← Worcester (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Worcester 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 35 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green Party | 18,328 | 33.0% | 12 | 34.3% | 12 | 34.3% | 0 |
| Labour Party | 16,446 | 29.6% | 17 | 48.6% | 11 | 31.4% | +6 |
| Conservative Party | 11,084 | 19.9% | 1 | 2.9% | 7 | 20.0% | -6 |
| Liberal Democrats | 7,894 | 14.2% | 5 | 14.3% | 5 | 14.3% | 0 |
| Independent | 1,288 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 297 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 207 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 68 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 55,612 | 100.0% | 35 | 100.0% | 35 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- St Nicholas · 2 seats · won at 37.2% · above quota
- Cathedral · 2 seats · won at 38.1% · above quota
- St Clement · 2 seats · won at 39.9% · above quota
- Fort Royal · 2 seats · won at 41.3% · above quota
- St Peter's Parish · 2 seats · won at 43.8% · above quota
- Rainbow Hill · 2 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Lower Wick and Pitmaston · 2 seats · won at 45.5% · above quota
- Dines Green and Grove Farm · 2 seats · won at 48.9% · above quota
- Nunnery · 3 seats · won at 41.5% · above quota
- St John's · 2 seats · won at 50.1% · above quota
- Warndon and Elbury Park · 3 seats · won at 47.4% · above quota
- Leopard Hill · 2 seats · won at 57.9% · above quota
- Claines · 3 seats · won at 54.1% · above quota
- Battenhall · 2 seats · won at 63.5% · above quota
- Arboretum · 2 seats · won at 65.0% · above quota
- St Stephen · 2 seats · won at 68.9% · above quota
Race results
St Nicholas · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,531
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murray, S. | Liberal Democrats | 796 | 26.0% | 52.0% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rudge, J. | Liberal Democrats | 569 | 18.6% | 37.2% | +3.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hodgson, S. | Conservative Party | 415 | 13.6% | 27.1% | — | |
| 4 | Hencher, M. | Green Party | 385 | 12.6% | 25.1% | — | |
| 5 | Lippett, J. | Conservative Party | 298 | 9.7% | 19.5% | — | |
| 6 | Wratten, C. | Green Party | 295 | 9.6% | 19.3% | — | |
| 7 | Stafford, M. | Labour Party | 172 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — | |
| 8 | Taylor, C. | Labour Party | 132 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — |
Cathedral · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,420
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Denham, L. | Labour Party | 644 | 22.7% | 45.4% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Scott, A. | Labour Party | 541 | 19.1% | 38.1% | +4.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bodenham, J. | Green Party | 525 | 18.5% | 37.0% | — | |
| 4 | Taylor, L. | Green Party | 464 | 16.3% | 32.7% | — | |
| 5 | Rimell, A. | Conservative Party | 225 | 7.9% | 15.9% | — | |
| 6 | Rimell, C. | Conservative Party | 216 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — | |
| 7 | Lankester, F. | Independent | 111 | 3.9% | 7.8% | — | |
| 8 | Smith, A. | Liberal Democrats | 43 | 1.5% | 3.0% | — | |
| 9 | Wild, S. | Liberal Democrats | 37 | 1.3% | 2.6% | — | |
| 10 | Harrison, A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 33 | 1.2% | 2.3% | — |
St Clement · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,498
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pingree, T. | Green Party | 788 | 26.3% | 52.6% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kinnersley, A. | Green Party | 598 | 20.0% | 39.9% | +6.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ballinger, B. | Conservative Party | 533 | 17.8% | 35.6% | — | |
| 4 | James, S. | Conservative Party | 482 | 16.1% | 32.2% | — | |
| 5 | Craigan, I. | Labour Party | 263 | 8.8% | 17.6% | — | |
| 6 | Wilde, J. | Labour Party | 179 | 6.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 7 | Windsor-Peplow, M. | Reform UK | 94 | 3.1% | 6.3% | — | |
| 8 | Mather, S. | Liberal Democrats | 59 | 2.0% | 3.9% | — |
Fort Royal · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,221
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Riaz, J. | Labour Party | 655 | 26.8% | 53.7% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sadiq, A. | Labour Party | 504 | 20.6% | 41.3% | +8.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McCarthy, H. | Green Party | 274 | 11.2% | 22.4% | — | |
| 4 | Zafar, N. | Independent | 252 | 10.3% | 20.6% | — | |
| 5 | Meah, R. | Independent | 236 | 9.7% | 19.3% | — | |
| 6 | Kirby, J. | Green Party | 179 | 7.3% | 14.7% | — | |
| 7 | Martins, A. | Conservative Party | 130 | 5.3% | 10.7% | — | |
| 8 | Martins, M. | Conservative Party | 128 | 5.2% | 10.5% | — | |
| 9 | Lee, A. | Liberal Democrats | 83 | 3.4% | 6.8% | — |
St Peter's Parish · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,654
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cockeram, S. | Green Party | 832 | 25.2% | 50.3% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Round, E. | Green Party | 724 | 21.9% | 43.8% | +10.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Renshaw, J. | Liberal Democrats | 537 | 16.2% | 32.5% | — | |
| 4 | Mackay, S. | Conservative Party | 428 | 12.9% | 25.9% | — | |
| 5 | Woolgar, J. | Conservative Party | 248 | 7.5% | 15.0% | — | |
| 6 | Carpenter, K. | Liberal Democrats | 216 | 6.5% | 13.1% | — | |
| 7 | Benfield, J. | Labour Party | 181 | 5.5% | 10.9% | — | |
| 8 | Tallett, S. | Labour Party | 142 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — |
Rainbow Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,167
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gregson, A. | Labour Party | 550 | 23.6% | 47.1% | +13.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cookson, Z. | Labour Party | 525 | 22.5% | 45.0% | +11.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Weeks, N. | Green Party | 488 | 20.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 4 | Trimmer, J. | Green Party | 464 | 19.9% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Burton, K. | Conservative Party | 161 | 6.9% | 13.8% | — | |
| 6 | Rouse, M. | Conservative Party | 96 | 4.1% | 8.2% | — | |
| 7 | Carpenter, S. | Liberal Democrats | 50 | 2.1% | 4.3% | — |
Lower Wick and Pitmaston · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,654
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amos, A. | Conservative Party | 817 | 24.7% | 49.4% | +16.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, S. | Labour Party | 752 | 22.7% | 45.5% | +12.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Daniels, A. | Labour Party | 653 | 19.7% | 39.5% | — | |
| 4 | Hodgson, L. | Conservative Party | 569 | 17.2% | 34.4% | — | |
| 5 | Brohan, S. | Green Party | 194 | 5.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 6 | Stephen, A. | Green Party | 170 | 5.1% | 10.3% | — | |
| 7 | Ondreasz, J. | Liberal Democrats | 129 | 3.9% | 7.8% | — | |
| 8 | Davies, E. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 23 | 0.7% | 1.4% | — |
Dines Green and Grove Farm · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 979
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb, M. | Labour Party | 609 | 31.1% | 62.2% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Norfolk, R. | Labour Party | 478 | 24.4% | 48.9% | +15.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cawte, M. | Conservative Party | 211 | 10.8% | 21.6% | — | |
| 4 | Wilson, M. | Conservative Party | 208 | 10.6% | 21.3% | — | |
| 5 | Pingree, K. | Green Party | 153 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — | |
| 6 | Silvester, N. | Green Party | 121 | 6.2% | 12.4% | — | |
| 7 | Holmes, A. | Liberal Democrats | 71 | 3.6% | 7.3% | — | |
| 8 | Potter, M. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 68 | 3.5% | 6.9% | — | |
| 9 | Davies, M. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 38 | 1.9% | 3.9% | — |
Nunnery · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,943
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agar, P. | Labour Party | 994 | 17.0% | 51.1% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Willmore, E. | Labour Party | 963 | 16.5% | 49.6% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ali, B. | Labour Party | 807 | 13.8% | 41.5% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ditta, A. | Conservative Party | 472 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Babu, L. | Conservative Party | 442 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — | |
| 6 | Owen, L. | Conservative Party | 417 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — | |
| 7 | Mitra, B. | Green Party | 340 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 8 | Ponder, A. | Green Party | 302 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 9 | Ahmed, N. | Independent | 260 | 4.5% | 13.4% | — | |
| 10 | Carney, D. | Reform UK | 203 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 11 | Butler, S. | Liberal Democrats | 184 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — | |
| 12 | Zmarzlik, J. | Green Party | 157 | 2.7% | 8.1% | — | |
| 13 | Ali, A. | Independent | 146 | 2.5% | 7.5% | — | |
| 14 | Zafar, M. | Independent | 143 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — |
St John's · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,257
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Udall, R. | Labour Party | 864 | 34.4% | 68.7% | +35.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barnes, J. | Labour Party | 630 | 25.1% | 50.1% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ottolangui, R. | Green Party | 355 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 4 | Swift, A. | Green Party | 322 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 5 | Burge, S. | Conservative Party | 164 | 6.5% | 13.0% | — | |
| 6 | Snell, A. | Conservative Party | 124 | 4.9% | 9.9% | — | |
| 7 | Jackson, P. | Liberal Democrats | 55 | 2.2% | 4.4% | — |
Warndon and Elbury Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,493
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Desayrah, J. | Labour Party | 868 | 19.4% | 58.1% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kimberley, E. | Labour Party | 783 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hussain, N. | Labour Party | 708 | 15.8% | 47.4% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Stanley, J. | Conservative Party | 389 | 8.7% | 26.0% | — | |
| 5 | Cleary, O. | Conservative Party | 388 | 8.7% | 26.0% | — | |
| 6 | Ditta, S. | Conservative Party | 325 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — | |
| 7 | Braithwaite, S. | Green Party | 288 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 8 | Dukes, S. | Green Party | 235 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 9 | Gilfillan, P. | Green Party | 165 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 10 | Awais, M. | Independent | 140 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 11 | Cottingham, S. | Liberal Democrats | 111 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — | |
| 12 | Ford, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 80 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Leopard Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,565
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cross, A. | Green Party | 1,029 | 32.9% | 65.8% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Collier, K. | Green Party | 906 | 28.9% | 57.9% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bittu, J. | Conservative Party | 364 | 11.6% | 23.3% | — | |
| 4 | Lippett, T. | Conservative Party | 346 | 11.1% | 22.1% | — | |
| 5 | Ali, J. | Labour Party | 199 | 6.4% | 12.7% | — | |
| 6 | Desayrah, S. | Labour Party | 176 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — | |
| 7 | Jagger, P. | Liberal Democrats | 64 | 2.0% | 4.1% | — | |
| 8 | Ricketts, B. | Liberal Democrats | 46 | 1.5% | 2.9% | — |
Claines · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,464
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allcott, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,798 | 24.3% | 73.0% | +48.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jagger, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,401 | 19.0% | 56.9% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lawrance, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,333 | 18.0% | 54.1% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Thorp, C. | Conservative Party | 473 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 5 | Nosal, T. | Conservative Party | 373 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 6 | Wisniewski, T. | Conservative Party | 360 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 7 | Squires, J. | Labour Party | 333 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 8 | Allaway, L. | Labour Party | 309 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 9 | Neill, M. | Green Party | 289 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 10 | Henri, T. | Labour Party | 267 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — | |
| 11 | Nichols, C. | Green Party | 236 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 12 | Bovey, S. | Green Party | 221 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Battenhall · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,910
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stephen, L. | Green Party | 1,367 | 35.8% | 71.6% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sobczyk, P. | Green Party | 1,213 | 31.8% | 63.5% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taylor, G. | Labour Party | 322 | 8.4% | 16.9% | — | |
| 4 | Benfield, I. | Labour Party | 306 | 8.0% | 16.0% | — | |
| 5 | Akhtar, P. | Conservative Party | 300 | 7.9% | 15.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hussain, N. | Conservative Party | 253 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 7 | Symon, P. | Liberal Democrats | 59 | 1.5% | 3.1% | — |
Arboretum · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,676
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooper, H. | Green Party | 1,183 | 35.3% | 70.6% | +37.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lewing, K. | Green Party | 1,090 | 32.5% | 65.0% | +31.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tull, A. | Labour Party | 314 | 9.4% | 18.7% | — | |
| 4 | Haque, N. | Labour Party | 261 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — | |
| 5 | Coldicott, Z. | Conservative Party | 151 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — | |
| 6 | Stanley, A. | Conservative Party | 120 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — | |
| 7 | Taylor, J. | Liberal Democrats | 106 | 3.2% | 6.3% | — | |
| 8 | Morgan, A. | Liberal Democrats | 94 | 2.8% | 5.6% | — | |
| 9 | Fowler, C. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 33 | 1.0% | 2.0% | — |
St Stephen · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,425
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mace, A. | Green Party | 995 | 34.9% | 69.8% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Laurenson, N. | Green Party | 981 | 34.4% | 68.9% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wild, J. | Conservative Party | 256 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 4 | Coates, R. | Labour Party | 224 | 7.9% | 15.7% | — | |
| 5 | Wisniewska, A. | Conservative Party | 202 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — | |
| 6 | Willmore, M. | Labour Party | 138 | 4.8% | 9.7% | — | |
| 7 | Melville, A. | Liberal Democrats | 53 | 1.9% | 3.7% | — |