← Westmorland and Furness (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort

Westmorland and Furness 2022

Local elections held 5 May 2022.

33 ward races
65 seats
2 elected below the proportional quota
3.1% of seats below quota
13 unfairly awarded seats
20.0% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 33 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 65 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Liberal Democrats54,16339.1%3655.4%2640.0%+10
Conservative Party40,80729.4%1116.9%1929.2%-8
Labour Party24,73117.8%1523.1%1218.5%+3
Green Party9,4296.8%11.5%46.2%-3
Independent9,1226.6%23.1%46.2%-2
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition3350.2%00.0%00.0%0
Total138,587100.0%65100.0%65100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2022)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

High Furness · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 41.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,404

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brereton M.Conservative Party58141.4%−8.6 ptsElected
2Wharton I.Liberal Democrats56240.0%
3Carter S.Labour Party16411.7%
4Howlett P.Green Party976.9%

Electorate 3,065 · EC ward code E05014230 · Back to ward index

Low Furness · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 44.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −5.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,461

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cooper B.Conservative Party65044.5%−5.5 ptsElected
2Willis J.Liberal Democrats62742.9%
3Hunt E.Labour Party1288.8%
4Rigg P.Green Party563.8%

Electorate 3,343 · EC ward code E05014239 · Back to ward index

Dalton South · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,432

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Taylor D.Independent58520.4%40.9%+7.5 ptsElected
2Callister T.Labour Party48817.0%34.1%+0.8 ptsElected
3Nott S.Labour Party48316.9%33.7%
4Ronson S.Conservative Party46916.4%32.8%
5English D.Conservative Party43215.1%30.2%
6McLeavy M.Independent2689.4%18.7%
7Miller B.Liberal Democrats742.6%5.2%
8Baker P.Liberal Democrats642.2%4.5%

Electorate 4,620 · EC ward code E05014223 · Back to ward index

Appleby and Brough · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,776

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Connell A.Liberal Democrats98627.8%55.5%+22.2 ptsElected
2Simpkins G.Liberal Democrats63117.8%35.5%+2.2 ptsElected
3Hayes G.Independent60917.2%34.3%
4Patterson W.Independent51114.4%28.8%
5Smith C.Conservative Party45112.7%25.4%
6Berkeley H.Conservative Party36310.2%20.4%

Electorate 4,740 · EC ward code E05014218 · Back to ward index

Bowness and Lyth · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 53.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,406

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bavin S.Liberal Democrats74753.1%+3.1 ptsElected
2Bland J.Conservative Party58441.5%
3Clayton S.Green Party755.3%

Electorate 2,917 · EC ward code E05014219 · Back to ward index

Penrith North · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,131

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bell P.Liberal Democrats1,27730.0%59.9%+26.6 ptsElected
2Rudhall M.Liberal Democrats82019.2%38.5%+5.2 ptsElected
3Ross A.Green Party67515.8%31.7%
4Fearon H.Conservative Party51912.2%24.4%
5Fearon H.Conservative Party44410.4%20.8%
6Tidbury W.Green Party2666.2%12.5%
7Jackson S.Independent1383.2%6.5%
8Devine P.Independent1222.9%5.7%

Electorate 5,777 · EC ward code E05014242 · Back to ward index

Hesket and Lazonby · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,610

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Atkinson C.Conservative Party67621.0%42.0%+8.7 ptsElected
2Carrick H.Conservative Party65820.4%40.9%+7.5 ptsElected
3Martin E.Independent59918.6%37.2%
4Ryland D.Independent53016.5%32.9%
5Burgin R.Liberal Democrats48415.0%30.1%
6Evans D.Liberal Democrats2297.1%14.2%
7Lloyd B.Green Party441.4%2.7%

Electorate 4,960 · EC ward code E05014229 · Back to ward index

Ulverston · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,803

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Filmore J.Green Party1,44512.7%38.0%+13.0 ptsElected
2Drake J.Labour Party1,28611.3%33.8%+8.8 ptsElected
3Irving H.Conservative Party1,26511.1%33.3%+8.3 ptsElected
4Scrogham M.Labour Party1,24710.9%32.8%
5Butcher A.Conservative Party1,21810.7%32.0%
6Wilson M.Labour Party1,18910.4%31.3%
7Rigg A.Conservative Party1,16510.2%30.6%
8Gerry B.Green Party9308.2%24.5%
9O'Hara R.Green Party8647.6%22.7%
10Hudson A.Liberal Democrats3453.0%9.1%
11Rushton D.Liberal Democrats2462.2%6.5%
12Howarth C.Liberal Democrats2091.8%5.5%

Electorate 9,288 · EC ward code E05014246 · Back to ward index

Upper Kent · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 60.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,574

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jama A.Liberal Democrats94960.3%+10.3 ptsElected
2Huck D.Conservative Party41526.4%
3Richardson F.Green Party21013.3%

Electorate 3,337 · EC ward code E05014247 · Back to ward index

Alston and Fellside · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,879

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Robinson M.Independent98426.2%52.4%+19.0 ptsElected
2Hanley M.Labour Party82421.9%43.9%+10.5 ptsElected
3Lindley I.Labour Party57215.2%30.4%
4Beveridge M.Conservative Party42511.3%22.6%
5Normington D.Conservative Party40310.7%21.5%
6Baker A.Liberal Democrats40210.7%21.4%
7Sanderson R.Liberal Democrats1473.9%7.8%

Electorate 5,209 · EC ward code E05014217 · Back to ward index

Burton and Holme · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 60.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,468

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hughes V.Liberal Democrats89160.7%+10.7 ptsElected
2Harvey T.Conservative Party51935.4%
3Blunden S.Green Party584.0%

Electorate 2,800 · EC ward code E05014220 · Back to ward index

Hawcoat and Newbarns · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,605

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hall L.Conservative Party1,15114.7%44.2%+19.2 ptsElected
2Phillips N.Conservative Party1,06913.7%41.0%+16.0 ptsElected
3Worthington R.Conservative Party99312.7%38.1%+13.1 ptsElected
4Cassidy D.Labour Party97412.5%37.4%
5Leach M.Labour Party91311.7%35.0%
6Preston H.Labour Party89111.4%34.2%
7Edwards D.Independent5587.1%21.4%
8Pryer S.Independent4686.0%18.0%
9McClure W.Independent4165.3%16.0%
10Opie D.Liberal Democrats1602.0%6.1%
11Eccles S.Liberal Democrats1231.6%4.7%
12Herbert C.Liberal Democrats1001.3%3.8%

Electorate 8,786 · EC ward code E05014228 · Back to ward index

Coniston and Hawkshead · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 63.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,337

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Pender S.Liberal Democrats85463.9%+13.9 ptsElected
2Hoad M.Conservative Party37027.7%
3Martin P.Labour Party604.5%
4Poole M.Green Party534.0%

Electorate 2,635 · EC ward code E05014221 · Back to ward index

Eden and Lyvennet Vale · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,729

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Baker L.Liberal Democrats96027.8%55.5%+22.2 ptsElected
2McCall N.Liberal Democrats81623.6%47.2%+13.9 ptsElected
3Breen P.Conservative Party63018.2%36.4%
4Whipp D.Conservative Party58516.9%33.8%
5Tonkin M.Independent46613.5%27.0%

Electorate 4,509 · EC ward code E05014225 · Back to ward index

Levens and Crooklands · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,718

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Battye J.Liberal Democrats1,10664.4%+14.4 ptsElected
2Holmes K.Conservative Party53931.4%
3Pickup H.Green Party734.2%

Electorate 3,156 · EC ward code E05014238 · Back to ward index

Kirkby Stephen and Tebay · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,439

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dew P.Conservative Party86129.9%59.9%+26.5 ptsElected
2Murray J.Liberal Democrats69724.2%48.5%+15.1 ptsElected
3Waite A.Liberal Democrats55719.4%38.7%
4Lancaster S.Independent49617.2%34.5%
5Briggs R.Conservative Party2669.2%18.5%

Electorate 4,007 · EC ward code E05014237 · Back to ward index

Penrith South · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,835

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Taylor V.Liberal Democrats91124.8%49.6%+16.3 ptsElected
2Eyles M.Liberal Democrats89924.5%49.0%+15.7 ptsElected
3Barnes G.Conservative Party52014.2%28.3%
4Vickers M.Conservative Party45912.5%25.0%
5Quinn L.Independent39710.8%21.6%
6Clark M.Independent2727.4%14.8%
7O'Brien R.Green Party2125.8%11.6%

Electorate 7,079 · EC ward code E05014243 · Back to ward index

Eamont and Shap · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 65.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,570

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hughes N.Liberal Democrats1,03165.7%+15.7 ptsElected
2Lowther T.Conservative Party53934.3%

Electorate 3,436 · EC ward code E05014224 · Back to ward index

Kendal Strickland and fell · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,329

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Archibald G.Liberal Democrats1,38129.7%59.3%+26.0 ptsElected
2Thornton P.Liberal Democrats1,22526.3%52.6%+19.3 ptsElected
3Miller L.Green Party74916.1%32.2%
4Vincent G.Green Party57612.4%24.7%
5Branney V.Labour Party2435.2%10.4%
6Asbury I.Conservative Party2214.7%9.5%
7Scott J.Conservative Party2154.6%9.2%
8Powell-Davies M.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition471.0%2.0%

Electorate 4,951 · EC ward code E05014235 · Back to ward index

Greystoke and Ullswater · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,625

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Derbyshire J.Liberal Democrats1,15070.8%+20.8 ptsElected
2Wicks D.Conservative Party47529.2%

Electorate 3,401 · EC ward code E05014227 · Back to ward index

Kendal Highgate · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,657

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dixon P.Liberal Democrats1,11133.5%67.1%+33.7 ptsElected
2Severn M.Liberal Democrats94228.4%56.9%+23.5 ptsElected
3Bond M.Conservative Party2798.4%16.8%
4Nicholson M.Conservative Party2648.0%15.9%
5Naish R.Green Party2567.7%15.5%
6Rodham I.Green Party1795.4%10.8%
7Gill O.Labour Party1604.8%9.7%
8Batchelor T.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1223.7%7.4%

Electorate 4,663 · EC ward code E05014232 · Back to ward index

Dalton North · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,333

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Shirley B.Conservative Party92134.6%69.1%+35.8 ptsElected
2Edwards D.Conservative Party78329.4%58.8%+25.4 ptsElected
3Elliot R.Labour Party55620.9%41.7%
4Hogg R.Liberal Democrats2629.8%19.7%
5Coleman S.Liberal Democrats1435.4%10.7%

Electorate 4,767 · EC ward code E05014222 · Back to ward index

Risedale and Roosecote · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,206

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Murphy J.Labour Party1,15217.4%52.2%+27.2 ptsElected
2Coles A.Labour Party1,13917.2%51.6%+26.6 ptsElected
3Biggins T.Labour Party1,13017.1%51.2%+26.2 ptsElected
4Gawne D.Conservative Party98414.9%44.6%
5Shaw L.Conservative Party94714.3%42.9%
6Haddow R.Conservative Party87113.2%39.5%
7Barwise M.Liberal Democrats1452.2%6.6%
8Sullivan J.Liberal Democrats1281.9%5.8%
9Troughton H.Liberal Democrats1211.8%5.5%

Electorate 8,270 · EC ward code E05014244 · Back to ward index

Grange and Cartmel · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,974

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Boak J.Liberal Democrats2,58821.7%65.1%+40.1 ptsElected
2Endsor P.Liberal Democrats2,48620.9%62.6%+37.6 ptsElected
3Sanderson S.Liberal Democrats2,04017.1%51.3%+26.3 ptsElected
4Hanlon F.Independent1,42812.0%35.9%
5McLaren T.Conservative Party1,0508.8%26.4%
6Townley J.Conservative Party8827.4%22.2%
7Wilson D.Conservative Party7296.1%18.3%
8Barnett M.Green Party3012.5%7.6%
9Woods P.Green Party1771.5%4.5%
10Mossbarnet L.Green Party1371.1%3.4%
11El-Doufani L.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1050.9%2.6%

Electorate 8,761 · EC ward code E05014226 · Back to ward index

Sedbergh and Kirkby Lonsdale · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,926

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mitchell I.Liberal Democrats1,89132.3%64.6%+31.3 ptsElected
2Hodgson H.Liberal Democrats1,85431.7%63.4%+30.0 ptsElected
3Lancaster K.Conservative Party98316.8%33.6%
4Bell P.Conservative Party89815.3%30.7%
5Gray T.Green Party2253.8%7.7%

Electorate 6,059 · EC ward code E05014245 · Back to ward index

Kendal Castle · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,905

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hennessy E.Liberal Democrats1,22432.1%64.3%+30.9 ptsElected
2Ladhams H.Liberal Democrats1,21231.8%63.6%+30.3 ptsElected
3Byrom N.Conservative Party43011.3%22.6%
4Williams D.Conservative Party40410.6%21.2%
5Wickham C.Green Party2075.4%10.9%
6Antrobus J.Green Party1985.2%10.4%
7Henderson P.Labour Party1343.5%7.0%

Electorate 4,792 · EC ward code E05014231 · Back to ward index

Kendal Nether · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,779

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Evans S.Liberal Democrats1,19233.5%67.0%+33.7 ptsElected
2Cornthwaite J.Liberal Democrats1,16632.8%65.5%+32.2 ptsElected
3Slater L.Conservative Party3339.4%18.7%
4Bower R.Conservative Party2717.6%15.2%
5Wood L.Green Party1995.6%11.2%
6Braithwaite P.Labour Party1825.1%10.2%
7Rayson D.Green Party1544.3%8.7%
8Casson P.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition611.7%3.4%

Electorate 5,012 · EC ward code E05014233 · Back to ward index

Walney Island · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,045

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cassidy F.Labour Party1,34922.0%66.0%+41.0 ptsElected
2Husband A.Labour Party1,17919.2%57.6%+32.6 ptsElected
3Assouad T.Labour Party1,17519.1%57.4%+32.4 ptsElected
4Rose P.Conservative Party68111.1%33.3%
5Sharpe S.Conservative Party63810.4%31.2%
6Gibney T.Conservative Party62210.1%30.4%
7Fletcher S.Independent2754.5%13.4%
8Trollope P.Liberal Democrats811.3%4.0%
9Hogg C.Liberal Democrats771.3%3.8%
10Perkins T.Liberal Democrats591.0%2.9%

Electorate 8,237 · EC ward code E05014248 · Back to ward index

Kent Estuary · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,453

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chaffey H.Liberal Democrats1,76736.0%72.0%+38.7 ptsElected
2Audland R.Liberal Democrats1,62133.0%66.1%+32.8 ptsElected
3Handley M.Conservative Party65413.3%26.7%
4Smillie P.Conservative Party52610.7%21.4%
5Abel J.Green Party3376.9%13.7%

Electorate 5,001 · EC ward code E05014236 · Back to ward index

Kendal South · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,247

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brook J.Liberal Democrats1,54734.4%68.9%+35.5 ptsElected
2Rathbone D.Liberal Democrats1,54034.3%68.6%+35.2 ptsElected
3Gudgeon L.Conservative Party56412.6%25.1%
4Worthington S.Conservative Party4219.4%18.7%
5Fuster E.Green Party1773.9%7.9%
6Sparling L.Labour Party1353.0%6.0%
7Whiting P.Green Party1092.4%4.9%

Electorate 4,931 · EC ward code E05014234 · Back to ward index

Ormsgill and Parkside · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,878

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1McEwan B.Labour Party1,24222.0%66.1%+41.1 ptsElected
2Brook D.Labour Party1,21121.5%64.5%+39.5 ptsElected
3Morgan B.Labour Party1,17720.9%62.7%+37.7 ptsElected
4Burley E.Conservative Party63511.3%33.8%
5English A.Conservative Party57510.2%30.6%
6Wylie E.Conservative Party5279.4%28.1%
7Richardson J.Liberal Democrats1142.0%6.1%
8Walker P.Liberal Democrats841.5%4.5%
9Wilkinson-Marsh A.Liberal Democrats681.2%3.6%

Electorate 8,240 · EC ward code E05014241 · Back to ward index

Old Barrow and Hindpool · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,653

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Burns A.Labour Party1,18323.9%71.6%+46.6 ptsElected
2Hamilton K.Labour Party1,08922.0%65.9%+40.9 ptsElected
3Thomson M.Labour Party1,07621.7%65.1%+40.1 ptsElected
4Bispham A.Conservative Party50110.1%30.3%
5Das P.Conservative Party4078.2%24.6%
6Lauderdale B.Conservative Party4068.2%24.6%
7Campbell A.Liberal Democrats1142.3%6.9%
8Gardiner G.Liberal Democrats992.0%6.0%
9Pickthall S.Liberal Democrats831.7%5.0%

Electorate 8,432 · EC ward code E05014240 · Back to ward index

Windermere and Ambleside · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,208

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Clark W.Liberal Democrats2,33024.2%72.6%+47.6 ptsElected
2Jarvis A.Liberal Democrats2,23123.2%69.5%+44.5 ptsElected
3Jones D.Liberal Democrats2,18322.7%68.0%+43.0 ptsElected
4Musetti C.Conservative Party96610.0%30.1%
5Stephenson J.Conservative Party7748.0%24.1%
6Cross P.Conservative Party7517.8%23.4%
7Threadgold K.Green Party3904.1%12.2%

Electorate 7,625 · EC ward code E05014249 · Back to ward index