← Warwick (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort

Warwick 2023

Local elections held 4 May 2023.

17 ward races
44 seats
1 elected below the proportional quota
2.3% of seats below quota
6 unfairly awarded seats
13.6% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 17 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 44 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Green Party27,78926.3%1431.8%1227.3%+2
Conservative Party27,53826.1%613.6%1227.3%-6
Liberal Democrats23,84722.6%1022.7%1022.7%0
Labour Party22,57621.4%1125.0%920.5%+2
WHIT RES3,5873.4%36.8%12.3%+2
UK Independence Party (UKIP)1220.1%00.0%00.0%0
Heritage Party1160.1%00.0%00.0%0
Reform UK730.1%00.0%00.0%0
Total105,648100.0%44100.0%44100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2023)
Previous (2022)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Radford Semele · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 40.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −9.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,085

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Noonan, B.Conservative Party43540.1%−9.9 ptsElected
2Byrne, L.Liberal Democrats39836.7%
3Hugl, L.Labour Party14713.5%
4Wiseman, P.Green Party1059.7%

Electorate 2,842 · Back to ward index

Cubbington and Leek Wootton · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,624

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Payne, J.Liberal Democrats69721.5%42.9%+9.6 ptsElected
2Redford, P.Conservative Party63319.5%39.0%+5.6 ptsElected
3Wright, T.Conservative Party61518.9%37.9%
4Ragany, J.Liberal Democrats60818.7%37.4%
5Roberts, J.Labour Party3079.5%18.9%
6Beattie, E.Green Party2016.2%12.4%
7Byart, A.Green Party1875.8%11.5%

Electorate 4,471 · Back to ward index

Warwick Aylesford · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,672

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Browne, D.Labour Party80224.0%48.0%+14.6 ptsElected
2Rosu, G.Labour Party71021.2%42.5%+9.1 ptsElected
3Bartlett, L.Conservative Party61718.5%36.9%
4Colnet, L.Conservative Party55716.7%33.3%
5Atkins, P.Green Party2006.0%12.0%
6Dahlmann, F.Liberal Democrats1715.1%10.2%
7Boileau, J.Liberal Democrats1444.3%8.6%
8O'Brien, T.Green Party1434.3%8.6%

Electorate 5,034 · Back to ward index

Budbrooke · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,987

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Matecki, J.Conservative Party90522.8%45.6%+12.2 ptsElected
2Phillips, P.Conservative Party86421.7%43.5%+10.2 ptsElected
3Barrott, J.Labour Party80620.3%40.6%
4Jackson, G.Liberal Democrats74918.9%37.7%
5Lever, S.Green Party3498.8%17.6%
6Dearing, J.Green Party3007.6%15.1%

Electorate 5,191 · Back to ward index

Bishop's Tachbrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,512

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Collins, M.Labour Party67622.4%44.7%+11.4 ptsElected
2Day, A.Conservative Party66822.1%44.2%+10.8 ptsElected
3Fox, D.Labour Party66321.9%43.8%
4Greene, M.Conservative Party62720.7%41.5%
5Alty, J.Green Party1615.3%10.6%
6Skilton, D.Green Party1053.5%6.9%
7Lomas, N.Liberal Democrats652.1%4.3%
8Lambert, K.Liberal Democrats592.0%3.9%

Electorate 4,681 · Back to ward index

Warwick Saltisford · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,826

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dray, K.Labour Party96826.5%53.0%+19.7 ptsElected
2Sinnott, J.Labour Party87223.9%47.8%+14.4 ptsElected
3Morley, J.Conservative Party51514.1%28.2%
4Herring, H.Conservative Party51314.1%28.1%
5Chilvers, E.Green Party3289.0%18.0%
6Fell, C.Liberal Democrats2376.5%13.0%
7Beddow, A.Liberal Democrats2186.0%11.9%

Electorate 5,391 · Back to ward index

Kenilworth Abbey and Arden · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,159

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Armstrong, D.Green Party1,59716.9%50.6%+25.6 ptsElected
2Aizlewood, K.Green Party1,53516.2%48.6%+23.6 ptsElected
3Hales, R.Conservative Party1,29213.6%40.9%+15.9 ptsElected
4Watson, J.Green Party1,27513.5%40.4%
5Cooke, J.Conservative Party1,26213.3%39.9%
6Gee, J.Conservative Party1,23013.0%38.9%
7Gurney-Terry, A.Liberal Democrats3493.7%11.0%
8Williams, E.Liberal Democrats3453.6%10.9%
9Deacon, H.Labour Party3073.2%9.7%
10Macy, T.Liberal Democrats2853.0%9.0%

Electorate 8,411 · Back to ward index

Kenilworth Park Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,061

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kennedy, A.Green Party1,83820.0%60.0%+35.0 ptsElected
2Cron, L.Green Party1,58517.3%51.8%+26.8 ptsElected
3Williams, L.Green Party1,33314.5%43.5%+18.5 ptsElected
4Graham, M.Conservative Party1,06611.6%34.8%
5Bunker, F.Conservative Party97110.6%31.7%
6Lasok, F.Conservative Party8469.2%27.6%
7Easthaugh, J.Labour Party4915.3%16.0%
8Marsh, A.Liberal Democrats4364.7%14.2%
9Chalmers, A.Liberal Democrats4044.4%13.2%
10Fuchss, S.Liberal Democrats2142.3%7.0%

Electorate 7,767 · Back to ward index

Warwick Myton and Heathcote · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,616

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gorman, K.Green Party1,46018.6%55.8%+30.8 ptsElected
2Harrison, D.Green Party1,41418.0%54.1%+29.1 ptsElected
3Yellapragada, H.Green Party1,17415.0%44.9%+19.9 ptsElected
4Dore, G.Conservative Party86711.0%33.1%
5Low, C.Conservative Party84110.7%32.1%
6Murphy, N.Conservative Party7759.9%29.6%
7Mangat, M.Labour Party7439.5%28.4%
8McHugh, M.Liberal Democrats1772.3%6.8%
9Kelly, J.Liberal Democrats1772.3%6.8%
10Pittarello, D.Liberal Democrats1471.9%5.6%
11Sedgley, M.Reform UK730.9%2.8%

Electorate 6,630 · Back to ward index

Leamington Lillington · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,066

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Boad, A.Liberal Democrats1,76319.2%57.5%+32.5 ptsElected
2Kohler, P.Liberal Democrats1,62617.7%53.0%+28.0 ptsElected
3Russell, D.Liberal Democrats1,38215.0%45.1%+20.1 ptsElected
4Murphy, A.Labour Party7277.9%23.7%
5Parkins, S.Labour Party7107.7%23.2%
6Turok, R.Labour Party5526.0%18.0%
7Rothwell, P.Conservative Party5275.7%17.2%
8Stevens, D.Conservative Party4675.1%15.2%
9Watson, M.Green Party4444.8%14.5%
10Wakeford, L.Conservative Party3393.7%11.1%
11Smith, A.Green Party3113.4%10.1%
12Walton, T.Green Party2352.6%7.7%
13Chapman, G.Heritage Party1161.3%3.8%

Electorate 8,832 · Back to ward index

Kenilworth St John's · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,253

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dickson, K.Liberal Democrats1,94820.0%59.9%+34.9 ptsElected
2Dickson, R.Liberal Democrats1,82618.7%56.1%+31.1 ptsElected
3Milton, A.Liberal Democrats1,47315.1%45.3%+20.3 ptsElected
4Spencer, R.Conservative Party1,16611.9%35.8%
5Rukin, J.Green Party97210.0%29.9%
6Metcalf, A.Conservative Party9569.8%29.4%
7Moore, I.Conservative Party8869.1%27.2%
8Shiels, P.Labour Party5325.5%16.4%

Electorate 7,730 · Back to ward index

Warwick All Saints and Woodloes · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,610

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sullivan, J.Labour Party1,27216.2%48.7%+23.7 ptsElected
2Kang, R.Labour Party1,23415.8%47.3%+22.3 ptsElected
3Wightman, P.Labour Party1,22215.6%46.8%+21.8 ptsElected
4Tracey, J.Conservative Party98912.6%37.9%
5Jacques, O.Conservative Party97912.5%37.5%
6Grainger, M.Conservative Party97712.5%37.4%
7Lewis, T.Green Party3694.7%14.1%
8Nickels, J.Green Party3494.5%13.4%
9Boynton, M.Liberal Democrats2563.3%9.8%
10Cooper, A.Liberal Democrats1832.3%7.0%

Electorate 7,302 · Back to ward index

Leamington Milverton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,918

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gifford, B.Liberal Democrats1,92622.0%66.0%+41.0 ptsElected
2Gifford, C.Liberal Democrats1,61518.4%55.3%+30.3 ptsElected
3Syson, S.Liberal Democrats1,42416.3%48.8%+23.8 ptsElected
4Marshall, A.Labour Party6417.3%22.0%
5Adkins, H.Labour Party5726.5%19.6%
6Deeley, S.Labour Party5185.9%17.8%
7Byrne, L.Conservative Party4945.6%16.9%
8Key, H.Conservative Party4745.4%16.2%
9North, C.Conservative Party4385.0%15.0%
10Philpott, C.Green Party3674.2%12.6%
11Holmes, J.Green Party2853.3%9.8%

Electorate 7,211 · Back to ward index

Whitnash · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,004

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Barton, A.WHIT RES1,29521.5%64.6%+39.6 ptsElected
2Falp, J.WHIT RES1,28421.4%64.1%+39.1 ptsElected
3Margrave, R.WHIT RES1,00816.8%50.3%+25.3 ptsElected
4Ling, F.Labour Party64510.7%32.2%
5Clark, V.Green Party3165.3%15.8%
6Edwards, W.Green Party2644.4%13.2%
7Walsh, C.Liberal Democrats2153.6%10.7%
8Reid, B.Green Party2143.6%10.7%
9Ahern, J.Conservative Party1873.1%9.3%
10Parmar, E.Conservative Party1612.7%8.0%
11Moore, D.Conservative Party1592.6%7.9%
12Jessamine, J.Liberal Democrats1422.4%7.1%
13Steele, L.UK Independence Party (UKIP)1222.0%6.1%

Electorate 7,409 · Back to ward index

Leamington Clarendon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,485

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hunt, K.Labour Party1,48019.9%59.6%+34.6 ptsElected
2King, C.Labour Party1,42719.1%57.4%+32.4 ptsElected
3Harrison, J.Labour Party1,30217.5%52.4%+27.4 ptsElected
4Richards, S.Green Party5697.6%22.9%
5Alexander, D.Liberal Democrats4936.6%19.8%
6Thompson, A.Conservative Party4826.5%19.4%
7Hutchings, B.Liberal Democrats4415.9%17.7%
8Brown, P.Liberal Democrats4275.7%17.2%
9Cox, N.Conservative Party4255.7%17.1%
10Stone, N.Conservative Party4095.5%16.5%

Electorate 7,579 · Back to ward index

Leamington Brunswick · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,668

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chilvers, J.Green Party1,13022.6%67.7%+42.7 ptsElected
2Davison, I.Green Party1,04220.8%62.5%+37.5 ptsElected
3Tangri, N.Green Party96819.3%58.0%+33.0 ptsElected
4Barker, J.Labour Party4699.4%28.1%
5Sweeney, J.Labour Party4078.1%24.4%
6Kerr, M.Labour Party4008.0%24.0%
7Garth, T.Conservative Party1603.2%9.6%
8Bateman, J.Conservative Party1292.6%7.7%
9Aujla, P.Liberal Democrats1042.1%6.2%
10Jee, H.Conservative Party1012.0%6.1%
11Mitte, J.Liberal Democrats561.1%3.4%
12Dickinson, L.Liberal Democrats390.8%2.3%

Electorate 6,817 · Back to ward index

Leamington Willes · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,267

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Luckhurst, M.Green Party1,61123.7%71.1%+46.1 ptsElected
2Roberts, W.Green Party1,60923.7%71.0%+46.0 ptsElected
3Billiald, E.Green Party1,44421.2%63.7%+38.7 ptsElected
4Bhardwaj, K.Labour Party97414.3%43.0%
5Foden, H.Liberal Democrats2533.7%11.2%
6Calder, S.Conservative Party2303.4%10.1%
7Pandey, A.Liberal Democrats2143.1%9.4%
8Chaloner, T.Conservative Party1692.5%7.5%
9Naylor, D.Liberal Democrats1612.4%7.1%
10Heather, C.Conservative Party1352.0%6.0%

Electorate 7,444 · Back to ward index