← Stockport (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Stockport 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 63 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 82,930 | 38.4% | 30 | 47.6% | 25 | 39.7% | +5 |
| Labour Party | 70,045 | 32.4% | 24 | 38.1% | 21 | 33.3% | +3 |
| Conservative Party | 35,267 | 16.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 17.5% | -11 |
| Green Party | 15,578 | 7.2% | 3 | 4.8% | 4 | 6.3% | -1 |
| Independent | 5,857 | 2.7% | 3 | 4.8% | 1 | 1.6% | +2 |
| ECA | 4,662 | 2.2% | 3 | 4.8% | 1 | 1.6% | +2 |
| WEP | 681 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 606 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| STOCK FANC | 233 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 215,859 | 100.0% | 63 | 100.0% | 63 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Norbury and Woodsmoor · 3 seats · won at 40.0% · above quota
- Bredbury and Woodley · 3 seats · won at 41.4% · above quota
- Offerton · 3 seats · won at 42.0% · above quota
- Bramhall North · 3 seats · won at 42.1% · above quota
- Manor · 3 seats · won at 42.7% · above quota
- Cheadle East and Cheadle Hulme North · 3 seats · won at 42.7% · above quota
- Heald Green · 3 seats · won at 44.5% · above quota
- Hazel Grove · 3 seats · won at 46.0% · above quota
- Bramhall South and Woodford · 3 seats · won at 48.5% · above quota
- Edgeley · 3 seats · won at 49.4% · above quota
- Cheadle West and Gatley · 3 seats · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Reddish South · 3 seats · won at 55.1% · above quota
- Marple South and High Lane · 3 seats · won at 59.1% · above quota
- Cheadle Hulme South · 3 seats · won at 59.6% · above quota
- Marple North · 3 seats · won at 60.8% · above quota
- Bredbury Green and Romiley · 3 seats · won at 61.7% · above quota
- Davenport and Cale Green · 3 seats · won at 64.1% · above quota
- Reddish North · 3 seats · won at 64.4% · above quota
- Brinnington and Stockport Central · 3 seats · won at 65.0% · above quota
- Heatons North · 3 seats · won at 70.7% · above quota
- Heatons South · 3 seats · won at 71.0% · above quota
Race results
Norbury and Woodsmoor · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,167
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baynham, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,944 | 15.5% | 46.6% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hardwick, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,936 | 15.5% | 46.5% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | West, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,667 | 13.3% | 40.0% | +15.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Johnstone, O. | Conservative Party | 1,581 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 5 | Walker, L. | Conservative Party | 1,273 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 6 | Wright, J. | Conservative Party | 1,270 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 7 | Byrne, J. | Labour Party | 820 | 6.6% | 19.7% | — | |
| 8 | Caruso-Kelly, N. | Labour Party | 789 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 9 | Devine, I. | Labour Party | 736 | 5.9% | 17.7% | — | |
| 10 | Handscomb, P. | Green Party | 373 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — | |
| 11 | Schofield, L. | Reform UK | 113 | 0.9% | 2.7% | — |
Bredbury and Woodley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,569
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barratt, J. | Labour Party | 1,639 | 15.3% | 45.9% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thorpe, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,598 | 14.9% | 44.8% | +19.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barratt, R. | Labour Party | 1,479 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Epps, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,390 | 13.0% | 39.0% | — | |
| 5 | Willis, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,388 | 13.0% | 38.9% | — | |
| 6 | Price, C. | Labour Party | 1,238 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 7 | Morley, T. | Conservative Party | 515 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 8 | Lyons, M. | Conservative Party | 480 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 9 | Wylde, B. | Conservative Party | 424 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 10 | Crompton, A. | Green Party | 312 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — | |
| 11 | Chatton, S. | Independent | 243 | 2.3% | 6.8% | — |
Offerton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,406
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dawson, W. | Liberal Democrats | 1,664 | 16.3% | 48.9% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hibbert, H. | Labour Party | 1,479 | 14.5% | 43.4% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sharp, W. | Labour Party | 1,431 | 14.0% | 42.0% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harrison, O. | Liberal Democrats | 1,421 | 13.9% | 41.7% | — | |
| 5 | Sheaff, P. | Labour Party | 1,338 | 13.1% | 39.3% | — | |
| 6 | Weldon, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,182 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 7 | Butler, M. | Conservative Party | 486 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 8 | Bennett, S. | Conservative Party | 391 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 9 | Torley, S. | Green Party | 377 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 10 | Ward, S. | Conservative Party | 270 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 11 | Kelly, J. | Reform UK | 178 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — |
Bramhall North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,100
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,210 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wyatt, S. | Liberal Democrats | 2,149 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wynne, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,728 | 14.0% | 42.1% | +17.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bates, F. | Conservative Party | 1,634 | 13.3% | 39.9% | — | |
