← Tameside (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Tameside 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 57 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 71,400 | 63.3% | 52 | 91.2% | 37 | 64.9% | +15 |
| Conservative Party | 26,685 | 23.6% | 5 | 8.8% | 14 | 24.6% | -9 |
| Green Party | 10,865 | 9.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 8.8% | -5 |
| Independent | 2,078 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.8% | -1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 1,109 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| WEP | 462 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| OMRL | 244 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 112,843 | 100.0% | 57 | 100.0% | 57 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Stalybridge North · 3 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- Hyde Werneth · 3 seats · won at 48.8% · above quota
- Hyde Godley · 3 seats · won at 50.3% · above quota
- Ashton Hurst · 3 seats · won at 51.2% · above quota
- Stalybridge South · 3 seats · won at 51.6% · above quota
- Dukinfield Stalybridge · 3 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- Ashton Waterloo · 3 seats · won at 54.1% · above quota
- Hyde Newton · 3 seats · won at 55.9% · above quota
- Mossley · 3 seats · won at 57.8% · above quota
- St Peter's · 3 seats · won at 58.1% · above quota
- Longdendale · 3 seats · won at 62.6% · above quota
- Audenshaw · 3 seats · won at 67.4% · above quota
- Droylsden East · 3 seats · won at 68.1% · above quota
- Denton North East · 3 seats · won at 69.0% · above quota
- Ashton St Michael's · 3 seats · won at 69.2% · above quota
- Droylsden West · 3 seats · won at 70.6% · above quota
- Dukinfield · 3 seats · won at 71.5% · above quota
- Denton South · 3 seats · won at 73.7% · above quota
- Denton West · 3 seats · won at 75.1% · above quota
Race results
Stalybridge North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,999
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beardmore, C. | Labour Party | 1,057 | 17.6% | 52.9% | +27.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pearce, A. | Labour Party | 992 | 16.5% | 49.6% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jackson, J. | Labour Party | 956 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barton, S. | Independent | 848 | 14.1% | 42.4% | — | |
| 5 | Patrick, C. | Conservative Party | 643 | 10.7% | 32.2% | — | |
| 6 | Tilbrook, L. | Conservative Party | 590 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 7 | Marland, K. | Conservative Party | 509 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 8 | Mason-Power, A. | Green Party | 402 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — |
Hyde Werneth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,135
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chadwick, P. | Conservative Party | 1,665 | 17.7% | 53.1% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Alam, S. | Labour Party | 1,608 | 17.1% | 51.3% | +26.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fitzpatrick, J. | Labour Party | 1,530 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Welsh, R. | Conservative Party | 1,456 | 15.5% | 46.4% | — | |
| 5 | Rahman, M. | Labour Party | 1,352 | 14.4% | 43.1% | — | |
| 6 | Molloy, P. | Conservative Party | 1,324 | 14.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 7 | Cooper, A. | Green Party | 470 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — |
Hyde Godley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,266
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kitchen, J. | Labour Party | 1,278 | 18.8% | 56.4% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Affleck, B. | Labour Party | 1,273 | 18.7% | 56.2% | +31.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McAllister, D. | Labour Party | 1,139 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Colbourne, A. | Conservative Party | 1,139 | 16.8% | 50.3% | — | |
| 5 | Molloy, M. | Conservative Party | 843 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 6 | Reza, A. | Conservative Party | 790 | 11.6% | 34.9% | — | |
| 7 | Powell, Z. | Green Party | 335 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — |
Ashton Hurst · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,056
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glover, M. | Labour Party | 1,307 | 21.2% | 63.6% | +38.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Costello, D. | Conservative Party | 1,232 | 20.0% | 59.9% | +34.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Karim, M. | Labour Party | 1,052 | 17.1% | 51.2% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lewis, D. | Labour Party | 1,046 | 17.0% | 50.9% | — | |
| 5 | Turner, L. | Conservative Party | 980 | 15.9% | 47.7% | — | |
| 6 | Jones, H. | Green Party | 551 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — |
Stalybridge South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,516
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dickinson, D. | Conservative Party | 1,494 | 19.8% | 59.4% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Billington, L. | Conservative Party | 1,402 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tilbrook, D. | Conservative Party | 1,297 | 17.2% | 51.6% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Coates, F. | Labour Party | 1,098 | 14.5% | 43.6% | — | |
| 5 | Flanagan, K. | Labour Party | 951 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 6 | McKenzie, S. | Labour Party | 869 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 7 | Hickling, A. | Green Party | 436 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — |
Dukinfield Stalybridge · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,214
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feeley, L. | Labour Party | 1,243 | 18.7% | 56.2% | +31.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sweeton, D. | Labour Party | 1,229 | 18.5% | 55.5% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wills, E. | Labour Party | 1,189 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McPartland, K. | Conservative Party | 997 | 15.0% | 45.0% | — | |
| 5 | Dawson, D. | Conservative Party | 831 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 6 | Smith, M. | Conservative Party | 728 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 7 | Freeman, L. | Green Party | 424 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — |
Ashton Waterloo · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,177
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Choksi, V. | Labour Party | 1,343 | 20.6% | 61.7% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Howarth, D. | Labour Party | 1,185 | 18.1% | 54.4% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Patel, S. | Labour Party | 1,179 | 18.0% | 54.1% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Clark, C. | Green Party | 864 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 5 | Huntbach, L. | Green Party | 810 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 6 | Clarke, T. | Green Party | 759 | 11.6% | 34.9% | — | |
| 7 | Allen, M. | Conservative Party | 392 | 6.0% | 18.0% | — |
Hyde Newton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,661
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bowden, H. | Labour Party | 1,175 | 23.6% | 70.8% | +45.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Robinson, P. | Labour Party | 1,137 | 22.8% | 68.5% | +43.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Roderick, H. | Labour Party | 929 | 18.6% | 55.9% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Edwards, C. | Conservative Party | 539 | 10.8% | 32.5% | — | |
| 5 | Ince, W. | Conservative Party | 458 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 6 | Ball-Foster, P. | Liberal Democrats | 378 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 7 | Powell, E. | Green Party | 366 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — |
Mossley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,177
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homer, J. | Labour Party | 1,466 | 22.5% | 67.4% | +42.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sharif, T. | Labour Party | 1,334 | 20.4% | 61.3% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Homer, S. | Labour Party | 1,259 | 19.3% | 57.8% | +32.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gill, D. | Green Party | 716 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 5 | Aylett, D. | Independent | 698 | 10.7% | 32.1% | — | |
| 6 | Hay, A. | Conservative Party | 595 | 9.1% | 27.3% | — | |
| 7 | Thomas, H. | WEP | 462 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — |
St Peter's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,724
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bowerman, J. | Labour Party | 1,507 | 29.1% | 87.4% | +62.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bray, W. | Labour Party | 1,232 | 23.8% | 71.5% | +46.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McNally, D. | Labour Party | 1,002 | 19.4% | 58.1% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ahmad, I. | Independent | 532 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 5 | Azam, S. | Conservative Party | 524 | 10.1% | 30.4% | — | |
| 6 | Whiteley, S. | Green Party | 375 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — |
Longdendale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,920
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North, J. | Labour Party | 1,429 | 24.8% | 74.4% | +49.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ferguson, G. | Labour Party | 1,344 | 23.3% | 70.0% | +45.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Owen, J. | Labour Party | 1,201 | 20.9% | 62.6% | +37.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brierley, I. | Green Party | 642 | 11.1% | 33.4% | — | |
| 5 | Browning, L. | Conservative Party | 586 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 6 | Robertson, C. | Conservative Party | 558 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — |
Audenshaw · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,993
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin, C. | Labour Party | 1,574 | 26.3% | 79.0% | +54.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Axford, N. | Labour Party | 1,493 | 25.0% | 74.9% | +49.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, T. | Labour Party | 1,344 | 22.5% | 67.4% | +42.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mather, D. | Conservative Party | 1,079 | 18.0% | 54.1% | — | |
| 5 | Robinson, L. | Green Party | 490 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — |
Droylsden East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,500
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mills, D. | Labour Party | 1,071 | 23.8% | 71.4% | +46.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Quinn, S. | Labour Party | 1,051 | 23.4% | 70.1% | +45.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Boyle, L. | Labour Party | 1,021 | 22.7% | 68.1% | +43.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Stevenson, M. | Conservative Party | 548 | 12.2% | 36.5% | — | |
| 5 | Axon, L. | Green Party | 451 | 10.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 6 | Fitton, R. | Liberal Democrats | 358 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — |
Denton North East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,480
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gwynne, A. | Labour Party | 1,341 | 30.2% | 90.6% | +65.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ward, D. | Labour Party | 1,106 | 24.9% | 74.7% | +49.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ricci, V. | Labour Party | 1,021 | 23.0% | 69.0% | +44.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cobb, D. | Conservative Party | 578 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 5 | Bradley, J. | Green Party | 394 | 8.9% | 26.6% | — |
Ashton St Michael's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,710
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McLaren, A. | Labour Party | 1,323 | 25.8% | 77.4% | +52.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fairfoull, B. | Labour Party | 1,247 | 24.3% | 72.9% | +47.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Drennan, J. | Labour Party | 1,184 | 23.1% | 69.2% | +44.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Golas, V. | Conservative Party | 557 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ross, J. | Green Party | 446 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 6 | Bartley, J. | Liberal Democrats | 373 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — |
Droylsden West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,525
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooney, G. | Labour Party | 1,304 | 28.5% | 85.5% | +60.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holland, A. | Labour Party | 1,188 | 26.0% | 77.9% | +52.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Holland, B. | Labour Party | 1,077 | 23.5% | 70.6% | +45.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harrop, N. | Green Party | 506 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 5 | Wexler, J. | Conservative Party | 499 | 10.9% | 32.7% | — |
Dukinfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,546
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lane, J. | Labour Party | 1,222 | 26.4% | 79.1% | +54.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, J. | Labour Party | 1,187 | 25.6% | 76.8% | +51.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sharif, N. | Labour Party | 1,105 | 23.8% | 71.5% | +46.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rose, D. | Conservative Party | 579 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 5 | Wood, J. | Green Party | 544 | 11.7% | 35.2% | — |
Denton South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 73.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +48.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,898
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newton, G. | Labour Party | 1,517 | 26.6% | 79.9% | +54.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reid, C. | Labour Party | 1,502 | 26.4% | 79.1% | +54.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Naylor, J. | Labour Party | 1,398 | 24.6% | 73.7% | +48.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cho, T. | Conservative Party | 666 | 11.7% | 35.1% | — | |
| 5 | Gartside, B. | Green Party | 366 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 6 | Haughton, F. | OMRL | 244 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — |
Denton West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,119
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, G. | Labour Party | 1,928 | 30.3% | 91.0% | +66.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Warrington, B. | Labour Party | 1,714 | 27.0% | 80.9% | +55.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 1,591 | 25.0% | 75.1% | +50.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dunne, T. | Conservative Party | 607 | 9.5% | 28.6% | — | |
| 5 | Parr, C. | Green Party | 518 | 8.1% | 24.4% | — |