← Stockton-on-Tees (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Stockton-on-Tees 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 27 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 56 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 42,338 | 43.0% | 26 | 46.4% | 25 | 44.6% | +1 |
| Labour Party | 33,058 | 33.6% | 22 | 39.3% | 19 | 33.9% | +3 |
| Independent | 7,647 | 7.8% | 1 | 1.8% | 4 | 7.1% | -3 |
| IBIS | 5,573 | 5.7% | 3 | 5.4% | 3 | 5.4% | 0 |
| THORN IND | 4,418 | 4.5% | 4 | 7.1% | 2 | 3.6% | +2 |
| Green Party | 3,382 | 3.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 3.6% | -2 |
| Reform UK | 2,115 | 2.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.8% | -1 |
| Total | 98,531 | 100.0% | 56 | 100.0% | 56 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Billingham West and Wolviston · 2 seats · won at 40.4% · above quota
- Mandale and Victoria · 2 seats · won at 43.0% · above quota
- Norton Central · 2 seats · won at 45.5% · above quota
- Grangefield · 1 seat · won at 62.6% · above quota
- Ingleby Barwick North · 3 seats · won at 39.2% · above quota
- Ingleby Barwick South · 3 seats · won at 42.7% · above quota
- Fairfield · 3 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- Ropner · 2 seats · won at 53.6% · above quota
- Southern Villages · 1 seat · won at 70.5% · above quota
- Village · 2 seats · won at 54.4% · above quota
- Norton North · 2 seats · won at 55.1% · above quota
- Billingham North · 2 seats · won at 57.5% · above quota
- Hardwick and Salters Lane · 2 seats · won at 57.6% · above quota
- Newtown · 1 seat · won at 74.4% · above quota
- Stainsby Hill · 2 seats · won at 57.9% · above quota
- Billingham Central · 2 seats · won at 58.0% · above quota
- Stockton Town Centre · 2 seats · won at 59.2% · above quota
- Eaglescliffe West · 2 seats · won at 60.6% · above quota
- Bishopsgarth and Elm Tree · 2 seats · won at 60.9% · above quota
- Billingham East · 2 seats · won at 62.4% · above quota
- Eaglescliffe East · 2 seats · won at 62.5% · above quota
- Northern Parishes · 2 seats · won at 64.1% · above quota
- Billingham South · 2 seats · won at 67.8% · above quota
- Yarm · 3 seats · won at 59.5% · above quota
- Hartburn · 3 seats · won at 61.9% · above quota
- Roseworth · 2 seats · won at 72.1% · above quota
- Norton South · 2 seats · won at 74.4% · above quota
Race results
Billingham West and Wolviston · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,898
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reynard, D. | Conservative Party | 838 | 22.1% | 44.2% | +10.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Vickers, M. | Conservative Party | 766 | 20.2% | 40.4% | +7.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Atkinson, H. | Independent | 634 | 16.7% | 33.4% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 549 | 14.5% | 28.9% | — | |
| 5 | Forrest, D. | Labour Party | 524 | 13.8% | 27.6% | — | |
| 6 | Snead, G. | Independent | 485 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — |
Mandale and Victoria · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,445
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eglington, R. | Labour Party | 728 | 25.2% | 50.4% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gale, N. | Labour Party | 621 | 21.5% | 43.0% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Walmsley, S. | THORN IND | 509 | 17.6% | 35.2% | — | |
| 4 | Large, T. | THORN IND | 488 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — | |
| 5 | Donegan, L. | Conservative Party | 216 | 7.5% | 14.9% | — | |
| 6 | Frost, L. | Independent | 174 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 7 | Hampton, T. | Conservative Party | 154 | 5.3% | 10.7% | — |
Norton Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,375
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson, S. | Labour Party | 719 | 26.1% | 52.3% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Evans, L. | Labour Party | 625 | 22.7% | 45.5% | +12.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thompson, T. | Independent | 355 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 4 | Maxwell, T. | Conservative Party | 325 | 11.8% | 23.6% | — | |
| 5 | Young, A. | Conservative Party | 314 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 6 | Deehan, H. | Independent | 238 | 8.7% | 17.3% | — | |
| 7 | McGlade, E. | Independent | 174 | 6.3% | 12.7% | — |
Grangefield · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 62.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 874
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clark, C. | Labour Party | 547 | 62.6% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clarke, L. | Conservative Party | 327 | 37.4% | — |
Ingleby Barwick North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,112
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watson, S. | Conservative Party | 874 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Strike, T. | Independent | 848 | 13.4% | 40.2% | +15.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Watson, A. | Conservative Party | 827 | 13.1% | 39.2% | +14.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Faulks, P. | IBIS | 824 | 13.0% | 39.0% | — | |
| 5 | Foreman, J. | IBIS | 681 | 10.7% | 32.2% | — | |
| 6 | Wood, E. | Labour Party | 658 | 10.4% | 31.2% | — | |
| 7 | Rutland, J. | Conservative Party | 650 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 8 | Kirby, J. | IBIS | 583 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 9 | Harland, S. | Green Party | 333 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 10 | French, A. | Independent | 57 | 0.9% | 2.7% | — |
Ingleby Barwick South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,601
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Faulks, K. | IBIS | 1,203 | 15.4% | 46.3% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barnes, S. | IBIS | 1,171 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Patterson, R. | IBIS | 1,111 | 14.2% | 42.7% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Irwin, J. | Conservative Party | 1,017 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 5 | Fryer, M. | Conservative Party | 935 | 12.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 6 | Davies, S. | Conservative Party | 880 | 11.3% | 33.8% | — | |
| 7 | Nicholas, K. | Labour Party | 648 | 8.3% | 24.9% | — | |
| 8 | Hobson, D. | Green Party | 361 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 9 | Mathers, Z. | Independent | 262 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 10 | Ellison, T. | Reform UK | 124 | 1.6% | 4.8% | — | |
| 11 | Clough, E. | Independent | 54 | 0.7% | 2.1% | — | |
| 12 | Williamson, M. | Independent | 36 | 0.5% | 1.4% | — |
Fairfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,724
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richardson, S. | Conservative Party | 1,273 | 15.6% | 46.7% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Griffiths, A. | Conservative Party | 1,219 | 14.9% | 44.8% | +19.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Scott, S. | Conservative Party | 1,183 | 14.5% | 43.4% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cunningham, A. | Labour Party | 801 | 9.8% | 29.4% | — | |
| 5 | Johnson-Colmer, J. | Labour Party | 723 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 6 | Stephenson, J. | Labour Party | 712 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 7 | Woodhead, B. | Independent | 694 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 8 | Perry, M. | Independent | 582 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 9 | Perry, L. | Independent | 519 | 6.4% | 19.1% | — | |
| 10 | McCabe, N. | Reform UK | 242 | 3.0% | 8.9% | — | |
| 11 | Thomas, S. | Independent | 108 | 1.3% | 4.0% | — | |
| 12 | Thomas, M. | Independent | 86 | 1.1% | 3.2% | — | |
| 13 | Bell-Berry, W. | Independent | 30 | 0.4% | 1.1% | — |
Ropner · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,635
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hussain, S. | Conservative Party | 934 | 28.6% | 57.1% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mubeen, S. | Conservative Party | 876 | 26.8% | 53.6% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Javed, M. | Labour Party | 739 | 22.6% | 45.2% | — | |
| 4 | Prince, K. | Labour Party | 721 | 22.0% | 44.1% | — |
Southern Villages · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 777
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hampton, E. | Conservative Party | 548 | 70.5% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chandler, G. | Labour Party | 229 | 29.5% | — |
Village · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,440
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moore, M. | THORN IND | 806 | 28.0% | 56.0% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dalgarno, I. | THORN IND | 783 | 27.2% | 54.4% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cooper, J. | Conservative Party | 383 | 13.3% | 26.6% | — | |
| 4 | Jenkins, P. | Labour Party | 321 | 11.1% | 22.3% | — | |
| 5 | Cunniffe, T. | Conservative Party | 305 | 10.6% | 21.2% | — | |
| 6 | Smith, D. | Labour Party | 281 | 9.8% | 19.5% | — |
Norton North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,543
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vickers, H. | Conservative Party | 1,408 | 27.7% | 55.4% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Riordan, T. | Conservative Party | 1,400 | 27.5% | 55.1% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilburn, D. | Labour Party | 1,143 | 22.5% | 45.0% | — | |
| 4 | Wilburn, N. | Labour Party | 1,134 | 22.3% | 44.6% | — |
Billingham North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,758
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gamble, C. | Labour Party | 1,045 | 29.7% | 59.5% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Besford, M. | Labour Party | 1,011 | 28.8% | 57.5% | +24.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barry, K. | Conservative Party | 718 | 20.4% | 40.9% | — | |
| 4 | Stott, L. | Conservative Party | 593 | 16.9% | 33.7% | — | |
| 5 | Hobson, J. | Green Party | 148 | 4.2% | 8.4% | — |
Hardwick and Salters Lane · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,135
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stephenson, N. | Labour Party | 675 | 29.7% | 59.5% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooke, N. | Labour Party | 654 | 28.8% | 57.6% | +24.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harker, C. | Reform UK | 349 | 15.4% | 30.8% | — | |
| 4 | Harker, G. | Reform UK | 267 | 11.8% | 23.5% | — | |
| 5 | Merifield, M. | Conservative Party | 164 | 7.2% | 14.5% | — | |
| 6 | Wellington, J. | Conservative Party | 160 | 7.1% | 14.1% | — |
Newtown · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 74.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 468
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Surtees, M. | Labour Party | 348 | 74.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Riordan, L. | Conservative Party | 120 | 25.6% | — |
Stainsby Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,555
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walmsley, S. | THORN IND | 932 | 30.0% | 59.9% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Godwin, R. | THORN IND | 900 | 28.9% | 57.9% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lamb, B. | Labour Party | 415 | 13.3% | 26.7% | — | |
| 4 | Higginbotham, Z. | Labour Party | 405 | 13.0% | 26.0% | — | |
| 5 | Dent, J. | Conservative Party | 237 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — | |
| 6 | Dent, S. | Conservative Party | 221 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — |
Billingham Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,264
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCoy, A. | Labour Party | 826 | 32.7% | 65.4% | +32.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Woodhouse, B. | Labour Party | 733 | 29.0% | 58.0% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McDermottroe, J. | Reform UK | 308 | 12.2% | 24.4% | — | |
| 4 | Sharp, J. | Conservative Party | 259 | 10.2% | 20.5% | — | |
| 5 | Tunney, L. | Conservative Party | 242 | 9.6% | 19.2% | — | |
| 6 | Stringer, C. | Green Party | 159 | 6.3% | 12.6% | — |
Stockton Town Centre · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,062
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beall, P. | Labour Party | 731 | 34.4% | 68.8% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rowling, P. | Labour Party | 629 | 29.6% | 59.2% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams, A. | Conservative Party | 318 | 15.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 4 | Mazi, M. | Conservative Party | 286 | 13.5% | 26.9% | — | |
| 5 | Hardy, A. | Independent | 160 | 7.5% | 15.1% | — |
Eaglescliffe West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,882
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tunney, L. | Conservative Party | 1,204 | 32.0% | 64.0% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clarke, D. | Conservative Party | 1,140 | 30.3% | 60.6% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Batchelor, F. | Labour Party | 623 | 16.6% | 33.1% | — | |
| 4 | Clarke, J. | Labour Party | 494 | 13.1% | 26.2% | — | |
| 5 | Bradford, S. | Green Party | 168 | 4.5% | 8.9% | — | |
| 6 | Stephenson, A. | Reform UK | 135 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — |
Bishopsgarth and Elm Tree · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,016
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stratton, H. | Conservative Party | 1,288 | 32.0% | 63.9% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tate, E. | Conservative Party | 1,227 | 30.4% | 60.9% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cunningham, J. | Labour Party | 764 | 19.0% | 37.9% | — | |
| 4 | Jennings, S. | Labour Party | 752 | 18.7% | 37.3% | — |
Billingham East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,173
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bendelow, M. | Labour Party | 781 | 33.3% | 66.6% | +33.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stoker, M. | Labour Party | 732 | 31.2% | 62.4% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carney, M. | Conservative Party | 233 | 9.9% | 19.9% | — | |
| 4 | Jeffrey, C. | Green Party | 215 | 9.2% | 18.3% | — | |
| 5 | Geer, I. | Conservative Party | 207 | 8.8% | 17.6% | — | |
| 6 | Stringer, D. | Green Party | 178 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — |
Eaglescliffe East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,763
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houghton, S. | Conservative Party | 1,258 | 35.7% | 71.4% | +38.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, J. | Conservative Party | 1,101 | 31.2% | 62.5% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rowlinson, R. | Labour Party | 682 | 19.3% | 38.7% | — | |
| 4 | Singh, K. | Green Party | 484 | 13.7% | 27.5% | — |
Northern Parishes · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,457
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gardner, J. | Conservative Party | 938 | 32.2% | 64.4% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sewell, V. | Conservative Party | 934 | 32.1% | 64.1% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Matthews, S. | Independent | 545 | 18.7% | 37.4% | — | |
| 4 | McCarthy, M. | Labour Party | 496 | 17.0% | 34.1% | — |
Billingham South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,483
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weston, P. | Labour Party | 1,037 | 35.0% | 69.9% | +36.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Weston, K. | Labour Party | 1,005 | 33.9% | 67.8% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Scott, D. | Conservative Party | 298 | 10.0% | 20.1% | — | |
| 4 | Holdaway, J. | Conservative Party | 291 | 9.8% | 19.6% | — | |
| 5 | Spence, D. | Reform UK | 150 | 5.1% | 10.1% | — | |
| 6 | Stringer, K. | Green Party | 129 | 4.3% | 8.7% | — | |
| 7 | Lacey, S. | Independent | 56 | 1.9% | 3.8% | — |
Yarm · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,648
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sherris, A. | Conservative Party | 1,805 | 22.7% | 68.2% | +43.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fagan, D. | Conservative Party | 1,612 | 20.3% | 60.9% | +35.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Coulson, J. | Conservative Party | 1,575 | 19.8% | 59.5% | +34.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Butler, J. | Labour Party | 803 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 5 | Smailes, P. | Independent | 802 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 6 | Wegg, B. | Independent | 748 | 9.4% | 28.2% | — | |
| 7 | Jordan, J. | Green Party | 600 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — |
Hartburn · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,542
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall, L. | Conservative Party | 1,788 | 23.4% | 70.3% | +45.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Innes, N. | Conservative Party | 1,773 | 23.2% | 69.7% | +44.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | French, J. | Conservative Party | 1,574 | 20.6% | 61.9% | +36.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Coombs, C. | Labour Party | 771 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 5 | Tyler, J. | Labour Party | 681 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 6 | Hobson, J. | Green Party | 342 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 7 | Elliott, A. | Reform UK | 264 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 8 | Stephenson, A. | Reform UK | 169 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 9 | Singh, K. | Green Party | 134 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — | |
| 10 | Jordan, J. | Green Party | 131 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — |
Roseworth · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 72.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,171
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beall, J. | Labour Party | 863 | 36.8% | 73.7% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Inman, B. | Labour Party | 844 | 36.0% | 72.1% | +38.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smailes, M. | Conservative Party | 275 | 11.7% | 23.5% | — | |
| 4 | Bright, J. | Conservative Party | 253 | 10.8% | 21.6% | — | |
| 5 | Walker, M. | Reform UK | 107 | 4.6% | 9.1% | — |
Norton South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 74.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,215
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cook, B. | Labour Party | 931 | 38.3% | 76.7% | +43.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Johnson, E. | Labour Party | 904 | 37.2% | 74.4% | +41.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nightscales, G. | Conservative Party | 303 | 12.5% | 24.9% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, D. | Conservative Party | 291 | 12.0% | 24.0% | — |