| 5 | Holt, L. | Conservative Party | 1,625 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 6 | Crossen, P. | Conservative Party | 1,503 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 7 | Hind, D. | Green Party | 468 | 3.8% | 11.4% | — | |
| 8 | Beswick, J. | Labour Party | 420 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 9 | Bennett, M. | Labour Party | 311 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — | |
| 10 | Parkinson, D. | Labour Party | 252 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — |
Manor · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,697
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clingan, L. | Labour Party | 1,328 | 16.4% | 49.2% | +24.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Glithero, S. | Labour Party | 1,280 | 15.8% | 47.5% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stewart, C. | Labour Party | 1,152 | 14.2% | 42.7% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Meikle, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,103 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 5 | Hirst, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,047 | 12.9% | 38.8% | — | |
| 6 | Jones, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,021 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 7 | Rablen, T. | Green Party | 270 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — | |
| 8 | Tinne, C. | Conservative Party | 233 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — | |
| 9 | Battle, B. | Independent | 213 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 10 | Murphy, C. | Independent | 173 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 11 | Sorton, A. | Independent | 142 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — | |
| 12 | Speakman, S. | Reform UK | 130 | 1.6% | 4.8% | — |
Cheadle East and Cheadle Hulme North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,899
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meller, D. | Labour Party | 2,041 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Julian, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,846 | 15.8% | 47.3% | +22.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Guariento, Y. | Labour Party | 1,666 | 14.2% | 42.7% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hill, M. | Labour Party | 1,586 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 5 | Hendley, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,575 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 6 | O'Neill, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,408 | 12.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 7 | Booth, M. | Conservative Party | 449 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 8 | Khan, N. | Conservative Party | 381 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 9 | Padfield, M. | Green Party | 377 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 10 | Leck, P. | Conservative Party | 368 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — |
Heald Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,403
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCann, C. | Independent | 1,663 | 16.3% | 48.9% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Charles-Jones, A. | Independent | 1,625 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stuart, C. | Independent | 1,516 | 14.8% | 44.5% | +19.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ahmed, Q. | Liberal Democrats | 988 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — | |
| 5 | Bowker, G. | Liberal Democrats | 893 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 6 | Roberts, I. | Liberal Democrats | 863 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 7 | Priestley, K. | Labour Party | 625 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 8 | Owen, C. | Labour Party | 563 | 5.5% | 16.5% | — | |
| 9 | Preece, B. | Labour Party | 442 | 4.3% | 13.0% | — | |
| 10 | McGahan, J. | Conservative Party | 302 | 3.0% | 8.9% | — | |
| 11 | Salmons, Y. | Conservative Party | 290 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — | |
| 12 | Williamson, O. | Conservative Party | 237 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 13 | Ramachandran, C. | Green Party | 202 | 2.0% | 5.9% | — |
Hazel Grove · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,172
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austin, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,662 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Meikle, W. | Liberal Democrats | 1,596 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Singleton, F. | Liberal Democrats | 1,458 | 15.3% | 46.0% | +21.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Law, B. | Conservative Party | 924 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 5 | Baker, A. | Conservative Party | 891 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 6 | Arnold, E. | Conservative Party | 891 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 7 | Carrigan, C. | Labour Party | 708 | 7.4% | 22.3% | — | |
| 8 | Paton, L. | Labour Party | 544 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 9 | White, J. | Labour Party | 468 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — | |
| 10 | Bullock, M. | Green Party | 375 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
Bramhall South and Woodford · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,509
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Powney, I. | Liberal Democrats | 2,342 | 17.3% | 51.9% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jones, D. | Liberal Democrats | 2,228 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Meal, J. | Liberal Democrats | 2,188 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bagnall, B. | Conservative Party | 2,025 | 15.0% | 44.9% | — | |
| 5 | Hurleston, M. | Conservative Party | 1,828 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 6 | McGahan, J. | Conservative Party | 1,789 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 7 | Dearden, A. | Green Party | 437 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 8 | Martin, V. | Labour Party | 254 | 1.9% | 5.6% | — | |
| 9 | Szkilnyk, K. | Labour Party | 230 | 1.7% | 5.1% | — | |
| 10 | Wells, C. | Labour Party | 207 | 1.5% | 4.6% | — |
Edgeley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,957
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wynne, M. | ECA | 1,714 | 19.3% | 58.0% | +33.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, L. | ECA | 1,487 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Caton, A. | ECA | 1,461 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Heywood, L. | Labour Party | 1,183 | 13.3% | 40.0% | — | |
| 5 | Lynott, G. | Labour Party | 1,166 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 6 | Leonard, R. | Labour Party | 1,083 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 7 | Rick, S. | Green Party | 204 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 8 | Cowbury, R. | Liberal Democrats | 187 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — | |
| 9 | Whitmore, T. | Liberal Democrats | 155 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — | |
| 10 | Traynor, B. | Liberal Democrats | 124 | 1.4% | 4.2% | — | |
| 11 | Seppman, K. | Conservative Party | 106 | 1.2% | 3.6% | — |
Cheadle West and Gatley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,687
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenhalgh, C. | Liberal Democrats | 2,219 | 20.1% | 60.2% | +35.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hunter, I. | Liberal Democrats | 2,160 | 19.5% | 58.6% | +33.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Morrison, T. | Liberal Democrats | 2,018 | 18.2% | 54.7% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fox, M. | Conservative Party | 832 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 5 | Cook, M. | Conservative Party | 759 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 6 | Khan, F. | Conservative Party | 690 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — | |
| 7 | Gleeson, C. | Labour Party | 678 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 8 | Barrett, R. | Green Party | 625 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 9 | Preece, E. | Labour Party | 569 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 10 | Kokolakakis, T. | Labour Party | 510 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — |
Reddish South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,610
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crix, L. | Green Party | 2,174 | 20.1% | 60.2% | +35.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lawson, G. | Green Party | 2,042 | 18.9% | 56.6% | +31.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Frizzell, J. | Green Party | 1,989 | 18.4% | 55.1% | +30.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Williams, J. | Labour Party | 1,481 | 13.7% | 41.0% | — | |
| 5 | White, D. | Labour Party | 1,453 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 6 | Wright, P. | Labour Party | 1,195 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 7 | Bates, J. | Conservative Party | 268 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — | |
| 8 | Grant, M. | Liberal Democrats | 104 | 1.0% | 2.9% | — | |
| 9 | Richardson, R. | Liberal Democrats | 71 | 0.7% | 2.0% | — | |
| 10 | Somekh, J. | Liberal Democrats | 54 | 0.5% | 1.5% | — |
Marple South and High Lane · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,498
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alexander, S. | Liberal Democrats | 2,168 | 20.7% | 62.0% | +37.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thornley, A. | Liberal Democrats | 2,115 | 20.2% | 60.5% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Macalister, C. | Liberal Democrats | 2,069 | 19.7% | 59.1% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Finnie, A. | Conservative Party | 898 | 8.6% | 25.7% | — | |
| 5 | Lord, A. | Conservative Party | 807 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 6 | Morley-Scott, W. | Conservative Party | 721 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 7 | Threlfall, A. | Green Party | 565 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 8 | Hindle, M. | Labour Party | 473 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 9 | Towey, P. | Labour Party | 363 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 10 | Whittley, M. | Labour Party | 316 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Cheadle Hulme South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,037
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hunter, M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,852 | 23.5% | 70.6% | +45.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Foster-Grime, H. | Liberal Democrats | 2,657 | 21.9% | 65.8% | +40.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Holloway, K. | Liberal Democrats | 2,405 | 19.9% | 59.6% | +34.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dougal, B. | Conservative Party | 732 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 5 | Evans, M. | Conservative Party | 728 | 6.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hawkins, B. | Labour Party | 694 | 5.7% | 17.2% | — | |
| 7 | Shaw, G. | Conservative Party | 631 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 8 | McDermott, T. | Labour Party | 509 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 9 | O'Shea, A. | Green Party | 506 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 10 | Pelham, J. | Labour Party | 398 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — |
Marple North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,063
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gribbon, S. | Liberal Democrats | 2,752 | 22.6% | 67.7% | +42.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Abell, G. | Liberal Democrats | 2,638 | 21.6% | 64.9% | +39.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Senior, B. | Liberal Democrats | 2,472 | 20.3% | 60.8% | +35.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Noble, N. | Conservative Party | 766 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 5 | Bright, J. | Green Party | 658 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 6 | Ebbage, J. | Conservative Party | 644 | 5.3% | 15.9% | — | |
| 7 | Marchbank, D. | Conservative Party | 613 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 8 | Broadhurst, S. | Labour Party | 552 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 9 | Hamilton, C. | Labour Party | 430 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — | |
| 10 | Wild, B. | Labour Party | 382 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 11 | Hatton, S. | Independent | 282 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — |
Bredbury Green and Romiley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,321
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smart, L. | Liberal Democrats | 2,301 | 23.1% | 69.3% | +44.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clark, A. | Liberal Democrats | 2,239 | 22.5% | 67.4% | +42.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Roberts, M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,048 | 20.6% | 61.7% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bentley, P. | Conservative Party | 607 | 6.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 5 | Cannon, J. | Conservative Party | 563 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 6 | Walsh, M. | Conservative Party | 559 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 7 | Black, P. | Labour Party | 488 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 8 | Colman, D. | Labour Party | 439 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 9 | Colman, S. | Labour Party | 399 | 4.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 10 | Wyatt, S. | Green Party | 319 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — |
Davenport and Cale Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,885
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davies, D. | Labour Party | 2,165 | 25.0% | 75.0% | +50.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wild, W. | Labour Party | 1,890 | 21.8% | 65.5% | +40.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mobbs, J. | Labour Party | 1,849 | 21.4% | 64.1% | +39.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wells, D. | Liberal Democrats | 549 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 5 | Granelli, P. | Green Party | 518 | 6.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 6 | Ardern, S. | Liberal Democrats | 446 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 7 | Lumb, N. | Conservative Party | 427 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — | |
| 8 | Fairbanks, B. | Liberal Democrats | 393 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 9 | Hopkins, D. | Reform UK | 185 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 10 | Pearson, J. | STOCK FANC | 117 | 1.4% | 4.1% | — | |
| 11 | Walker, A. | STOCK FANC | 116 | 1.3% | 4.0% | — |
Reddish North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,272
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson, D. | Labour Party | 1,799 | 26.4% | 79.2% | +54.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McCormack, H. | Labour Party | 1,632 | 23.9% | 71.8% | +46.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wise, R. | Labour Party | 1,464 | 21.5% | 64.4% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mellish, H. | Green Party | 658 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — | |
| 5 | Clayton, B. | Conservative Party | 412 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 6 | King, P. | WEP | 297 | 4.4% | 13.1% | — | |
| 7 | Jones, P. | Liberal Democrats | 242 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — | |
| 8 | Pantall, J. | Liberal Democrats | 164 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — | |
| 9 | Richardson, L. | Liberal Democrats | 149 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — |
Brinnington and Stockport Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,297
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carrigan, C. | Labour Party | 1,041 | 26.8% | 80.3% | +55.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Waters, K. | Labour Party | 931 | 23.9% | 71.8% | +46.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wardlaw, K. | Labour Party | 843 | 21.7% | 65.0% | +40.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Drury, A. | Green Party | 282 | 7.2% | 21.7% | — | |
| 5 | Lloyd, R. | Conservative Party | 222 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 6 | Barrowcliff, C. | Liberal Democrats | 217 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 7 | Ingham, S. | Liberal Democrats | 212 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 8 | Holliss, J. | Liberal Democrats | 142 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — |
Heatons North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,768
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sedgwick, D. | Labour Party | 2,873 | 25.4% | 76.2% | +51.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, J. | Labour Party | 2,819 | 24.9% | 74.8% | +49.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ryness, D. | Labour Party | 2,664 | 23.6% | 70.7% | +45.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dugdale, S. | Green Party | 900 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 5 | Sajjad, H. | Conservative Party | 647 | 5.7% | 17.2% | — | |
| 6 | Ankers, P. | Liberal Democrats | 386 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 7 | Coffey, D. | WEP | 384 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 8 | Humphreys, J. | Liberal Democrats | 371 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 9 | Wright, C. | Liberal Democrats | 260 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — |
Heatons South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,635
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foster, C. | Labour Party | 2,868 | 26.3% | 78.9% | +53.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fitzpatrick, D. | Labour Party | 2,838 | 26.0% | 78.1% | +53.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Vibert, C. | Labour Party | 2,582 | 23.7% | 71.0% | +46.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Tyrrell, S. | Green Party | 947 | 8.7% | 26.0% | — | |
| 5 | Tennuchi, J. | Conservative Party | 575 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 6 | McDermott, M. | Liberal Democrats | 418 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 7 | Allan, M. | Liberal Democrats | 353 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 8 | Hardisty, R. | Liberal Democrats | 325 | 3.0% | 8.9% | — |