← Surrey Heath (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Surrey Heath 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 14 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 35 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 28,416 | 48.8% | 24 | 68.6% | 18 | 51.4% | +6 |
| Conservative Party | 22,912 | 39.4% | 6 | 17.1% | 14 | 40.0% | -8 |
| Independent | 3,927 | 6.7% | 3 | 8.6% | 2 | 5.7% | +1 |
| Labour Party | 2,428 | 4.2% | 2 | 5.7% | 1 | 2.9% | +1 |
| Reform UK | 372 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Green Party | 145 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 58,200 | 100.0% | 35 | 100.0% | 35 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Windlesham and Chobham · 3 seats · won at 33.2% · above quota
- Bagshot · 3 seats · won at 39.0% · above quota
- St Pauls · 2 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- Bisley and West End · 3 seats · won at 42.0% · above quota
- Old Dean · 2 seats · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Parkside · 2 seats · won at 56.2% · above quota
- St. Michaels · 2 seats · won at 58.4% · above quota
- Lightwater · 3 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- Frimley · 2 seats · won at 59.8% · above quota
- Town · 2 seats · won at 60.9% · above quota
- Watchetts · 2 seats · won at 61.0% · above quota
- Mytchett and Deepcut · 3 seats · won at 56.3% · above quota
- Frimley Green · 3 seats · won at 60.9% · above quota
- Heatherside · 3 seats · won at 63.5% · above quota
Race results
Windlesham and Chobham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,840
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wheeler, V. | Independent | 864 | 15.7% | 47.0% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tedder, P. | Independent | 790 | 14.3% | 42.9% | +17.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McGrath, E. | Independent | 611 | 11.1% | 33.2% | +8.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cars, J. | Conservative Party | 535 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 5 | Moqbel, A. | Liberal Democrats | 534 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — | |
| 6 | Massarano, J. | Liberal Democrats | 513 | 9.3% | 27.9% | — | |
| 7 | Ibrahim, S. | Liberal Democrats | 490 | 8.9% | 26.6% | — | |
| 8 | Bakar, A. | Conservative Party | 394 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 9 | Khan, F. | Conservative Party | 352 | 6.4% | 19.1% | — | |
| 10 | Hook, A. | Independent | 292 | 5.3% | 15.9% | — | |
| 11 | Relton, C. | Green Party | 145 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — |
Bagshot · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,746
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gordon, M. | Conservative Party | 1,061 | 20.3% | 60.8% | +35.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | White, V. | Conservative Party | 978 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilson, R. | Liberal Democrats | 681 | 13.0% | 39.0% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cann, F. | Conservative Party | 677 | 12.9% | 38.8% | — | |
| 5 | Whitcroft, C. | Liberal Democrats | 676 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — | |
| 6 | Virani, Z. | Liberal Democrats | 599 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 7 | Willgoss, A. | Independent | 364 | 6.9% | 20.8% | — | |
| 8 | Goggin, S. | Reform UK | 202 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — |
St Pauls · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,449
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cope, J. | Conservative Party | 714 | 24.6% | 49.3% | +16.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thorne, J. | Conservative Party | 692 | 23.9% | 47.8% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Browne, S. | Liberal Democrats | 673 | 23.2% | 46.5% | — | |
| 4 | Hodges-Long, M. | Liberal Democrats | 654 | 22.6% | 45.2% | — | |
| 5 | Ridgway, G. | Labour Party | 83 | 2.9% | 5.7% | — | |
| 6 | Radeva, M. | Labour Party | 81 | 2.8% | 5.6% | — |
Bisley and West End · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,054
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Noble, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,312 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kang, S. | Liberal Democrats | 902 | 14.6% | 43.9% | +18.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Perrett, Y. | Liberal Democrats | 863 | 14.0% | 42.0% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Page, A. | Conservative Party | 753 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 5 | Henderson, T. | Conservative Party | 702 | 11.4% | 34.2% | — | |
| 6 | Hanney, A. | Conservative Party | 625 | 10.1% | 30.4% | — | |
| 7 | Alleway, G. | Independent | 598 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 8 | Keeling, A. | Independent | 408 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — |
Old Dean · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 921
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garrett, S. | Conservative Party | 563 | 30.6% | 61.1% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mears, L. | Conservative Party | 504 | 27.4% | 54.7% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gibbs, H. | Labour Party | 393 | 21.3% | 42.7% | — | |
| 4 | Gibbs, B. | Labour Party | 382 | 20.7% | 41.5% | — |
Parkside · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,483
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lee, R. | Liberal Democrats | 837 | 28.2% | 56.5% | +23.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kang, N. | Liberal Democrats | 833 | 28.1% | 56.2% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Grainger, L. | Conservative Party | 653 | 22.0% | 44.0% | — | |
| 4 | Bennett, S. | Conservative Party | 642 | 21.7% | 43.3% | — |
St. Michaels · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,133
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quin, J. | Labour Party | 684 | 30.2% | 60.4% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rowlands, M. | Labour Party | 661 | 29.2% | 58.4% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Buxton, C. | Conservative Party | 503 | 22.2% | 44.4% | — | |
| 4 | Mwenketishi, G. | Conservative Party | 417 | 18.4% | 36.8% | — |
Lightwater · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,152
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hoad, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,184 | 18.3% | 55.0% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | MacDonald, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,128 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thompson, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,080 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cooper, K. | Conservative Party | 966 | 15.0% | 44.9% | — | |
| 5 | Jennings-Evans, R. | Conservative Party | 943 | 14.6% | 43.8% | — | |
| 6 | Harris, J. | Conservative Party | 840 | 13.0% | 39.0% | — | |
| 7 | Appleford, P. | Reform UK | 170 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 8 | Johnson, T. | Labour Party | 144 | 2.2% | 6.7% | — |
Frimley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,207
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashbery, A. | Liberal Democrats | 783 | 32.4% | 64.9% | +31.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | O'Mahoney, D. | Liberal Democrats | 722 | 29.9% | 59.8% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Croke, S. | Conservative Party | 511 | 21.2% | 42.4% | — | |
| 4 | Ratiram, D. | Conservative Party | 397 | 16.5% | 32.9% | — |
Town · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,134
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glauert, M. | Liberal Democrats | 706 | 31.1% | 62.3% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | MacIntyre, L. | Liberal Democrats | 690 | 30.4% | 60.9% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Drury, N. | Conservative Party | 457 | 20.2% | 40.3% | — | |
| 4 | Singh, R. | Conservative Party | 414 | 18.3% | 36.5% | — |
Watchetts · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,349
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Finan-Cooke, L. | Liberal Democrats | 831 | 30.8% | 61.6% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Finan-Cooke, K. | Liberal Democrats | 823 | 30.5% | 61.0% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Adam-Holboj, C. | Conservative Party | 533 | 19.8% | 39.5% | — | |
| 4 | Dias, B. | Conservative Party | 511 | 18.9% | 37.9% | — |
Mytchett and Deepcut · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,689
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whitcroft, D. | Liberal Democrats | 995 | 19.6% | 58.9% | +33.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rise, M. | Liberal Democrats | 961 | 19.0% | 56.9% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Betton, C. | Liberal Democrats | 950 | 18.8% | 56.3% | +31.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fard, A. | Conservative Party | 752 | 14.8% | 44.5% | — | |
| 5 | Alexander, L. | Conservative Party | 747 | 14.7% | 44.2% | — | |
| 6 | Natolie, D. | Conservative Party | 661 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — |
Frimley Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,756
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olmo, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,131 | 21.5% | 64.4% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Whitcroft, H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,111 | 21.1% | 63.3% | +38.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mylvaganam, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,070 | 20.3% | 60.9% | +35.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Black, S. | Conservative Party | 738 | 14.0% | 42.0% | — | |
| 5 | Thomson, H. | Conservative Party | 610 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 6 | Fard, A. | Conservative Party | 608 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — |
Heatherside · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,381
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skipper, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,613 | 22.6% | 67.7% | +42.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ashbery, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,559 | 21.8% | 65.5% | +40.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Raikes, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,512 | 21.2% | 63.5% | +38.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wood, J. | Conservative Party | 829 | 11.6% | 34.8% | — | |
| 5 | Dickens, S. | Conservative Party | 819 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 6 | Henry, D. | Conservative Party | 811 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — |