← Windsor and Maidenhead (all cycles) · 2 May 2019 cohort

Windsor and Maidenhead 2019

Local elections held 2 May 2019.

19 ward races
41 seats
0 elected below the proportional quota
0.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 41 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party35,99942.8%2356.1%1946.3%+4
Liberal Democrats21,25325.3%922.0%1126.8%-2
tBf10,16012.1%37.3%512.2%-2
Labour Party7,6669.1%00.0%49.8%-4
OWRRA3,0273.6%24.9%12.4%+1
WWRA2,7333.3%37.3%12.4%+2
Independent1,1191.3%00.0%00.0%0
Flood9981.2%12.4%00.0%+1
Green Party9181.1%00.0%00.0%0
UK Independence Party (UKIP)1520.2%00.0%00.0%0
Total84,025100.0%41100.0%41100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2019 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2019 election (current) and on the eve of it (2018), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2019)
Previous (2018)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Riverside · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,199

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Simon DudleyConservative Party85119.4%38.7%+5.4 ptsElected
2Christopher TargowskiConservative Party77717.7%35.3%+2.0 ptsElected
3Claire StrettontBf67815.4%30.8%
4Mick JarvistBf60013.6%27.3%
5Rob CastellLiberal Democrats47610.8%21.7%
6Kashmir SinghLiberal Democrats45010.2%20.5%
7Craig McDermottGreen Party2154.9%9.8%
8Sharon BunceLabour Party1824.1%8.3%
9David Knowles-LeakLabour Party1683.8%7.6%

EC ward code E05012510 · Back to ward index

Belmont · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,072

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Simon BondLiberal Democrats95923.1%46.3%+13.0 ptsElected
2John BaldwinLiberal Democrats83820.2%40.5%+7.1 ptsElected
3Richard HemmingstBf64915.7%31.3%
4Philip LoveConservative Party62715.1%30.3%
5Marion MillsConservative Party58914.2%28.4%
6Patricia LattimerLabour Party2656.4%12.8%
7Ian SmithLabour Party2165.2%10.4%

EC ward code E05012495 · Back to ward index

Oldfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,633

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Geoffrey HilltBf73822.6%45.2%+11.9 ptsElected
2Helen TaylortBf67120.6%41.1%+7.8 ptsElected
3Derek WilsonConservative Party57317.5%35.1%
4Joel WheelerConservative Party50715.5%31.1%
5Anna BermangeLiberal Democrats2236.8%13.7%
6Tony BakerLabour Party2006.1%12.3%
7George ShawLiberal Democrats1855.7%11.3%
8Rory NosworthyLabour Party1685.1%10.3%

EC ward code E05012508 · Back to ward index

St Mary's · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,449

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Donna StimsonConservative Party62421.5%43.1%+9.7 ptsElected
2Gurch SinghConservative Party60420.8%41.7%+8.4 ptsElected
3Helen CraggsLiberal Democrats38013.1%26.2%
4Andrew HickleyLiberal Democrats2749.5%18.9%
5Richard WawmantBf2338.0%16.1%
6Derek Philip-XutBf2328.0%16.0%
7Thomas BakerLabour Party1976.8%13.6%
8John BarronGreen Party1866.4%12.8%
9Jacob CotterillLabour Party1685.8%11.6%

EC ward code E05012511 · Back to ward index

Bisham and Cookham · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,277

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mandy Kaur BrarLiberal Democrats1,32129.0%58.0%+24.7 ptsElected
2Gerry ClarkConservative Party96321.2%42.3%+9.0 ptsElected
3Mark HowardLiberal Democrats95220.9%41.8%
4Bill PerryConservative Party88519.4%38.9%
5Christopher MossGreen Party2726.0%11.9%
6Alexander McKendrickLabour Party1062.3%4.7%
7Geoff CuttingLabour Party541.2%2.4%

EC ward code E05012496 · Back to ward index

Furze Platt · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,379

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Catherine del CampoLiberal Democrats1,17724.7%49.5%+16.2 ptsElected
2Joshua ReynoldsLiberal Democrats1,01921.4%42.8%+9.5 ptsElected
3Derek SharpConservative Party63213.3%26.6%
4Hari SharmaIndependent57012.0%24.0%
5Mohammed IlyasConservative Party54311.4%22.8%
6Tom EastentBf4068.5%17.1%
7Louise ClarkeLabour Party1563.3%6.6%
8Edmund HollidayUK Independence Party (UKIP)1523.2%6.4%
9Clive LattimerLabour Party1022.1%4.3%

EC ward code E05012505 · Back to ward index

Clewer and Dedworth East · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,690

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Helen PricetBf76222.5%45.1%+11.8 ptsElected
2Carole da CostaWWRA72521.4%42.9%+9.6 ptsElected
3Phillip BicknellConservative Party64519.1%38.2%
4Michael AireyConservative Party64018.9%37.9%
5Mark WilsonLiberal Democrats2166.4%12.8%
6Laura BinnieLabour Party2106.2%12.4%
7Daniel WallLabour Party1825.4%10.8%

EC ward code E05012499 · Back to ward index

Clewer East · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,809

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Amy TisiLiberal Democrats81422.5%45.0%+11.7 ptsElected
2Karen DaviesLiberal Democrats79422.0%43.9%+10.6 ptsElected
3Natasha AireyConservative Party75320.8%41.6%
4Dee QuickConservative Party73620.3%40.7%
5Fintan McKeownGreen Party2456.8%13.5%
6Patrick GreenLabour Party1544.3%8.5%
7Stephen McGowanLabour Party1213.3%6.7%

EC ward code E05012501 · Back to ward index

Clewer and Dedworth West · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,009

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Wisdom da CostaWWRA1,06726.6%53.1%+19.8 ptsElected
2Jon DaveyWWRA94123.4%46.8%+13.5 ptsElected
3Ed WilsonConservative Party88522.0%44.1%
4Malcolm AlexanderConservative Party81120.2%40.4%
5Deborah FosterLabour Party1644.1%8.2%
6Joe YoungLabour Party1503.7%7.5%

EC ward code E05012500 · Back to ward index

Boyn Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,083

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stuart CarrollConservative Party1,07625.8%51.7%+18.3 ptsElected
2Gurpreet Singh BhangraConservative Party98123.5%47.1%+13.8 ptsElected
3Adam BermangeLiberal Democrats48311.6%23.2%
4Oliver BaldwinLiberal Democrats47311.4%22.7%
5Andrew HilltBf43010.3%20.6%
6Nasreen BrittaintBf3538.5%16.9%
7Marios AlexandrouLabour Party2225.3%10.7%
8Graham LeeLabour Party1483.6%7.1%

EC ward code E05012497 · Back to ward index

Datchet, Horton and Wraysbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,220

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1David CannonConservative Party1,11716.8%50.3%+25.3 ptsElected
2Ewan LarcombeFlood99815.0%44.9%+19.9 ptsElected
3Gary MuirConservative Party90313.6%40.7%+15.7 ptsElected
4Margaret LentontBf75111.3%33.8%
5Rushi MillnsConservative Party74511.2%33.6%
6David BuckleytBf6339.5%28.5%
7Linda O'FlynnLiberal Democrats2884.3%13.0%
8Jennifer WardLabour Party2714.1%12.2%
9Mark OlneyLabour Party2664.0%12.0%
10Tim O'FlynnLiberal Democrats2654.0%11.9%
11Gareth JonesLiberal Democrats2183.3%9.8%
12Peter WardLabour Party2063.1%9.3%

EC ward code E05012503 · Back to ward index

Eton and Castle · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,597

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Samantha RaynerConservative Party1,45718.7%56.1%+31.1 ptsElected
2John BowdenConservative Party1,31916.9%50.8%+25.8 ptsElected
3Shamsul ShelimConservative Party1,06513.7%41.0%+16.0 ptsElected
4George FusseyLiberal Democrats81810.5%31.5%
5Devon DaviesLiberal Democrats7389.5%28.4%
6Julian TisiLiberal Democrats6458.3%24.8%
7Keith OwentBf6097.8%23.5%
8Peter ShearmanLabour Party3985.1%15.3%
9Riccardo LudoviciLabour Party3724.8%14.3%
10Angus CameronLabour Party3704.7%14.2%

EC ward code E05012504 · Back to ward index

Pinkneys Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,519

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Simon WernerLiberal Democrats1,50729.9%59.8%+26.5 ptsElected
2Clive BaskervilleLiberal Democrats1,32626.3%52.7%+19.3 ptsElected
3Marius GilmoreConservative Party79915.9%31.7%
4Richard PopeConservative Party69313.8%27.5%
5Charles HollingsworthtBf4919.7%19.5%
6Jane CollissonLabour Party1312.6%5.2%
7Nigel SmithLabour Party901.8%3.6%

EC ward code E05012509 · Back to ward index

Hurley and Walthams · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,516

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Maureen HuntConservative Party1,03334.1%68.2%+34.8 ptsElected
2Andrew JohnsonConservative Party82227.1%54.2%+20.9 ptsElected
3John IlesLiberal Democrats32510.7%21.4%
4Jenny WernerLiberal Democrats2979.8%19.6%
5Hasrat AlitBf2739.0%18.0%
6Patrick McDonaldLabour Party1725.7%11.3%
7Jessica PocockLabour Party1093.6%7.2%

EC ward code E05012506 · Back to ward index

Cox Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,205

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Phil HaselerConservative Party1,22327.7%55.5%+22.1 ptsElected
2Ross McWilliamsConservative Party1,21927.6%55.3%+22.0 ptsElected
3Bruce AdamsLiberal Democrats60813.8%27.6%
4Bill BlackLiberal Democrats53612.2%24.3%
5David MarkstBf50611.5%23.0%
6Robert HornerLabour Party1743.9%7.9%
7Colin GreenfieldLabour Party1433.2%6.5%

EC ward code E05012502 · Back to ward index

Bray · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,749

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1David CoppingerConservative Party1,03929.7%59.4%+26.1 ptsElected
2Leo WaltersConservative Party99128.3%56.7%+23.3 ptsElected
3Lee PagetBf57316.4%32.8%
4Sheila AdamsLiberal Democrats36810.5%21.0%
5Robert AckerLiberal Democrats2256.4%12.9%
6Peter TargettLabour Party1524.3%8.7%
7Andrew FoakesLabour Party1494.3%8.5%

EC ward code E05012498 · Back to ward index

Sunningdale and Cheapside · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,493

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Christine BatesonConservative Party94631.7%63.4%+30.0 ptsElected
2Sayonara LuxtonConservative Party85728.7%57.4%+24.1 ptsElected
3Valerie PiketBf57219.2%38.3%
4Sonya LippoldLiberal Democrats2839.5%19.0%
5Mariano JuliaLiberal Democrats2428.1%16.2%
6Alison CarpenterLabour Party862.9%5.8%

EC ward code E05012512 · Back to ward index

Ascot and Sunninghill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,391

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1David HiltonConservative Party1,44620.2%60.5%+35.5 ptsElected
2Julian SharpeConservative Party1,37219.1%57.4%+32.4 ptsElected
3John StoryConservative Party1,35518.9%56.7%+31.7 ptsElected
4Tamasin BarnbrookLiberal Democrats5948.3%24.8%
5Adam JezardIndependent5497.7%23.0%
6Aaron Singh ChahalLiberal Democrats4866.8%20.3%
7Jonathan PopeLiberal Democrats4506.3%18.8%
8Spike HumphreyLabour Party3725.2%15.6%
9Ian SteersLabour Party3214.5%13.4%
10Margery ThorogoodLabour Party2283.2%9.5%

EC ward code E05012494 · Back to ward index

Old Windsor · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,123

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lynne JonesOWRRA1,61938.1%76.3%+42.9 ptsElected
2Neil KnowlesOWRRA1,40833.2%66.3%+33.0 ptsElected
3Arlene CarsonConservative Party54412.8%25.6%
4Amit VermaConservative Party3528.3%16.6%
5Roy ReevesLabour Party1643.9%7.7%
6Yvonne OlneyLabour Party1593.7%7.5%

EC ward code E05012507 · Back to ward index