← Teignbridge (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Teignbridge 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 47 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 28,005 | 38.4% | 26 | 55.3% | 19 | 40.4% | +7 |
| Conservative Party | 16,819 | 23.1% | 9 | 19.1% | 11 | 23.4% | -2 |
| SDA | 13,176 | 18.1% | 9 | 19.1% | 8 | 17.0% | +1 |
| Independent | 4,940 | 6.8% | 3 | 6.4% | 3 | 6.4% | 0 |
| Labour Party | 4,658 | 6.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 6.4% | -3 |
| Green Party | 4,416 | 6.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 6.4% | -3 |
| Heritage Party | 626 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 197 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 95 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 72,932 | 100.0% | 47 | 100.0% | 47 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Ipplepen · 1 seat · won at 39.4% · −10.6 pts below quota
- Kingsteignton East · 2 seats · won at 27.2% · −6.1 pts below quota
- Bradley · 2 seats · won at 29.1% · −4.3 pts below quota
- Moretonhampstead · 1 seat · won at 48.2% · −1.8 pts below quota
- Teignmouth Central · 2 seats · won at 32.3% · −1.0 pts below quota
- Teignmouth East · 2 seats · won at 35.4% · above quota
- Teignmouth West · 2 seats · won at 37.1% · above quota
- Dawlish South West · 2 seats · won at 37.5% · above quota
- Bushell · 2 seats · won at 37.6% · above quota
- Ashburton and Buckfastleigh · 3 seats · won at 32.1% · above quota
- Teign Valley · 2 seats · won at 42.0% · above quota
- Bovey · 3 seats · won at 34.2% · above quota
- Haytor · 1 seat · won at 61.1% · above quota
- Kingsteignton West · 2 seats · won at 45.3% · above quota
- Buckland and Milber · 3 seats · won at 38.8% · above quota
- Bishopsteignton · 1 seat · won at 66.0% · above quota
- Chudleigh · 2 seats · won at 49.7% · above quota
- Kenn Valley · 3 seats · won at 42.2% · above quota
- Shaldon and Stokeinteignhead · 1 seat · won at 70.4% · above quota
- Kenton and Starcross · 1 seat · won at 70.4% · above quota
- Kerswell-with-Combe · 2 seats · won at 58.3% · above quota
- College · 2 seats · won at 58.5% · above quota
- Dawlish North East · 3 seats · won at 53.9% · above quota
- Ambrook · 2 seats · won at 64.1% · above quota
Race results
Ipplepen · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 39.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −10.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 931
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Palethorpe, D. | Liberal Democrats | 367 | 39.4% | −10.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, D. | Conservative Party | 323 | 34.7% | — | |
| 3 | Rayner, N. | SDA | 241 | 25.9% | — |
Kingsteignton East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 27.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −6.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,140
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peart, R. | Conservative Party | 650 | 28.5% | 57.0% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gearon, K. | SDA | 310 | 13.6% | 27.2% | −6.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Edmonds, R. | Liberal Democrats | 299 | 13.1% | 26.2% | — | |
| 4 | Bickham, S. | SDA | 299 | 13.1% | 26.2% | — | |
| 5 | Jones, R. | Liberal Democrats | 292 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 6 | Cochrane, S. | Labour Party | 234 | 10.3% | 20.5% | — | |
| 7 | Dempster, A. | Independent | 196 | 8.6% | 17.2% | — |
Bradley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 29.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −4.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,531
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bullivant, P. | Conservative Party | 521 | 17.0% | 34.0% | +0.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Buscombe, R. | Liberal Democrats | 445 | 14.5% | 29.1% | −4.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hall, D. | SDA | 428 | 14.0% | 28.0% | — | |
| 4 | Lambell, L. | SDA | 392 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 5 | Jenks, R. | Conservative Party | 392 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 6 | Jenks, C. | Liberal Democrats | 379 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — | |
| 7 | Wynter, P. | Green Party | 257 | 8.4% | 16.8% | — | |
| 8 | Wynter, P. | Green Party | 248 | 8.1% | 16.2% | — |
Moretonhampstead · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 48.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −1.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,157
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farrand-Rogers, J. | Liberal Democrats | 558 | 48.2% | −1.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Edlmann, R. | Conservative Party | 414 | 35.8% | — | |
| 3 | Robillard, C. | Labour Party | 185 | 16.0% | — |
Teignmouth Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 32.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −1.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,331
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cox, D. | Liberal Democrats | 663 | 24.9% | 49.8% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Atkins, J. | Conservative Party | 430 | 16.2% | 32.3% | −1.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Miller, S. | Liberal Democrats | 398 | 15.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 4 | Eden, A. | Independent | 338 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — | |
| 5 | Robinson, J. | SDA | 291 | 10.9% | 21.9% | — | |
| 6 | Colclough, T. | Labour Party | 246 | 9.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 7 | Baldwin, H. | Labour Party | 241 | 9.1% | 18.1% | — | |
| 8 | Bovingdon, C. | Heritage Party | 54 | 2.0% | 4.1% | — |
Teignmouth East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,635
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackman, M. | Liberal Democrats | 582 | 17.8% | 35.6% | +2.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, P. | Liberal Democrats | 578 | 17.7% | 35.4% | +2.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Phipps, B. | Conservative Party | 468 | 14.3% | 28.6% | — | |
