← Windsor & Maidenhead (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Windsor & Maidenhead 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 41 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 39,208 | 45.4% | 22 | 53.7% | 21 | 51.2% | +1 |
| Conservative Party | 24,215 | 28.0% | 7 | 17.1% | 13 | 31.7% | -6 |
| W & M 1ST IND | 8,832 | 10.2% | 7 | 17.1% | 4 | 9.8% | +3 |
| Labour Party | 5,295 | 6.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 4.9% | -2 |
| OW RES | 2,643 | 3.1% | 2 | 4.9% | 1 | 2.4% | +1 |
| Independent | 1,767 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Green Party | 1,642 | 1.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| WW RES | 1,537 | 1.8% | 2 | 4.9% | 0 | 0.0% | +2 |
| NFPP | 1,099 | 1.3% | 1 | 2.4% | 0 | 0.0% | +1 |
| Reform UK | 123 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 86,361 | 100.0% | 41 | 100.0% | 41 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Bray · 2 seats · won at 39.0% · above quota
- Clewer and Dedworth West · 2 seats · won at 40.1% · above quota
- Sunningdale and Cheapside · 2 seats · won at 44.6% · above quota
- Hurley and Walthams · 2 seats · won at 48.6% · above quota
- Ascot and Sunninghill · 3 seats · won at 41.4% · above quota
- Datchet, Horton and Wraysbury · 3 seats · won at 44.0% · above quota
- Oldfield · 2 seats · won at 55.3% · above quota
- Clewer and Dedworth East · 2 seats · won at 59.5% · above quota
- Boyn Hill · 2 seats · won at 62.5% · above quota
- Riverside · 2 seats · won at 63.0% · above quota
- Furze Platt · 2 seats · won at 63.8% · above quota
- St Mary's · 2 seats · won at 64.6% · above quota
- Eton and Castle · 3 seats · won at 57.3% · above quota
- Cox Green · 2 seats · won at 67.9% · above quota
- Belmont · 2 seats · won at 71.0% · above quota
- Old Windsor · 2 seats · won at 71.6% · above quota
- Bisham and Cookham · 2 seats · won at 74.8% · above quota
- Pinkneys Green · 2 seats · won at 78.2% · above quota
- Clewer East · 2 seats · won at 79.9% · above quota
Race results
Bray · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,912
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cross, S. | W & M 1ST IND | 907 | 23.7% | 47.4% | +14.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walters, L. | Conservative Party | 746 | 19.5% | 39.0% | +5.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Crane, G. | W & M 1ST IND | 726 | 19.0% | 38.0% | — | |
| 4 | Wilson, D. | Conservative Party | 691 | 18.1% | 36.1% | — | |
| 5 | Adams, B. | Liberal Democrats | 317 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — | |
| 6 | Martin, T. | Liberal Democrats | 262 | 6.9% | 13.7% | — | |
| 7 | White, R. | Labour Party | 175 | 4.6% | 9.2% | — |
Clewer and Dedworth West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,892
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Costa, C. | WW RES | 778 | 20.6% | 41.1% | +7.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Costa, W. | WW RES | 759 | 20.1% | 40.1% | +6.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilson, E. | Independent | 649 | 17.2% | 34.3% | — | |
| 4 | Alexander, M. | Independent | 424 | 11.2% | 22.4% | — | |
| 5 | Davey, J. | Independent | 418 | 11.0% | 22.1% | — | |
| 6 | Haggart, I. | Conservative Party | 299 | 7.9% | 15.8% | — | |
| 7 | Swann, L. | Conservative Party | 244 | 6.4% | 12.9% | — | |
| 8 | Foster, D. | Labour Party | 212 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — |
Sunningdale and Cheapside · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,565
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luxton, S. | Conservative Party | 736 | 23.5% | 47.0% | +13.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gosling, G. | Conservative Party | 698 | 22.3% | 44.6% | +11.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pike, V. | W & M 1ST IND | 574 | 18.3% | 36.7% | — | |
| 4 | Newman, M. | W & M 1ST IND | 489 | 15.6% | 31.3% | — | |
| 5 | Fallon, C. | Liberal Democrats | 244 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — | |
| 6 | Julia, M. | Liberal Democrats | 218 | 7.0% | 13.9% | — | |
| 7 | Hayward, N. | Labour Party | 170 | 5.4% | 10.9% | — |
Hurley and Walthams · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,576
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blundell, G. | Liberal Democrats | 782 | 24.8% | 49.6% | +16.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hunt, M. | Conservative Party | 765 | 24.3% | 48.6% | +15.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Castell, R. | Liberal Democrats | 664 | 21.1% | 42.1% | — | |
| 4 | Johnson, A. | Conservative Party | 643 | 20.4% | 40.8% | — | |
| 5 | McDermott, C. | Green Party | 131 | 4.2% | 8.3% | — | |
| 6 | Lupton, S. | Labour Party | 94 | 3.0% | 6.0% | — | |
| 7 | Langley, T. | Labour Party | 72 | 2.3% | 4.6% | — |
Ascot and Sunninghill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,398
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharpe, J. | Conservative Party | 1,257 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Story, J. | Conservative Party | 1,254 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Majeed, A. | Conservative Party | 993 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Evans, L. | Liberal Democrats | 979 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 5 | Pope, J. | Liberal Democrats | 940 | 13.1% | 39.2% | — | |
| 6 | Karia, S. | Liberal Democrats | 877 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 7 | Gripton, J. | Labour Party | 472 | 6.6% | 19.7% | — | |
| 8 | Magill, R. | Green Party | 423 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — |
Datchet, Horton and Wraysbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,165
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Larcombe, E. | NFPP | 1,099 | 16.9% | 50.8% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Buckley, D. | W & M 1ST IND | 1,071 | 16.5% | 49.5% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Grove, J. | W & M 1ST IND | 953 | 14.7% | 44.0% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lenton, M. | Conservative Party | 748 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 5 | Barr, P. | Conservative Party | 638 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 6 | Verma, A. | Conservative Party | 589 | 9.1% | 27.2% | — | |
| 7 | Ward, P. | Labour Party | 394 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — | |
| 8 | Ward, J. | Labour Party | 289 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 9 | Macho, Z. | Green Party | 278 | 4.3% | 12.8% | — | |
| 10 | Boresjo, D. | Liberal Democrats | 241 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 11 | Trood, J. | Liberal Democrats | 195 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Oldfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,794
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, H. | W & M 1ST IND | 1,015 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hill, G. | W & M 1ST IND | 992 | 27.6% | 55.3% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Goyal, S. | Conservative Party | 731 | 20.4% | 40.7% | — | |
| 4 | Jones, J. | Conservative Party | 543 | 15.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 5 | Fairley, L. | Labour Party | 307 | 8.6% | 17.1% | — |
Clewer and Dedworth East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,589
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Price, H. | W & M 1ST IND | 1,160 | 36.5% | 73.0% | +39.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Carpenter, A. | W & M 1ST IND | 945 | 29.7% | 59.5% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bicknell, P. | Conservative Party | 371 | 11.7% | 23.3% | — | |
| 4 | Bhatti, H. | Conservative Party | 286 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 5 | Sanders, D. | Labour Party | 247 | 7.8% | 15.5% | — | |
| 6 | Margison, R. | Independent | 169 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — |
Boyn Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,213
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bermange, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,466 | 33.1% | 66.3% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shaw, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,383 | 31.3% | 62.5% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bhangra, G. | Conservative Party | 636 | 14.4% | 28.7% | — | |
| 4 | Khanna, A. | Conservative Party | 580 | 13.1% | 26.2% | — | |
| 5 | Alexandrou, M. | Labour Party | 195 | 4.4% | 8.8% | — | |
| 6 | McDonald, P. | Labour Party | 165 | 3.7% | 7.5% | — |
Riverside · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,424
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singh, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,622 | 33.5% | 66.9% | +33.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Coe, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,527 | 31.5% | 63.0% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Khan, S. | Conservative Party | 776 | 16.0% | 32.0% | — | |
| 4 | Tucker, T. | Conservative Party | 622 | 12.8% | 25.7% | — | |
| 5 | Smith, N. | Labour Party | 178 | 3.7% | 7.3% | — | |
| 6 | Collingwood, J. | Reform UK | 123 | 2.5% | 5.1% | — |
Furze Platt · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,284
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campo, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,582 | 34.6% | 69.3% | +35.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reynolds, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,457 | 31.9% | 63.8% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sharma, H. | Conservative Party | 577 | 12.6% | 25.3% | — | |
| 4 | Wallace, J. | Conservative Party | 534 | 11.7% | 23.4% | — | |
| 5 | Blair, G. | Labour Party | 170 | 3.7% | 7.4% | — | |
| 6 | Lattimer, C. | Labour Party | 141 | 3.1% | 6.2% | — | |
| 7 | Easten, T. | Independent | 107 | 2.3% | 4.7% | — |
St Mary's · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,738
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Douglas, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,199 | 34.5% | 69.0% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Singh, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,123 | 32.3% | 64.6% | +31.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stimson, D. | Conservative Party | 476 | 13.7% | 27.4% | — | |
| 4 | Su, H. | Conservative Party | 387 | 11.1% | 22.3% | — | |
| 5 | Nicholas, K. | Labour Party | 290 | 8.3% | 16.7% | — |
Eton and Castle · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,912
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tisi, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,701 | 19.5% | 58.4% | +33.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davies, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,686 | 19.3% | 57.9% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilson, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,667 | 19.1% | 57.3% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rayner, S. | Conservative Party | 902 | 10.3% | 31.0% | — | |
| 5 | Banham, P. | Conservative Party | 869 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 6 | Shelim, S. | Conservative Party | 670 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 7 | Boyle, M. | Green Party | 416 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 8 | Harrison, L. | Green Party | 310 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — | |
| 9 | Ludovici, R. | Labour Party | 285 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 10 | Khan, M. | Labour Party | 229 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — |
Cox Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,351
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moriarty, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,677 | 35.7% | 71.3% | +38.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reeves, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,597 | 34.0% | 67.9% | +34.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Haseler, P. | Conservative Party | 678 | 14.4% | 28.8% | — | |
| 4 | Sharma, S. | Conservative Party | 452 | 9.6% | 19.2% | — | |
| 5 | Horner, R. | Labour Party | 129 | 2.7% | 5.5% | — | |
| 6 | Lupton, J. | Labour Party | 85 | 1.8% | 3.6% | — | |
| 7 | Beer, S. | Green Party | 84 | 1.8% | 3.6% | — |
Belmont · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 71.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,234
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bond, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,641 | 36.7% | 73.5% | +40.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Martin, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,585 | 35.5% | 71.0% | +37.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ilyas, M. | Conservative Party | 502 | 11.2% | 22.5% | — | |
| 4 | Scawn, W. | Conservative Party | 494 | 11.1% | 22.1% | — | |
| 5 | Lattimer, P. | Labour Party | 245 | 5.5% | 11.0% | — |
Old Windsor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 71.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,711
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, L. | OW RES | 1,419 | 41.5% | 83.0% | +49.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Knowles, N. | OW RES | 1,224 | 35.8% | 71.6% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Auger, P. | Conservative Party | 274 | 8.0% | 16.0% | — | |
| 4 | Reeves, R. | Labour Party | 254 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 5 | Blackwell, C. | Conservative Party | 250 | 7.3% | 14.6% | — |
Bisham and Cookham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 74.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,524
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brar, M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,101 | 41.6% | 83.2% | +49.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Howard, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,887 | 37.4% | 74.8% | +41.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clark, G. | Conservative Party | 526 | 10.4% | 20.8% | — | |
| 4 | Weiss, T. | Conservative Party | 375 | 7.4% | 14.9% | — | |
| 5 | Grouse, G. | Labour Party | 94 | 1.9% | 3.7% | — | |
| 6 | Stack, M. | Labour Party | 65 | 1.3% | 2.6% | — |
Pinkneys Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 78.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,327
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baskerville, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,832 | 39.4% | 78.7% | +45.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Werner, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,819 | 39.1% | 78.2% | +44.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cook, M. | Conservative Party | 355 | 7.6% | 15.3% | — | |
| 4 | Guly, B. | Conservative Party | 310 | 6.7% | 13.3% | — | |
| 5 | Collisson, J. | Labour Party | 176 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — | |
| 6 | Freeman, J. | Labour Party | 162 | 3.5% | 7.0% | — |
Clewer East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 79.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,838
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davies, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,469 | 40.0% | 79.9% | +46.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tisi, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,468 | 39.9% | 79.9% | +46.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pryer, N. | Conservative Party | 402 | 10.9% | 21.9% | — | |
| 4 | Shah, K. | Conservative Party | 336 | 9.1% | 18.3% | — |