← Test Valley (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Test Valley 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 43 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 33,747 | 45.7% | 17 | 39.5% | 21 | 48.8% | -4 |
| Conservative Party | 31,534 | 42.7% | 26 | 60.5% | 19 | 44.2% | +7 |
| Labour Party | 2,867 | 3.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.3% | -1 |
| Independent | 2,854 | 3.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.3% | -1 |
| Green Party | 2,692 | 3.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.3% | -1 |
| Heritage Party | 71 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 49 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 73,814 | 100.0% | 43 | 100.0% | 43 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Charlton and the Pentons · 1 seat · won at 48.0% · −2.0 pts below quota
- Harewood · 1 seat · won at 52.0% · above quota
- Andover Winton · 2 seats · won at 42.9% · above quota
- Blackwater · 2 seats · won at 42.9% · above quota
- Ampfield and Braishfield · 1 seat · won at 62.0% · above quota
- Andover Millway · 3 seats · won at 39.0% · above quota
- Bourne Valley · 1 seat · won at 64.4% · above quota
- Andover St Mary's · 3 seats · won at 39.9% · above quota
- Andover Harroway · 3 seats · won at 40.2% · above quota
- Andover Romans · 3 seats · won at 40.9% · above quota
- Bellinger · 1 seat · won at 66.5% · above quota
- Romsey Abbey · 2 seats · won at 54.5% · above quota
- Andover Downlands · 2 seats · won at 55.3% · above quota
- Mid Test · 3 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Chilworth, Nursling and Rownhams · 3 seats · won at 49.8% · above quota
- Anna · 2 seats · won at 60.0% · above quota
- Romsey Cupernham · 3 seats · won at 54.2% · above quota
- Romsey Tadburn · 2 seats · won at 67.4% · above quota
- North Baddesley · 3 seats · won at 66.0% · above quota
- Valley Park · 2 seats · won at 75.4% · above quota
Race results
Charlton and the Pentons · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 48.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −2.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 894
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lashbrook, L. | Conservative Party | 429 | 48.0% | −2.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reynolds, J. | Liberal Democrats | 253 | 28.3% | — | |
| 3 | Howland, P. | Green Party | 163 | 18.2% | — | |
| 4 | Woods, N. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 49 | 5.5% | — |
Harewood · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 52.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,253
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Drew, D. | Conservative Party | 652 | 52.0% | +2.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clark, D. | Liberal Democrats | 601 | 48.0% | — |
Andover Winton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,288
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gillies, A. | Conservative Party | 645 | 25.0% | 50.1% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Matthews, L. | Conservative Party | 552 | 21.4% | 42.9% | +9.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hughes, J. | Liberal Democrats | 410 | 15.9% | 31.8% | — | |
| 4 | Hall-Cooper, A. | Liberal Democrats | 330 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 5 | Meyer, R. | Independent | 283 | 11.0% | 22.0% | — | |
| 6 | Horsnell, A. | Independent | 195 | 7.6% | 15.1% | — | |
| 7 | Rowles, R. | Independent | 161 | 6.3% | 12.5% | — |
Blackwater · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,261
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adams-King, N. | Conservative Party | 1,465 | 32.4% | 64.8% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bailey, G. | Conservative Party | 969 | 21.4% | 42.9% | +9.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ezard, T. | Liberal Democrats | 858 | 19.0% | 37.9% | — | |
| 4 | Craig, C. | Independent | 643 | 14.2% | 28.4% | — | |
| 5 | Reeves, J. | Green Party | 294 | 6.5% | 13.0% | — | |
| 6 | Beesley, A. | Liberal Democrats | 293 | 6.5% | 13.0% | — |
Ampfield and Braishfield · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 62.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 990
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yalden, S. | Liberal Democrats | 614 | 62.0% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rawson-Smith, M. | Conservative Party | 376 | 38.0% | — |
Andover Millway · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,977
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brooks, Z. | Conservative Party | 936 | 15.8% | 47.4% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Neal, J. | Conservative Party | 794 | 13.4% | 40.2% | +15.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Leech, M. | Conservative Party | 770 | 13.0% | 39.0% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gregory, T. | Liberal Democrats | 756 | 12.7% | 38.2% | — | |
| 5 | McGarry, M. | Liberal Democrats | 698 | 11.8% | 35.3% | — | |
| 6 | Simmonds, N. | Liberal Democrats | 529 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 7 | Hosen, C. | Green Party | 424 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — | |
| 8 | Farren, M. | Independent | 421 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — | |
| 9 | Pomphrey, A. | Green Party | 369 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — | |
| 10 | Emmerson, D. | Independent | 233 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
Bourne Valley · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 894
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North, P. | Conservative Party | 576 | 64.4% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walters, G. | Liberal Democrats | 318 | 35.6% | — |
Andover St Mary's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,264
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andersen, I. | Conservative Party | 676 | 17.8% | 53.5% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cattell, D. | Conservative Party | 538 | 14.2% | 42.6% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Budzynski, J. | Conservative Party | 504 | 13.3% | 39.9% | +14.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fitchet, A. | Labour Party | 479 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 5 | Bird, K. | Liberal Democrats | 457 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 6 | Cole, J. | Labour Party | 426 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 7 | Waue, S. | Independent | 306 | 8.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 8 | Briggs, A. | Liberal Democrats | 206 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 9 | Hurst, P. | Liberal Democrats | 200 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — |
Andover Harroway · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,623
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gregori, L. | Liberal Democrats | 781 | 16.0% | 48.1% | +23.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hughes, R. | Liberal Democrats | 716 | 14.7% | 44.1% | +19.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Borg-Neal, C. | Conservative Party | 652 | 13.4% | 40.2% | +15.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Burley, T. | Conservative Party | 645 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 5 | Hamilton, K. | Conservative Party | 642 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 6 | Reynolds, E. | Liberal Democrats | 581 | 11.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 7 | Mitchell, L. | Green Party | 309 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 8 | Roll, P. | Labour Party | 295 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — | |
| 9 | Juliff, G. | Independent | 248 | 5.1% | 15.3% | — |
Andover Romans · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,363
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sangster, J. | Liberal Democrats | 659 | 16.1% | 48.3% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brooks, K. | Conservative Party | 577 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | North, K. | Conservative Party | 557 | 13.6% | 40.9% | +15.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Msonthi, J. | Liberal Democrats | 554 | 13.5% | 40.6% | — | |
| 5 | Kidd, R. | Liberal Democrats | 549 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 6 | Preston, T. | Conservative Party | 540 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 7 | Hardstaff, S. | Independent | 364 | 8.9% | 26.7% | — | |
| 8 | Lindfield, S. | Labour Party | 290 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — |
Bellinger · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 66.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 799
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lashbrook, P. | Conservative Party | 531 | 66.5% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Johnson, G. | Liberal Democrats | 268 | 33.5% | — |
Romsey Abbey · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,867
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gidley, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,132 | 30.3% | 60.6% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Daas, N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,017 | 27.2% | 54.5% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Michell, N. | Conservative Party | 704 | 18.9% | 37.7% | — | |
| 4 | Dwyer, J. | Conservative Party | 642 | 17.2% | 34.4% | — | |
| 5 | Berg, B. | Labour Party | 167 | 4.5% | 8.9% | — | |
| 6 | Peterson, A. | Heritage Party | 71 | 1.9% | 3.8% | — |
Andover Downlands · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 815
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Donnelly, C. | Conservative Party | 526 | 32.3% | 64.5% | +31.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lodge, N. | Conservative Party | 451 | 27.7% | 55.3% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hughes, K. | Liberal Democrats | 261 | 16.0% | 32.0% | — | |
| 4 | Cotter, K. | Labour Party | 200 | 12.3% | 24.5% | — | |
| 5 | Burgess, C. | Liberal Democrats | 192 | 11.8% | 23.6% | — |
Mid Test · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,753
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnston, A. | Conservative Party | 1,402 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jeffrey, I. | Conservative Party | 1,382 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | MacDonald, S. | Conservative Party | 1,351 | 16.4% | 49.1% | +24.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hall, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,225 | 14.8% | 44.5% | — | |
| 5 | Marshall, A. | Liberal Democrats | 972 | 11.8% | 35.3% | — | |
| 6 | Theron, R. | Liberal Democrats | 897 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 7 | Shaw, C. | Green Party | 405 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 8 | Cotterell, J. | Green Party | 368 | 4.5% | 13.4% | — | |
| 9 | Elliott, J. | Labour Party | 256 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — |
Chilworth, Nursling and Rownhams · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,190
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dunleavey, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,190 | 18.1% | 54.3% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bundy, P. | Conservative Party | 1,144 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Swain, T. | Conservative Party | 1,091 | 16.6% | 49.8% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Berry, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,060 | 16.1% | 48.4% | — | |
| 5 | Gomer, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,048 | 16.0% | 47.9% | — | |
| 6 | Maltby, M. | Conservative Party | 1,037 | 15.8% | 47.4% | — |
Anna · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,838
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flood, M. | Conservative Party | 1,373 | 37.4% | 74.7% | +41.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hasselmann, S. | Conservative Party | 1,102 | 30.0% | 60.0% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Burnage, P. | Liberal Democrats | 454 | 12.4% | 24.7% | — | |
| 4 | Thom, C. | Liberal Democrats | 387 | 10.5% | 21.1% | — | |
| 5 | Bartholomew, C. | Green Party | 360 | 9.8% | 19.6% | — |
Romsey Cupernham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,192
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burnage, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,435 | 21.8% | 65.5% | +40.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gwynne, N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,327 | 20.2% | 60.5% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kohli, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,187 | 18.1% | 54.2% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mayer, T. | Conservative Party | 869 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ray, J. | Conservative Party | 768 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — | |
| 6 | Maslen, D. | Conservative Party | 664 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 7 | Chillingworth, A. | Labour Party | 326 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — |
Romsey Tadburn · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,936
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooper, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,463 | 37.8% | 75.6% | +42.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parker, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,304 | 33.7% | 67.4% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Collier, C. | Conservative Party | 494 | 12.8% | 25.5% | — | |
| 4 | Bloomfield, D. | Conservative Party | 410 | 10.6% | 21.2% | — | |
| 5 | Nixson, C. | Labour Party | 201 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — |
North Baddesley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,816
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ford, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,373 | 25.2% | 75.6% | +50.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooper, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,239 | 22.7% | 68.2% | +43.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Warnes, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,198 | 22.0% | 66.0% | +41.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Colton, L. | Conservative Party | 513 | 9.4% | 28.2% | — | |
| 5 | Billett, J. | Conservative Party | 483 | 8.9% | 26.6% | — | |
| 6 | Franke, R. | Conservative Party | 416 | 7.6% | 22.9% | — | |
| 7 | Jackson, C. | Labour Party | 227 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — |
Valley Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 75.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,721
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dowden, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,458 | 42.4% | 84.7% | +51.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dowden, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,297 | 37.7% | 75.4% | +42.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ball, M. | Conservative Party | 356 | 10.3% | 20.7% | — | |
| 4 | Davies, S. | Conservative Party | 330 | 9.6% | 19.2% | — |