← All councils

Amber Valley

Every election cycle we have data for, most recent first.

6 cycles in our data
34.7% all-time seats elected below the quota (41 of 118)
21.2% all-time seats unfairly awarded (25 of 118 across 6 cycles)

Cycles

Council composition as of 2025

42 councillors, by party. One square per seat. Source: opencouncildata annual snapshot — reflects the council at the end of 2025 (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Hover any seat for the party.

Most recent election (2023)

In 2023, 42 seats were up across 18 wards. The table below shows what each party actually won — alongside what they would have won if the 42 seats had been shared in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party27,25334.5%2661.9%1535.7%+11
Conservative Party24,64431.2%716.7%1331.0%-6
Green Party12,08015.3%614.3%614.3%0
Reform UK7,3589.3%00.0%49.5%-4
Liberal Democrats3,8434.9%12.4%24.8%-1
BELPER IND3,7124.7%24.8%24.8%0
Social Democratic Party690.1%00.0%00.0%0
NF400.1%00.0%00.0%0
Total78,999100.0%42100.0%42100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Full ward-by-ward results for 2023 →

Composition history

One row per opencouncildata annual snapshot — the council at the end of each year (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Newest first; hover any seat for the party.

2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016

Ward by ward

Each row is a ward, each column a cycle. Each cell shows the top-of-poll candidate's party (swatch) and their share of valid ballots. Wards are matched by name across cycles — boundary reviews can mean a ward of the same name is a slightly different area in a later cycle.

Ward201620182019202120222023
Alfreton54%59%41%47%51%55%
Alport57%
Alport and South West Parishes49%
Belper Central42%41%43%
Belper East45%43%45%32%
Belper North38%42%47%38%
Belper South48%40%55%60%
Codnor and Waingroves54%51%49%52%
Codnor, Langley Mill and Aldercar50%
Crich40%
Crich and South Wingfield39%
Duffield48%63%70%
Duffield and Quarndon69%
Heage and Ambergate47%43%52%53%
Heanor and Loscoe40%48%63%50%
Heanor East38%50%63%52%34%
Heanor West43%47%54%48%
Heanor West and Loscoe39%
Ironville and Riddings41%54%57%47%47%
Kilburn Denby and Holbrook57%51%
Kilburn, Denby and Holbrook48%57%43%
Kilburn, Denby, Holbrook and Horsley45%
Langley Mill and Aldercar44%49%63%50%
Ripley40%50%37%58%46%53%
Ripley and Marehay42%40%56%47%
Shipley Park Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse67%56%
Shipley Park, Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse52%64%
Smalley, Shipley and Horsley Woodhouse42%
Somercotes59%67%54%60%68%
South West Parishes68%
Swanwick60%42%53%48%
Wingfield69%