← West Northamptonshire (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

West Northamptonshire 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

31 ward races
93 seats
18 unfairly awarded seats
19.4% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 31 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 93 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party138,96950.8%6671.0%4851.6%+18
Labour Party68,50025.0%2021.5%2425.8%-4
Liberal Democrats43,25915.8%55.4%1516.1%-10
Green Party12,2364.5%00.0%44.3%-4
Independent7,4172.7%22.2%22.2%0
NORTH IND8950.3%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition7350.3%00.0%00.0%0
NORTH SPS6470.2%00.0%00.0%0
Reform UK4880.2%00.0%00.0%0
ND2000.1%00.0%00.0%0
Heritage Party1850.1%00.0%00.0%0
British National Party920.0%00.0%00.0%0
Total273,623100.0%93100.0%93100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2021 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2021 election (current) and on the eve of it (2020), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2021)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Brackley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,539

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Baker F.E.Conservative Party2,01519.0%56.9%+31.9 ptsElected
2Bagot-Webb T.Conservative Party1,69816.0%48.0%+23.0 ptsElected
3Sharps S.Independent1,22011.5%34.5%+9.5 ptsElected
4Kew J.R.Conservative Party1,21611.5%34.4%
5Butler R.J.Independent1,17911.1%33.3%
6Young L.M.Labour Party7226.8%20.4%
7Salipur Brittain Z.Labour Party7066.7%20.0%
8Rawlinson A.P.Independent6736.3%19.0%
9Judd G.T.Labour Party6516.1%18.4%
10Nash K.Liberal Democrats5365.0%15.1%

Electorate 11,821 · EC ward code E05013242 · Back to ward index

Headlands · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,135

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Joyce P.Labour Party1,42815.2%45.5%+20.5 ptsElected
2Hughes M.Conservative Party1,13612.1%36.2%+11.2 ptsElected
3Jolley K.Labour Party1,11911.9%35.7%+10.7 ptsElected
4Cowley-Coulton T.L.Conservative Party1,10911.8%35.4%
5Miah T.Labour Party1,10611.8%35.3%
6Bakare M.Conservative Party1,01210.8%32.3%
7Sawyer M.T.Liberal Democrats6577.0%21.0%
8Guest C.J.Liberal Democrats4815.1%15.3%
9Kent S.Green Party4494.8%14.3%
10Tomlinson S.R.Liberal Democrats4384.7%14.0%
11Allenby M.T.Green Party3754.0%12.0%
12Cairns H.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition961.0%3.1%

Electorate 10,392 · EC ward code E05013256 · Back to ward index

Kingsthorpe North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,264

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Rumens S.Conservative Party1,60116.3%49.0%+24.0 ptsElected
2Brown M.Conservative Party1,54215.7%47.2%+22.2 ptsElected
3Aziz M.Conservative Party1,23612.6%37.9%+12.9 ptsElected
4Miller S.Green Party1,08111.0%33.1%
5Appleyard T.NORTH IND8959.1%27.4%
6Ajayi T.Labour Party6907.0%21.1%
7Keane L.S.Labour Party6696.8%20.5%
8Powerville P.P.Green Party5755.9%17.6%
9Willis C.Green Party5445.6%16.7%
10Ali M.Labour Party5445.6%16.7%
11Biggs J.Liberal Democrats4164.2%12.7%

Electorate 9,968 · EC ward code E05013257 · Back to ward index

Kingsthorpe South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,431

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Beardsworth S.Liberal Democrats98513.5%40.5%+15.5 ptsElected
2Hawes C.Conservative Party94112.9%38.7%+13.7 ptsElected
3Barrett H.M.P.Labour Party92212.6%37.9%+12.9 ptsElected
4Newbury A.J.Conservative Party89512.3%36.8%
5Khan R.Labour Party78910.8%32.5%
6Ismail F.Labour Party7089.7%29.1%
7Dinh Q.Conservative Party6458.8%26.5%
8Woods T.Liberal Democrats5237.2%21.5%
9Miller E.M.Green Party4506.2%18.5%
10Tolley S.G.A.Liberal Democrats4356.0%17.9%

Electorate 9,503 · EC ward code E05013258 · Back to ward index

Talavera · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,337

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Meredith D.Liberal Democrats1,02014.5%43.6%+18.6 ptsElected
2Duffy J.Labour Party1,00314.3%42.9%+17.9 ptsElected
3Choudary N.Labour Party89112.7%38.1%+13.1 ptsElected
4Kimani M.Labour Party79011.3%33.8%
5Meredith R.Liberal Democrats78211.2%33.5%
6Hallam S.Conservative Party71810.2%30.7%
7Harkara A.Conservative Party6689.5%28.6%
8Glynane B.J.Liberal Democrats6188.8%26.4%
9Kujawska K.Conservative Party5217.4%22.3%

Electorate 10,075 · EC ward code E05013267 · Back to ward index

Towcester and Roade · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,035

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Clubley M.Conservative Party1,73914.4%43.1%+18.1 ptsElected
2Fowler L.Conservative Party1,69514.0%42.0%+17.0 ptsElected
3Samiotis L.Liberal Democrats1,62613.4%40.3%+15.3 ptsElected
4Wixon M.Conservative Party1,57013.0%38.9%
5Tarbun D.E.Liberal Democrats1,51112.5%37.4%
6Wade J.Liberal Democrats1,32811.0%32.9%
7Dando L'Olive R.J.Labour Party6325.2%15.7%
8Carmichael D.N.Labour Party6305.2%15.6%
9Matthews M.J.Green Party5924.9%14.7%
10Caseman-Jones M.Labour Party5834.8%14.4%
11Conquest P.J.ND2001.7%5.0%

Electorate 11,837 · EC ward code E05013268 · Back to ward index

Sixfields · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,146

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sargeant B.Conservative Party1,39014.7%44.2%+19.2 ptsElected
2Sturges-Alex N.Conservative Party1,29713.7%41.2%+16.2 ptsElected
3Chowdhury I.A.Conservative Party1,26913.4%40.3%+15.3 ptsElected
4Croucher G.Labour Party1,09011.5%34.6%
5Helm K.Labour Party1,04411.1%33.2%
6Chirisa L.Labour Party1,02910.9%32.7%
7Hope J.S.Liberal Democrats95710.1%30.4%
8Squires C.N.M.Liberal Democrats7117.5%22.6%
9Lawler T.Liberal Democrats6526.9%20.7%

Electorate 11,813 · EC ward code E05013266 · Back to ward index

Duston East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,906

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dyball P.S.Conservative Party1,29414.8%44.5%+19.5 ptsElected
2Hinch N.L.Conservative Party1,21814.0%41.9%+16.9 ptsElected
3Lunn G.Conservative Party1,17213.4%40.3%+15.3 ptsElected
4Maitland S.Labour Party1,14213.1%39.3%
5Kingston A.R.Labour Party1,06512.2%36.7%
6Pettitt R.Labour Party96911.1%33.3%
7Walder B.Independent7458.5%25.6%
8Green D.NORTH SPS6477.4%22.3%
9Beardsworth M.Liberal Democrats2803.2%9.6%
10Clive V.P.Heritage Party1852.1%6.4%

Electorate 9,262 · EC ward code E05013252 · Back to ward index

Delapre and Rushmere · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,339

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Davenport J.Independent1,14416.3%48.9%+23.9 ptsElected
2Connolly R.Conservative Party1,00114.3%42.8%+17.8 ptsElected
3Roberts E.L.Labour Party99414.2%42.5%+17.5 ptsElected
4Soan D.G.Conservative Party89412.7%38.2%
5Cranstoun C.C.Labour Party84112.0%36.0%
6Seymour F.Labour Party81511.6%34.8%
7Woolnough L.Conservative Party6449.2%27.5%
8Slater P.M.Green Party3334.7%14.2%
9Matthews R.H.Liberal Democrats2814.0%12.0%
10Smyth S.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition701.0%3.0%

Electorate 9,304 · EC ward code E05013251 · Back to ward index

Daventry West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,392

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Randall W.Labour Party1,18316.5%49.5%+24.5 ptsElected
2Gilford T.Conservative Party1,08815.2%45.5%+20.5 ptsElected
3Harrington-Carter L.Conservative Party1,04214.5%43.6%+18.6 ptsElected
4Dabbs A.S.Labour Party1,02514.3%42.9%
5Butler B.J.Conservative Party97113.5%40.6%
6Ritchie K.Labour Party89512.5%37.4%
7Smallman G.Green Party3184.4%13.3%
8Collyer A.C.Reform UK2823.9%11.8%
9Reid A.J.M.Liberal Democrats1892.6%7.9%
10Tippett J.B.Independent1832.6%7.7%

Electorate 9,255 · EC ward code E05013249 · Back to ward index

Braunston and Crick · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,533

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chantler A.E.Conservative Party1,82117.2%51.5%+26.5 ptsElected
2Longley M.R.Conservative Party1,64615.5%46.6%+21.6 ptsElected
3Humphreys R.Liberal Democrats1,58014.9%44.7%+19.7 ptsElected
4Simpson A.S.J.Liberal Democrats1,51914.3%43.0%
5Robertson I.B.Conservative Party1,45013.7%41.0%
6Knape A.R.M.Liberal Democrats1,35112.7%38.2%
7Stokes S.J.Green Party5224.9%14.8%
8Mercer N.S.Labour Party5054.8%14.3%
9Edison E.J.Reform UK2061.9%5.8%

Electorate 10,120 · EC ward code E05013243 · Back to ward index

St. George · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,978

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Russell C.Labour Party1,25821.2%63.6%+38.6 ptsElected
2Cali M.Labour Party1,03017.4%52.1%+27.1 ptsElected
3Strachan W.A.Labour Party95416.1%48.2%+23.2 ptsElected
4Kilby-Shaw S.Conservative Party63510.7%32.1%
5Gale-Rumens L.Conservative Party59310.0%30.0%
6Austin G.Conservative Party4808.1%24.3%
7Taylor M.E.J.Liberal Democrats4687.9%23.7%
8Thorpe J.i.E.Independent3495.9%17.6%
9Manole D.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1672.8%8.4%

Electorate 8,958 · EC ward code E05013264 · Back to ward index

Abington and Phippsville · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,718

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Smith Z.Labour Party1,65220.3%60.8%+35.8 ptsElected
2Purser B.Labour Party1,60119.6%58.9%+33.9 ptsElected
3Tarasiewicz W.W.Labour Party1,32116.2%48.6%+23.6 ptsElected
4Schultes J.J.Conservative Party83310.2%30.6%
5Begum N.Conservative Party81810.0%30.1%
6Choudary I.Conservative Party7979.8%29.3%
7Sawyer S.Liberal Democrats5546.8%20.4%
8Tarry J.R.Liberal Democrats3874.7%14.2%
9Scott A.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1912.3%7.0%

Electorate 9,636 · EC ward code E05013239 · Back to ward index

Brixworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,844

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Parker K.D.Conservative Party2,01617.5%52.4%+27.4 ptsElected
2Harris J.W.Liberal Democrats1,95817.0%50.9%+25.9 ptsElected
3Irving-Swift C.M.M.Conservative Party1,94116.8%50.5%+25.5 ptsElected
4Auger R.L.P.Conservative Party1,86916.2%48.6%
5Ware C.S.Liberal Democrats1,62914.1%42.4%
6Nixon T.Liberal Democrats1,49713.0%38.9%
7Kempa R.Labour Party6225.4%16.2%

Electorate 9,662 · EC ward code E05013244 · Back to ward index

Middleton Cheney · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,204

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Breese R.A.Conservative Party1,95620.3%61.0%+36.0 ptsElected
2Solesbury-Timms R.E.Conservative Party1,83419.1%57.2%+32.2 ptsElected
3Herring R.Conservative Party1,63717.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
4Allen M.J.Liberal Democrats1,29313.5%40.4%
5Hewison H.Liberal Democrats98610.3%30.8%
6Weaver S.J.Labour Party6767.0%21.1%
7Nash J.M.Liberal Democrats6166.4%19.2%
8Genner M.Independent3994.2%12.5%
9Phillips J.Independent2162.2%6.7%

Electorate 9,029 · EC ward code E05013260 · Back to ward index

Duston West and St. Crispin · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,221

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Golby M.J.Conservative Party1,51522.7%68.2%+43.2 ptsElected
2King A.Conservative Party1,35320.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
3Roberts J.Conservative Party1,13517.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
4Hills M.Labour Party86813.0%39.1%
5Mabbutt S.K.Green Party5968.9%26.8%
6Georgiou J.L.Liberal Democrats5297.9%23.8%
7Harley S.J.Liberal Democrats3545.3%15.9%
8Ingram M.Independent3124.7%14.0%

Electorate 7,831 · EC ward code E05013253 · Back to ward index

Billing and Rectory Farm · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,809

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hill J.W.Conservative Party1,51518.0%53.9%+28.9 ptsElected
2Holland-Delamere K.Labour Party1,48617.6%52.9%+27.9 ptsElected
3Clark P.L.Conservative Party1,47417.5%52.5%+27.5 ptsElected
4Perry V.J.Conservative Party1,38416.4%49.3%
5Powis D.Labour Party1,15913.8%41.3%
6Kumar D.Labour Party1,14013.5%40.6%
7Hussein A.Liberal Democrats2693.2%9.6%

Electorate 11,099 · EC ward code E05013240 · Back to ward index

Daventry East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,290

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Matten P.N.Conservative Party1,32119.2%57.7%+32.7 ptsElected
2Morgan C.W.Conservative Party1,27718.6%55.8%+30.8 ptsElected
3James D.T.Conservative Party1,21117.6%52.9%+27.9 ptsElected
4Carter E.E.Labour Party84012.2%36.7%
5Luke M.W.Labour Party73510.7%32.1%
6Ritchie B.Labour Party6259.1%27.3%
7Branigan D.L.Independent5127.5%22.4%
8Symons B.Liberal Democrats3495.1%15.2%

Electorate 8,307 · EC ward code E05013248 · Back to ward index

Long Buckby · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,656

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lister D.M.Conservative Party2,27120.7%62.1%+37.1 ptsElected
2Bignell P.J.Conservative Party2,11719.3%57.9%+32.9 ptsElected
3Morton A.C.Conservative Party2,02418.5%55.4%+30.4 ptsElected
4Myers C.Labour Party1,16810.6%31.9%
5Myers S.Labour Party1,15710.5%31.6%
6Sneddon S.T.Green Party8597.8%23.5%
7Strang N.A.S.Liberal Democrats5244.8%14.3%
8Farmer N.A.C.Liberal Democrats4664.2%12.7%
9Hughes W.Liberal Democrats3823.5%10.4%

Electorate 9,104 · EC ward code E05013259 · Back to ward index

Boothville and Parklands · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,819

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hallam M.Conservative Party2,10724.9%74.8%+49.8 ptsElected
2Lane J.W.Conservative Party1,66019.6%58.9%+33.9 ptsElected
3Stevenson L.E.L.Conservative Party1,57518.6%55.9%+30.9 ptsElected
4Ward R.Labour Party86810.3%30.8%
5Fitchett C.L.Labour Party84910.0%30.1%
6Haynes-Smith T.A.R.Labour Party7168.5%25.4%
7Markham I.P.Liberal Democrats4315.1%15.3%
8Whittaker E.P.I.Independent1581.9%5.6%
9Beasley R.British National Party921.1%3.3%

Electorate 8,875 · EC ward code E05013241 · Back to ward index

Riverside Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,428

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Flavell P.A.Conservative Party2,15721.0%62.9%+37.9 ptsElected
2Kilbride A.C.Conservative Party2,06820.1%60.3%+35.3 ptsElected
3Hibbert S.J.Conservative Party1,94118.9%56.6%+31.6 ptsElected
4Roy R.Labour Party1,18511.5%34.6%
5McNicholas M.Labour Party1,17611.4%34.3%
6Higginson G.Labour Party1,08610.6%31.7%
7Garlick D.Liberal Democrats6706.5%19.5%

Electorate 10,194 · EC ward code E05013263 · Back to ward index

Woodford and Weedon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,062

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Frost R.Conservative Party2,06322.5%67.4%+42.4 ptsElected
2Gilford J.Conservative Party2,04822.3%66.9%+41.9 ptsElected
3Smith D.J.Conservative Party1,77819.4%58.1%+33.1 ptsElected
4Slater C.P.Green Party8269.0%27.0%
5Reszeter V.Labour Party7588.3%24.8%
6Chetnik Z.Liberal Democrats5255.7%17.1%
7Faiers A.G.Liberal Democrats5115.6%16.7%
8Butlin J.H.Liberal Democrats3493.8%11.4%
9Phipps R.L.Independent3273.6%10.7%

Electorate 9,291 · EC ward code E05013269 · Back to ward index

Castle · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,104

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stone D.V.Labour Party1,40722.3%66.9%+41.9 ptsElected
2Alwahabi J.Labour Party1,30020.6%61.8%+36.8 ptsElected
3Haque E.Labour Party1,24119.7%59.0%+34.0 ptsElected
4Batten D.B.Conservative Party5618.9%26.7%
5Chaudhry M.A.Conservative Party4627.3%22.0%
6Hawkins J.Green Party4397.0%20.9%
7Iftikhar M.Conservative Party3856.1%18.3%
8Taylor M.Liberal Democrats3054.8%14.5%
9Simpson K.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2113.3%10.0%

Electorate 10,826 · EC ward code E05013246 · Back to ward index

Deanshanger · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,031

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1McCord I.A.Conservative Party2,03122.3%67.0%+42.0 ptsElected
2Pritchard K.Conservative Party1,96721.6%64.9%+39.9 ptsElected
3Barter W.A.M.Conservative Party1,84620.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
4Thompson A.B.Labour Party95910.5%31.6%
5Greaves A.Labour Party8689.5%28.6%
6Bray R.Green Party7448.2%24.5%
7Schraibman C.Liberal Democrats6777.4%22.3%

Electorate 9,548 · EC ward code E05013250 · Back to ward index

Moulton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,676

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cribbin D.Conservative Party2,43422.1%66.2%+41.2 ptsElected
2Warren M.Conservative Party2,29820.8%62.5%+37.5 ptsElected
3Shephard J.Conservative Party2,26420.5%61.6%+36.6 ptsElected
4Robertson-Mariott C.Labour Party6976.3%19.0%
5Atkins J.Labour Party6836.2%18.6%
6Hall S.Green Party6746.1%18.3%
7Marriott L.Labour Party6525.9%17.7%
8Torpy M.Liberal Democrats5414.9%14.7%
9Knowles R.M.Liberal Democrats4434.0%12.1%
10Ingles P.Liberal Democrats3423.1%9.3%

Electorate 11,040 · EC ward code E05013261 · Back to ward index

Nene Valley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,414

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bowen L.Conservative Party1,72723.9%71.6%+46.6 ptsElected
2Nunn J.Conservative Party1,55821.5%64.5%+39.5 ptsElected
3Larratt P.Conservative Party1,50720.8%62.4%+37.4 ptsElected
4Gilli L.Liberal Democrats83811.6%34.7%
5Akbur S.I.Labour Party82011.3%34.0%
6Wilson H.J.Green Party79110.9%32.8%

Electorate 8,792 · EC ward code E05013262 · Back to ward index

Hackleton and Grange Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,194

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Clarke S.Conservative Party2,29924.0%72.0%+47.0 ptsElected
2Cole F.L.Conservative Party2,10622.0%65.9%+40.9 ptsElected
3Grant A.G.Conservative Party2,02121.1%63.3%+38.3 ptsElected
4French P.R.Labour Party1,08711.3%34.0%
5Chapanionek K.A.Green Party1,08711.3%34.0%
6Tench W.P.Liberal Democrats98210.2%30.7%

Electorate 10,239 · EC ward code E05013255 · Back to ward index

Dallington Spencer · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,853

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Eales G.M.Labour Party1,40525.3%75.8%+50.8 ptsElected
2Ashraf R.Labour Party1,23022.1%66.4%+41.4 ptsElected
3Ealies T.Labour Party1,17521.1%63.4%+38.4 ptsElected
4Graham-Mole V.Conservative Party69712.5%37.6%
5Patel A.Conservative Party4598.3%24.8%
6Shah C.L.Conservative Party3716.7%20.0%
7Bowden H.Liberal Democrats2214.0%11.9%

Electorate 8,988 · EC ward code E05013247 · Back to ward index

East Hunsbury and Shelfleys · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,689

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Patel S.Conservative Party1,92323.8%71.5%+46.5 ptsElected
2Gonzalez De Savage A.Conservative Party1,87823.3%69.8%+44.8 ptsElected
3Chauhan P.Conservative Party1,71521.3%63.8%+38.8 ptsElected
4Vincent A.Labour Party91111.3%33.9%
5Walsh M.Liberal Democrats84810.5%31.5%
6Schofield P.A.Liberal Democrats7929.8%29.5%

Electorate 9,191 · EC ward code E05013254 · Back to ward index

Silverstone · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,821

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bambridge D.C.N.Conservative Party2,75524.0%72.1%+47.1 ptsElected
2Manners C.H.Conservative Party2,56222.4%67.1%+42.1 ptsElected
3Eastwood A.F.M.Conservative Party2,49621.8%65.3%+40.3 ptsElected
4Hamel J.B.Green Party9818.6%25.7%
5Hemelryk James R.C.A.Liberal Democrats9648.4%25.2%
6Langer M.H.Liberal Democrats8917.8%23.3%
7Brittain M.J.Labour Party8147.1%21.3%

Electorate 10,077 · EC ward code E05013265 · Back to ward index

Bugbrooke · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,341

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cooper K.E.Conservative Party2,40524.0%72.0%+47.0 ptsElected
2Addison A.Conservative Party2,39223.9%71.6%+46.6 ptsElected
3Brown A.W.Conservative Party2,29322.9%68.6%+43.6 ptsElected
4Waterhouse S.A.Labour Party1,14111.4%34.2%
5Bowles G.L.A.Liberal Democrats6116.1%18.3%
6Deare S.R.Liberal Democrats6076.1%18.2%
7Summers J.Liberal Democrats5745.7%17.2%

Electorate 9,940 · EC ward code E05013245 · Back to ward index