← Warrington (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Warrington 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 22 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 58 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 54,208 | 47.3% | 42 | 72.4% | 28 | 48.3% | +14 |
| Conservative Party | 29,261 | 25.5% | 1 | 1.7% | 15 | 25.9% | -14 |
| Liberal Democrats | 19,705 | 17.2% | 12 | 20.7% | 10 | 17.2% | +2 |
| Independent | 7,598 | 6.6% | 3 | 5.2% | 4 | 6.9% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 2,045 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.7% | -1 |
| Green Party | 1,822 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 114,639 | 100.0% | 58 | 100.0% | 58 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Penketh and Cuerdley · 3 seats · won at 36.5% · above quota
- Lymm South · 2 seats · won at 45.8% · above quota
- Burtonwood and Winwick · 2 seats · won at 46.2% · above quota
- Rixton and Woolston · 3 seats · won at 42.3% · above quota
- Stockton Heath · 2 seats · won at 53.0% · above quota
- Grappenhall · 2 seats · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Appleton · 3 seats · won at 47.7% · above quota
- Chapelford and Old Hall · 3 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- Latchford West · 2 seats · won at 56.6% · above quota
- Great Sankey North and Whittle Hall · 3 seats · won at 52.3% · above quota
- Culcheth, Glazebury and Croft · 3 seats · won at 54.9% · above quota
- Latchford East · 2 seats · won at 67.2% · above quota
- Orford · 3 seats · won at 63.0% · above quota
- Birchwood · 3 seats · won at 63.2% · above quota
- Bewsey and Whitecross · 3 seats · won at 63.2% · above quota
- Lymm North and Thelwall · 3 seats · won at 63.4% · above quota
- Great Sankey South · 3 seats · won at 63.8% · above quota
- Westbrook · 2 seats · won at 72.2% · above quota
- Poulton South · 2 seats · won at 78.1% · above quota
- Poplars and Hulme · 3 seats · won at 72.7% · above quota
- Fairfield and Howley · 3 seats · won at 74.0% · above quota
- Poulton North · 3 seats · won at 81.2% · above quota
Race results
Penketh and Cuerdley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,701
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peters, E. | Independent | 1,144 | 14.1% | 42.4% | +17.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barnard, J. | Labour Party | 1,130 | 13.9% | 41.8% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fellows, G. | Independent | 986 | 12.2% | 36.5% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gallagher, B. | Labour Party | 888 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 5 | McManus, M. | Labour Party | 841 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 6 | Lenihan, C. | Independent | 685 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 7 | Heaver, A. | Independent | 620 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 8 | Wych, C. | Independent | 484 | 6.0% | 17.9% | — | |
| 9 | Baxter, J. | Conservative Party | 468 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — | |
| 10 | Eriobuna, C. | Conservative Party | 390 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 11 | Wilkinson, P. | Conservative Party | 316 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 12 | Barr, K. | Liberal Democrats | 150 | 1.9% | 5.6% | — |
Lymm South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,782
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gowland, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,144 | 32.1% | 64.2% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Studdard, L. | Liberal Democrats | 816 | 22.9% | 45.8% | +12.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pemberton, I. | Conservative Party | 639 | 17.9% | 35.9% | — | |
| 4 | Ford, P. | Conservative Party | 532 | 14.9% | 29.9% | — | |
| 5 | Frith, S. | Labour Party | 432 | 12.1% | 24.2% | — |
Burtonwood and Winwick · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,545
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burgess, K. | Labour Party | 841 | 27.2% | 54.5% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mann, S. | Independent | 714 | 23.1% | 46.2% | +12.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carr, S. | Labour Party | 614 | 19.9% | 39.8% | — | |
| 4 | Murray, T. | Independent | 553 | 17.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 5 | Wheeldon, M. | Green Party | 198 | 6.4% | 12.8% | — | |
| 6 | Gardiner, S. | Conservative Party | 169 | 5.5% | 10.9% | — |
Rixton and Woolston · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,078
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tynan, R. | Conservative Party | 977 | 15.7% | 47.0% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooksey, H. | Labour Party | 973 | 15.6% | 46.8% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sheridan, L. | Labour Party | 879 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rushby, G. | Conservative Party | 782 | 12.5% | 37.6% | — | |
| 5 | Varghese, S. | Labour Party | 738 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 6 | Klein, H. | Conservative Party | 730 | 11.7% | 35.1% | — | |
| 7 | Eastty, P. | Independent | 447 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — | |
| 8 | Wild, K. | Green Party | 393 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 9 | Siddall, G. | Reform UK | 316 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — |
Stockton Heath · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,920
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wheeler, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,210 | 31.5% | 63.0% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harris, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,018 | 26.5% | 53.0% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Murphy, L. | Labour Party | 634 | 16.5% | 33.0% | — | |
| 4 | Sheldon, S. | Conservative Party | 537 | 14.0% | 28.0% | — | |
| 5 | Olsen, L. | Conservative Party | 440 | 11.5% | 22.9% | — |
Grappenhall · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,123
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Browne, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,184 | 27.9% | 55.8% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Speed, H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,160 | 27.3% | 54.7% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Freeman, A. | Conservative Party | 583 | 13.7% | 27.5% | — | |
| 4 | Freeman, J. | Conservative Party | 573 | 13.5% | 27.0% | — | |
| 5 | Cundy, D. | Labour Party | 463 | 10.9% | 21.8% | — | |
| 6 | Caldow, M. | Green Party | 282 | 6.6% | 13.3% | — |
Appleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,022
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Booth, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,999 | 22.1% | 66.2% | +41.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walker, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,906 | 21.0% | 63.1% | +38.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Scott, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,440 | 15.9% | 47.7% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jervis, M. | Conservative Party | 1,165 | 12.9% | 38.6% | — | |
| 5 | Chapman, G. | Conservative Party | 1,040 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 6 | Critchley, K. | Conservative Party | 997 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 7 | Whalen, J. | Labour Party | 518 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — |
Chapelford and Old Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,423
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parish, S. | Labour Party | 1,521 | 20.9% | 62.8% | +37.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Warburton, P. | Labour Party | 1,394 | 19.2% | 57.5% | +32.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pete, B. | Labour Party | 1,163 | 16.0% | 48.0% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cooper, B. | Conservative Party | 935 | 12.9% | 38.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hepherd-Hall, G. | Conservative Party | 737 | 10.1% | 30.4% | — | |
| 6 | Shah, N. | Conservative Party | 692 | 9.5% | 28.6% | — | |
| 7 | Bird, A. | Liberal Democrats | 446 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 8 | Hutton-Riedijk, B. | Green Party | 381 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — |
Latchford West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,546
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McLaughlin, M. | Labour Party | 915 | 29.6% | 59.2% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Matthews, D. | Labour Party | 875 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taylor, S. | Conservative Party | 565 | 18.3% | 36.6% | — | |
| 4 | Turner, M. | Conservative Party | 504 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Jordan, T. | Liberal Democrats | 232 | 7.5% | 15.0% | — |
Great Sankey North and Whittle Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,457
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henshaw, J. | Labour Party | 1,365 | 18.5% | 55.6% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Patel, H. | Labour Party | 1,319 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cameron, M. | Labour Party | 1,285 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Catlow, N. | Independent | 1,159 | 15.7% | 47.2% | — | |
| 5 | Groom, J. | Conservative Party | 606 | 8.2% | 24.7% | — | |
| 6 | Kuong-Kwan, C. | Conservative Party | 592 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 7 | Davies, S. | Green Party | 568 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 8 | Mitchell, B. | Conservative Party | 477 | 6.5% | 19.4% | — |
Culcheth, Glazebury and Croft · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,078
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 1,763 | 19.1% | 57.3% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Johnson, N. | Labour Party | 1,694 | 18.3% | 55.0% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Seddon, J. | Labour Party | 1,691 | 18.3% | 54.9% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Benson, C. | Conservative Party | 1,457 | 15.8% | 47.3% | — | |
| 5 | Allen, V. | Conservative Party | 1,374 | 14.9% | 44.6% | — | |
| 6 | Edwards, A. | Conservative Party | 1,256 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — |
Latchford East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,260
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mundry, K. | Labour Party | 880 | 34.9% | 69.9% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mundry, H. | Labour Party | 847 | 33.6% | 67.2% | +33.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Allan, H. | Conservative Party | 294 | 11.7% | 23.3% | — | |
| 4 | Olsen, C. | Conservative Party | 256 | 10.2% | 20.3% | — | |
| 5 | Duncan, V. | Liberal Democrats | 242 | 9.6% | 19.2% | — |
Orford · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,504
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Appleton, D. | Labour Party | 1,039 | 23.0% | 69.1% | +44.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Russon, E. | Labour Party | 981 | 21.7% | 65.2% | +40.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Frith, R. | Labour Party | 948 | 21.0% | 63.0% | +38.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kilgannon, C. | Independent | 806 | 17.9% | 53.6% | — | |
| 5 | Nicholls, T. | Reform UK | 476 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 6 | Bent, D. | Conservative Party | 262 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — |
Birchwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,273
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dhillon, K. | Labour Party | 1,454 | 21.3% | 64.0% | +39.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dhillon, B. | Labour Party | 1,448 | 21.2% | 63.7% | +38.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Price, T. | Labour Party | 1,436 | 21.1% | 63.2% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Baldng, N. | Conservative Party | 891 | 13.1% | 39.2% | — | |
| 5 | Allen, C. | Conservative Party | 626 | 9.2% | 27.5% | — | |
| 6 | Murphy, N. | Conservative Party | 536 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — | |
| 7 | Challinor, D. | Reform UK | 428 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — |
Bewsey and Whitecross · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,605
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright, S. | Labour Party | 1,151 | 23.9% | 71.7% | +46.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jennings, T. | Labour Party | 1,133 | 23.5% | 70.6% | +45.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mohammed, S. | Labour Party | 1,015 | 21.1% | 63.2% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Crowther, D. | Liberal Democrats | 414 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 5 | Critchley, C. | Conservative Party | 378 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — | |
| 6 | Thompson, L. | Conservative Party | 365 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — | |
| 7 | Price, B. | Conservative Party | 359 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — |
Lymm North and Thelwall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,868
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marks, I. | Liberal Democrats | 2,014 | 23.4% | 70.2% | +45.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hignett, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,848 | 21.5% | 64.4% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Johnson, W. | Liberal Democrats | 1,817 | 21.1% | 63.4% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Milner, H. | Labour Party | 819 | 9.5% | 28.6% | — | |
| 5 | Pembeton, C. | Conservative Party | 802 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 6 | Farrington, S. | Conservative Party | 687 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 7 | Higginson, C. | Conservative Party | 616 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — |
Great Sankey South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,948
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watson, L. | Labour Party | 1,378 | 23.6% | 70.8% | +45.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hussain, M. | Labour Party | 1,256 | 21.5% | 64.5% | +39.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hussain, L. | Labour Party | 1,243 | 21.3% | 63.8% | +38.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Pennington, A. | Conservative Party | 490 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 5 | Dolan, M. | Conservative Party | 422 | 7.2% | 21.7% | — | |
| 6 | Lovegrove, C. | Conservative Party | 389 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 7 | Tobin, A. | Liberal Democrats | 346 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 8 | Smith, R. | Liberal Democrats | 319 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — |
Westbrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 72.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,172
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rufus, M. | Labour Party | 925 | 39.5% | 78.9% | +45.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Eglinton, K. | Labour Party | 846 | 36.1% | 72.2% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ruben, G. | Conservative Party | 573 | 24.4% | 48.9% | — |
Poulton South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 78.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,057
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Knowles, R. | Labour Party | 841 | 39.8% | 79.6% | +46.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rydzkowski, S. | Labour Party | 825 | 39.0% | 78.1% | +44.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jones, A. | Conservative Party | 448 | 21.2% | 42.4% | — |
Poplars and Hulme · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 72.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +47.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,134
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sudworth, N. | Labour Party | 1,004 | 29.5% | 88.5% | +63.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kerr-Brown, J. | Labour Party | 894 | 26.3% | 78.8% | +53.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Southern, G. | Labour Party | 825 | 24.2% | 72.7% | +47.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cornwell, D. | Reform UK | 402 | 11.8% | 35.4% | — | |
| 5 | Muir, A. | Conservative Party | 278 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — |
Fairfield and Howley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,418
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flahety, J. | Labour Party | 1,271 | 29.9% | 89.6% | +64.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Higgins, T. | Labour Party | 1,167 | 27.4% | 82.3% | +57.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Zaman, S. | Labour Party | 1,049 | 24.7% | 74.0% | +49.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fowler, D. | Reform UK | 423 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 5 | Thompson, D. | Conservative Party | 345 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — |
Poulton North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 81.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +56.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,436
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friend, G. | Labour Party | 1,259 | 29.2% | 87.7% | +62.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Emery, S. | Labour Party | 1,172 | 27.2% | 81.6% | +56.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gillham, U. | Labour Party | 1,166 | 27.1% | 81.2% | +56.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Millington, M. | Conservative Party | 711 | 16.5% | 49.5% | — |