← Tandridge (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Tandridge 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 43 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 11,718 | 21.9% | 7 | 16.3% | 10 | 23.3% | -3 |
| RES | 10,412 | 19.4% | 12 | 27.9% | 9 | 20.9% | +3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 8,766 | 16.4% | 11 | 25.6% | 7 | 16.3% | +4 |
| O and L RES | 6,903 | 12.9% | 5 | 11.6% | 6 | 14.0% | -1 |
| Labour Party | 6,839 | 12.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 14.0% | -6 |
| Independent | 4,178 | 7.8% | 5 | 11.6% | 3 | 7.0% | +2 |
| L and C RES | 1,944 | 3.6% | 2 | 4.7% | 1 | 2.3% | +1 |
| Green Party | 1,102 | 2.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.3% | -1 |
| CATER RES | 795 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| WHY RES | 743 | 1.4% | 1 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | +1 |
| Heritage Party | 189 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 53,589 | 100.0% | 43 | 100.0% | 43 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Whyteleafe · 2 seats · won at 37.0% · above quota
- Bletchingley and Nutfield · 3 seats · won at 35.7% · above quota
- Westway · 3 seats · won at 35.8% · above quota
- Harestone · 2 seats · won at 46.1% · above quota
- Warlingham West · 2 seats · won at 46.7% · above quota
- Portley and Queens Park · 3 seats · won at 39.1% · above quota
- Lingfield and Crowhurst · 3 seats · won at 40.6% · above quota
- Warlingham East and Chelsham and Farleigh · 3 seats · won at 40.7% · above quota
- Chaldon · 1 seat · won at 65.8% · above quota
- Dormansland and Felbridge · 3 seats · won at 41.6% · above quota
- Tatsfield and Titsey · 1 seat · won at 70.0% · above quota
- Woldingham · 1 seat · won at 70.8% · above quota
- Valley · 2 seats · won at 60.9% · above quota
- Burstow Horne and Outwood · 3 seats · won at 65.3% · above quota
- Oxted South · 3 seats · won at 70.9% · above quota
- Limpsfield · 2 seats · won at 82.3% · above quota
- Oxted North · 3 seats · won at 79.4% · above quota
- Godstone · 3 seats · won at 82.7% · above quota
Race results
Whyteleafe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 846
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cline, D. | WHY RES | 441 | 26.1% | 52.1% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gray, J. | Liberal Democrats | 313 | 18.5% | 37.0% | +3.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jones, M. | WHY RES | 302 | 17.8% | 35.7% | — | |
| 4 | Evans, D. | Liberal Democrats | 233 | 13.8% | 27.5% | — | |
| 5 | Knight, R. | Labour Party | 116 | 6.9% | 13.7% | — | |
| 6 | Eve, J. | Conservative Party | 97 | 5.7% | 11.5% | — | |
| 7 | Millar, H. | Conservative Party | 85 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — | |
| 8 | Hibberd, J. | Green Party | 53 | 3.1% | 6.3% | — | |
| 9 | Weller, A. | Labour Party | 52 | 3.1% | 6.1% | — |
Bletchingley and Nutfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,403
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Windsor, H. | Independent | 640 | 15.2% | 45.6% | +20.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Case, L. | RES | 518 | 12.3% | 36.9% | +11.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fowler, R. | Liberal Democrats | 501 | 11.9% | 35.7% | +10.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hammond, L. | Conservative Party | 495 | 11.8% | 35.3% | — | |
| 5 | Hickson, S. | Liberal Democrats | 366 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 6 | Redman, M. | Liberal Democrats | 348 | 8.3% | 24.8% | — | |
| 7 | Carter, I. | Conservative Party | 343 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 8 | Malkin, E. | Green Party | 271 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 9 | Baharier, L. | Labour Party | 218 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 10 | Wantling, B. | Labour Party | 195 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 11 | Bailey, G. | Heritage Party | 168 | 4.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 12 | Powell, G. | Labour Party | 145 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — |
Westway · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,181
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rujbally, J. | Liberal Democrats | 622 | 17.6% | 52.7% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sowambur, S. | Liberal Democrats | 571 | 16.1% | 48.3% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sharma, A. | Conservative Party | 423 | 11.9% | 35.8% | +10.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kelly, C. | Conservative Party | 412 | 11.6% | 34.9% | — | |
| 5 | Steddy, M. | Conservative Party | 406 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 6 | Clements, R. | Labour Party | 405 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 7 | Stewart, R. | Labour Party | 360 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 8 | Avery, A. | Labour Party | 345 | 9.7% | 29.2% | — |
Harestone · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,151
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evans, A. | Liberal Democrats | 697 | 30.3% | 60.6% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Spencer, R. | Liberal Democrats | 531 | 23.1% | 46.1% | +12.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Casebourne, M. | Conservative Party | 468 | 20.3% | 40.7% | — | |
| 4 | Winsbury, M. | Conservative Party | 378 | 16.4% | 32.8% | — | |
| 5 | Walker, C. | Labour Party | 127 | 5.5% | 11.0% | — | |
| 6 | Holloway, T. | Labour Party | 101 | 4.4% | 8.8% | — |
Warlingham West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,053
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bloore, R. | Conservative Party | 596 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Prew, K. | Conservative Party | 492 | 23.4% | 46.7% | +13.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ralph, E. | Liberal Democrats | 333 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 4 | Mackinlay, D. | Liberal Democrats | 277 | 13.2% | 26.3% | — | |
| 5 | Haley, M. | Independent | 144 | 6.8% | 13.7% | — | |
| 6 | Bracey, S. | Labour Party | 132 | 6.3% | 12.5% | — | |
| 7 | Waters, A. | Labour Party | 131 | 6.2% | 12.4% | — |
Portley and Queens Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,276
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horne, B. | Liberal Democrats | 767 | 20.0% | 60.1% | +35.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooper, M. | Conservative Party | 637 | 16.6% | 49.9% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mark, R. | Conservative Party | 499 | 13.0% | 39.1% | +14.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Berns, S. | CATER RES | 493 | 12.9% | 38.6% | — | |
| 5 | Jenkins, L. | Conservative Party | 468 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 6 | Lopez, J. | Labour Party | 352 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 7 | Bray, N. | Labour Party | 336 | 8.8% | 26.3% | — | |
| 8 | Willmott, S. | Labour Party | 277 | 7.2% | 21.7% | — |
Lingfield and Crowhurst · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,437
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duggan, J. | L and C RES | 739 | 17.1% | 51.4% | +26.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Killick, P. | L and C RES | 684 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lockwood, L. | Independent | 584 | 13.5% | 40.6% | +15.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Schmidt, A. | L and C RES | 521 | 12.1% | 36.3% | — | |
| 5 | Howard, R. | Labour Party | 360 | 8.4% | 25.1% | — | |
| 6 | Chapman, F. | Labour Party | 305 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — | |
| 7 | Pettitt, J. | Labour Party | 272 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 8 | Beck, A. | Conservative Party | 253 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — | |
| 9 | Greenhalgh, P. | Conservative Party | 241 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 10 | Wilkes, D. | Liberal Democrats | 190 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 11 | Shahjid, A. | Conservative Party | 161 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — |
Warlingham East and Chelsham and Farleigh · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,225
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pursehouse, J. | Independent | 850 | 23.1% | 69.4% | +44.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chotai, P. | Liberal Democrats | 506 | 13.8% | 41.3% | +16.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Patel, A. | Liberal Democrats | 499 | 13.6% | 40.7% | +15.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Strzebrakowski, M. | Independent | 495 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Adams, N. | Conservative Party | 494 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 6 | Lamont, M. | Conservative Party | 268 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — | |
| 7 | Whittington, M. | Conservative Party | 246 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 8 | Cresswell, J. | Labour Party | 200 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 9 | Mann, D. | Labour Party | 118 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — |
Chaldon · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 65.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 558
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharp, L. | Conservative Party | 367 | 65.8% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parker, N. | Liberal Democrats | 113 | 20.3% | — | |
| 3 | Gower, R. | Green Party | 78 | 14.0% | — |
Dormansland and Felbridge · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,420
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steeds, L. | Conservative Party | 705 | 16.5% | 49.6% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | White, N. | RES | 655 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | O'Riordan, N. | RES | 591 | 13.9% | 41.6% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Moore, J. | Independent | 565 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Young, M. | Conservative Party | 458 | 10.8% | 32.3% | — | |
| 6 | Lea, N. | Conservative Party | 328 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 7 | Peterson, B. | Green Party | 273 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 8 | Nickols, D. | Liberal Democrats | 193 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 9 | Martin, R. | Liberal Democrats | 179 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 10 | Clarke, R. | Labour Party | 168 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 11 | Jones, E. | Labour Party | 145 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — |
Tatsfield and Titsey · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 604
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allen, M. | Independent | 423 | 70.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Budgen, K. | Conservative Party | 129 | 21.4% | — | |
| 3 | Stewart, S. | Green Party | 52 | 8.6% | — |
Woldingham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 674
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sherry, D. | Independent | 477 | 70.8% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bradbury, S. | Conservative Party | 120 | 17.8% | — | |
| 3 | Manning, N. | Labour Party | 46 | 6.8% | — | |
| 4 | Pomery, N. | Liberal Democrats | 31 | 4.6% | — |
Valley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 960
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, A. | Liberal Democrats | 628 | 32.7% | 65.5% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gaffney, J. | Liberal Democrats | 584 | 30.4% | 60.9% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Roberts, P. | CATER RES | 302 | 15.7% | 31.5% | — | |
| 4 | Barry, M. | Conservative Party | 155 | 8.1% | 16.2% | — | |
| 5 | Watson, A. | Labour Party | 134 | 7.0% | 14.0% | — | |
| 6 | Morrigan, N. | Labour Party | 116 | 6.0% | 12.1% | — |
Burstow Horne and Outwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,223
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolton, A. | RES | 825 | 22.5% | 67.5% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Farr, S. | RES | 800 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, R. | RES | 799 | 21.8% | 65.3% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harris, T. | Conservative Party | 361 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 5 | Case-Green, S. | Labour Party | 197 | 5.4% | 16.1% | — | |
| 6 | McLean de Boer, E. | Green Party | 189 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 7 | Allen, M. | Labour Party | 180 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 8 | Wilkinson, J. | Liberal Democrats | 171 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — | |
| 9 | McLean, A. | Labour Party | 147 | 4.0% | 12.0% | — |
Oxted South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,511
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shiner, D. | O and L RES | 1,096 | 24.2% | 72.5% | +47.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Langton, C. | O and L RES | 1,079 | 23.8% | 71.4% | +46.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Black, B. | RES | 1,071 | 23.6% | 70.9% | +45.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Halliwell, D. | Labour Party | 265 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 5 | Hunter, P. | Labour Party | 263 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 6 | Dean, M. | Labour Party | 254 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 7 | Parker, E. | Conservative Party | 235 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 8 | Cook, N. | Conservative Party | 144 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — | |
| 9 | Budgen, M. | Conservative Party | 126 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — |
Limpsfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 82.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,210
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blackwell, C. | RES | 1,051 | 43.4% | 86.9% | +53.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Booth, I. | RES | 996 | 41.2% | 82.3% | +49.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brewer, R. | Conservative Party | 144 | 6.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 4 | Milton, B. | Conservative Party | 116 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — | |
| 5 | McCann, R. | Liberal Democrats | 113 | 4.7% | 9.3% | — |
Oxted North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 79.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +54.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,864
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sayer, C. | O and L RES | 1,570 | 28.1% | 84.2% | +59.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Damesick, P. | O and L RES | 1,531 | 27.4% | 82.1% | +57.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bassett, C. | O and L RES | 1,481 | 26.5% | 79.4% | +54.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Giddings, I. | Green Party | 186 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — | |
| 5 | Brealey, J. | Conservative Party | 186 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — | |
| 6 | Labrosse, L. | Labour Party | 170 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 7 | Hatchwell, L. | Conservative Party | 153 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — | |
| 8 | Hatchwell, M. | Conservative Party | 149 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — | |
| 9 | Son, P. | O and L RES | 146 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 10 | Dean, C. | Heritage Party | 21 | 0.4% | 1.1% | — |
Godstone · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 82.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +57.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,231
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crane, M. | RES | 1,051 | 28.5% | 85.4% | +60.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Farr, C. | RES | 1,037 | 28.1% | 84.2% | +59.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | White, C. | RES | 1,018 | 27.6% | 82.7% | +57.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hare, A. | Labour Party | 207 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 5 | Watkins, O. | Conservative Party | 205 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 6 | Cheah, H. | Conservative Party | 175 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — |