← Wyre (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Wyre 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 50 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 29,105 | 52.8% | 30 | 60.0% | 27 | 54.0% | +3 |
| Labour Party | 20,383 | 37.0% | 17 | 34.0% | 19 | 38.0% | -2 |
| Independent | 3,573 | 6.5% | 3 | 6.0% | 3 | 6.0% | 0 |
| Green Party | 1,447 | 2.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.0% | -1 |
| Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 483 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Liberal Democrats | 109 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 55,100 | 100.0% | 50 | 100.0% | 50 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Pilling · 1 seat · won at 42.9% · −7.1 pts below quota
- Calder · 1 seat · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Wyresdale · 1 seat · won at 59.0% · above quota
- Breck · 2 seats · won at 46.0% · above quota
- Pheasant's Wood · 1 seat · won at 66.7% · above quota
- Preesall · 3 seats · won at 41.7% · above quota
- Jubilee · 2 seats · won at 50.3% · above quota
- Carleton · 2 seats · won at 52.2% · above quota
- Cleveleys Park · 2 seats · won at 52.6% · above quota
- Rossall · 3 seats · won at 46.4% · above quota
- Victoria and Norcross · 2 seats · won at 55.2% · above quota
- Pharos · 2 seats · won at 57.8% · above quota
- Hambleton and Stalmine · 2 seats · won at 58.1% · above quota
- Warren · 2 seats · won at 60.1% · above quota
- Garstang · 3 seats · won at 52.7% · above quota
- Mount · 2 seats · won at 61.8% · above quota
- Marsh Mill · 3 seats · won at 54.0% · above quota
- Bourne · 3 seats · won at 54.8% · above quota
- Park · 2 seats · won at 63.6% · above quota
- Great Eccleston · 2 seats · won at 64.6% · above quota
- Brock with Catterall · 2 seats · won at 64.9% · above quota
- Stanah · 2 seats · won at 67.3% · above quota
- Tithebarn · 2 seats · won at 68.6% · above quota
- Hardhorn with High Cross · 3 seats · won at 65.1% · above quota
Race results
Pilling · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 42.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −7.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 742
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leigh, A. | Conservative Party | 318 | 42.9% | −7.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rushforth, B. | Independent | 277 | 37.3% | — | |
| 3 | Beavers, R. | Labour Party | 147 | 19.8% | — |
Calder · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 706
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ibison, J. | Conservative Party | 386 | 54.7% | +4.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Heaton-Bentley, M. | Labour Party | 320 | 45.3% | — |
Wyresdale · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 59.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 671
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker, C. | Labour Party | 396 | 59.0% | +9.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Leech, J. | Conservative Party | 275 | 41.0% | — |
Breck · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,008
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Le Marinel, P. | Conservative Party | 471 | 23.4% | 46.7% | +13.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Preston, J. | Conservative Party | 463 | 23.0% | 46.0% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Calver, T. | Labour Party | 418 | 20.7% | 41.5% | — | |
| 4 | Hazlewood, S. | Labour Party | 404 | 20.0% | 40.1% | — | |
| 5 | Gibson, P. | Independent | 259 | 12.9% | 25.7% | — |
Pheasant's Wood · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 66.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 655
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kay, A. | Conservative Party | 437 | 66.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stephenson, J. | Labour Party | 218 | 33.3% | — |
Preesall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,524
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rimmer, C. | Independent | 1,010 | 22.1% | 66.3% | +41.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rushforth, C. | Independent | 938 | 20.5% | 61.5% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sorenson, A. | Independent | 636 | 13.9% | 41.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Orme, P. | Conservative Party | 590 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — | |
| 5 | Taylor-Royston, S. | Conservative Party | 544 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 6 | Moon, P. | Conservative Party | 537 | 11.7% | 35.2% | — | |
| 7 | Shewan, R. | Labour Party | 318 | 7.0% | 20.9% | — |
Jubilee · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,083
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fail, R. | Labour Party | 598 | 27.6% | 55.2% | +21.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Martin, W. | Labour Party | 544 | 25.1% | 50.3% | +16.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Faulkner, S. | Conservative Party | 537 | 24.8% | 49.6% | — | |
| 4 | Porter, S. | Conservative Party | 486 | 22.4% | 44.9% | — |
Carleton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,333
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker, A. | Labour Party | 725 | 27.2% | 54.4% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fielding, S. | Labour Party | 696 | 26.1% | 52.2% | +18.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Townsend, C. | Conservative Party | 608 | 22.8% | 45.6% | — | |
| 4 | Lyons-Walker, A. | Conservative Party | 538 | 20.2% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Eaves, A. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 99 | 3.7% | 7.4% | — |
Cleveleys Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,329
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amos, I. | Conservative Party | 705 | 26.5% | 53.1% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rendell, R. | Conservative Party | 699 | 26.3% | 52.6% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Audley, C. | Labour Party | 567 | 21.3% | 42.7% | — | |
| 4 | Anderton, M. | Labour Party | 500 | 18.8% | 37.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hinchcliffe, C. | Liberal Democrats | 109 | 4.1% | 8.2% | — | |
| 6 | McNeal, C. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 77 | 2.9% | 5.8% | — |
Rossall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,036
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raynor, C. | Labour Party | 523 | 16.8% | 50.5% | +25.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Meekins, B. | Conservative Party | 493 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thewlis, F. | Conservative Party | 481 | 15.5% | 46.4% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Stephenson, E. | Labour Party | 460 | 14.8% | 44.4% | — | |
| 5 | Raynor, R. | Labour Party | 455 | 14.6% | 43.9% | — | |
| 6 | Wiliiams, H. | Conservative Party | 445 | 14.3% | 43.0% | — | |
| 7 | Gerrard, D. | Independent | 250 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — |
Victoria and Norcross · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,148
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baxter, C. | Conservative Party | 693 | 30.2% | 60.4% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Vincent, M. | Conservative Party | 634 | 27.6% | 55.2% | +21.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harrison, L. | Labour Party | 504 | 22.0% | 43.9% | — | |
| 4 | McCord, D. | Labour Party | 465 | 20.3% | 40.5% | — |
Pharos · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 651
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duffy, R. | Labour Party | 444 | 34.1% | 68.3% | +34.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Moliner, M. | Labour Party | 376 | 28.9% | 57.8% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shaw, D. | Conservative Party | 200 | 15.4% | 30.7% | — | |
| 4 | Vincent, M. | Conservative Party | 173 | 13.3% | 26.6% | — | |
| 5 | Pickton, M. | Green Party | 108 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — |
Hambleton and Stalmine · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,082
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robinson, J. | Conservative Party | 693 | 32.0% | 64.0% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bowen, L. | Conservative Party | 629 | 29.1% | 58.1% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fielding, H. | Labour Party | 374 | 17.3% | 34.6% | — | |
| 4 | Mead-Mason, B. | Green Party | 265 | 12.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 5 | Bell-Fairclough, J. | Independent | 203 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — |
Warren · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 837
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blair, M. | Labour Party | 552 | 33.0% | 66.0% | +32.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stephenson, B. | Labour Party | 503 | 30.1% | 60.1% | +26.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fitzgerald, J. | Conservative Party | 311 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — | |
| 4 | Meekins, D. | Conservative Party | 307 | 18.4% | 36.7% | — |
Garstang · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,753
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atkins, D. | Conservative Party | 1,065 | 20.3% | 60.8% | +35.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Collinson, A. | Conservative Party | 1,050 | 20.0% | 59.9% | +34.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Atkins, R. | Conservative Party | 923 | 17.6% | 52.7% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gale, D. | Labour Party | 787 | 15.0% | 44.9% | — | |
| 5 | Moore, J. | Labour Party | 732 | 13.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 6 | Meeks, L. | Green Party | 702 | 13.3% | 40.0% | — |
Mount · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 790
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stephenson, C. | Labour Party | 555 | 35.1% | 70.3% | +37.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stirzaker, M. | Labour Party | 488 | 30.9% | 61.8% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, S. | Conservative Party | 273 | 17.3% | 34.6% | — | |
| 4 | Ashton, T. | Conservative Party | 263 | 16.7% | 33.3% | — |
Marsh Mill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,492
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higgs, D. | Conservative Party | 902 | 20.2% | 60.5% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ellison, P. | Conservative Party | 900 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jackson, H. | Conservative Party | 805 | 18.0% | 54.0% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smith, P. | Labour Party | 659 | 14.7% | 44.2% | — | |
| 5 | Jackson, W. | Labour Party | 616 | 13.8% | 41.3% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor, J. | Labour Party | 594 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — |
Bourne · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,060
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wells, V. | Labour Party | 604 | 19.0% | 57.0% | +32.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Swatton, H. | Labour Party | 582 | 18.3% | 54.9% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Higginson, K. | Labour Party | 581 | 18.3% | 54.8% | +29.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ballard, H. | Conservative Party | 500 | 15.7% | 47.2% | — | |
| 5 | Eccles, J. | Conservative Party | 461 | 14.5% | 43.5% | — | |
| 6 | Wyers-Roebuck, T. | Conservative Party | 453 | 14.2% | 42.7% | — |
Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 709
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beavers, L. | Labour Party | 504 | 35.5% | 71.1% | +37.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, C. | Labour Party | 451 | 31.8% | 63.6% | +30.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Northwood, G. | Conservative Party | 275 | 19.4% | 38.8% | — | |
| 4 | Hunt, S. | Conservative Party | 188 | 13.3% | 26.5% | — |
Great Eccleston · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,101
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catterall, S. | Conservative Party | 758 | 34.4% | 68.8% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cartridge, P. | Conservative Party | 711 | 32.3% | 64.6% | +31.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hogarth, D. | Green Party | 372 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — | |
| 4 | Haley, P. | Labour Party | 361 | 16.4% | 32.8% | — |
Brock with Catterall · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 918
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolton, D. | Conservative Party | 696 | 37.9% | 75.9% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Swift, D. | Conservative Party | 595 | 32.4% | 64.9% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bonser, O. | Labour Party | 544 | 29.6% | 59.3% | — |
Stanah · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 997
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Livesey, S. | Conservative Party | 774 | 38.8% | 77.7% | +44.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Minto, K. | Conservative Party | 671 | 33.7% | 67.3% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rawlings, E. | Labour Party | 548 | 27.5% | 55.0% | — |
Tithebarn · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 841
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Birch, C. | Conservative Party | 601 | 35.8% | 71.5% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McKay, L. | Conservative Party | 577 | 34.3% | 68.6% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gratrix, R. | Labour Party | 503 | 29.9% | 59.8% | — |
Hardhorn with High Cross · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,362
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bridge, S. | Conservative Party | 1,097 | 26.9% | 80.6% | +55.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Berry, R. | Conservative Party | 1,028 | 25.2% | 75.5% | +50.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nicholls, S. | Conservative Party | 886 | 21.7% | 65.1% | +40.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Calver, M. | Labour Party | 767 | 18.8% | 56.3% | — | |
| 5 | Lang, J. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 307 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — |