← Warrington (all cycles) · 5 May 2016 cohort

Warrington 2016

Local elections held 5 May 2016.

22 ward races
58 seats
0 elected below the proportional quota
0.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 22 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 58 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party59,03148.8%4577.6%3051.7%+15
Conservative Party27,81623.0%23.4%1424.1%-12
Liberal Democrats24,95320.6%1119.0%1220.7%-1
UK Independence Party (UKIP)3,6523.0%00.0%11.7%-1
Independent2,2451.9%00.0%11.7%-1
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1,7191.4%00.0%00.0%0
Green Party1,5591.3%00.0%00.0%0
Total120,975100.0%58100.0%58100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2016 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2016 election (current) and on the eve of it (2015), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2016)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Stockton Heath · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 36.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,221

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Peter WalkerLiberal Democrats1,08924.5%49.0%+15.7 ptsElected
2Graham WelbornLiberal Democrats81318.3%36.6%+3.3 ptsElected
3Stephen TaylorConservative Party67515.2%30.4%
4Laurence MurphyLabour Party61413.8%27.7%
5Jonathan LevyConservative Party58113.1%26.2%
6Sandra EavesLabour Party52211.8%23.5%
7Harry GibbinsGreen Party1473.3%6.6%

EC ward code E05011044 · Back to ward index

Lymm South · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,976

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sheila WoodyattConservative Party92523.4%46.8%+13.5 ptsElected
2Kath BuckleyConservative Party87922.2%44.5%+11.2 ptsElected
3Ed GoughLiberal Democrats78019.7%39.5%
4Graham GowlandLiberal Democrats66816.9%33.8%
5David CockayneLabour Party46611.8%23.6%
6James AshingtonUK Independence Party (UKIP)2335.9%11.8%

EC ward code E05011037 · Back to ward index

Westbrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,331

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stefan KrizanacLiberal Democrats82731.1%62.1%+28.8 ptsElected
2Judith GuthrieLabour Party60622.8%45.5%+12.2 ptsElected
3John JoyceLabour Party47717.9%35.8%
4Jeff ButlerLiberal Democrats46017.3%34.6%
5Alex LeslieConservative Party29211.0%21.9%

EC ward code E05011045 · Back to ward index

Chapelford and Old Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,348

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Faisal RashidLabour Party1,48921.1%63.4%+38.4 ptsElected
2Steve ParishLabour Party1,16116.5%49.4%+24.4 ptsElected
3Rebecca KnowlesLabour Party1,01114.4%43.1%+18.1 ptsElected
4Allan BirdLiberal Democrats6989.9%29.7%
5Phil HaywardConservative Party5938.4%25.3%
6David KnappLiberal Democrats4636.6%19.7%
7Roy SmithLiberal Democrats3975.6%16.9%
8Anthony KerriganConservative Party3645.2%15.5%
9Anna SharkeyConservative Party3324.7%14.1%
10Ian WilsonUK Independence Party (UKIP)3324.7%14.1%
11Mike WassGreen Party2042.9%8.7%

EC ward code E05011028 · Back to ward index

Rixton and Woolston · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,235

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Tony McCarthyLabour Party1,31419.6%58.8%+33.8 ptsElected
2Andrew HillLabour Party1,21418.1%54.3%+29.3 ptsElected
3Pat WrightLabour Party97914.6%43.8%+18.8 ptsElected
4Bill BrinksmanIndependent88213.2%39.5%
5Paul BrethertonIndependent71710.7%32.1%
6Mark ChapmanConservative Party5608.4%25.1%
7Howard KleinConservative Party4606.9%20.6%
8Isaac TweedaleConservative Party4116.1%18.4%
9Paul WenlockLiberal Democrats1682.5%7.5%

EC ward code E05011043 · Back to ward index

Culcheth, Glazebury and Croft · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,057

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Matt SmithLabour Party1,78819.5%58.5%+33.5 ptsElected
2Joan GrimeLabour Party1,60917.5%52.6%+27.6 ptsElected
3Jan DavidsonLabour Party1,40115.3%45.8%+20.8 ptsElected
4Frank AllenConservative Party1,35914.8%44.5%
5Sue BlandConservative Party1,31814.4%43.1%
6Valerie AllenConservative Party1,26313.8%41.3%
7Eddie SloaneLiberal Democrats4324.7%14.1%

EC ward code E05011029 · Back to ward index

Poulton South · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,206

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Colin FroggattLabour Party88236.6%73.2%+39.8 ptsElected
2Maureen CreaghanLabour Party67828.1%56.2%+22.9 ptsElected
3Bob TaylorTrade Unionist and Socialist Coalition36014.9%29.9%
4Emma SloanConservative Party32413.4%26.9%
5Dave HockenhullLiberal Democrats1676.9%13.9%

EC ward code E05011042 · Back to ward index

Grappenhall · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,896

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mike BigginLiberal Democrats1,30634.5%68.9%+35.6 ptsElected
2Ryan BateLiberal Democrats1,11929.5%59.0%+25.7 ptsElected
3Olivia ReillyConservative Party56514.9%29.8%
4Iona GillisConservative Party42111.1%22.2%
5Andy HeaverLabour Party38010.0%20.0%

EC ward code E05011031 · Back to ward index

Latchford West · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,670

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Les MorganLabour Party1,06832.0%64.0%+30.6 ptsElected
2Maureen McLaughlinLabour Party99129.7%59.3%+26.0 ptsElected
3Michael HaworthConservative Party3219.6%19.2%
4David WoodyattConservative Party3179.5%19.0%
5Ann RaymondLiberal Democrats2838.5%16.9%
6Celia JordanLiberal Democrats2728.1%16.3%
7Dave CundyTrade Unionist and Socialist Coalition882.6%5.3%

EC ward code E05011035 · Back to ward index

Appleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,188

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brian AxcellLiberal Democrats2,19122.9%68.7%+43.7 ptsElected
2Judith WheelerLiberal Democrats2,03421.3%63.8%+38.8 ptsElected
3Sharon HarrisLiberal Democrats1,64017.1%51.4%+26.4 ptsElected
4Basil MitchellConservative Party1,07511.2%33.7%
5Barbara PriceConservative Party8919.3%27.9%
6Ian HoughtonConservative Party7317.6%22.9%
7Nick BentLabour Party5565.8%17.4%
8David BiltonGreen Party4474.7%14.0%

EC ward code E05011024 · Back to ward index

Penketh and Cuerdley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,769

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1David KeaneLabour Party1,62219.5%58.6%+33.6 ptsElected
2Linda DirirLabour Party1,51118.2%54.6%+29.6 ptsElected
3Allin DirirLabour Party1,48617.9%53.7%+28.7 ptsElected
4Sam BaxterConservative Party1,31715.9%47.6%
5Kevin MortonConservative Party1,08713.1%39.3%
6Matt JonesConservative Party1,03012.4%37.2%
7Denis McAllisterLiberal Democrats2543.1%9.2%

EC ward code E05011039 · Back to ward index

Lymm North and Thelwall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,117

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bob BarrLiberal Democrats2,02721.7%65.0%+40.0 ptsElected
2Ian MarksLiberal Democrats1,94320.8%62.3%+37.3 ptsElected
3Wendy JohnsonLiberal Democrats1,68518.0%54.1%+29.1 ptsElected
4Chris ZastawnyLabour Party8959.6%28.7%
5Jonathan SmithConservative Party8579.2%27.5%
6Kevin YatesConservative Party7357.9%23.6%
7Harish SharmaConservative Party6797.3%21.8%
8Derek ClarkUK Independence Party (UKIP)5305.7%17.0%

EC ward code E05011036 · Back to ward index

Great Sankey North and Whittle Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,164

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jan HartLabour Party1,32120.4%61.1%+36.1 ptsElected
2Dan PriceLabour Party1,26519.5%58.5%+33.5 ptsElected
3Tony WilliamsLabour Party1,21718.7%56.2%+31.2 ptsElected
4Mike FoxallConservative Party69810.8%32.3%
5Christine BoothConservative Party66810.3%30.9%
6Arthur BoothConservative Party66010.2%30.5%
7Stephanie DaviesGreen Party3325.1%15.3%
8Cliff TaylorLiberal Democrats3305.1%15.3%

EC ward code E05011032 · Back to ward index

Latchford East · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,260

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hans MundryLabour Party92936.9%73.8%+40.4 ptsElected
2Karen MundryLabour Party82232.6%65.3%+31.9 ptsElected
3Julian CraddockConservative Party1927.6%15.2%
4Ken ScatesConservative Party1455.8%11.5%
5Tim PriceLiberal Democrats1405.6%11.1%
6Rupert BudgenLiberal Democrats1234.9%9.8%
7John LappinGreen Party853.4%6.7%
8Sue HayesTrade Unionist and Socialist Coalition833.3%6.6%

EC ward code E05011034 · Back to ward index

Fairfield and Howley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,692

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jean FlahertyLabour Party1,23424.3%72.9%+47.9 ptsElected
2Tony HigginsLabour Party1,00819.9%59.6%+34.6 ptsElected
3Peter CareyLabour Party99719.6%58.9%+33.9 ptsElected
4Kevin BennettTrade Unionist and Socialist Coalition92118.1%54.4%
5Lyndsay McAteerGreen Party3446.8%20.3%
6Simone JohnsonConservative Party3326.5%19.6%
7Ann OldburyLiberal Democrats2404.7%14.2%

EC ward code E05011030 · Back to ward index

Great Sankey South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,862

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Amanda KingLabour Party1,43225.6%76.9%+51.9 ptsElected
2Hitesh PatelLabour Party1,19321.4%64.1%+39.1 ptsElected
3Jean CarterLabour Party1,15420.7%62.0%+37.0 ptsElected
4Sue JenkinConservative Party5469.8%29.3%
5Peter EltonConservative Party4948.8%26.5%
6Sonia BogganConservative Party4037.2%21.6%
7Tim HarwoodLiberal Democrats2274.1%12.2%
8Andrew FordTrade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1382.5%7.4%

EC ward code E05011033 · Back to ward index

Birchwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,334

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Russ BowdenLabour Party1,71924.5%73.6%+48.6 ptsElected
2Pauline NelsonLabour Party1,57822.5%67.6%+42.6 ptsElected
3Chris FitzsimmonsLabour Party1,47521.1%63.2%+38.2 ptsElected
4Nigel BaldingConservative Party78211.2%33.5%
5Peter LintonConservative Party6188.8%26.5%
6Amy LintonIndependent5297.6%22.7%
7John DaviesLiberal Democrats3024.3%12.9%

EC ward code E05011026 · Back to ward index

Poplars and Hulme · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,702

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1John Kerr-BrownLabour Party1,19623.4%70.3%+45.3 ptsElected
2Hilary CookseyLabour Party1,10321.6%64.8%+39.8 ptsElected
3Brian MaherLabour Party1,09021.3%64.0%+39.0 ptsElected
4Mike ByrneUK Independence Party (UKIP)4639.1%27.2%
5Trevor NichollsUK Independence Party (UKIP)4508.8%26.4%
6Mal LingleyUK Independence Party (UKIP)4408.6%25.9%
7Francine LeslieConservative Party2224.3%13.0%
8Pam ToddLiberal Democrats1422.8%8.3%

EC ward code E05011040 · Back to ward index

Orford · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,904

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mike HannonLabour Party1,49326.1%78.4%+53.4 ptsElected
2Kerri MorrisLabour Party1,37424.1%72.2%+47.2 ptsElected
3Morgan TarrLabour Party1,23421.6%64.8%+39.8 ptsElected
4Ian RichardsUK Independence Party (UKIP)4207.4%22.1%
5Dion ChallinorUK Independence Party (UKIP)3926.9%20.6%
6Sid SimmonsUK Independence Party (UKIP)3926.9%20.6%
7Jan WoningConservative Party1542.7%8.1%
8Pam MarksLiberal Democrats1372.4%7.2%
9Clive LawrinsonIndependent1172.0%6.1%

EC ward code E05011038 · Back to ward index

Poulton North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,823

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Diana BennettLabour Party1,41325.8%77.5%+52.5 ptsElected
2Graham FriendLabour Party1,41125.8%77.4%+52.4 ptsElected
3Russell PurnellLabour Party1,22222.3%67.0%+42.0 ptsElected
4Chris OliverLiberal Democrats72613.3%39.8%
5Philip EasttyConservative Party69612.7%38.2%

EC ward code E05011041 · Back to ward index

Burtonwood and Winwick · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 75.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,406

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cathy MitchellLabour Party1,08338.5%77.0%+43.7 ptsElected
2Terry O'NeillLabour Party1,06537.9%75.7%+42.4 ptsElected
3Robin SloanConservative Party39914.2%28.4%
4Timothy MuttockLiberal Democrats2659.4%18.8%

EC ward code E05011027 · Back to ward index

Bewsey and Whitecross · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,487

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sarah HallLabour Party1,14225.6%76.8%+51.8 ptsElected
2Steve WrightLabour Party1,08024.2%72.6%+47.6 ptsElected
3Tom JenningsLabour Party1,06123.8%71.3%+46.3 ptsElected
4Bob TimmisLiberal Democrats3197.1%21.4%
5Rowland BlackstockConservative Party2355.3%15.8%
6Pat SmithConservative Party2104.7%14.1%
7Irina AxcellLiberal Democrats1513.4%10.2%
8Judith WalkerLiberal Democrats1353.0%9.1%
9Shelley BennettTrade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1292.9%8.7%

EC ward code E05011025 · Back to ward index