← Spelthorne (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Spelthorne 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 13 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 39 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 24,656 | 38.5% | 12 | 30.8% | 16 | 41.0% | -4 |
| Liberal Democrats | 11,893 | 18.6% | 10 | 25.6% | 7 | 17.9% | +3 |
| Independent | 11,363 | 17.7% | 7 | 17.9% | 7 | 17.9% | 0 |
| Labour Party | 8,696 | 13.6% | 7 | 17.9% | 5 | 12.8% | +2 |
| Green Party | 6,927 | 10.8% | 3 | 7.7% | 4 | 10.3% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 350 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 157 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 64,042 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Ashford Town · 3 seats · won at 36.0% · above quota
- Ashford East · 3 seats · won at 39.8% · above quota
- Laleham and Shepperton Green · 3 seats · won at 42.5% · above quota
- Ashford North and Stanwell South · 3 seats · won at 43.7% · above quota
- Sunbury Common · 3 seats · won at 46.3% · above quota
- Ashford Common · 3 seats · won at 49.0% · above quota
- Shepperton Town · 3 seats · won at 51.0% · above quota
- Sunbury East · 3 seats · won at 51.8% · above quota
- Staines · 3 seats · won at 52.1% · above quota
- Staines South · 3 seats · won at 55.4% · above quota
- Halliford and Sunbury West · 3 seats · won at 55.5% · above quota
- Stanwell North · 3 seats · won at 56.5% · above quota
- Riverside and Laleham · 3 seats · won at 57.9% · above quota
Race results
Ashford Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,881
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arnold, M. | Independent | 801 | 14.2% | 42.6% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rybinski, O. | Conservative Party | 725 | 12.8% | 38.5% | +13.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McLuskey, A. | Green Party | 677 | 12.0% | 36.0% | +11.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gething, N. | Conservative Party | 653 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 5 | Woodward, P. | Conservative Party | 651 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 6 | Kluth, M. | Labour Party | 571 | 10.1% | 30.4% | — | |
| 7 | Winch, D. | Green Party | 548 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 8 | Henfrey, R. | Independent | 519 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 9 | Edgington, Q. | Independent | 499 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — |
Ashford East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,795
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sexton, J. | Independent | 991 | 18.4% | 55.2% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Baldock, E. | Independent | 776 | 14.4% | 43.2% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chandler, R. | Conservative Party | 714 | 13.3% | 39.8% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Robinson, K. | Conservative Party | 615 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Tuteja, V. | Conservative Party | 544 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 6 | Enright, J. | Independent | 467 | 8.7% | 26.0% | — | |
| 7 | Dare, G. | Labour Party | 442 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 8 | Hyde, C. | Green Party | 319 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 9 | Gravett, G. | Independent | 265 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — | |
| 10 | Scott, N. | Green Party | 253 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — |
Laleham and Shepperton Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,672
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howkins, K. | Conservative Party | 945 | 18.8% | 56.5% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clarke, D. | Conservative Party | 878 | 17.5% | 52.5% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mathur, A. | Conservative Party | 710 | 14.2% | 42.5% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Whitmore, S. | Green Party | 673 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 5 | Beecher, G. | Green Party | 614 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 6 | Thesiger, J. | Liberal Democrats | 470 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 7 | Cooper, P. | Labour Party | 378 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 8 | Johnston, J. | Independent | 192 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 9 | Pattinson, A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 65 | 1.3% | 3.9% | — | |
| 10 | Couchman, H. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 55 | 1.1% | 3.3% | — | |
| 11 | Couchman, P. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 37 | 0.7% | 2.2% | — |
Ashford North and Stanwell South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,534
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beatty, S. | Labour Party | 728 | 15.8% | 47.5% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Geach, R. | Labour Party | 695 | 15.1% | 45.3% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Buck, M. | Labour Party | 671 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Maya, S. | Conservative Party | 511 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 5 | Brar, A. | Conservative Party | 506 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 6 | Fegredo, J. | Conservative Party | 497 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 7 | Davies, C. | Independent | 421 | 9.1% | 27.4% | — | |
| 8 | Lane, J. | Independent | 395 | 8.6% | 25.7% | — | |
| 9 | Rough, M. | Reform UK | 178 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — |
Sunbury Common · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,400
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boparai, H. | Liberal Democrats | 828 | 19.7% | 59.1% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dong, M. | Liberal Democrats | 740 | 17.6% | 52.8% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gyawali, S. | Liberal Democrats | 648 | 15.4% | 46.3% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Beardsmore, I. | Independent | 608 | 14.5% | 43.4% | — | |
| 5 | Stanton, J. | Independent | 348 | 8.3% | 24.9% | — | |
| 6 | Rollo, S. | Conservative Party | 347 | 8.3% | 24.8% | — | |
| 7 | Bhadye, J. | Conservative Party | 283 | 6.7% | 20.2% | — | |
| 8 | Sapunovas, A. | Conservative Party | 227 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 9 | O'Brien, R. | Reform UK | 172 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — |
Ashford Common · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,578
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhadye, S. | Conservative Party | 783 | 16.5% | 49.6% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Islam, N. | Conservative Party | 781 | 16.5% | 49.5% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rutherford, K. | Independent | 773 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Matharu, J. | Conservative Party | 709 | 15.0% | 44.9% | — | |
| 5 | Alexander, D. | Independent | 706 | 14.9% | 44.7% | — | |
| 6 | Lamb, A. | Labour Party | 491 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 7 | Mockford, A. | Liberal Democrats | 490 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — |
Shepperton Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,804
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attewell, M. | Conservative Party | 1,194 | 22.1% | 66.2% | +41.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brennan, L. | Conservative Party | 955 | 17.6% | 52.9% | +27.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Boughtflower, J. | Conservative Party | 920 | 17.0% | 51.0% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hughes, P. | Green Party | 694 | 12.8% | 38.5% | — | |
| 5 | Gammon, M. | Liberal Democrats | 672 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 6 | Bentley, S. | Labour Party | 555 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 7 | Bryer, S. | Independent | 423 | 7.8% | 23.4% | — |
Sunbury East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,852
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grant, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,068 | 19.2% | 57.7% | +32.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Weerasinghe, W. | Conservative Party | 967 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lee, M. | Conservative Party | 960 | 17.3% | 51.8% | +26.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Alexiou, M. | Liberal Democrats | 952 | 17.1% | 51.4% | — | |
| 5 | Patel, J. | Conservative Party | 852 | 15.3% | 46.0% | — | |
| 6 | Dollin, D. | Green Party | 758 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — |
Staines · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,809
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beecher, M. | Green Party | 1,222 | 22.5% | 67.6% | +42.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gale, A. | Green Party | 1,169 | 21.5% | 64.6% | +39.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams, H. | Independent | 942 | 17.4% | 52.1% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mustafa, K. | Labour Party | 740 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 5 | Francis, M. | Conservative Party | 537 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 6 | Burgess, T. | Conservative Party | 474 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 7 | Ulisse, A. | Conservative Party | 343 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — |
Staines South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,387
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bateson, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,171 | 28.1% | 84.4% | +59.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Caplin, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,064 | 25.6% | 76.7% | +51.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Burrell, J. | Labour Party | 769 | 18.5% | 55.4% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hurst, K. | Conservative Party | 437 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Watts, M. | Conservative Party | 383 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 6 | Reid, G. | Conservative Party | 337 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — |
Halliford and Sunbury West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,501
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dunn, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,014 | 22.5% | 67.5% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Nichols, L. | Liberal Democrats | 921 | 20.4% | 61.3% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Turner, J. | Liberal Democrats | 833 | 18.5% | 55.5% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Nowicka, A. | Conservative Party | 489 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Brennan, M. | Conservative Party | 489 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 6 | Robigo, P. | Conservative Party | 477 | 10.6% | 31.8% | — | |
| 7 | Bowen, R. | Labour Party | 281 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — |
Stanwell North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,368
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doran, S. | Labour Party | 804 | 19.6% | 58.8% | +33.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Button, J. | Labour Party | 798 | 19.4% | 58.3% | +33.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Doran, J. | Labour Party | 773 | 18.8% | 56.5% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McIlroy, A. | Conservative Party | 632 | 15.4% | 46.2% | — | |
| 5 | McIlroy, J. | Conservative Party | 621 | 15.1% | 45.4% | — | |
| 6 | Vijjhalwar, R. | Conservative Party | 476 | 11.6% | 34.8% | — |
Riverside and Laleham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,764
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saliagopoulos, D. | Independent | 1,191 | 22.5% | 67.5% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Geraci, D. | Independent | 1,046 | 19.8% | 59.3% | +34.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gibson, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,022 | 19.3% | 57.9% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mooney, S. | Conservative Party | 754 | 14.2% | 42.7% | — | |
| 5 | Malcouronne, K. | Conservative Party | 661 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 6 | Zenonos, M. | Conservative Party | 619 | 11.7% | 35.1% | — |