← Westminster (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Westminster 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 54 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 58,395 | 48.0% | 31 | 57.4% | 26 | 48.1% | +5 |
| Conservative Party | 49,067 | 40.3% | 23 | 42.6% | 22 | 40.7% | +1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 13,153 | 10.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 11.1% | -6 |
| Green Party | 930 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| ND | 124 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 121,669 | 100.0% | 54 | 100.0% | 54 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Lancaster Gate · 3 seats · won at 43.6% · above quota
- Hyde Park · 3 seats · won at 45.2% · above quota
- Vincent Square · 3 seats · won at 45.5% · above quota
- Marylebone · 3 seats · won at 45.9% · above quota
- Little Venice · 3 seats · won at 46.1% · above quota
- Pimlico South · 3 seats · won at 46.2% · above quota
- St James's · 3 seats · won at 48.4% · above quota
- Pimlico North · 3 seats · won at 48.9% · above quota
- West End · 3 seats · won at 49.0% · above quota
- Regent's Park · 3 seats · won at 50.1% · above quota
- Abbey Road · 3 seats · won at 51.0% · above quota
- Bayswater · 3 seats · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Maida Vale · 3 seats · won at 57.8% · above quota
- Knightsbridge and Belgravia · 3 seats · won at 65.0% · above quota
- Westbourne · 3 seats · won at 70.0% · above quota
- Church Street · 3 seats · won at 70.8% · above quota
- Queens Park · 3 seats · won at 73.0% · above quota
- Harrow Road · 3 seats · won at 73.1% · above quota
Race results
Lancaster Gate · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,415
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dupuy L. | Conservative Party | 1,110 | 15.3% | 46.0% | +21.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ormsby E. | Labour Party | 1,057 | 14.6% | 43.8% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jude R. | Labour Party | 1,053 | 14.5% | 43.6% | +18.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bright M. | Conservative Party | 1,051 | 14.5% | 43.5% | — | |
| 5 | Goodwin D. | Labour Party | 1,031 | 14.2% | 42.7% | — | |
| 6 | Stephenson-Oliver P. | Conservative Party | 980 | 13.5% | 40.6% | — | |
| 7 | Baring S. | Liberal Democrats | 319 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 8 | Hughes K. | Green Party | 303 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 9 | Hurdis B. | Liberal Democrats | 182 | 2.5% | 7.5% | — | |
| 10 | Serero T. | Liberal Democrats | 159 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — |
Hyde Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,713
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chowdhury M. | Labour Party | 804 | 15.6% | 46.9% | +21.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dimoldenberg P. | Labour Party | 780 | 15.2% | 45.5% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Southern J. | Labour Party | 774 | 15.1% | 45.2% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Acton H. | Conservative Party | 758 | 14.8% | 44.3% | — | |
| 5 | Cox A. | Conservative Party | 709 | 13.8% | 41.4% | — | |
| 6 | Nizar Z. | Conservative Party | 659 | 12.8% | 38.5% | — | |
| 7 | Ryan S. | Liberal Democrats | 249 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 8 | Byrne A. | Liberal Democrats | 240 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — | |
| 9 | Yaghi R. | Liberal Democrats | 165 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — |
Vincent Square · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,867
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey D. | Conservative Party | 1,377 | 16.0% | 48.0% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Arrindell G. | Labour Party | 1,324 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Short S. | Conservative Party | 1,305 | 15.2% | 45.5% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hayes M. | Conservative Party | 1,297 | 15.1% | 45.2% | — | |
| 5 | Parton D. | Labour Party | 1,232 | 14.3% | 43.0% | — | |
| 6 | Paskaralingam A. | Labour Party | 1,155 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 7 | Gonshaw F. | Liberal Democrats | 371 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 8 | Kerle P. | Liberal Democrats | 271 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — | |
| 9 | Wood R. | Liberal Democrats | 269 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — |
Marylebone · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,497
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rowley I. | Conservative Party | 1,186 | 15.8% | 47.5% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Arzymanow B. | Conservative Party | 1,154 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Scarborough K. | Conservative Party | 1,146 | 15.3% | 45.9% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barr A. | Liberal Democrats | 866 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 5 | Botsford E. | Liberal Democrats | 785 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 6 | Poser F. | Liberal Democrats | 645 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 7 | Johnston B. | Labour Party | 583 | 7.8% | 23.3% | — | |
| 8 | Broadley J. | Labour Party | 581 | 7.8% | 23.3% | — | |
| 9 | Lord M. | Labour Party | 546 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — |
Little Venice · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,393
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dean L. | Conservative Party | 1,140 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Caplan M. | Conservative Party | 1,136 | 15.8% | 47.5% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hassan S. | Labour Party | 1,104 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Green M. | Conservative Party | 1,088 | 15.2% | 45.5% | — | |
| 5 | Wrighting R. | Labour Party | 1,071 | 14.9% | 44.7% | — | |
| 6 | Qureshi M. | Labour Party | 1,053 | 14.7% | 44.0% | — | |
| 7 | Magnin M. | Liberal Democrats | 231 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 8 | Stokes T. | Liberal Democrats | 196 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — | |
| 9 | Alimoradian B. | Liberal Democrats | 161 | 2.2% | 6.7% | — |
Pimlico South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,919
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Begum L. | Labour Party | 1,516 | 17.3% | 51.9% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Eagleton R. | Labour Party | 1,426 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams J. | Labour Party | 1,350 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Spencer J. | Conservative Party | 1,271 | 14.5% | 43.5% | — | |
| 5 | Gassanly M. | Conservative Party | 1,268 | 14.5% | 43.4% | — | |
| 6 | Conary G. | Conservative Party | 1,252 | 14.3% | 42.9% | — | |
| 7 | Poole D. | Liberal Democrats | 252 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — | |
| 8 | Hegazi O. | Liberal Democrats | 216 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — | |
| 9 | Aggarwal V. | Liberal Democrats | 207 | 2.4% | 7.1% | — |
St James's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,971
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hyams L. | Conservative Party | 979 | 16.6% | 49.7% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mitchell T. | Conservative Party | 965 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shearer M. | Conservative Party | 954 | 16.1% | 48.4% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Darbin K. | Labour Party | 789 | 13.3% | 40.0% | — | |
| 5 | Spence P. | Labour Party | 701 | 11.9% | 35.6% | — | |
| 6 | Medforth N. | Labour Party | 700 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 7 | Ahearne M. | Liberal Democrats | 295 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 8 | Diggory P. | Liberal Democrats | 281 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 9 | Wells A. | Liberal Democrats | 249 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — |
Pimlico North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,581
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilkinson J. | Conservative Party | 1,366 | 17.6% | 52.9% | +27.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Glen J. | Conservative Party | 1,327 | 17.1% | 51.4% | +26.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pitt Ford E. | Conservative Party | 1,263 | 16.3% | 48.9% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Heasman P. | Labour Party | 1,024 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 5 | Peter Heap S. | Labour Party | 1,021 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 6 | Robinson E. | Labour Party | 881 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 7 | Coleman T. | Liberal Democrats | 478 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 8 | Service S. | Liberal Democrats | 382 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — |
West End · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,269
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fisher P. | Labour Party | 1,158 | 17.0% | 51.0% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Toale J. | Labour Party | 1,111 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lilley P. | Labour Party | 1,111 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barnes T. | Conservative Party | 961 | 14.1% | 42.4% | — | |
| 5 | Redmond J. | Conservative Party | 923 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 6 | Murphy E. | Conservative Party | 913 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 7 | Taylor S. | Liberal Democrats | 264 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 8 | Coelho G. | Liberal Democrats | 207 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 9 | Weisz J. | Liberal Democrats | 158 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — |
Regent's Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,112
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rigby R. | Conservative Party | 1,140 | 18.0% | 54.0% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Swaddle P. | Conservative Party | 1,097 | 17.3% | 51.9% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Oteh-Osoka R. | Conservative Party | 1,059 | 16.7% | 50.1% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Azizul Haque M. | Labour Party | 696 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 5 | Richardson K. | Labour Party | 685 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 6 | Whittam C. | Labour Party | 653 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 7 | Lichtenstein V. | Green Party | 316 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 8 | Kerle K. | Liberal Democrats | 308 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 9 | Rowe M. | Liberal Democrats | 204 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 10 | Sims J. | Liberal Democrats | 179 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — |
Abbey Road · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,340
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Langford A. | Conservative Party | 1,241 | 17.7% | 53.0% | +28.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sargeant C. | Conservative Party | 1,199 | 17.1% | 51.2% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mendoza A. | Conservative Party | 1,193 | 17.0% | 51.0% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hanson S. | Labour Party | 803 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Evans J. | Labour Party | 770 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 6 | Monshizadeh-Azar S. | Labour Party | 702 | 10.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 7 | Griffiths T. | Liberal Democrats | 367 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 8 | Dinu C. | Green Party | 311 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 9 | Guinness C. | Liberal Democrats | 231 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 10 | Weisz S. | Liberal Democrats | 204 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — |
Bayswater · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,638
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carman M. | Labour Party | 1,618 | 20.4% | 61.3% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sullivan M. | Labour Party | 1,481 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Small-Edwards J. | Labour Party | 1,476 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Askew A. | Conservative Party | 910 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 5 | Bott I. | Conservative Party | 875 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 6 | Shelford H. | Conservative Party | 792 | 10.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 7 | Caizley S. | Liberal Democrats | 276 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 8 | Smithard J. | Liberal Democrats | 266 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 9 | Ubilava N. | Liberal Democrats | 219 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — |
Maida Vale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,442
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barraclough G. | Labour Party | 1,590 | 21.7% | 65.1% | +40.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Butler-Thalassis N. | Labour Party | 1,531 | 20.9% | 62.7% | +37.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Less I. | Labour Party | 1,411 | 19.3% | 57.8% | +32.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Prendergast J. | Conservative Party | 833 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 5 | Janal M. | Conservative Party | 719 | 9.8% | 29.4% | — | |
| 6 | Oteh I. | Conservative Party | 689 | 9.4% | 28.2% | — | |
| 7 | Sergeant H. | Liberal Democrats | 247 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 8 | Nisbet J. | Liberal Democrats | 168 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 9 | Toeman P. | Liberal Democrats | 139 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — |
Knightsbridge and Belgravia · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,911
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hitchcock E. | Conservative Party | 1,263 | 22.0% | 66.1% | +41.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Robathan R. | Conservative Party | 1,244 | 21.7% | 65.1% | +40.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Devenish T. | Conservative Party | 1,243 | 21.7% | 65.0% | +40.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Horbury S. | Labour Party | 486 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 5 | Silverman A. | Labour Party | 438 | 7.6% | 22.9% | — | |
| 6 | McKie G. | Labour Party | 430 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — | |
| 7 | Durnford-Slater R. | Liberal Democrats | 349 | 6.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 8 | Pyatt R. | Liberal Democrats | 280 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — |
Westbourne · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,703
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boothroyd D. | Labour Party | 1,277 | 25.0% | 75.0% | +50.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Piddock A. | Labour Party | 1,206 | 23.6% | 70.8% | +45.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hug A. | Labour Party | 1,193 | 23.3% | 70.0% | +45.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Berry J. | Conservative Party | 341 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 5 | Parry L. | Conservative Party | 318 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — | |
| 6 | Davies T. | Conservative Party | 300 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — | |
| 7 | Mills S. | Liberal Democrats | 149 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — | |
| 8 | Jan Dhaaramsey A. | ND | 124 | 2.4% | 7.3% | — | |
| 9 | Coomes A. | Liberal Democrats | 118 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 10 | Wright J. | Liberal Democrats | 84 | 1.6% | 4.9% | — |
Church Street · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,723
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Less A. | Labour Party | 1,303 | 25.2% | 75.6% | +50.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Noble M. | Labour Party | 1,249 | 24.2% | 72.5% | +47.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Toki A. | Labour Party | 1,219 | 23.6% | 70.8% | +45.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kaseke B. | Conservative Party | 347 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 5 | Johal A. | Conservative Party | 318 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 6 | Law J. | Conservative Party | 308 | 6.0% | 17.9% | — | |
| 7 | Dunbar W. | Liberal Democrats | 143 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — | |
| 8 | Jagger R. | Liberal Democrats | 142 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — | |
| 9 | Ryan P. | Liberal Democrats | 139 | 2.7% | 8.1% | — |
Queens Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 73.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +48.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,085
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McAllister P. | Labour Party | 1,691 | 27.0% | 81.1% | +56.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sanquest C. | Labour Party | 1,568 | 25.1% | 75.2% | +50.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taouzzale H. | Labour Party | 1,523 | 24.3% | 73.0% | +48.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Galley H. | Conservative Party | 380 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — | |
| 5 | Ralph Sargeant E. | Conservative Party | 334 | 5.3% | 16.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hopkinson B. | Conservative Party | 315 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 7 | Toeman H. | Liberal Democrats | 189 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 8 | McCarthy J. | Liberal Democrats | 143 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 9 | Tschawow K. | Liberal Democrats | 113 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Harrow Road · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 73.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +48.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,976
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bush R. | Labour Party | 1,524 | 25.7% | 77.1% | +52.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Albert C. | Labour Party | 1,492 | 25.2% | 75.5% | +50.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Roca T. | Labour Party | 1,444 | 24.4% | 73.1% | +48.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lambert H. | Conservative Party | 381 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 5 | Haynes T. | Conservative Party | 362 | 6.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 6 | Parr S. | Conservative Party | 328 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 7 | Baynes W. | Liberal Democrats | 219 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 8 | Tabari S. | Liberal Democrats | 179 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — |