← Vale Of White Horse (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Vale Of White Horse 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 38 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 34,321 | 54.6% | 34 | 89.5% | 22 | 57.9% | +12 |
| Conservative Party | 18,499 | 29.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 28.9% | -11 |
| Green Party | 6,823 | 10.9% | 4 | 10.5% | 4 | 10.5% | 0 |
| Labour Party | 3,005 | 4.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.6% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 101 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 100 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 62,849 | 100.0% | 38 | 100.0% | 38 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Stanford · 1 seat · won at 44.2% · −5.8 pts below quota
- Wootton · 1 seat · won at 45.4% · −4.6 pts below quota
- Thames · 1 seat · won at 49.8% · −0.2 pts below quota
- Ridgeway · 1 seat · won at 58.0% · above quota
- Marcham · 1 seat · won at 58.2% · above quota
- Sutton Courtenay · 1 seat · won at 58.5% · above quota
- Kingston Bagpuize · 1 seat · won at 59.6% · above quota
- Abingdon Caldecott · 2 seats · won at 43.6% · above quota
- Steventon and the Hanneys · 1 seat · won at 64.4% · above quota
- Abingdon Fitzharris · 2 seats · won at 47.9% · above quota
- Kennington and Radley · 2 seats · won at 49.5% · above quota
- Watchfield and Shrivenham · 2 seats · won at 50.1% · above quota
- Hendreds · 1 seat · won at 67.7% · above quota
- Drayton · 1 seat · won at 72.7% · above quota
- Wantage and Grove Brook · 2 seats · won at 58.1% · above quota
- Abingdon Abbey Northcourt · 2 seats · won at 58.6% · above quota
- Cumnor · 2 seats · won at 59.5% · above quota
- Abingdon Peachcroft · 2 seats · won at 61.5% · above quota
- Abingdon Dunmore · 2 seats · won at 63.1% · above quota
- Botley and Sunningwell · 2 seats · won at 63.9% · above quota
- Faringdon · 2 seats · won at 64.6% · above quota
- Wantage Charlton · 2 seats · won at 65.1% · above quota
- Grove North · 2 seats · won at 65.7% · above quota
- Blewbury and Harwell · 2 seats · won at 69.6% · above quota
Race results
Stanford · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 44.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −5.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,235
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caul, S. | Liberal Democrats | 546 | 44.2% | −5.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Boyd, N. | Conservative Party | 536 | 43.4% | — | |
| 3 | Brooks, J. | Green Party | 153 | 12.4% | — |
Wootton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 45.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −4.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 951
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shaw, V. | Liberal Democrats | 432 | 45.4% | −4.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Robinson, G. | Conservative Party | 348 | 36.6% | — | |
| 3 | Thomas, A. | Green Party | 112 | 11.8% | — | |
| 4 | Hall, C. | Labour Party | 59 | 6.2% | — |
Thames · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 49.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −0.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,216
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coleman, M. | Liberal Democrats | 606 | 49.8% | −0.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Swale, R. | Conservative Party | 427 | 35.1% | — | |
| 3 | Avery, J. | Independent | 100 | 8.2% | — | |
| 4 | Crouch, D. | Labour Party | 83 | 6.8% | — |
Ridgeway · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 58.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,156
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barrow, P. | Liberal Democrats | 671 | 58.0% | +8.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lundie, G. | Conservative Party | 485 | 42.0% | — |
Marcham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 58.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 854
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clegg, R. | Liberal Democrats | 497 | 58.2% | +8.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Plumb, J. | Conservative Party | 357 | 41.8% | — |
Sutton Courtenay · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 58.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 834
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Webber, R. | Liberal Democrats | 488 | 58.5% | +8.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Atkinson, P. | Conservative Party | 233 | 27.9% | — | |
| 3 | Grandjean, M. | Green Party | 113 | 13.5% | — |
Kingston Bagpuize · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 59.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,476
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rayner, J. | Liberal Democrats | 880 | 59.6% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Swale, D. | Conservative Party | 596 | 40.4% | — |
Abingdon Caldecott · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,542
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fawcett, N. | Liberal Democrats | 805 | 26.1% | 52.2% | +18.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Skinner, A. | Liberal Democrats | 672 | 21.8% | 43.6% | +10.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Badcock, A. | Conservative Party | 522 | 16.9% | 33.9% | — | |
| 4 | Green, A. | Conservative Party | 503 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Reilly, A. | Green Party | 301 | 9.8% | 19.5% | — | |
| 6 | Mitra-Jones, S. | Labour Party | 280 | 9.1% | 18.2% | — |
Steventon and the Hanneys · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,361
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Povolotsky, S. | Liberal Democrats | 876 | 64.4% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brown, L. | Conservative Party | 485 | 35.6% | — |
Abingdon Fitzharris · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,751
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harpe, E. | Liberal Democrats | 894 | 25.5% | 51.1% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Maddison, R. | Liberal Democrats | 838 | 23.9% | 47.9% | +14.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Palmer, C. | Conservative Party | 520 | 14.8% | 29.7% | — | |
| 4 | Pope, D. | Conservative Party | 493 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 5 | Rogers, S. | Green Party | 313 | 8.9% | 17.9% | — | |
| 6 | Logie, M. | Labour Party | 276 | 7.9% | 15.8% | — | |
| 7 | Pierce, J. | Labour Party | 168 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — |
Kennington and Radley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,816
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lugova, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,056 | 29.1% | 58.2% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cox, J. | Liberal Democrats | 899 | 24.8% | 49.5% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jennings, G. | Conservative Party | 515 | 14.2% | 28.4% | — | |
| 4 | Brown, D. | Conservative Party | 462 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — | |
| 5 | Couper, C. | Green Party | 282 | 7.8% | 15.5% | — | |
| 6 | Henderson, C. | Green Party | 247 | 6.8% | 13.6% | — | |
| 7 | Mayne, R. | Labour Party | 170 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — |
Watchfield and Shrivenham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,336
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foxhall, K. | Green Party | 1,355 | 29.0% | 58.0% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Patel, V. | Green Party | 1,170 | 25.0% | 50.1% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Howell, S. | Conservative Party | 1,091 | 23.4% | 46.7% | — | |
| 4 | Ware, E. | Conservative Party | 1,055 | 22.6% | 45.2% | — |
Hendreds · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 67.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,085
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James, S. | Green Party | 735 | 67.7% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shelley, J. | Conservative Party | 350 | 32.3% | — |
Drayton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 72.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 949
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooke, A. | Liberal Democrats | 690 | 72.7% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Campbell, C. | Conservative Party | 259 | 27.3% | — |
Wantage and Grove Brook · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,680
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hannaby, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,160 | 34.5% | 69.0% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Duveen, A. | Liberal Democrats | 976 | 29.0% | 58.1% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Boyd, C. | Conservative Party | 446 | 13.3% | 26.5% | — | |
| 4 | Turnbull, G. | Conservative Party | 418 | 12.4% | 24.9% | — | |
| 5 | Gaston, T. | Green Party | 360 | 10.7% | 21.4% | — |
Abingdon Abbey Northcourt · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,617
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pighills, H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,109 | 34.3% | 68.6% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Briggs, C. | Green Party | 948 | 29.3% | 58.6% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jenkins, V. | Conservative Party | 389 | 12.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 4 | Webb, S. | Labour Party | 299 | 9.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 5 | Srao, V. | Conservative Party | 273 | 8.4% | 16.9% | — | |
| 6 | Websdale, N. | Labour Party | 215 | 6.7% | 13.3% | — |
Cumnor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,813
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roberts, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,333 | 36.8% | 73.5% | +40.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Houghton, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,078 | 29.7% | 59.5% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robinson, C. | Conservative Party | 486 | 13.4% | 26.8% | — | |
| 4 | Kainth, M. | Conservative Party | 437 | 12.1% | 24.1% | — | |
| 5 | Davis, E. | Labour Party | 291 | 8.0% | 16.1% | — |
Abingdon Peachcroft · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,825
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pighills, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,140 | 31.2% | 62.5% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thompson, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,122 | 30.7% | 61.5% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pirouet, C. | Conservative Party | 561 | 15.4% | 30.7% | — | |
| 4 | Brooker, W. | Conservative Party | 551 | 15.1% | 30.2% | — | |
| 5 | Shelton, E. | Labour Party | 276 | 7.6% | 15.1% | — |
Abingdon Dunmore · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,793
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foulsham, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,216 | 33.9% | 67.8% | +34.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Forder, O. | Liberal Democrats | 1,131 | 31.5% | 63.1% | +29.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Packard, A. | Conservative Party | 506 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 4 | McCarthy, C. | Conservative Party | 451 | 12.6% | 25.2% | — | |
| 5 | Burton, P. | Labour Party | 281 | 7.8% | 15.7% | — |
Botley and Sunningwell · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,808
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, E. | Liberal Democrats | 1,184 | 32.7% | 65.5% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hallett, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,155 | 31.9% | 63.9% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Turner, A. | Conservative Party | 327 | 9.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 4 | Gholami-Babaahmady, N. | Labour Party | 323 | 8.9% | 17.9% | — | |
| 5 | Turner, E. | Conservative Party | 316 | 8.7% | 17.5% | — | |
| 6 | Spooner, J. | Labour Party | 284 | 7.9% | 15.7% | — | |
| 7 | Phillips, K. | Green Party | 27 | 0.7% | 1.5% | — |
Faringdon · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,152
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,531 | 35.6% | 71.1% | +37.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Edwards, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,390 | 32.3% | 64.6% | +31.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Famakin, J. | Conservative Party | 583 | 13.5% | 27.1% | — | |
| 4 | Morrisen, R. | Conservative Party | 481 | 11.2% | 22.4% | — | |
| 5 | Swallow, A. | Green Party | 319 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — |
Wantage Charlton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,850
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crawford, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,291 | 34.9% | 69.8% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | O'Leary, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,205 | 32.6% | 65.1% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dickson, C. | Conservative Party | 436 | 11.8% | 23.6% | — | |
| 4 | Patel, D. | Green Party | 388 | 10.5% | 21.0% | — | |
| 5 | Dickson, C. | Conservative Party | 380 | 10.3% | 20.5% | — |
Grove North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,379
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Batstone, R. | Liberal Democrats | 986 | 35.8% | 71.5% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bentley, K. | Liberal Democrats | 906 | 32.8% | 65.7% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mabbett, B. | Conservative Party | 471 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 4 | Brown, C. | Conservative Party | 395 | 14.3% | 28.6% | — |
Blewbury and Harwell · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,507
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gascoigne, H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,813 | 36.2% | 72.3% | +39.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dewhurst, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,745 | 34.8% | 69.6% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Convery, C. | Conservative Party | 743 | 14.8% | 29.6% | — | |
| 4 | Murphy, J. | Conservative Party | 612 | 12.2% | 24.4% | — | |
| 5 | Shields, P. | Reform UK | 101 | 2.0% | 4.0% | — |