| 4 | Russell, S. | Conservative Party | 433 | 13.2% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Chilvers, J. | SDA | 294 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 6 | Chasteau, L. | Labour Party | 284 | 8.7% | 17.4% | — | |
| 7 | MacGreggor, A. | SDA | 223 | 6.8% | 13.6% | — | |
| 8 | Tipper, M. | Labour Party | 215 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 9 | Hamilton, F. | Green Party | 192 | 5.9% | 11.7% | — |
Teignmouth West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,008
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffries, N. | Liberal Democrats | 402 | 19.9% | 39.9% | +6.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Henderson, A. | Liberal Democrats | 374 | 18.6% | 37.1% | +3.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jackson, J. | Labour Party | 270 | 13.4% | 26.8% | — | |
| 4 | Hind, O. | SDA | 267 | 13.2% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Aylward, R. | Labour Party | 264 | 13.1% | 26.2% | — | |
| 6 | Marino, R. | SDA | 228 | 11.3% | 22.6% | — | |
| 7 | Sidwell, C. | Conservative Party | 211 | 10.5% | 20.9% | — |
Dawlish South West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,475
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foden, A. | Liberal Democrats | 767 | 26.0% | 52.0% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | James, M. | Liberal Democrats | 553 | 18.7% | 37.5% | +4.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Weatherhead, A. | Independent | 537 | 18.2% | 36.4% | — | |
| 4 | Prowse, R. | Conservative Party | 453 | 15.4% | 30.7% | — | |
| 5 | Petherick, J. | Independent | 417 | 14.1% | 28.3% | — | |
| 6 | Costello, P. | SDA | 223 | 7.6% | 15.1% | — |
Bushell · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,096
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hook, J. | Liberal Democrats | 503 | 22.9% | 45.9% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hayes, R. | Liberal Democrats | 412 | 18.8% | 37.6% | +4.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Joyce, M. | SDA | 342 | 15.6% | 31.2% | — | |
| 4 | Jones, L. | SDA | 304 | 13.9% | 27.7% | — | |
| 5 | Yabsley, N. | Conservative Party | 215 | 9.8% | 19.6% | — | |
| 6 | Walker, S. | Conservative Party | 185 | 8.4% | 16.9% | — | |
| 7 | Giddings, O. | Green Party | 158 | 7.2% | 14.4% | — | |
| 8 | Dobson, R. | Heritage Party | 73 | 3.3% | 6.7% | — |
Ashburton and Buckfastleigh · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 32.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,598
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nutley, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,226 | 15.7% | 47.2% | +22.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cox, H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,030 | 13.2% | 39.6% | +14.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rogers, S. | Conservative Party | 834 | 10.7% | 32.1% | +7.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Major, J. | Liberal Democrats | 808 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 5 | Clarke, S. | SDA | 793 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 6 | Knopfler, D. | SDA | 769 | 9.9% | 29.6% | — | |
| 7 | Haworth, R. | Green Party | 712 | 9.1% | 27.4% | — | |
| 8 | Dennis, C. | Conservative Party | 683 | 8.8% | 26.3% | — | |
| 9 | Searight, M. | Conservative Party | 599 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 10 | Parker, J. | Labour Party | 341 | 4.4% | 13.1% | — |
Teign Valley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,494
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purser, S. | Conservative Party | 764 | 25.6% | 51.1% | +17.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Swain, A. | Liberal Democrats | 627 | 21.0% | 42.0% | +8.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tume, T. | Conservative Party | 626 | 21.0% | 41.9% | — | |
| 4 | Webb, C. | Liberal Democrats | 608 | 20.3% | 40.7% | — | |
| 5 | Duffy, N. | Labour Party | 363 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — |
Bovey · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,232
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,011 | 15.1% | 45.3% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, M. | Conservative Party | 786 | 11.7% | 35.2% | +10.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Webster, S. | Conservative Party | 763 | 11.4% | 34.2% | +9.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Holden, C. | Conservative Party | 696 | 10.4% | 31.2% | — | |
| 5 | Oldrieve, S. | Liberal Democrats | 627 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 6 | Webb, L. | Labour Party | 564 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 7 | Kelly, E. | Independent | 519 | 7.8% | 23.3% | — | |
| 8 | West, C. | Green Party | 478 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 9 | Hensels, I. | Green Party | 444 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 10 | Pelling, J. | Green Party | 411 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 11 | Speht, R. | Liberal Democrats | 397 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — |
Haytor · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 61.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 791
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steemson, R. | Independent | 483 | 61.1% | +11.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Evans, M. | Conservative Party | 153 | 19.3% | — | |
| 3 | Lynne, T. | SDA | 124 | 15.7% | — | |
| 4 | Sabine, A. | Heritage Party | 31 | 3.9% | — |
Kingsteignton West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,033
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rollason, D. | Liberal Democrats | 514 | 24.9% | 49.8% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thorne, B. | Conservative Party | 468 | 22.7% | 45.3% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nation, D. | Liberal Democrats | 456 | 22.1% | 44.2% | — | |
| 4 | Danks, S. | Conservative Party | 395 | 19.1% | 38.3% | — | |
| 5 | Moss, D. | Labour Party | 232 | 11.2% | 22.5% | — |
Buckland and Milber · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,681
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ryan, M. | SDA | 752 | 14.9% | 44.7% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parker, C. | Liberal Democrats | 735 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hall, A. | SDA | 652 | 12.9% | 38.8% | +13.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Corney-Walker, D. | Liberal Democrats | 619 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 5 | Brint, B. | SDA | 540 | 10.7% | 32.1% | — | |
| 6 | James, A. | Liberal Democrats | 466 | 9.2% | 27.7% | — | |
| 7 | Crout, K. | Conservative Party | 387 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 8 | Collman, S. | Green Party | 241 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 9 | Pocock, S. | Green Party | 197 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 10 | Haden, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 116 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 11 | Hunt, M. | Heritage Party | 90 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — | |
| 12 | Burns, M. | Heritage Party | 86 | 1.7% | 5.1% | — | |
| 13 | Osben, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 81 | 1.6% | 4.8% | — | |
| 14 | Dobson, T. | Heritage Party | 80 | 1.6% | 4.8% | — |
Bishopsteignton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 66.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 856
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MacGreggor, A. | Independent | 565 | 66.0% | +16.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Baverstock, A. | Conservative Party | 291 | 34.0% | — |
Chudleigh · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,604
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keeling, R. | Liberal Democrats | 916 | 28.6% | 57.1% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sanders, S. | Liberal Democrats | 797 | 24.9% | 49.7% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kirby, B. | Conservative Party | 587 | 18.3% | 36.6% | — | |
| 4 | Webb, R. | Labour Party | 486 | 15.2% | 30.3% | — | |
| 5 | Yeo, C. | Conservative Party | 421 | 13.1% | 26.3% | — |
Kenn Valley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,180
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuttall, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,270 | 19.4% | 58.3% | +33.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parrott, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,076 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lake, K. | Conservative Party | 919 | 14.1% | 42.2% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Braund, D. | Liberal Democrats | 912 | 13.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 5 | May, C. | Conservative Party | 699 | 10.7% | 32.1% | — | |
| 6 | Baker, L. | Conservative Party | 633 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — | |
| 7 | Rockliffe, L. | Green Party | 624 | 9.5% | 28.6% | — | |
| 8 | Cousens, J. | Labour Party | 406 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — |
Shaldon and Stokeinteignhead · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 992
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarance, C. | Independent | 698 | 70.4% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cox, K. | Liberal Democrats | 165 | 16.6% | — | |
| 3 | Murray, M. | SDA | 79 | 8.0% | — | |
| 4 | Warrener, M. | Labour Party | 50 | 5.0% | — |
Kenton and Starcross · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 912
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, G. | Liberal Democrats | 642 | 70.4% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wilby, P. | Green Party | 175 | 19.2% | — | |
| 3 | Hilditch, C. | Reform UK | 95 | 10.4% | — |
Kerswell-with-Combe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,437
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, J. | SDA | 923 | 32.1% | 64.3% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Radford, J. | SDA | 837 | 29.1% | 58.3% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Whitford, C. | Liberal Democrats | 439 | 15.3% | 30.6% | — | |
| 4 | Leader, J. | Conservative Party | 340 | 11.8% | 23.7% | — | |
| 5 | Raybould, R. | Liberal Democrats | 334 | 11.6% | 23.3% | — |
College · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,301
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bradford, J. | SDA | 897 | 34.5% | 69.0% | +35.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mullone, L. | SDA | 761 | 29.3% | 58.5% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pratt, D. | Green Party | 279 | 10.7% | 21.5% | — | |
| 4 | Frampton, D. | Labour Party | 277 | 10.6% | 21.3% | — | |
| 5 | Hearn, S. | Conservative Party | 229 | 8.8% | 17.6% | — | |
| 6 | Phillips, J. | Conservative Party | 158 | 6.1% | 12.1% | — |
Dawlish North East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,915
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wrigley, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,438 | 25.0% | 75.1% | +50.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dawson, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,182 | 20.6% | 61.7% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Goodman-Bradbury, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,033 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Petherick, L. | Independent | 783 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 5 | Mayne, L. | Conservative Party | 693 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 6 | Munday, W. | Independent | 404 | 7.0% | 21.1% | — | |
| 7 | Cruikshank, A. | Heritage Party | 212 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — |
Ambrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,656
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daws, R. | SDA | 1,145 | 34.6% | 69.1% | +35.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parker, P. | SDA | 1,062 | 32.1% | 64.1% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Crompton, M. | Liberal Democrats | 638 | 19.3% | 38.5% | — | |
| 4 | Goodman-Bradbury, P. | Liberal Democrats | 467 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — |