← Stevenage (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Stevenage 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 13 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 39 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 26,842 | 51.7% | 31 | 79.5% | 21 | 53.8% | +10 |
| Conservative Party | 9,940 | 19.1% | 2 | 5.1% | 7 | 17.9% | -5 |
| Liberal Democrats | 8,962 | 17.3% | 6 | 15.4% | 7 | 17.9% | -1 |
| Green Party | 3,924 | 7.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 7.7% | -3 |
| Reform UK | 1,479 | 2.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.6% | -1 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 770 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 51,917 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Longmeadow · 3 seats · won at 35.9% · above quota
- Woodfield · 3 seats · won at 40.3% · above quota
- Bandley Hill and Poplars · 3 seats · won at 42.3% · above quota
- Old Town · 3 seats · won at 48.2% · above quota
- Chells · 3 seats · won at 51.1% · above quota
- Martins Wood · 3 seats · won at 54.6% · above quota
- Symonds Green · 3 seats · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Almond Hill · 3 seats · won at 63.4% · above quota
- Manor · 3 seats · won at 63.9% · above quota
- Roebuck · 3 seats · won at 64.7% · above quota
- Bedwell · 3 seats · won at 66.3% · above quota
- Shephall · 3 seats · won at 67.6% · above quota
- St Nicholas · 3 seats · won at 69.4% · above quota
Race results
Longmeadow · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,651
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clark, P. | Labour Party | 700 | 14.1% | 42.4% | +17.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Guy, L. | Labour Party | 663 | 13.4% | 40.2% | +15.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Elekolusi, A. | Labour Party | 593 | 12.0% | 35.9% | +10.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Farquharson, A. | Conservative Party | 590 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 5 | Mitchell, A. | Conservative Party | 571 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 6 | Facey, B. | Conservative Party | 568 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 7 | Borcherds, J. | Green Party | 491 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 8 | Hurst, M. | Reform UK | 193 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 9 | Bainbridge, D. | Reform UK | 191 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 10 | Snell, M. | Liberal Democrats | 180 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — | |
| 11 | Durling, P. | Reform UK | 164 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 12 | Kerr, H. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 48 | 1.0% | 2.9% | — |
Woodfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,417
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bibby, P. | Conservative Party | 624 | 14.7% | 44.0% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brady, L. | Labour Party | 602 | 14.2% | 42.5% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Notley, M. | Conservative Party | 571 | 13.4% | 40.3% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Boyle, R. | Labour Party | 571 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 5 | Hanafin, J. | Conservative Party | 559 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 6 | Tripathi, S. | Labour Party | 520 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 7 | Warr, R. | Green Party | 227 | 5.3% | 16.0% | — | |
| 8 | Brinkworth, J. | Liberal Democrats | 227 | 5.3% | 16.0% | — | |
| 9 | Brinkworth, N. | Liberal Democrats | 204 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 10 | Amato, A. | Reform UK | 146 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — |
Bandley Hill and Poplars · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,630
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, J. | Labour Party | 749 | 15.3% | 45.9% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Woods, J. | Labour Party | 701 | 14.3% | 43.0% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Choudhury, K. | Labour Party | 689 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Denny-Stubbs, D. | Conservative Party | 530 | 10.8% | 32.5% | — | |
| 5 | Facey, V. | Conservative Party | 508 | 10.4% | 31.2% | — | |
| 6 | Wyatt, M. | Conservative Party | 462 | 9.4% | 28.3% | — | |
| 7 | Littleton, C. | Liberal Democrats | 271 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 8 | Hearn, M. | Reform UK | 266 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 9 | Wilkins, P. | Liberal Democrats | 252 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 10 | Mannan, R. | Liberal Democrats | 218 | 4.5% | 13.4% | — | |
| 11 | Busolini, A. | Green Party | 183 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 12 | Pickersgill, M. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 62 | 1.3% | 3.8% | — |
Old Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,372
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houlihan, C. | Labour Party | 733 | 17.8% | 53.4% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, N. | Labour Party | 665 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Humberstone, M. | Labour Party | 661 | 16.1% | 48.2% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Curtis, H. | Conservative Party | 523 | 12.7% | 38.1% | — | |
| 5 | Wheeler, M. | Conservative Party | 504 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 6 | Malavia, D. | Conservative Party | 433 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 7 | Whitmore, A. | Green Party | 301 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — | |
| 8 | Anderson, A. | Liberal Democrats | 226 | 5.5% | 16.5% | — | |
| 9 | Kerr, M. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 69 | 1.7% | 5.0% | — |
Chells · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,365
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashley-Wren, J. | Liberal Democrats | 741 | 18.1% | 54.3% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wren, T. | Liberal Democrats | 738 | 18.0% | 54.1% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Booth, S. | Liberal Democrats | 698 | 17.0% | 51.1% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lloyd, J. | Labour Party | 509 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 5 | Newman, P. | Labour Party | 460 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 6 | Pendlebury, T. | Labour Party | 448 | 10.9% | 32.8% | — | |
| 7 | Clarkson, C. | Conservative Party | 290 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — | |
| 8 | Ingarfill, D. | Green Party | 212 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — |
Martins Wood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,312
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arceno, M. | Labour Party | 798 | 20.3% | 60.8% | +35.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Briscoe, L. | Labour Party | 751 | 19.1% | 57.2% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Veres, C. | Labour Party | 717 | 18.2% | 54.6% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Facey, A. | Conservative Party | 421 | 10.7% | 32.1% | — | |
| 5 | Bainbridge, J. | Reform UK | 267 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — | |
| 6 | Henry, R. | Reform UK | 252 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 7 | Hodson, C. | Green Party | 238 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 8 | Segadelli, A. | Liberal Democrats | 228 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 9 | Lovelace-Collins, N. | Green Party | 203 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 10 | Gentleman, M. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 61 | 1.5% | 4.6% | — |
Symonds Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,119
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hollywell, J. | Labour Party | 787 | 23.4% | 70.3% | +45.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rossati, L. | Labour Party | 666 | 19.8% | 59.5% | +34.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Roopchand, C. | Labour Party | 627 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ingarfill, J. | Conservative Party | 510 | 15.2% | 45.6% | — | |
| 5 | Watts, B. | Green Party | 351 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 6 | Hearmon, C. | Liberal Democrats | 316 | 9.4% | 28.2% | — | |
| 7 | Palmer, T. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 101 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Almond Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,234
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin-Haugh, L. | Labour Party | 834 | 22.5% | 67.6% | +42.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Plater, T. | Labour Party | 814 | 22.0% | 65.9% | +40.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thomas, J. | Labour Party | 783 | 21.1% | 63.4% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Houps, M. | Conservative Party | 469 | 12.7% | 38.0% | — | |
| 5 | Dawson, P. | Green Party | 447 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 6 | Reece, R. | Liberal Democrats | 356 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — |
Manor · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,601
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,122 | 23.4% | 70.1% | +45.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McGuinness, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,077 | 22.4% | 67.3% | +42.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Snell, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,023 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barr, L. | Labour Party | 397 | 8.3% | 24.8% | — | |
| 5 | McKay, M. | Labour Party | 357 | 7.4% | 22.3% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor, P. | Labour Party | 328 | 6.8% | 20.5% | — | |
| 7 | Goldsmith, A. | Conservative Party | 311 | 6.5% | 19.4% | — | |
| 8 | Hodson, A. | Green Party | 189 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
Roebuck · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,083
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wells, A. | Labour Party | 727 | 22.4% | 67.1% | +42.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gordon, A. | Labour Party | 701 | 21.6% | 64.7% | +39.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chowdhury, F. | Labour Party | 701 | 21.6% | 64.7% | +39.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Leech, N. | Conservative Party | 433 | 13.3% | 40.0% | — | |
| 5 | Bye, N. | Liberal Democrats | 310 | 9.5% | 28.6% | — | |
| 6 | Gora, P. | Green Party | 286 | 8.8% | 26.4% | — | |
| 7 | Clare, B. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 92 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — |
Bedwell · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,186
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McGrath, C. | Labour Party | 887 | 24.9% | 74.8% | +49.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chowdhury, N. | Labour Party | 830 | 23.3% | 70.0% | +45.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Plater, E. | Labour Party | 786 | 22.1% | 66.3% | +41.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bibby, C. | Conservative Party | 367 | 10.3% | 31.0% | — | |
| 5 | Berry, C. | Liberal Democrats | 296 | 8.3% | 25.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hodges, S. | Green Party | 282 | 7.9% | 23.8% | — | |
| 7 | Glennon, S. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 109 | 3.1% | 9.2% | — |
Shephall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 984
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broom, R. | Labour Party | 737 | 25.0% | 74.9% | +49.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mead, S. | Labour Party | 733 | 24.8% | 74.5% | +49.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Speller, S. | Labour Party | 665 | 22.5% | 67.6% | +42.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lawrence, C. | Conservative Party | 289 | 9.8% | 29.4% | — | |
| 5 | Barks, D. | Liberal Democrats | 219 | 7.4% | 22.3% | — | |
| 6 | Mok, S. | Green Party | 209 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — | |
| 7 | Clare, B. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 100 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — |
St Nicholas · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,351
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barr, S. | Labour Party | 1,052 | 26.0% | 77.9% | +52.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Henry, R. | Labour Party | 962 | 23.7% | 71.2% | +46.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Parris, C. | Labour Party | 938 | 23.1% | 69.4% | +44.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mitchell, M. | Conservative Party | 407 | 10.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 5 | Keane, C. | Green Party | 305 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 6 | Jones, H. | Liberal Democrats | 260 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 7 | Gentleman, A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 128 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — |