← Waltham Forest (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort

Waltham Forest 2022

Local elections held 5 May 2022.

22 ward races
60 seats
10 unfairly awarded seats
16.7% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 22 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 60 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party97,17359.1%4778.3%3761.7%+10
Conservative Party36,53022.2%1321.7%1423.3%-1
Green Party12,3967.5%00.0%46.7%-4
Liberal Democrats12,2417.4%00.0%46.7%-4
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition3,4902.1%00.0%11.7%-1
Independent1,7611.1%00.0%00.0%0
WEP4040.2%00.0%00.0%0
Reform UK2740.2%00.0%00.0%0
ND430.0%00.0%00.0%0
Total164,312100.0%60100.0%60100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2022)
Previous (2021)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Hale End and Highams Park South · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,945

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bell T.Labour Party1,61227.4%54.7%+21.4 ptsElected
2Dore R.Labour Party1,59427.1%54.1%+20.8 ptsElected
3Cooke K.Conservative Party88115.0%29.9%
4Stone H.Conservative Party71812.2%24.4%
5Dean C.WEP4046.9%13.7%
6Pond E.Independent2604.4%8.8%
7Holloway M.Green Party2574.4%8.7%
8Nuri C.Liberal Democrats1322.2%4.5%
9Ivens J.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition320.5%1.1%

Electorate 6,550 · EC ward code E05013889 · Back to ward index

Valley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,609

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Akram A.Conservative Party1,81216.7%50.2%+25.2 ptsElected
2Hemsted J.Conservative Party1,78816.5%49.5%+24.5 ptsElected
3Baptiste E.Labour Party1,75516.2%48.6%+23.6 ptsElected
4Tonner K.Conservative Party1,74616.1%48.4%
5Chaney S.Labour Party1,67315.5%46.4%
6Weeks N.Labour Party1,51514.0%42.0%
7Loxton J.Liberal Democrats2031.9%5.6%
8Heinze E.Liberal Democrats1721.6%4.8%
9Ozerim I.Liberal Democrats1631.5%4.5%

Electorate 9,940 · EC ward code E05013901 · Back to ward index

Hatch Lane and Highams Park North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,312

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Fitzgerald M.Conservative Party1,73217.4%52.3%+27.3 ptsElected
2Halabi J.Conservative Party1,65116.6%49.8%+24.8 ptsElected
3James T.Conservative Party1,61816.3%48.9%+23.9 ptsElected
4Burns C.Labour Party1,56115.7%47.1%
5Fryd D.Labour Party1,32813.4%40.1%
6Rehman Z.Labour Party1,26412.7%38.2%
7Tatam R.Green Party6236.3%18.8%
8Cuffaro L.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1591.6%4.8%

Electorate 9,546 · EC ward code E05013890 · Back to ward index

Upper Walthamstow · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,992

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Quin C.Labour Party1,29432.5%65.0%+31.6 ptsElected
2Patel Y.Labour Party1,14528.7%57.5%+24.2 ptsElected
3Payne R.Green Party42610.7%21.4%
4Samuel-Leport M.Conservative Party41510.4%20.8%
5Bhuiyan M.Conservative Party3689.2%18.5%
6Morgan J.Liberal Democrats2225.6%11.1%
7Hawksbee L.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition701.8%3.5%
8Fawad S.ND431.1%2.2%

Electorate 5,655 · EC ward code E05013900 · Back to ward index

Larkswood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,309

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1O'Connell S.Conservative Party1,69017.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
2Moss J.Conservative Party1,66316.8%50.3%+25.3 ptsElected
3Saumarez C.Conservative Party1,64716.6%49.8%+24.8 ptsElected
4Stern B.Labour Party1,20712.2%36.5%
5Mahmood B.Labour Party1,10811.2%33.5%
6Hussain M.Labour Party1,09511.0%33.1%
7Quigley T.Independent5815.9%17.6%
8Millstone C.Green Party5125.2%15.5%
9Faiz M.Liberal Democrats2412.4%7.3%
10Douglas L.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1141.1%3.4%
11King R.Reform UK700.7%2.1%

Electorate 9,352 · EC ward code E05013894 · Back to ward index

Endlebury · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,556

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Berg R.Conservative Party1,56830.7%61.3%+28.0 ptsElected
2Best E.Conservative Party1,52929.9%59.8%+26.5 ptsElected
3King S.Labour Party94018.4%36.8%
4Willmoth L.Labour Party79415.5%31.1%
5Lea N.Liberal Democrats1613.1%6.3%
6Sachs-Eldridge S.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition661.3%2.6%
7Williams R.Reform UK541.1%2.1%

Electorate 6,611 · EC ward code E05013886 · Back to ward index

Grove Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,849

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Limbajee K.Labour Party1,61518.9%56.7%+31.7 ptsElected
2Mbachu A.Labour Party1,51617.7%53.2%+28.2 ptsElected
3Rasool U.Labour Party1,48717.4%52.2%+27.2 ptsElected
4Angus A.Liberal Democrats97311.4%34.2%
5McCarthy N.Liberal Democrats8199.6%28.7%
6Measure M.Green Party7338.6%25.7%
7Dyer J.Liberal Democrats7208.4%25.3%
8Berg K.Conservative Party1822.1%6.4%
9Berg I.Conservative Party1812.1%6.4%
10Berg L.Conservative Party1712.0%6.0%
11Parslow K.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1501.8%5.3%

Electorate 9,979 · EC ward code E05013888 · Back to ward index

Chapel End · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,886

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mitchell L.Labour Party2,10124.3%72.8%+47.8 ptsElected
2Douglas P.Labour Party1,87021.6%64.8%+39.8 ptsElected
3Terry S.Labour Party1,66119.2%57.5%+32.5 ptsElected
4Wheat S.Green Party90610.5%31.4%
5Bramley B.Liberal Democrats3944.6%13.7%
6Hemsted G.Conservative Party3243.7%11.2%
7Hemsted R.Conservative Party2983.4%10.3%
8Khadim I.Conservative Party2833.3%9.8%
9Lewis A.Liberal Democrats2492.9%8.6%
10Watson G.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2002.3%6.9%
11Miller M.Liberal Democrats1882.2%6.5%
12Driscoll K.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1852.1%6.4%

Electorate 9,482 · EC ward code E05013884 · Back to ward index

Leyton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,239

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Eglin R.Labour Party1,61024.0%71.9%+46.9 ptsElected
2Ihenachor W.Labour Party1,47822.0%66.0%+41.0 ptsElected
3Wheeler T.Labour Party1,29119.2%57.7%+32.7 ptsElected
4Gardner R.Green Party5117.6%22.8%
5Ali S.Liberal Democrats4566.8%20.4%
6Chadha M.Liberal Democrats3905.8%17.4%
7Stone T.Liberal Democrats3134.7%14.0%
8Maske L.Conservative Party2173.2%9.7%
9Karamehmet E.Conservative Party2093.1%9.3%
10Mohammed E.Conservative Party1702.5%7.6%
11Reynolds M.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition711.1%3.2%

Electorate 9,418 · EC ward code E05013896 · Back to ward index

Chingford Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,500

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Goldie M.Conservative Party2,34822.4%67.1%+42.1 ptsElected
2Isa K.Conservative Party2,13020.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
3Imre S.Conservative Party2,03919.4%58.3%+33.3 ptsElected
4Ali-Rahman R.Labour Party1,0139.6%28.9%
5Burns N.Labour Party9859.4%28.1%
6Large N.Labour Party8798.4%25.1%
7Bayne C.Green Party5515.2%15.7%
8Boyle H.Liberal Democrats4063.9%11.6%
9Davis M.Reform UK1501.4%4.3%

Electorate 8,714 · EC ward code E05013885 · Back to ward index

Cathall · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,608

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Asghar N.Labour Party1,18636.9%73.8%+40.4 ptsElected
2O'Dea J.Labour Party1,07133.3%66.6%+33.3 ptsElected
3Jarvis L.Green Party36411.3%22.6%
4Buckworth M.Conservative Party1915.9%11.9%
5Rodden M.Liberal Democrats1775.5%11.0%
6Rana N.Conservative Party1584.9%9.8%
7Joseph R.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition682.1%4.2%

Electorate 6,928 · EC ward code E05013883 · Back to ward index

St James · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,697

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Deakin C.Labour Party2,06825.6%76.7%+51.7 ptsElected
2Thompson K.Labour Party1,85122.9%68.6%+43.6 ptsElected
3Salek S.Labour Party1,59519.7%59.1%+34.1 ptsElected
4Barrat R.Green Party1,13214.0%42.0%
5Lewendon M.Liberal Democrats3484.3%12.9%
6Edwards C.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition3073.8%11.4%
7Martlew N.Liberal Democrats2763.4%10.2%
8Khiljee N.Conservative Party1852.3%6.9%
9Maqsoom Z.Conservative Party1842.3%6.8%
10Mehmood F.Conservative Party1451.8%5.4%

Electorate 8,776 · EC ward code E05013899 · Back to ward index

Leytonstone · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,889

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gray J.Labour Party1,88621.8%65.3%+40.3 ptsElected
2Loakes C.Labour Party1,88121.7%65.1%+40.1 ptsElected
3Pye M.Labour Party1,77820.5%61.6%+36.6 ptsElected
4Lafferty C.Green Party5576.4%19.3%
5Dawes M.Green Party5236.0%18.1%
6Mary Warrington R.Green Party4825.6%16.7%
7Bowden M.Conservative Party2853.3%9.9%
8Adams S.Conservative Party2833.3%9.8%
9Khan S.Conservative Party2522.9%8.7%
10Mirza S.Liberal Democrats2232.6%7.7%
11McCarthy D.Liberal Democrats1962.3%6.8%
12Harrison R.Liberal Democrats1962.3%6.8%
13Hockey L.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition650.8%2.3%
14Talaia M.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition590.7%2.0%

Electorate 9,108 · EC ward code E05013897 · Back to ward index

Wood Street · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 72.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,073

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ashworth V.Labour Party1,78243.0%86.0%+52.6 ptsElected
2Sweden R.Labour Party1,49936.2%72.3%+39.0 ptsElected
3Addenbrooke T.Liberal Democrats3137.5%15.1%
4Dougall R.Conservative Party2024.9%9.7%
5Finch M.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1814.4%8.7%
6Naqvi S.Conservative Party1694.1%8.2%

Electorate 6,326 · EC ward code E05013903 · Back to ward index

William Morris · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,194

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gardiner K.Labour Party2,65427.7%83.1%+58.1 ptsElected
2Williams G.Labour Party2,56326.7%80.2%+55.2 ptsElected
3Phipps J.Labour Party2,07321.6%64.9%+39.9 ptsElected
4Greenwood H.Green Party1,12611.7%35.2%
5Ali H.Conservative Party3273.4%10.2%
6Mitchell P.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2953.1%9.2%
7Khan S.Conservative Party2792.9%8.7%
8Seher A.Conservative Party2662.8%8.3%

Electorate 9,871 · EC ward code E05013902 · Back to ward index

Cann Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,564

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Littlejohn S.Labour Party1,94325.3%75.8%+50.8 ptsElected
2Bianca Green K.Labour Party1,87324.3%73.0%+48.0 ptsElected
3Rayner K.Labour Party1,67121.7%65.2%+40.2 ptsElected
4Richardson P.Green Party6398.3%24.9%
5Carder J.Liberal Democrats3594.7%14.0%
6Ahmed S.Liberal Democrats3013.9%11.7%
7Gibbons H.Conservative Party2833.7%11.0%
8Griffin O.Conservative Party2813.7%11.0%
9Kizil E.Conservative Party2242.9%8.7%
10Stronge T.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1181.5%4.6%

Electorate 10,639 · EC ward code E05013882 · Back to ward index

Markhouse · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 74.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,766

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Khan J.Labour Party1,32137.4%74.8%+41.5 ptsElected
2Waldron S.Labour Party1,31137.1%74.3%+40.9 ptsElected
3Addenbrooke C.Liberal Democrats2657.5%15.0%
4Bird E.Liberal Democrats2126.0%12.0%
5Hasan F.Conservative Party1524.3%8.6%
6Maqsoom S.Conservative Party1414.0%8.0%
7Taaffe L.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1293.7%7.3%

Electorate 6,741 · EC ward code E05013898 · Back to ward index

Forest · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,974

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Berberi M.Labour Party2,04522.9%68.8%+43.8 ptsElected
2Malik Z.Labour Party1,98222.2%66.6%+41.6 ptsElected
3Berberi K.Labour Party1,96122.0%65.9%+40.9 ptsElected
4Roberts G.Green Party7168.0%24.1%
5Hadley J.Liberal Democrats4314.8%14.5%
6Randle J.Liberal Democrats3614.0%12.1%
7Sallery G.Liberal Democrats3163.5%10.6%
8Karamehmet S.Conservative Party2893.2%9.7%
9Karamehmet I.Conservative Party2843.2%9.5%
10Karamehmet S.Conservative Party2622.9%8.8%
11Ahmad A.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1721.9%5.8%
12Ssekandwa A.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1031.2%3.5%

Electorate 10,548 · EC ward code E05013887 · Back to ward index

Higham Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,499

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bellamy K.Labour Party2,00126.7%80.1%+55.1 ptsElected
2Lewis K.Labour Party1,77523.7%71.0%+46.0 ptsElected
3Strathearn A.Labour Party1,67322.3%67.0%+42.0 ptsElected
4Ashcroft L.Green Party6628.8%26.5%
5Gil Martinez L.Liberal Democrats3164.2%12.6%
6Kelly R.Liberal Democrats2623.5%10.5%
7Smith P.Liberal Democrats2303.1%9.2%
8Cleverley M.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1582.1%6.3%
9Ikram H.Conservative Party1502.0%6.0%
10Islam S.Conservative Party1482.0%5.9%
11Sheikh A.Conservative Party1211.6%4.8%

Electorate 9,599 · EC ward code E05013892 · Back to ward index

Lea Bridge · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,427

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dhedhi S.Labour Party1,89226.0%77.9%+52.9 ptsElected
2Whilby J.Labour Party1,88925.9%77.8%+52.8 ptsElected
3Lyons G.Labour Party1,62722.3%67.0%+42.0 ptsElected
4Fabios S.Independent92012.6%37.9%
5Hussain M.Conservative Party2693.7%11.1%
6Shaikh M.Conservative Party2423.3%10.0%
7Zafar M.Conservative Party2263.1%9.3%
8Robinson B.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2173.0%8.9%

Electorate 9,858 · EC ward code E05013895 · Back to ward index

Hoe Street · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,997

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mirwitch M.Labour Party2,20624.5%73.6%+48.6 ptsElected
2Khan A.Labour Party2,09123.3%69.8%+44.8 ptsElected
3Dixon A.Labour Party2,03522.6%67.9%+42.9 ptsElected
4Lambert S.Green Party96410.7%32.2%
5Simmons C.Liberal Democrats3734.1%12.4%
6Goodman J.Liberal Democrats3263.6%10.9%
7Bell P.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2993.3%10.0%
8Ipadeola M.Conservative Party2442.7%8.1%
9Irfan M.Conservative Party2362.6%7.9%
10Mir N.Conservative Party2182.4%7.3%

Electorate 9,770 · EC ward code E05013893 · Back to ward index

High Street · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,199

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ihenachor C.Labour Party1,54723.5%70.4%+45.4 ptsElected
2Connor T.Labour Party1,53123.2%69.6%+44.6 ptsElected
3Anwar R.Labour Party1,52123.1%69.2%+44.2 ptsElected
4Wooman A.Green Party71210.8%32.4%
5Pollard K.Liberal Democrats2553.9%11.6%
6Taaffe N.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1742.6%7.9%
7Cocking R.Liberal Democrats1682.5%7.6%
8Chopra-Evans M.Conservative Party1612.4%7.3%
9Khan M.Conservative Party1522.3%6.9%
10Latif H.Conservative Party1432.2%6.5%
11Dinant Schreuder J.Liberal Democrats1352.0%6.1%
12Wallace-Esnard N.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition981.5%4.5%

Electorate 7,602 · EC ward code E05013891 · Back to ward index