← Elmbridge (all cycles) · 5 May 2016 cohort

Elmbridge 2016

Local elections held 5 May 2016.

16 ward races
48 seats
0 elected below the proportional quota
0.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 48 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party41,80543.4%2245.8%2347.9%-1
Liberal Democrats13,10713.6%714.6%714.6%0
Molesey9,2219.6%612.5%510.4%+1
HWWGRA5,7175.9%36.3%36.3%0
Labour Party5,3445.5%00.0%24.2%-2
TDWGRA4,9475.1%36.3%24.2%+1
Walton3,7653.9%36.3%24.2%+1
WStGI3,0663.2%12.1%12.1%0
Esher2,7892.9%12.1%12.1%0
UK Independence Party (UKIP)2,5912.7%00.0%12.1%-1
Hersham2,3862.5%24.2%12.1%+1
Green Party1,1261.2%00.0%00.0%0
Independent4680.5%00.0%00.0%0
Total96,332100.0%48100.0%48100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2016 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2016 election (current) and on the eve of it (2015), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2016)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Weybridge Riverside · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,918

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Andrew DavisLiberal Democrats89315.5%46.6%+21.6 ptsElected
2Michael FreemanConservative Party88015.3%45.9%+20.9 ptsElected
3Andy MuddymanConservative Party78413.6%40.9%+15.9 ptsElected
4Vicki MacleodLiberal Democrats76413.3%39.8%
5Barbara CowinConservative Party76313.3%39.8%
6Adriana DredgeLiberal Democrats61610.7%32.1%
7Craig MackenzieIndependent4688.1%24.4%
8Stephanie FranklinLabour Party2384.1%12.4%
9Warren WeertmanLabour Party1853.2%9.6%
10Thomas WicksLabour Party1642.8%8.5%

EC ward code E05011088 · Back to ward index

Hersham Village · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,080

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hersham Roy GreenHersham1,11117.8%53.4%+28.4 ptsElected
2Mary SheldonConservative Party1,05116.8%50.5%+25.5 ptsElected
3Anne HillHersham90414.5%43.5%+18.5 ptsElected
4John O'ReillyConservative Party87514.0%42.1%
5Florence MitchellConservative Party77012.3%37.0%
6Olivia PalmerGreen Party5088.1%24.4%
7Peter JepsonLabour Party4196.7%20.1%
8Janet ShellLiberal Democrats3255.2%15.6%
9Nicholas WoodUK Independence Party (UKIP)2784.5%13.4%

EC ward code E05011077 · Back to ward index

Esher · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,191

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1David ArcherConservative Party1,11817.0%51.0%+26.0 ptsElected
2Timothy OliverConservative Party1,05616.1%48.2%+23.2 ptsElected
3Peter HeaneyEsher1,02015.5%46.6%+21.6 ptsElected
4Sue CitronEsher97814.9%44.6%
5Simon WaughConservative Party93514.2%42.7%
6Joyce KeenEsher79112.0%36.1%
7Terry DuhigHersham3715.6%16.9%
8Laura HarmourGreen Party3044.6%13.9%

EC ward code E05011076 · Back to ward index

Weybridge St George's Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,114

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Peter HarmanWStGI1,15418.2%54.6%+29.6 ptsElected
2Ian DonaldsonConservative Party1,05716.7%50.0%+25.0 ptsElected
3Simon FoaleConservative Party1,03316.3%48.9%+23.9 ptsElected
4Tom CattonWStGI1,02916.2%48.7%
5Rani Kaur BhamraWStGI88313.9%41.8%
6John RowlandConservative Party86213.6%40.8%
7Lee GodfreyLabour Party1762.8%8.3%
8Angus RendallLabour Party1492.3%7.0%

EC ward code E05011089 · Back to ward index

Molesey East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,776

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stuart SelleckMolesey1,57618.9%56.8%+31.8 ptsElected
2Ivan ReganMolesey1,51718.2%54.6%+29.6 ptsElected
3Tony PophamMolesey1,43717.3%51.8%+26.8 ptsElected
4Steve BaxConservative Party1,15913.9%41.7%
5Peter SzantoConservative Party92511.1%33.3%
6Debi OliverConservative Party88810.7%32.0%
7Sarah Spencer-BowdageGreen Party3143.8%11.3%
8Surraya SumnerLabour Party3143.8%11.3%
9Trevor MarshallUK Independence Party (UKIP)1992.4%7.2%

EC ward code E05011080 · Back to ward index

Claygate · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,406

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mary MarshallLiberal Democrats1,65422.9%68.8%+43.8 ptsElected
2Alex CoomesLiberal Democrats1,46920.4%61.1%+36.1 ptsElected
3Kim CrossLiberal Democrats1,27117.6%52.8%+27.8 ptsElected
4Mark SugdenConservative Party96413.4%40.1%
5Geoff HerbertConservative Party77210.7%32.1%
6Xingang WangConservative Party5858.1%24.3%
7Felix RileyLabour Party3054.2%12.7%
8Bernard CollignonUK Independence Party (UKIP)1972.7%8.2%

EC ward code E05011074 · Back to ward index

Walton Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,091

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chris SadlerWalton1,35521.6%64.8%+39.8 ptsElected
2Alan PalmerWalton1,26020.1%60.3%+35.3 ptsElected
3Graham WoolgarWalton1,15018.3%55.0%+30.0 ptsElected
4Andrew AndersonConservative Party74811.9%35.8%
5Paul LiptrotConservative Party71411.4%34.2%
6Christine RichardsonConservative Party70011.2%33.5%
7Margaret HawkesLabour Party3455.5%16.5%

EC ward code E05011085 · Back to ward index

Walton North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,213

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Andrew KellyConservative Party78221.5%64.5%+39.5 ptsElected
2Rachael LakeConservative Party73120.1%60.3%+35.3 ptsElected
3Alan KopitkoConservative Party67018.4%55.2%+30.2 ptsElected
4Richard LeonardLabour Party58216.0%48.0%
5David IonsUK Independence Party (UKIP)46812.9%38.6%
6Linda AlankoLiberal Democrats40611.2%33.5%

EC ward code E05011086 · Back to ward index

Long Ditton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,841

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Shweta KapadiaLiberal Democrats1,30423.6%70.8%+45.8 ptsElected
2Neil HoustonLiberal Democrats1,27523.1%69.2%+44.2 ptsElected
3Barry FairbankLiberal Democrats1,20321.8%65.3%+40.3 ptsElected
4Jerry MillsConservative Party63611.5%34.5%
5Natasha OdoneConservative Party4347.9%23.6%
6Derek WilliamsonConservative Party4137.5%22.4%
7Redvers CunninghamUK Independence Party (UKIP)2594.7%14.1%

EC ward code E05011079 · Back to ward index

Cobham and Downside · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,565

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mike BennisonConservative Party1,15724.6%73.9%+48.9 ptsElected
2Dorothy MitchellConservative Party1,15524.6%73.8%+48.8 ptsElected
3James BrowneConservative Party1,04122.2%66.5%+41.5 ptsElected
4David BellchamberLiberal Democrats59312.6%37.9%
5Elaine KingstonUK Independence Party (UKIP)3788.1%24.2%
6Lana HylandsLabour Party3707.9%23.6%

EC ward code E05011075 · Back to ward index

Molesey West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,982

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mike AxtonMolesey1,62727.4%82.1%+57.1 ptsElected
2Vic EldridgeMolesey1,58326.6%79.9%+54.9 ptsElected
3Ruby AhmedMolesey1,48124.9%74.7%+49.7 ptsElected
4Richard DoxfordConservative Party3205.4%16.1%
5Jamal AjjaneLabour Party3045.1%15.3%
6Philippe BassettConservative Party2604.4%13.1%
7Paul NagleLiberal Democrats1893.2%9.5%
8Inna SpektorConservative Party1833.1%9.2%

EC ward code E05011081 · Back to ward index

Oatlands and Burwood Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,842

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Glenn DearloveConservative Party1,46226.5%79.4%+54.4 ptsElected
2Lewis BrownConservative Party1,41025.5%76.5%+51.5 ptsElected
3Barry CheyneConservative Party1,38925.1%75.4%+50.4 ptsElected
4Elinor JonesLabour Party3526.4%19.1%
5Martin ListerLabour Party3476.3%18.8%
6Simon KadwillUK Independence Party (UKIP)2885.2%15.6%
7Irene ThrelkeldLabour Party2785.0%15.1%

EC ward code E05011082 · Back to ward index

Thames Ditton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,161

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Tricia BlandTDWGRA1,66425.7%77.0%+52.0 ptsElected
2Karen RandolphTDWGRA1,64725.4%76.2%+51.2 ptsElected
3Ruth LyonTDWGRA1,63625.2%75.7%+50.7 ptsElected
4Mandy SansomConservative Party4747.3%21.9%
5Graham WestConservative Party4236.5%19.6%
6Andrew ReidConservative Party3815.9%17.6%
7Jaska AlankoLiberal Democrats2574.0%11.9%

EC ward code E05011084 · Back to ward index

Walton South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 76.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +51.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,714

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Christine ElmerConservative Party1,40827.4%82.2%+57.2 ptsElected
2Chris CrossConservative Party1,32525.8%77.3%+52.3 ptsElected
3Malcolm HowardConservative Party1,30225.3%76.0%+51.0 ptsElected
4Vera-Anne AndersonLabour Party58411.4%34.1%
5Alastair SturgisLiberal Democrats52210.2%30.5%

EC ward code E05011087 · Back to ward index

Hinchley Wood and Weston Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 78.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +53.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,361

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Tannia ShipleyHWWGRA1,95027.5%82.6%+57.6 ptsElected
2Janet TurnerHWWGRA1,90626.9%80.7%+55.7 ptsElected
3Nigel Haig-BrownHWWGRA1,86126.3%78.8%+53.8 ptsElected
4Charlotte SharmanConservative Party4656.6%19.7%
5Martin FoxConservative Party4596.5%19.4%
6Craig HarrisonConservative Party4416.2%18.7%

EC ward code E05011078 · Back to ward index

Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 79.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +54.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,856

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Oliver ChappellConservative Party1,49726.9%80.7%+55.7 ptsElected
2Andrew BurleyConservative Party1,47426.5%79.4%+54.4 ptsElected
3James VickersConservative Party1,47426.5%79.4%+54.4 ptsElected
4Simon DaviesLiberal Democrats3666.6%19.7%
5Richard AtkinsUK Independence Party (UKIP)2634.7%14.2%
6Philip BirchUK Independence Party (UKIP)2614.7%14.1%
7Hugh BryantLabour Party2324.2%12.5%

EC ward code E05011083 · Back to ward index