← West Suffolk (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
West Suffolk 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 39 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 60 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 23,996 | 44.1% | 24 | 40.0% | 28 | 46.7% | -4 |
| Labour Party | 16,523 | 30.4% | 17 | 28.3% | 19 | 31.7% | -2 |
| Independent | 5,082 | 9.3% | 8 | 13.3% | 5 | 8.3% | +3 |
| WS IND | 4,307 | 7.9% | 9 | 15.0% | 5 | 8.3% | +4 |
| Green Party | 2,266 | 4.2% | 1 | 1.7% | 2 | 3.3% | -1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 1,649 | 3.0% | 1 | 1.7% | 1 | 1.7% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 470 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| CPB | 74 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 54,367 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Haverhill Central · 1 seat · won at 38.2% · −11.8 pts below quota
- Ixworth · 1 seat · won at 39.2% · −10.8 pts below quota
- Withersfield · 1 seat · won at 45.9% · −4.1 pts below quota
- Barrow · 1 seat · won at 47.9% · −2.1 pts below quota
- Brandon East · 1 seat · won at 48.5% · −1.5 pts below quota
- Horringer · 1 seat · won at 49.8% · −0.2 pts below quota
- Manor · 1 seat · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Newmarket East · 2 seats · won at 34.7% · above quota
- Pakenham and Troston · 1 seat · won at 53.4% · above quota
- Iceni · 2 seats · won at 38.3% · above quota
- Brandon West · 1 seat · won at 57.2% · above quota
- Kentford and Moulton · 1 seat · won at 57.4% · above quota
- Brandon Central · 1 seat · won at 58.9% · above quota
- Haverhill West · 2 seats · won at 42.5% · above quota
- Newmarket West · 2 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Minden · 2 seats · won at 46.9% · above quota
- Eastgate · 1 seat · won at 63.8% · above quota
- Risby · 1 seat · won at 64.0% · above quota
- Mildenhall Kingsway and Market · 1 seat · won at 64.5% · above quota
- Abbeygate · 2 seats · won at 48.1% · above quota
- Exning · 1 seat · won at 64.9% · above quota
- Newmarket North · 2 seats · won at 48.4% · above quota
- Rougham · 1 seat · won at 66.1% · above quota
- Barningham · 1 seat · won at 66.7% · above quota
- St Olaves · 2 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- Whepstead and Wickhambrook · 1 seat · won at 67.5% · above quota
- Haverhill North · 2 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Southgate · 2 seats · won at 51.8% · above quota
- The Fornhams and Great Barton · 2 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- The Rows · 2 seats · won at 54.1% · above quota
- Haverhill South East · 1 seat · won at 72.0% · above quota
- Lakenheath · 2 seats · won at 57.8% · above quota
- Haverhill East · 2 seats · won at 57.9% · above quota
- Moreton Hall · 3 seats · won at 51.2% · above quota
- Haverhill South · 2 seats · won at 64.9% · above quota
- Tollgate · 2 seats · won at 65.4% · above quota
- Mildenhall Great Heath · 1 seat · won at 82.1% · above quota
- Westgate · 2 seats · won at 68.0% · above quota
- Clare, Hundon and Kedington · 3 seats · won at 87.8% · above quota
Race results
Haverhill Central · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 38.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −11.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 599
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luccarini, A. | Independent | 229 | 38.2% | −11.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Martin, M. | Labour Party | 221 | 36.9% | — | |
| 3 | Sowa, H. | Conservative Party | 149 | 24.9% | — |
Ixworth · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 39.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −10.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 618
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Griffiths, J. | Conservative Party | 242 | 39.2% | −10.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lord, B. | Independent | 211 | 34.1% | — | |
| 3 | Vicat, H. | Labour Party | 165 | 26.7% | — |
Withersfield · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 45.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −4.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 739
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wijenayaka, I. | Labour Party | 339 | 45.9% | −4.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stevens, P. | Conservative Party | 325 | 44.0% | — | |
| 3 | Lord, P. | Independent | 75 | 10.1% | — |
Barrow · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 47.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −2.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 731
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houlder, I. | Conservative Party | 350 | 47.9% | −2.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, T. | Labour Party | 192 | 26.3% | — | |
| 3 | Kronbergs, Z. | Liberal Democrats | 189 | 25.9% | — |
Brandon East · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 48.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −1.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 567
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wittam, P. | WS IND | 275 | 48.5% | −1.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mason, C. | Conservative Party | 154 | 27.2% | — | |
| 3 | Smith, S. | Independent | 138 | 24.3% | — |
Horringer · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 49.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −0.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 839
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Soons, K. | Conservative Party | 418 | 49.8% | −0.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ereira-Guyer, M. | Green Party | 249 | 29.7% | — | |
| 3 | Cornish, Q. | Labour Party | 172 | 20.5% | — |
Manor · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 50.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 697
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, D. | WS IND | 355 | 50.9% | +0.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harvey, B. | Conservative Party | 342 | 49.1% | — |
Newmarket East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 914
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perry, S. | Labour Party | 358 | 19.6% | 39.2% | +5.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hood, R. | Conservative Party | 317 | 17.4% | 34.7% | +1.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Edge, J. | Liberal Democrats | 309 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — | |
| 4 | Nobbs, R. | Conservative Party | 306 | 16.7% | 33.5% | — | |
| 5 | Richer, J. | WS IND | 292 | 16.0% | 32.0% | — | |
| 6 | Kerby, T. | Independent | 245 | 13.4% | 26.8% | — |
Pakenham and Troston · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 53.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 581
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Speed, A. | Conservative Party | 310 | 53.4% | +3.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stephenson, S. | Labour Party | 271 | 46.6% | — |
Iceni · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 627
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dicker, D. | WS IND | 354 | 28.3% | 56.5% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Drummond, A. | Conservative Party | 240 | 19.2% | 38.3% | +5.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Morse, S. | Green Party | 231 | 18.4% | 36.9% | — | |
| 4 | Holland, K. | Labour Party | 227 | 18.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 5 | Anderson, L. | WS IND | 201 | 16.0% | 32.1% | — |
Brandon West · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 57.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 542
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lukaniuk, V. | WS IND | 310 | 57.2% | +7.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Palmer, D. | Conservative Party | 232 | 42.8% | — |
Kentford and Moulton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 57.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 900
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dicker, R. | WS IND | 517 | 57.4% | +7.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bennett, B. | Conservative Party | 216 | 24.0% | — | |
| 3 | Appleton, H. | Labour Party | 167 | 18.6% | — |
Brandon Central · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 58.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 492
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Savage, J. | WS IND | 290 | 58.9% | +8.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Simmons, T. | Conservative Party | 202 | 41.1% | — |
Haverhill West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 991
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin, A. | Labour Party | 455 | 23.0% | 45.9% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Marks, M. | Conservative Party | 421 | 21.2% | 42.5% | +9.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Page, D. | Labour Party | 413 | 20.8% | 41.7% | — | |
| 4 | Roach, D. | Conservative Party | 358 | 18.1% | 36.1% | — | |
| 5 | Davidson, B. | Independent | 335 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — |
Newmarket West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 838
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yarrow, K. | Labour Party | 475 | 28.4% | 56.7% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lynch, C. | Conservative Party | 377 | 22.5% | 45.0% | +11.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pitts, C. | Conservative Party | 364 | 21.7% | 43.5% | — | |
| 4 | Warn, C. | Green Party | 343 | 20.5% | 41.0% | — | |
| 5 | Whittle, A. | Reform UK | 116 | 6.9% | 13.9% | — |
Minden · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,586
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higgins, D. | Labour Party | 831 | 26.2% | 52.4% | +19.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | O'Driscoll, R. | Labour Party | 744 | 23.5% | 46.9% | +13.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Everitt, R. | Conservative Party | 602 | 19.0% | 38.0% | — | |
| 4 | Turner, C. | Conservative Party | 482 | 15.2% | 30.4% | — | |
| 5 | Korfanty, H. | Liberal Democrats | 320 | 10.1% | 20.2% | — | |
| 6 | Pinsker, R. | Liberal Democrats | 192 | 6.1% | 12.1% | — |
Eastgate · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 63.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 650
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Waterman, C. | Labour Party | 415 | 63.8% | +13.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bastiani, Z. | Conservative Party | 235 | 36.2% | — |
Risby · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 791
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glossop, S. | Conservative Party | 506 | 64.0% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Appleton, P. | Labour Party | 285 | 36.0% | — |
Mildenhall Kingsway and Market · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 592
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shipp, I. | Independent | 382 | 64.5% | +14.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thielker, M. | Conservative Party | 114 | 19.3% | — | |
| 3 | Finn, P. | Labour Party | 96 | 16.2% | — |
Abbeygate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,197
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wakelam, J. | Green Party | 796 | 33.3% | 66.5% | +33.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rayner, J. | Conservative Party | 575 | 24.0% | 48.1% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Iannelli-Popham, N. | Labour Party | 515 | 21.5% | 43.0% | — | |
| 4 | Mackenzie, A. | Labour Party | 433 | 18.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 5 | Turner, D. | CPB | 74 | 3.1% | 6.2% | — |
Exning · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 636
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | London, J. | Liberal Democrats | 413 | 64.9% | +14.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wood, T. | Conservative Party | 223 | 35.1% | — |
Newmarket North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 717
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anderson, M. | WS IND | 483 | 33.7% | 67.4% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jarvis, J. | Labour Party | 347 | 24.2% | 48.4% | +15.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Burton, C. | Conservative Party | 313 | 21.8% | 43.7% | — | |
| 4 | Stainton, P. | WS IND | 290 | 20.2% | 40.5% | — |
Rougham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 66.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 688
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mildmay-White, S. | Conservative Party | 455 | 66.1% | +16.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cullen, I. | Labour Party | 233 | 33.9% | — |
Barningham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 66.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 793
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bull, C. | Conservative Party | 529 | 66.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Alexander, C. | Labour Party | 264 | 33.3% | — |
St Olaves · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 877
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Halpin, L. | Labour Party | 511 | 29.1% | 58.3% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stennett, F. | Independent | 440 | 25.1% | 50.2% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 418 | 23.8% | 47.7% | — | |
| 4 | Murray, T. | Conservative Party | 219 | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | |
| 5 | Cockram, J. | Conservative Party | 166 | 9.5% | 18.9% | — |
Whepstead and Wickhambrook · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 67.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 764
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pugh, S. | Conservative Party | 516 | 67.5% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sanderson, R. | Labour Party | 248 | 32.5% | — |
Haverhill North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 829
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firman, P. | Independent | 462 | 27.9% | 55.7% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mason, J. | Conservative Party | 422 | 25.5% | 50.9% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cox, Q. | Labour Party | 412 | 24.8% | 49.7% | — | |
| 4 | Mason, L. | Conservative Party | 362 | 21.8% | 43.7% | — |
Southgate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,188
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chung, P. | Conservative Party | 705 | 29.7% | 59.3% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stamp, S. | Conservative Party | 615 | 25.9% | 51.8% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Moore, J. | Labour Party | 388 | 16.3% | 32.7% | — | |
| 4 | Dexter-Mills, C. | Green Party | 339 | 14.3% | 28.5% | — | |
| 5 | Godber, C. | Labour Party | 329 | 13.8% | 27.7% | — |
The Fornhams and Great Barton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,340
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hopfensperger, B. | Conservative Party | 765 | 28.6% | 57.1% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Broughton, S. | Conservative Party | 719 | 26.8% | 53.7% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Martin, B. | Labour Party | 383 | 14.3% | 28.6% | — | |
| 4 | King, J. | Green Party | 308 | 11.5% | 23.0% | — | |
| 5 | Moore, B. | Labour Party | 278 | 10.4% | 20.8% | — | |
| 6 | Derry, J. | Liberal Democrats | 226 | 8.4% | 16.9% | — |
The Rows · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 869
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Waldron, D. | WS IND | 470 | 27.0% | 54.1% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bradshaw, M. | WS IND | 470 | 27.0% | 54.1% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stanbury, L. | Conservative Party | 420 | 24.2% | 48.3% | — | |
| 4 | Millward, J. | Conservative Party | 378 | 21.7% | 43.5% | — |
Haverhill South East · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 72.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 504
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, T. | Independent | 363 | 72.0% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Andre, R. | Labour Party | 141 | 28.0% | — |
Lakenheath · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,049
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kelly, G. | Independent | 660 | 31.5% | 62.9% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Whitehand, T. | Independent | 606 | 28.9% | 57.8% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Frost, S. | Conservative Party | 453 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — | |
| 4 | Noble, C. | Conservative Party | 379 | 18.1% | 36.1% | — |
Haverhill East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 482
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hanlon, P. | Labour Party | 303 | 31.4% | 62.9% | +29.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Miller-Jones, L. | Labour Party | 279 | 28.9% | 57.9% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Burns, J. | Independent | 222 | 23.0% | 46.1% | — | |
| 4 | Khawaja, A. | Conservative Party | 160 | 16.6% | 33.2% | — |
Moreton Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,524
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armitage, P. | Labour Party | 810 | 17.7% | 53.1% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lindberg, R. | Labour Party | 797 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mager, B. | Conservative Party | 781 | 17.1% | 51.2% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Haque, U. | Labour Party | 757 | 16.6% | 49.7% | — | |
| 5 | Thompson, P. | Conservative Party | 716 | 15.7% | 47.0% | — | |
| 6 | Maher, D. | Conservative Party | 711 | 15.6% | 46.7% | — |
Haverhill South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 544
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, D. | Labour Party | 383 | 35.2% | 70.4% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, L. | Labour Party | 353 | 32.4% | 64.9% | +31.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Crooks, J. | Independent | 352 | 32.4% | 64.7% | — |
Tollgate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,073
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hind, D. | Labour Party | 740 | 34.5% | 69.0% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sayer, M. | Labour Party | 701 | 32.7% | 65.4% | +32.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Winter, M. | Conservative Party | 354 | 16.5% | 33.0% | — | |
| 4 | Sillett, D. | Conservative Party | 350 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — |
Mildenhall Great Heath · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 82.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 441
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alecock, R. | Independent | 362 | 82.1% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Leaman, R. | Conservative Party | 79 | 17.9% | — |
Westgate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,105
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rout, R. | Conservative Party | 785 | 35.5% | 71.0% | +37.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Augustine, J. | Conservative Party | 751 | 34.0% | 68.0% | +34.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McGoochan, P. | Labour Party | 674 | 30.5% | 61.0% | — |
Clare, Hundon and Kedington · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 87.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +62.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,396
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarke, N. | Conservative Party | 1,381 | 33.0% | 98.9% | +73.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rushbrook, M. | Conservative Party | 1,226 | 29.3% | 87.8% | +62.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Richardson, K. | Conservative Party | 1,226 | 29.3% | 87.8% | +62.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Turbefield, R. | Reform UK | 354 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — |