← Warrington (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

Warrington 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

22 ward races
58 seats
13 unfairly awarded seats
22.4% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 22 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 58 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party54,51938.9%3662.1%2339.7%+13
Conservative Party51,34536.7%1119.0%2237.9%-11
Liberal Democrats22,38816.0%813.8%915.5%-1
Independent8,5526.1%35.2%35.2%0
Green Party3,2422.3%00.0%11.7%-1
Total140,046100.0%58100.0%58100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2021 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2021 election (current) and on the eve of it (2020), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2021)
Previous (2020)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Westbrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,737

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Carr S.M.Labour Party65919.0%37.9%+4.6 ptsElected
2Gallagher B.Labour Party61917.8%35.6%+2.3 ptsElected
3Paszkowska M.A.Conservative Party61017.6%35.1%
4Shah N.J.Conservative Party50714.6%29.2%
5Duddle D.L.Independent42812.3%24.6%
6Webb J.I.Independent42712.3%24.6%
7Walker J.M.Liberal Democrats1143.3%6.6%
8Davies B.M.Liberal Democrats1103.2%6.3%

Electorate 5,188 · EC ward code E05011045 · Back to ward index

Stockton Heath · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,450

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Wheeler J.C.Liberal Democrats1,01220.7%41.3%+8.0 ptsElected
2Walker P.J.Liberal Democrats99920.4%40.8%+7.4 ptsElected
3Kidley B.Conservative Party88518.1%36.1%
4Olsen L.J.Conservative Party83717.1%34.2%
5Murphy L.J.Labour Party50410.3%20.6%
6Slater G.L.Labour Party4449.1%18.1%
7McAteer L.Green Party2194.5%8.9%

Electorate 5,662 · EC ward code E05011044 · Back to ward index

Lymm South · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,405

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Buckley K.Conservative Party1,11923.3%46.5%+13.2 ptsElected
2Gowland G.F.Liberal Democrats1,01921.2%42.4%+9.0 ptsElected
3Martland T.Liberal Democrats89518.6%37.2%
4Pemberton I.Conservative Party85917.9%35.7%
5Cockayne T.Labour Party3827.9%15.9%
6Anderson C.M.Labour Party2966.2%12.3%
7Griffiths J.Independent2395.0%9.9%

Electorate 5,092 · EC ward code E05011037 · Back to ward index

Grappenhall · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,520

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bate R.S.R.Liberal Democrats1,33526.5%53.0%+19.7 ptsElected
2Biggin M.J.Liberal Democrats1,13622.5%45.1%+11.8 ptsElected
3Brookes S.C.Conservative Party1,05220.9%41.8%
4Freeman J.S.Conservative Party80315.9%31.9%
5Cundy D.Labour Party2615.2%10.4%
6Price S.J.Labour Party2585.1%10.2%
7Wilson K.R.Green Party1943.8%7.7%

Electorate 5,549 · EC ward code E05011031 · Back to ward index

Latchford West · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,862

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1McLaughlin M.P.Labour Party90924.4%48.8%+15.5 ptsElected
2Morgan L.Labour Party85923.1%46.1%+12.8 ptsElected
3Bowles A.L.Conservative Party79321.3%42.6%
4Taylor S.H.Conservative Party78721.1%42.3%
5Chisholm S.J.Liberal Democrats2075.6%11.1%
6Stansfield J.K.Liberal Democrats1694.5%9.1%

Electorate 5,900 · EC ward code E05011035 · Back to ward index

Poulton North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,397

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Friend D.Labour Party1,17216.3%48.9%+23.9 ptsElected
2Friend G.J.Labour Party1,12615.7%47.0%+22.0 ptsElected
3Emery S.Labour Party95613.3%39.9%+14.9 ptsElected
4Gibson W.D.Conservative Party80411.2%33.5%
5Duncanson B.A.Conservative Party79911.1%33.3%
6Settle G.Green Party72710.1%30.3%
7Tweedale I.Conservative Party7099.9%29.6%
8Parr J.Independent5447.6%22.7%
9Wilson S.Liberal Democrats2032.8%8.5%
10Harwood T.Liberal Democrats1522.1%6.3%

Electorate 8,020 · EC ward code E05011041 · Back to ward index

Great Sankey North and Whittle Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,514

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Whalen J.Labour Party1,18415.7%47.1%+22.1 ptsElected
2Patel H.Labour Party1,14315.2%45.5%+20.5 ptsElected
3Henshaw J.Labour Party1,00713.4%40.1%+15.1 ptsElected
4Pinnington P.Conservative Party82410.9%32.8%
5Paterson O.J.Conservative Party76610.2%30.5%
6Catlow N.J.Independent7229.6%28.7%
7Mirfin T.J.Conservative Party6448.5%25.6%
8Clark D.Independent5427.2%21.6%
9Davies S.Green Party4325.7%17.2%
10Tobin A.J.Liberal Democrats2773.7%11.0%

Electorate 7,908 · EC ward code E05011032 · Back to ward index

Chapelford and Old Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,629

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Parish S.Labour Party1,22415.5%46.6%+21.6 ptsElected
2Warburton P.J.Labour Party1,18615.0%45.1%+20.1 ptsElected
3Butler L.M.Conservative Party1,10414.0%42.0%+17.0 ptsElected
4Knowles R.A.Labour Party1,08813.8%41.4%
5Wilson I.A.Conservative Party97212.3%37.0%
6Tuli S.Conservative Party90811.5%34.5%
7Bird A.K.Liberal Democrats5677.2%21.6%
8Williamson S.L.Green Party4655.9%17.7%
9Wass M.A.Green Party2042.6%7.8%
10Taylor C.Liberal Democrats1682.1%6.4%

Electorate 8,803 · EC ward code E05011028 · Back to ward index

Penketh and Cuerdley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,223

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Heaver A.Independent1,47315.2%45.7%+20.7 ptsElected
2Fellows G.Independent1,39114.4%43.2%+18.2 ptsElected
3Lenihan C.J.Independent1,36114.1%42.2%+17.2 ptsElected
4Dirir L.S.Labour Party1,03810.7%32.2%
5Brookes A.C.Labour Party1,02110.6%31.7%
6Potts M.A.Conservative Party9439.8%29.3%
7Watson K.Labour Party8278.6%25.7%
8Davies L.G.Conservative Party7958.2%24.7%
9Marshall M.Conservative Party6787.0%21.0%
10Todd P.Liberal Democrats1431.5%4.4%

Electorate 8,260 · EC ward code E05011039 · Back to ward index

Poulton South · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,474

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Creaghan M.A.Labour Party78826.7%53.5%+20.1 ptsElected
2Rydzkowski S.J.Labour Party74525.3%50.6%+17.2 ptsElected
3Klein H.M.Conservative Party59420.2%40.3%
4Stewart S.W.Conservative Party54018.3%36.6%
5Crowther D.Liberal Democrats1444.9%9.8%
6Warren D.G.Liberal Democrats1364.6%9.2%

Electorate 4,823 · EC ward code E05011042 · Back to ward index

Birchwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,506

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bowden R.Labour Party1,52120.2%60.7%+35.7 ptsElected
2Ellis D.M.Labour Party1,38918.5%55.4%+30.4 ptsElected
3Balding N.W.Conservative Party1,07614.3%42.9%+17.9 ptsElected
4Guthrie J.M.Labour Party1,07314.3%42.8%
5Allen C.P.Conservative Party1,06814.2%42.6%
6Young P.A.Conservative Party7439.9%29.6%
7Scott M.Liberal Democrats3514.7%14.0%
8Eccles D.J.Liberal Democrats2984.0%11.9%

Electorate 8,354 · EC ward code E05011026 · Back to ward index

Rixton and Woolston · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,544

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dixon J.T.Conservative Party1,25016.4%49.1%+24.1 ptsElected
2Hill A.J.Labour Party1,15715.2%45.5%+20.5 ptsElected
3Eastty P.Conservative Party1,12014.7%44.0%+19.0 ptsElected
4Wright P.Labour Party1,06914.0%42.0%
5Tynan R.Conservative Party1,06413.9%41.8%
6Rashid F.Labour Party97012.7%38.1%
7Bray P.A.Independent4125.4%16.2%
8Speed H.Liberal Democrats2953.9%11.6%
9Meichen B.A.Liberal Democrats2943.9%11.6%

Electorate 7,655 · EC ward code E05011043 · Back to ward index

Lymm North and Thelwall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,852

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Barr B.Liberal Democrats2,12918.4%55.3%+30.3 ptsElected
2Marks I.G.Liberal Democrats2,01317.4%52.3%+27.3 ptsElected
3Johnson W.Liberal Democrats1,73515.0%45.0%+20.0 ptsElected
4Chadwick S.P.Conservative Party1,21110.5%31.4%
5Leigh J.F.Conservative Party1,21010.5%31.4%
6Longton R.N.Conservative Party1,1009.5%28.6%
7Brownhill C.Labour Party9007.8%23.4%
8Wormald K.Labour Party6575.7%17.1%
9Rufus M.V.Labour Party6015.2%15.6%

Electorate 9,079 · EC ward code E05011036 · Back to ward index

Orford · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,853

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Milner H.C.Labour Party1,03618.6%55.9%+30.9 ptsElected
2Lloyd-Fitzgerald C.E.Labour Party98417.7%53.1%+28.1 ptsElected
3Tarr M.A.W.Labour Party85615.4%46.2%+21.2 ptsElected
4Kilgannon C.A.Conservative Party77213.9%41.7%
5Murphy S.Conservative Party74213.3%40.0%
6Forshaw N.Conservative Party65111.7%35.1%
7Nicholls T.Independent3496.3%18.8%
8Jordan C.E.Liberal Democrats1703.1%9.2%

Electorate 8,868 · EC ward code E05011038 · Back to ward index

Appleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,044

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jervis M.C.Conservative Party2,02416.7%50.0%+25.0 ptsElected
2Chapman G.Conservative Party1,98916.4%49.2%+24.2 ptsElected
3Critchley K.D.Conservative Party1,92615.9%47.6%+22.6 ptsElected
4Lewenz P.R.Liberal Democrats1,62813.4%40.3%
5Harris S.A.Liberal Democrats1,55112.8%38.3%
6Browne M.D.Liberal Democrats1,49712.3%37.0%
7Matthews D.J.T.Labour Party5294.4%13.1%
8Frith R.M.D.Labour Party5114.2%12.6%
9Warnock-Smith A.A.Labour Party4783.9%11.8%

Electorate 8,457 · EC ward code E05011024 · Back to ward index

Fairfield and Howley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,727

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Flaherty J.Labour Party1,20123.2%69.5%+44.5 ptsElected
2Higgins T.Labour Party1,05720.4%61.2%+36.2 ptsElected
3Zaman S.Labour Party88317.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
4Crawshaw S.Conservative Party53810.4%31.2%
5Davies S.S.L.Conservative Party4468.6%25.8%
6Donleavy P.J.Conservative Party3977.7%23.0%
7Harris D.J.Green Party3045.9%17.6%
8Cummerson C.M.Liberal Democrats1783.4%10.3%
9Martin J.Green Party1773.4%10.2%

Electorate 8,543 · EC ward code E05011030 · Back to ward index

Culcheth, Glazebury and Croft · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,581

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Benson C.R.Conservative Party1,94218.1%54.2%+29.2 ptsElected
2Allen V.M.Conservative Party1,92317.9%53.7%+28.7 ptsElected
3Maisey W.Conservative Party1,84517.2%51.5%+26.5 ptsElected
4Smith M.Labour Party1,55614.5%43.4%
5Alldred B.Labour Party1,44213.4%40.3%
6Davidson J.Labour Party1,15410.7%32.2%
7Williams G.L.Green Party5204.8%14.5%
8Sloane E.Liberal Democrats3623.4%10.1%

Electorate 8,834 · EC ward code E05011029 · Back to ward index

Burtonwood and Winwick · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,598

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Abbey A.Labour Party98630.9%61.7%+28.4 ptsElected
2Mitchell C.Labour Party95830.0%60.0%+26.6 ptsElected
3Campbell P.T.Conservative Party57918.1%36.2%
4Murray T.Conservative Party56417.7%35.3%
5Davies E.J.Liberal Democrats1083.4%6.8%

Electorate 5,066 · EC ward code E05011027 · Back to ward index

Bewsey and Whitecross · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,600

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hall S.E.Labour Party1,04621.8%65.4%+40.4 ptsElected
2Wright S.Labour Party92519.3%57.8%+32.8 ptsElected
3Jennings T.Labour Party87918.3%54.9%+29.9 ptsElected
4Critchley C.M.Conservative Party4539.4%28.3%
5Trainer B.Independent4238.8%26.4%
6Kerrigan A.J.Conservative Party3908.1%24.4%
7Olsen C.A.Conservative Party3447.2%21.5%
8Timmis R.Liberal Democrats3407.1%21.3%

Electorate 8,717 · EC ward code E05011025 · Back to ward index

Great Sankey South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,414

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1King A.M.Labour Party1,51220.9%62.6%+37.6 ptsElected
2Watson L.Labour Party1,41519.5%58.6%+33.6 ptsElected
3Hussain M.Labour Party1,36318.8%56.5%+31.5 ptsElected
4Wilson A.T.P.Conservative Party91612.6%37.9%
5Goldie C.Conservative Party85511.8%35.4%
6Prakash A.Conservative Party80311.1%33.3%
7Smith R.A.Liberal Democrats3795.2%15.7%

Electorate 8,405 · EC ward code E05011033 · Back to ward index

Poplars and Hulme · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,521

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sudworth N.J.Labour Party1,04723.0%68.9%+43.9 ptsElected
2Kerr-Brown J.S.Labour Party94220.6%61.9%+36.9 ptsElected
3Cooksey H.Labour Party88719.4%58.3%+33.3 ptsElected
4Birchall C.D.Conservative Party57812.7%38.0%
5Blackstock R.Conservative Party3828.4%25.1%
6Mitchell C.B.Conservative Party3607.9%23.7%
7Lingley M.Independent2415.3%15.8%
8Anderson M.Liberal Democrats1252.7%8.2%

Electorate 8,825 · EC ward code E05011040 · Back to ward index

Latchford East · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,370

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mundry H.J.Labour Party92233.6%67.3%+34.0 ptsElected
2Mundry K.E.Labour Party91733.5%66.9%+33.6 ptsElected
3Allan H.W.Conservative Party37713.8%27.5%
4Fox T.S.Conservative Party37513.7%27.4%
5McAllister D.P.Liberal Democrats1495.4%10.9%

Electorate 6,477 · EC ward code E05011034 · Back to ward index