← Waverley (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Waverley 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 50 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 29,116 | 38.0% | 10 | 20.0% | 19 | 38.0% | -9 |
| Liberal Democrats | 23,058 | 30.1% | 22 | 44.0% | 15 | 30.0% | +7 |
| FARN RES | 10,469 | 13.7% | 13 | 26.0% | 7 | 14.0% | +6 |
| Green Party | 6,381 | 8.3% | 1 | 2.0% | 4 | 8.0% | -3 |
| Labour Party | 4,488 | 5.9% | 2 | 4.0% | 3 | 6.0% | -1 |
| Independent | 2,986 | 3.9% | 2 | 4.0% | 2 | 4.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 115 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 28 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 76,641 | 100.0% | 50 | 100.0% | 50 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Ewhurst and Ellens Green · 1 seat · won at 51.2% · above quota
- Farnham Bourne · 2 seats · won at 42.8% · above quota
- Elstead and Peper Harow · 1 seat · won at 60.9% · above quota
- Alfold, Dunsfold and Hascombe · 2 seats · won at 46.5% · above quota
- Western Commons · 2 seats · won at 47.1% · above quota
- Godalming Holloway · 2 seats · won at 47.7% · above quota
- Cranleigh West · 2 seats · won at 48.2% · above quota
- Hindhead and Beacon Hill · 2 seats · won at 54.0% · above quota
- Godalming Farncombe and Catteshall · 2 seats · won at 55.4% · above quota
- Haslemere East · 3 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- Godalming Binscombe and Charterhouse · 3 seats · won at 48.8% · above quota
- Farnham Rowledge · 2 seats · won at 57.2% · above quota
- Farnham Castle · 2 seats · won at 57.9% · above quota
- Milford and Witley · 3 seats · won at 50.0% · above quota
- Chiddingfold · 1 seat · won at 75.1% · above quota
- Farnham Moor Park · 2 seats · won at 59.3% · above quota
- Bramley and Wonersh · 3 seats · won at 51.9% · above quota
- Farnham North West · 2 seats · won at 62.1% · above quota
- Farnham Firgrove · 2 seats · won at 64.7% · above quota
- Haslemere West · 2 seats · won at 64.8% · above quota
- Farnham Heath End · 2 seats · won at 67.3% · above quota
- Cranleigh East · 3 seats · won at 60.4% · above quota
- Godalming Central and Ockford · 2 seats · won at 69.7% · above quota
- Farnham Weybourne · 2 seats · won at 71.5% · above quota
Race results
Ewhurst and Ellens Green · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 51.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 902
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higgins, M. | Liberal Democrats | 462 | 51.2% | +1.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clowes, N. | Conservative Party | 377 | 41.8% | — | |
| 3 | Nisbet, K. | Reform UK | 34 | 3.8% | — | |
| 4 | Mitchell, J. | Labour Party | 29 | 3.2% | — |
Farnham Bourne · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,451
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cockburn, C. | Conservative Party | 776 | 26.7% | 53.5% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Murray, C. | FARN RES | 621 | 21.4% | 42.8% | +9.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Martin, M. | FARN RES | 614 | 21.2% | 42.3% | — | |
| 4 | Fitch, A. | Conservative Party | 533 | 18.4% | 36.7% | — | |
| 5 | Wilson, G. | Green Party | 357 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — |
Elstead and Peper Harow · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 60.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,065
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Long, G. | Liberal Democrats | 649 | 60.9% | +10.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dowell, S. | Conservative Party | 416 | 39.1% | — |
Alfold, Dunsfold and Hascombe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 847
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deanus, K. | Conservative Party | 572 | 33.8% | 67.5% | +34.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Relleen, C. | Conservative Party | 394 | 23.3% | 46.5% | +13.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Palmer, G. | Liberal Democrats | 377 | 22.3% | 44.5% | — | |
| 4 | Sampson, A. | Green Party | 257 | 15.2% | 30.3% | — | |
| 5 | Naqvi, Z. | Labour Party | 94 | 5.5% | 11.1% | — |
Western Commons · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,286
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Munro, D. | Independent | 997 | 38.8% | 77.6% | +44.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Staunton, J. | Conservative Party | 605 | 23.5% | 47.1% | +13.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ryland, S. | Green Party | 601 | 23.4% | 46.8% | — | |
| 4 | Nasir, N. | Conservative Party | 368 | 14.3% | 28.6% | — |
Godalming Holloway · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,884
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin, P. | Conservative Party | 900 | 23.9% | 47.8% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Duce, A. | Liberal Democrats | 899 | 23.9% | 47.7% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Weightman, C. | Green Party | 871 | 23.1% | 46.2% | — | |
| 4 | Gray, M. | Conservative Party | 788 | 20.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 5 | Clark, A. | Independent | 310 | 8.2% | 16.5% | — |
Cranleigh West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,736
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Townsend, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,110 | 32.0% | 63.9% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Morrison, A. | Liberal Democrats | 836 | 24.1% | 48.2% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pierce, C. | Conservative Party | 682 | 19.6% | 39.3% | — | |
| 4 | Cox, T. | Conservative Party | 622 | 17.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 5 | Davies, J. | Labour Party | 113 | 3.3% | 6.5% | — | |
| 6 | Barringer, A. | Reform UK | 81 | 2.3% | 4.7% | — | |
| 7 | Dunn, L. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 22 | 0.6% | 1.3% | — | |
| 8 | Waple, E. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 6 | 0.2% | 0.3% | — |
Hindhead and Beacon Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,379
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davidson, J. | Liberal Democrats | 801 | 29.0% | 58.1% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Spence, J. | Liberal Democrats | 745 | 27.0% | 54.0% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carter, M. | Conservative Party | 653 | 23.7% | 47.4% | — | |
| 4 | Hall, G. | Conservative Party | 559 | 20.3% | 40.5% | — |
Godalming Farncombe and Catteshall · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,296
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rivers, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,074 | 41.4% | 82.9% | +49.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Crowe, J. | Labour Party | 718 | 27.7% | 55.4% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams, N. | Conservative Party | 473 | 18.2% | 36.5% | — | |
| 4 | Wells, R. | Conservative Party | 327 | 12.6% | 25.2% | — |
Haslemere East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,156
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nicholson, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,169 | 18.1% | 54.2% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Weldon, T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,122 | 17.3% | 52.0% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barker-Lomax, Z. | Conservative Party | 1,030 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mulliner, S. | Conservative Party | 976 | 15.1% | 45.3% | — | |
| 5 | Betts, G. | Conservative Party | 938 | 14.5% | 43.5% | — | |
| 6 | Matthes, C. | Green Party | 905 | 14.0% | 42.0% | — | |
| 7 | Lewis, S. | Labour Party | 327 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — |
Godalming Binscombe and Charterhouse · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,172
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rivers, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,377 | 21.1% | 63.4% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, S. | Green Party | 1,280 | 19.6% | 58.9% | +33.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Palmer, N. | Labour Party | 1,061 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cosser, S. | Conservative Party | 984 | 15.1% | 45.3% | — | |
| 5 | Holliday, E. | Conservative Party | 954 | 14.6% | 43.9% | — | |
| 6 | Husseini, D. | Conservative Party | 860 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — |
Farnham Rowledge · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,429
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ward, J. | FARN RES | 893 | 31.2% | 62.5% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clark, P. | FARN RES | 818 | 28.6% | 57.2% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dearsley, D. | Conservative Party | 425 | 14.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 4 | Storey, C. | Conservative Party | 379 | 13.3% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Westcott, M. | Independent | 343 | 12.0% | 24.0% | — |
Farnham Castle · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 993
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McClean, H. | FARN RES | 621 | 31.3% | 62.6% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hesse, G. | FARN RES | 575 | 29.0% | 57.9% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gaskell, J. | Labour Party | 429 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — | |
| 4 | Ovens, C. | Conservative Party | 188 | 9.5% | 18.9% | — | |
| 5 | Watson, A. | Conservative Party | 172 | 8.7% | 17.3% | — |
Milford and Witley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,118
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gale, M. | Independent | 1,336 | 21.0% | 63.1% | +38.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Law, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,064 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sullivan, P. | Conservative Party | 1,058 | 16.7% | 50.0% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hudson, G. | Conservative Party | 1,057 | 16.6% | 49.9% | — | |
| 5 | Bray-Parry, M. | Green Party | 946 | 14.9% | 44.7% | — | |
| 6 | Sadler, T. | Conservative Party | 892 | 14.0% | 42.1% | — |
Chiddingfold · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 75.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 889
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Busby, D. | Liberal Democrats | 668 | 75.1% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thompson, K. | Conservative Party | 221 | 24.9% | — |
Farnham Moor Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,174
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MacLeod, A. | FARN RES | 981 | 41.8% | 83.6% | +50.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Merryweather, M. | Liberal Democrats | 696 | 29.7% | 59.3% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Austin, S. | Conservative Party | 397 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — | |
| 4 | Donovan-Smith, S. | Conservative Party | 273 | 11.6% | 23.3% | — |
Bramley and Wonersh · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,680
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austin, J. | Conservative Party | 1,673 | 20.8% | 62.4% | +37.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Atkins, L. | Conservative Party | 1,450 | 18.0% | 54.1% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Goodridge, M. | Conservative Party | 1,390 | 17.3% | 51.9% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Vivian, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,077 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 5 | Wright, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,073 | 13.3% | 40.0% | — | |
| 6 | D'Arcy, M. | Green Party | 903 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 7 | Hall, S. | Labour Party | 271 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 8 | Hard, C. | Labour Party | 203 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — |
Farnham North West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 932
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beaman, D. | FARN RES | 668 | 35.9% | 71.7% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | White, G. | FARN RES | 578 | 31.0% | 62.1% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fletcher, N. | Green Party | 261 | 14.0% | 28.0% | — | |
| 4 | Frost, P. | Conservative Party | 218 | 11.7% | 23.4% | — | |
| 5 | Pressly, J. | Conservative Party | 138 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — |
Farnham Firgrove · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,299
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mirylees, K. | FARN RES | 851 | 32.8% | 65.5% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hyman, J. | FARN RES | 841 | 32.4% | 64.7% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Birchwood, R. | Labour Party | 454 | 17.5% | 34.9% | — | |
| 4 | Forrest, A. | Conservative Party | 239 | 9.2% | 18.4% | — | |
| 5 | Page, W. | Conservative Party | 213 | 8.2% | 16.4% | — |
Haslemere West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,175
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keen, J. | Liberal Democrats | 856 | 36.4% | 72.9% | +39.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Robini, J. | Liberal Democrats | 761 | 32.4% | 64.8% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fry, S. | Conservative Party | 293 | 12.5% | 24.9% | — | |
| 4 | Bridge, T. | Conservative Party | 257 | 10.9% | 21.9% | — | |
| 5 | Westcott-White, T. | Labour Party | 183 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — |
Farnham Heath End · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,239
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wicks, M. | FARN RES | 837 | 33.8% | 67.6% | +34.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fairclough, T. | FARN RES | 834 | 33.7% | 67.3% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jones, A. | Labour Party | 360 | 14.5% | 29.1% | — | |
| 4 | Croft, R. | Conservative Party | 233 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — | |
| 5 | Stacey, T. | Conservative Party | 214 | 8.6% | 17.3% | — |
Cranleigh East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,000
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Townsend, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,351 | 22.5% | 67.5% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reed, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,316 | 21.9% | 65.8% | +40.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Reed, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,207 | 20.1% | 60.4% | +35.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kelly, S. | Conservative Party | 666 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 5 | Chatfield, S. | Conservative Party | 617 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 6 | Davidson, D. | Conservative Party | 597 | 10.0% | 29.8% | — | |
| 7 | West, M. | Labour Party | 246 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — |
Godalming Central and Ockford · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,204
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Follows, P. | Liberal Democrats | 897 | 37.3% | 74.5% | +41.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kiehl, V. | Liberal Democrats | 839 | 34.9% | 69.7% | +36.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bolton, A. | Conservative Party | 374 | 15.5% | 31.1% | — | |
| 4 | Howell, D. | Conservative Party | 297 | 12.3% | 24.7% | — |
Farnham Weybourne · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 71.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 884
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laughton, A. | FARN RES | 737 | 41.7% | 83.4% | +50.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Steijger, R. | Liberal Democrats | 632 | 35.8% | 71.5% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sampson, I. | Conservative Party | 211 | 11.9% | 23.9% | — | |
| 4 | Lewis, A. | Conservative Party | 187 | 10.6% | 21.2% | — |