← Wokingham (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Wokingham 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 54 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 61,794 | 41.3% | 27 | 50.0% | 22 | 40.7% | +5 |
| Conservative Party | 56,932 | 38.0% | 19 | 35.2% | 21 | 38.9% | -2 |
| Labour Party | 27,173 | 18.1% | 8 | 14.8% | 10 | 18.5% | -2 |
| Green Party | 3,383 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.9% | -1 |
| Independent | 336 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 152 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 149,770 | 100.0% | 54 | 100.0% | 54 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Maiden Erlegh and Whitegates · 3 seats · won at 33.4% · above quota
- Wescott · 3 seats · won at 37.1% · above quota
- South Lake · 3 seats · won at 39.9% · above quota
- Shinfield · 3 seats · won at 41.0% · above quota
- Norreys · 3 seats · won at 41.4% · above quota
- Hillside · 3 seats · won at 41.9% · above quota
- Barkham and Arborfield · 3 seats · won at 43.3% · above quota
- Hawkedon · 3 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- Spencers Wood and Swallowfield · 3 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- Thames · 3 seats · won at 43.7% · above quota
- Bulmershe and Coronation · 3 seats · won at 44.8% · above quota
- Loddon · 3 seats · won at 45.6% · above quota
- Wokingham Without · 3 seats · won at 47.0% · above quota
- Finchampstead · 3 seats · won at 48.8% · above quota
- Emmbrook · 3 seats · won at 51.1% · above quota
- Evendons · 3 seats · won at 56.1% · above quota
- Winnersh · 3 seats · won at 57.9% · above quota
- Twyford, Ruscombe and Hurst · 3 seats · won at 63.8% · above quota
Race results
Maiden Erlegh and Whitegates · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,481
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jorgensen, N. | Conservative Party | 1,187 | 11.4% | 34.1% | +9.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Newton, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,182 | 11.3% | 34.0% | +9.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ng Sio-Hong, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,162 | 11.1% | 33.4% | +8.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smith, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,133 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hussain, W. | Conservative Party | 1,110 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — | |
| 6 | McKenzie, R. | Labour Party | 1,026 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 7 | Duhan, V. | Labour Party | 959 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 8 | Ranga, M. | Conservative Party | 956 | 9.2% | 27.5% | — | |
| 9 | Skuse, T. | Labour Party | 898 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 10 | Langlois, S. | Green Party | 493 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — | |
| 11 | Mohammed, I. | Independent | 336 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — |
Wescott · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,667
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ainslie, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,318 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Comber, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,202 | 15.0% | 45.1% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cooke, C. | Liberal Democrats | 990 | 12.4% | 37.1% | +12.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Murray, G. | Conservative Party | 964 | 12.0% | 36.2% | — | |
| 5 | Pett, J. | Conservative Party | 879 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 6 | Sharma, R. | Conservative Party | 791 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 7 | Croy, A. | Labour Party | 661 | 8.3% | 24.8% | — | |
| 8 | Chapman, D. | Green Party | 433 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 9 | Monte, P. | Labour Party | 392 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 10 | Pearson, A. | Labour Party | 370 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — |
South Lake · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,668
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gilder, K. | Conservative Party | 1,180 | 14.7% | 44.2% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rowland, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,080 | 13.5% | 40.5% | +15.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jewell, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,065 | 13.3% | 39.9% | +14.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bourke, J. | Conservative Party | 1,056 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 5 | Harman, N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,008 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 6 | Dalton, M. | Conservative Party | 994 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 7 | Clark, T. | Labour Party | 616 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 8 | Dally, A. | Labour Party | 571 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 9 | Horton, S. | Labour Party | 435 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — |
Shinfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,149
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bell, S. | Labour Party | 997 | 15.5% | 46.4% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gray, A. | Labour Party | 923 | 14.3% | 43.0% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Srinivasan, V. | Conservative Party | 881 | 13.7% | 41.0% | +16.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rance, J. | Conservative Party | 868 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Anand, V. | Labour Party | 867 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 6 | Pollock, H. | Conservative Party | 855 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 7 | Garg, S. | Liberal Democrats | 405 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — | |
| 8 | Brock, N. | Liberal Democrats | 397 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 9 | Wharton, B. | Liberal Democrats | 253 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
Norreys · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,567
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burgess, R. | Labour Party | 1,398 | 18.2% | 54.5% | +29.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Weighill, M. | Labour Party | 1,128 | 14.6% | 43.9% | +18.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nagella, N. | Labour Party | 1,063 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cunnington, P. | Conservative Party | 963 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 5 | Fairweather, L. | Conservative Party | 853 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 6 | Greer, R. | Conservative Party | 786 | 10.2% | 30.6% | — | |
| 7 | Fumagalli, M. | Liberal Democrats | 524 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — | |
| 8 | Dixon, W. | Liberal Democrats | 495 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 9 | Sayers, P. | Liberal Democrats | 421 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — | |
| 10 | Gillman, S. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 69 | 0.9% | 2.7% | — |
Hillside · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,283
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jorgensen, P. | Conservative Party | 1,699 | 17.3% | 51.8% | +26.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Iyengunmwena, M. | Conservative Party | 1,399 | 14.2% | 42.6% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,376 | 14.0% | 41.9% | +16.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Neal, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,324 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 5 | Browne, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,307 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 6 | Afzal, S. | Conservative Party | 1,263 | 12.8% | 38.5% | — | |
| 7 | Ainsworth, E. | Labour Party | 421 | 4.3% | 12.8% | — | |
| 8 | Sarasan, H. | Labour Party | 401 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Watson, H. | Green Party | 353 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — | |
| 10 | Rupert, J. | Labour Party | 305 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — |
Barkham and Arborfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,247
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Betteridge, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,018 | 15.1% | 45.3% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barley, J. | Conservative Party | 982 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Evans, G. | Conservative Party | 973 | 14.4% | 43.3% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Boadu, J. | Liberal Democrats | 964 | 14.3% | 42.9% | — | |
| 5 | Richards, H. | Liberal Democrats | 940 | 13.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 6 | Graabek, S. | Conservative Party | 840 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 7 | Feroz, A. | Green Party | 322 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 8 | Francis, J. | Labour Party | 257 | 3.8% | 11.4% | — | |
| 9 | Medhurst, A. | Labour Party | 242 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — | |
| 10 | Jinkerson, T. | Labour Party | 202 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Hawkedon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,125
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hare, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,433 | 15.3% | 45.9% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ahlawat, R. | Conservative Party | 1,413 | 15.1% | 45.2% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | De Jong, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,356 | 14.5% | 43.4% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mickleburgh, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,355 | 14.5% | 43.4% | — | |
| 5 | Holton, T. | Conservative Party | 1,293 | 13.8% | 41.4% | — | |
| 6 | Grandison, G. | Conservative Party | 1,274 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 7 | Craske, M. | Labour Party | 527 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — | |
| 8 | Law-Sinha, C. | Labour Party | 386 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 9 | McKeown, H. | Labour Party | 338 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — |
Spencers Wood and Swallowfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,482
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glover, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,189 | 16.0% | 47.9% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Edmonds, D. | Conservative Party | 1,103 | 14.8% | 44.4% | +19.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Munro, S. | Conservative Party | 1,077 | 14.5% | 43.4% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Pollock, A. | Conservative Party | 1,047 | 14.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 5 | Johnson, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,020 | 13.7% | 41.1% | — | |
| 6 | Rider, D. | Liberal Democrats | 856 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 7 | Blomley, T. | Green Party | 418 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 8 | Taylor, J. | Labour Party | 259 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 9 | Gale, W. | Labour Party | 252 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 10 | Hooper, S. | Labour Party | 224 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Thames · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,785
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akhtar, S. | Conservative Party | 1,416 | 16.9% | 50.8% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, W. | Conservative Party | 1,284 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harding, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,217 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Firmager, M. | Conservative Party | 1,186 | 14.2% | 42.6% | — | |
| 5 | Wilson, Y. | Liberal Democrats | 1,172 | 14.0% | 42.1% | — | |
| 6 | Power, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,027 | 12.3% | 36.9% | — | |
| 7 | Crainer, S. | Labour Party | 380 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 8 | Hugman, T. | Labour Party | 355 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — | |
| 9 | Scott, B. | Labour Party | 317 | 3.8% | 11.4% | — |
Bulmershe and Coronation · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,620
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Swaddle, A. | Conservative Party | 1,468 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Younis, S. | Conservative Party | 1,318 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Salman, Y. | Conservative Party | 1,173 | 14.9% | 44.8% | +19.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barton, P. | Liberal Democrats | 632 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 5 | McFarlane, K. | Labour Party | 591 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 6 | Nash, S. | Liberal Democrats | 584 | 7.4% | 22.3% | — | |
| 7 | Evans, W. | Labour Party | 576 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 8 | Shacklady, G. | Green Party | 542 | 6.9% | 20.7% | — | |
| 9 | Sharp, D. | Labour Party | 510 | 6.5% | 19.5% | — | |
| 10 | Jordan, S. | Liberal Democrats | 467 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — |
Loddon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,539
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bello, G. | Labour Party | 1,338 | 17.6% | 52.7% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Nagra, M. | Labour Party | 1,316 | 17.3% | 51.8% | +26.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Freeney, A. | Labour Party | 1,159 | 15.2% | 45.6% | +20.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bragg, D. | Conservative Party | 1,033 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 5 | Soane, B. | Conservative Party | 1,003 | 13.2% | 39.5% | — | |
| 6 | Loyes, A. | Conservative Party | 869 | 11.4% | 34.2% | — | |
| 7 | Heap, A. | Liberal Democrats | 406 | 5.3% | 16.0% | — | |
| 8 | Fraser, A. | Liberal Democrats | 254 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — | |
| 9 | Khayinza, I. | Liberal Democrats | 240 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — |
Wokingham Without · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,379
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brunel-Walker, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,267 | 17.8% | 53.3% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Montgomery, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,256 | 17.6% | 52.8% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Turtle, S. | Conservative Party | 1,117 | 15.7% | 47.0% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Davies, D. | Conservative Party | 1,082 | 15.2% | 45.5% | — | |
| 5 | Salmon, C. | Liberal Democrats | 977 | 13.7% | 41.1% | — | |
| 6 | Clark, U. | Conservative Party | 958 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 7 | Lam, J. | Labour Party | 181 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — | |
| 8 | Fry, A. | Labour Party | 161 | 2.3% | 6.8% | — | |
| 9 | Pluves, J. | Labour Party | 137 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — |
Finchampstead · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,439
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Margetts, C. | Conservative Party | 1,715 | 16.6% | 49.9% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Margetts, R. | Conservative Party | 1,707 | 16.5% | 49.6% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harper, P. | Conservative Party | 1,677 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cornish, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,635 | 15.8% | 47.5% | — | |
| 5 | Eytle, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,498 | 14.5% | 43.6% | — | |
| 6 | Dignan, F. | Liberal Democrats | 1,404 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 7 | Clark, J. | Labour Party | 246 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — | |
| 8 | Tapping, G. | Labour Party | 238 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 9 | Hills, I. | Labour Party | 196 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — |
Emmbrook · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,056
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bishop-Firth, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,760 | 19.2% | 57.6% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shepherd-Dubey, I. | Liberal Democrats | 1,736 | 18.9% | 56.8% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Alvi, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,562 | 17.0% | 51.1% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lee, D. | Conservative Party | 1,069 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — | |
| 5 | Haines, K. | Conservative Party | 918 | 10.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 6 | McDermott, J. | Conservative Party | 813 | 8.9% | 26.6% | — | |
| 7 | Seymour, L. | Green Party | 369 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — | |
| 8 | Callender, B. | Labour Party | 356 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 9 | Groves, M. | Labour Party | 293 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 10 | Ferguson, J. | Labour Party | 291 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — |
Evendons · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,767
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashwell, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,668 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Timlin, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,580 | 19.0% | 57.1% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mather, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,552 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Waters, J. | Conservative Party | 876 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 5 | Cant, J. | Conservative Party | 873 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 6 | Jeater, M. | Conservative Party | 839 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 7 | Jones, A. | Labour Party | 324 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 8 | Morris, M. | Labour Party | 306 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 9 | Heath, C. | Labour Party | 284 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — |
Winnersh · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,522
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bray, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,703 | 22.5% | 67.5% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shepherd-Dubey, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,473 | 19.5% | 58.4% | +33.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fishwick, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,460 | 19.3% | 57.9% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Chadwick, A. | Conservative Party | 755 | 10.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 5 | Pollock, J. | Conservative Party | 620 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 6 | Washbourne, M. | Conservative Party | 603 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 7 | Evans, D. | Labour Party | 305 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — | |
| 8 | Eastaugh, P. | Labour Party | 301 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 9 | Murungi, A. | Labour Party | 263 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 10 | Gillman, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 83 | 1.1% | 3.3% | — |
Twyford, Ruscombe and Hurst · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,150
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conway, S. | Liberal Democrats | 2,456 | 26.0% | 78.0% | +53.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Alder, M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,027 | 21.5% | 64.4% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Andrea, M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,008 | 21.3% | 63.8% | +38.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jarvis, J. | Conservative Party | 719 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 5 | Woolner, G. | Conservative Party | 579 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 6 | George, M. | Conservative Party | 576 | 6.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 7 | Boniface, M. | Green Party | 453 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 8 | Noble, R. | Labour Party | 250 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 9 | Mantel, R. | Labour Party | 211 | 2.2% | 6.7% | — | |
| 10 | Tang, P. | Labour Party | 170 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |