 | 30.4% | — |
Sonning Common · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,133
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rawlins, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,250 | 29.3% | 58.6% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Morgan-Giles, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,135 | 26.6% | 53.2% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bartholomew, D. | Conservative Party | 979 | 22.9% | 45.9% | — | |
| 4 | Harrison, B. | Conservative Party | 902 | 21.1% | 42.3% | — |
Forest Hill and Holton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 71.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,164
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bearder, T. | Liberal Democrats | 837 | 71.9% | +21.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Flynn, G. | Conservative Party | 327 | 28.1% | — |
Woodcote and Rotherfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,499
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Connor, J. | Green Party | 1,529 | 30.6% | 61.2% | +27.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Norman, J. | Green Party | 1,387 | 27.8% | 55.5% | +22.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kingsbury, J. | Conservative Party | 1,028 | 20.6% | 41.1% | — | |
| 4 | Vahey, P. | Conservative Party | 902 | 18.1% | 36.1% | — | |
| 5 | Carpin, D. | Reform UK | 151 | 3.0% | 6.0% | — |
Goring · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 73.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,498
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Filipova-Rivers, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,098 | 73.3% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bulmer, K. | Conservative Party | 400 | 26.7% | — |
Didcot North East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,507
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rouane, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,471 | 19.6% | 58.7% | +33.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tinsley, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,237 | 16.4% | 49.3% | +24.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ziauddin, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,213 | 16.1% | 48.4% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Warren, A. | Conservative Party | 739 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 5 | Thompson, A. | Conservative Party | 731 | 9.7% | 29.2% | — | |
| 6 | Francisco, A. | Conservative Party | 665 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 7 | Wilson, C. | Labour Party | 548 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — | |
| 8 | Ryall, G. | Labour Party | 493 | 6.6% | 19.7% | — | |
| 9 | Wheeler, P. | Labour Party | 425 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — |
Chinnor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,345
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sadler, E. | Liberal Democrats | 1,354 | 28.9% | 57.8% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gordon-Creed, A. | Green Party | 1,334 | 28.4% | 56.9% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Heathcote, L. | Conservative Party | 1,082 | 23.1% | 46.2% | — | |
| 4 | Endean-Mills, J. | Conservative Party | 919 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — |
Sandford and the Wittenhams · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 74.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,210
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Casey-Rerhaye, A. | Green Party | 895 | 74.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Samu, E. | Conservative Party | 315 | 26.0% | — |
Henley-on-Thames · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,985
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gawrysiak, S. | HEN RES | 1,934 | 21.6% | 64.8% | +39.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Arlett, K. | HEN RES | 1,652 | 18.4% | 55.3% | +30.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hinton, K. | HEN RES | 1,557 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hillier, L. | Conservative Party | 1,014 | 11.3% | 34.0% | — | |
| 5 | Adkins, D. | Conservative Party | 793 | 8.9% | 26.6% | — | |
| 6 | Fraser, H. | Green Party | 730 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 7 | Legh, H. | Conservative Party | 664 | 7.4% | 22.2% | — | |
| 8 | Powell, J. | Liberal Democrats | 612 | 6.8% | 20.5% | — |
Berinsfield · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 80.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 951
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bennett, R. | Green Party | 761 | 80.0% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dhillon, P. | Conservative Party | 190 | 20.0% | — |
Benson and Crowmarsh · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,321
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooper, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,589 | 34.2% | 68.5% | +35.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Powell, A. | Green Party | 1,534 | 33.1% | 66.1% | +32.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bloomfield, F. | Conservative Party | 799 | 17.2% | 34.4% | — | |
| 4 | Flux, G. | Conservative Party | 719 | 15.5% | 31.0% | — |
Thame · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,041
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gregory, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,943 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bretherton, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,939 | 21.3% | 63.8% | +38.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barker, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,862 | 20.4% | 61.2% | +36.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dodds, D. | Conservative Party | 1,093 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 5 | Hall, W. | Conservative Party | 793 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 6 | Thomas, D. | Conservative Party | 765 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 7 | Hartridge, S. | Labour Party | 728 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — |
Chalgrove · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 86.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,076
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turner, D. | Liberal Democrats | 929 | 86.3% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Patel, J. | Conservative Party | 147 | 13.7% | — |
Wallingford · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 73.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,383
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barlow, J. | Green Party | 2,032 | 42.6% | 85.3% | +51.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Keats-Rohan, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,762 | 37.0% | 73.9% | +40.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lloyd, A. | Conservative Party | 609 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 4 | Okolo, C. | Conservative Party | 363 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — |