← Amber Valley (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Amber Valley 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 42 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 27,253 | 34.5% | 26 | 61.9% | 15 | 35.7% | +11 |
| Conservative Party | 24,644 | 31.2% | 7 | 16.7% | 13 | 31.0% | -6 |
| Green Party | 12,080 | 15.3% | 6 | 14.3% | 6 | 14.3% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 7,358 | 9.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 9.5% | -4 |
| Liberal Democrats | 3,843 | 4.9% | 1 | 2.4% | 2 | 4.8% | -1 |
| BELPER IND | 3,712 | 4.7% | 2 | 4.8% | 2 | 4.8% | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 69 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| NF | 40 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 78,999 | 100.0% | 42 | 100.0% | 42 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Belper North · 2 seats · won at 32.1% · −1.3 pts below quota
- Heanor East · 2 seats · won at 34.5% · above quota
- Belper East · 3 seats · won at 29.3% · above quota
- Smalley, Shipley and Horsley Woodhouse · 2 seats · won at 38.0% · above quota
- Crich and South Wingfield · 2 seats · won at 38.2% · above quota
- Heage and Ambergate · 2 seats · won at 39.1% · above quota
- Swanwick · 2 seats · won at 42.9% · above quota
- Heanor West and Loscoe · 3 seats · won at 35.4% · above quota
- Ripley and Marehay · 2 seats · won at 45.9% · above quota
- Kilburn, Denby, Holbrook and Horsley · 3 seats · won at 38.1% · above quota
- Ironville and Riddings · 2 seats · won at 47.1% · above quota
- Codnor, Langley Mill and Aldercar · 3 seats · won at 39.2% · above quota
- Alport and South West Parishes · 2 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- Ripley · 3 seats · won at 45.2% · above quota
- Somercotes · 2 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- Belper South · 2 seats · won at 57.5% · above quota
- Alfreton · 3 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Duffield and Quarndon · 2 seats · won at 64.9% · above quota
Race results
Belper North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 32.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −1.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,067
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monkman, E. | Labour Party | 783 | 18.9% | 37.9% | +4.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bellamy, B. | BELPER IND | 663 | 16.0% | 32.1% | −1.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Butler, J. | Labour Party | 600 | 14.5% | 29.0% | — | |
| 4 | Spendlove, G. | Conservative Party | 570 | 13.8% | 27.6% | — | |
| 5 | Kerry, J. | Conservative Party | 481 | 11.6% | 23.3% | — | |
| 6 | Wilkinson, J. | BELPER IND | 378 | 9.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 7 | Harlow, J. | Green Party | 340 | 8.2% | 16.5% | — | |
| 8 | Willshaw, R. | Green Party | 318 | 7.7% | 15.4% | — |
Heanor East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,521
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ward, J. | Labour Party | 524 | 17.2% | 34.5% | +1.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holmes, T. | Labour Party | 524 | 17.2% | 34.5% | +1.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gent, J. | Reform UK | 505 | 16.6% | 33.2% | — | |
| 4 | Burrell, M. | Reform UK | 496 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Edwards-Milson, L. | Conservative Party | 393 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 6 | Gilbert, J. | Conservative Party | 381 | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | |
| 7 | Hallsworth, C. | Green Party | 219 | 7.2% | 14.4% | — |
Belper East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 29.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,040
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hill, T. | Labour Party | 978 | 10.7% | 32.2% | +7.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Porter, J. | Labour Party | 928 | 10.2% | 30.5% | +5.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Atkinson, F. | BELPER IND | 890 | 9.8% | 29.3% | +4.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Nelson, J. | Conservative Party | 867 | 9.5% | 28.5% | — | |
| 5 | Bellamy, R. | BELPER IND | 852 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 6 | Orman-Chan, S. | Labour Party | 816 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 7 | Greatbatch, M. | Conservative Party | 787 | 8.6% | 25.9% | — | |
| 8 | Bishop, J. | BELPER IND | 729 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 9 | Crawley, J. | Conservative Party | 673 | 7.4% | 22.1% | — | |
| 10 | Devine, S. | Green Party | 469 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 11 | Wozniczka, J. | Green Party | 372 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 12 | Simmons, M. | Green Party | 329 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — | |
| 13 | Morrissey, J. | Liberal Democrats | 234 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 14 | Salmon, R. | Liberal Democrats | 124 | 1.4% | 4.1% | — | |
| 15 | Scrase, I. | Liberal Democrats | 73 | 0.8% | 2.4% | — |
Smalley, Shipley and Horsley Woodhouse · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,770
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paget, A. | Green Party | 748 | 21.1% | 42.3% | +8.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pizzey, L. | Green Party | 672 | 19.0% | 38.0% | +4.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Iliffe, R. | Conservative Party | 592 | 16.7% | 33.4% | — | |
| 4 | Perko, C. | Conservative Party | 455 | 12.9% | 25.7% | — | |
| 5 | Jordan, C. | Labour Party | 270 | 7.6% | 15.3% | — | |
| 6 | Stevenson, A. | Reform UK | 268 | 7.6% | 15.1% | — | |
| 7 | Harvey, V. | Reform UK | 240 | 6.8% | 13.6% | — | |
| 8 | Venables, K. | Labour Party | 228 | 6.4% | 12.9% | — | |
| 9 | Miller, A. | Liberal Democrats | 67 | 1.9% | 3.8% | — |
Crich and South Wingfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,806
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harper, D. | Conservative Party | 710 | 19.7% | 39.3% | +6.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, K. | Liberal Democrats | 690 | 19.1% | 38.2% | +4.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harper, T. | Conservative Party | 668 | 18.5% | 37.0% | — | |
| 4 | Johnson, M. | Liberal Democrats | 570 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | Benson, T. | Labour Party | 257 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — | |
| 6 | Horton, F. | Green Party | 238 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 7 | Cowings, J. | Labour Party | 216 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 8 | Lowick, S. | Green Party | 174 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — | |
| 9 | Oakenfull, E. | Reform UK | 89 | 2.5% | 4.9% | — |
Heage and Ambergate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,399
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lobley, P. | Labour Party | 746 | 26.7% | 53.3% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Burslem, A. | Labour Party | 547 | 19.6% | 39.1% | +5.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ward, A. | Conservative Party | 524 | 18.7% | 37.5% | — | |
| 4 | Taylor, V. | Conservative Party | 391 | 14.0% | 28.0% | — | |
| 5 | Hatchett, D. | Green Party | 228 | 8.2% | 16.3% | — | |
| 6 | Hartwell, C. | Green Party | 222 | 7.9% | 15.9% | — | |
| 7 | Chatburn, K. | Reform UK | 139 | 5.0% | 9.9% | — |
Swanwick · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,536
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hayes, S. | Conservative Party | 733 | 23.9% | 47.7% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Powis, J. | Conservative Party | 659 | 21.5% | 42.9% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Trewick, G. | Labour Party | 597 | 19.4% | 38.9% | — | |
| 4 | Nicholls, A. | Labour Party | 488 | 15.9% | 31.8% | — | |
| 5 | Elliott, S. | Green Party | 265 | 8.6% | 17.3% | — | |
| 6 | Trigg, M. | Liberal Democrats | 179 | 5.8% | 11.7% | — | |
| 7 | Hibbard, M. | Reform UK | 150 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — |
Heanor West and Loscoe · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,219
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bower, S. | Labour Party | 873 | 13.1% | 39.3% | +14.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Beswick, N. | Labour Party | 858 | 12.9% | 38.7% | +13.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jones, M. | Labour Party | 786 | 11.8% | 35.4% | +10.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Grainger, S. | Conservative Party | 642 | 9.6% | 28.9% | — | |
| 5 | Stones, J. | Reform UK | 640 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — | |
| 6 | Booth, R. | Reform UK | 605 | 9.1% | 27.3% | — | |
| 7 | Savage, N. | Conservative Party | 580 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 8 | Weston, B. | Reform UK | 555 | 8.3% | 25.0% | — | |
| 9 | Wright, D. | Conservative Party | 513 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 10 | Brooks, J. | Green Party | 251 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 11 | Stephenson, S. | Liberal Democrats | 126 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — | |
| 12 | Marler, J. | Liberal Democrats | 117 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — | |
| 13 | Holliday, B. | Liberal Democrats | 111 | 1.7% | 5.0% | — |
Ripley and Marehay · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,491
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cox, L. | Labour Party | 694 | 23.3% | 46.5% | +13.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wilson, M. | Labour Party | 684 | 22.9% | 45.9% | +12.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ashton, R. | Conservative Party | 665 | 22.3% | 44.6% | — | |
| 4 | Spencer, T. | Conservative Party | 460 | 15.4% | 30.9% | — | |
| 5 | Bedford, M. | Green Party | 176 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 6 | Cresswell, M. | Reform UK | 162 | 5.4% | 10.9% | — | |
| 7 | Smith, T. | Reform UK | 141 | 4.7% | 9.5% | — |
Kilburn, Denby, Holbrook and Horsley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,572
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farnsworth, L. | Labour Party | 1,158 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ainsworth, T. | Conservative Party | 1,065 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Whitmore, J. | Conservative Party | 981 | 12.7% | 38.1% | +13.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Murray, M. | Conservative Party | 930 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 5 | Missett, M. | Labour Party | 885 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 6 | Watson, D. | Labour Party | 856 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 7 | McGuinness, M. | Green Party | 376 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 8 | Gorman, K. | Green Party | 373 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 9 | Waterfall, M. | Reform UK | 331 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 10 | Nathan, A. | Reform UK | 250 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 11 | Cresswell, G. | Liberal Democrats | 189 | 2.4% | 7.3% | — | |
| 12 | Gent, S. | Liberal Democrats | 171 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 13 | Gent, C. | Liberal Democrats | 150 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — |
Ironville and Riddings · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,371
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grundy, R. | Labour Party | 645 | 23.5% | 47.1% | +13.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cox, K. | Labour Party | 645 | 23.5% | 47.1% | +13.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clark, P. | Conservative Party | 444 | 16.2% | 32.4% | — | |
| 4 | Turner, S. | Conservative Party | 372 | 13.6% | 27.1% | — | |
| 5 | Rose, P. | Reform UK | 235 | 8.6% | 17.1% | — | |
| 6 | Gent, M. | Reform UK | 214 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — | |
| 7 | Hatchett, R. | Green Party | 108 | 3.9% | 7.9% | — | |
| 8 | Karpasea, J. | Liberal Democrats | 50 | 1.8% | 3.6% | — | |
| 9 | Kift, K. | Liberal Democrats | 28 | 1.0% | 2.0% | — |
Codnor, Langley Mill and Aldercar · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,744
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emmas-Williams, C. | Labour Party | 871 | 16.7% | 50.0% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hamilton, E. | Labour Party | 702 | 13.4% | 40.3% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Moon, D. | Labour Party | 684 | 13.1% | 39.2% | +14.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cattermole, D. | Conservative Party | 552 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 5 | Goodrum, S. | Reform UK | 470 | 9.0% | 27.0% | — | |
| 6 | Cresswell, S. | Conservative Party | 430 | 8.2% | 24.7% | — | |
| 7 | Trower, S. | Reform UK | 427 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 8 | Abernethy, A. | Reform UK | 404 | 7.7% | 23.2% | — | |
| 9 | Donohue, A. | Conservative Party | 401 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 10 | Powers, V. | Green Party | 250 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 11 | Knowles, T. | NF | 40 | 0.8% | 2.3% | — |
Alport and South West Parishes · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,762
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, D. | Conservative Party | 868 | 24.6% | 49.3% | +15.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Orton, J. | Conservative Party | 846 | 24.0% | 48.0% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Meynell, G. | Green Party | 496 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 4 | Hancock, D. | Labour Party | 455 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 5 | Dwyer, M. | Labour Party | 450 | 12.8% | 25.5% | — | |
| 6 | Heap, M. | Liberal Democrats | 165 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — | |
| 7 | Stanton, P. | Liberal Democrats | 143 | 4.1% | 8.1% | — | |
| 8 | Theobald, F. | Reform UK | 100 | 2.8% | 5.7% | — |
Ripley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,262
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holmes, T. | Labour Party | 1,192 | 17.6% | 52.7% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, D. | Labour Party | 1,062 | 15.6% | 46.9% | +21.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Allwood, M. | Labour Party | 1,022 | 15.1% | 45.2% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Carter, S. | Conservative Party | 902 | 13.3% | 39.9% | — | |
| 5 | Moss, P. | Conservative Party | 830 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 6 | Tassi, L. | Conservative Party | 798 | 11.8% | 35.3% | — | |
| 7 | Fender, H. | Green Party | 188 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — | |
| 8 | Greaves, K. | Green Party | 175 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 9 | Booth, B. | Reform UK | 169 | 2.5% | 7.5% | — | |
| 10 | Hind, S. | Reform UK | 145 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 11 | Gillians, P. | Liberal Democrats | 105 | 1.5% | 4.6% | — | |
| 12 | Taylor, E. | Social Democratic Party | 69 | 1.0% | 3.1% | — | |
| 13 | Gent, J. | Liberal Democrats | 69 | 1.0% | 3.1% | — | |
| 14 | Snith, P. | Liberal Democrats | 60 | 0.9% | 2.7% | — |
Somercotes · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 967
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCabe, J. | Labour Party | 653 | 33.8% | 67.6% | +34.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sherman, E. | Labour Party | 519 | 26.8% | 53.7% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ainsworth, J. | Conservative Party | 207 | 10.7% | 21.4% | — | |
| 4 | Hayes, J. | Conservative Party | 193 | 10.0% | 20.0% | — | |
| 5 | Gent, S. | Reform UK | 92 | 4.8% | 9.5% | — | |
| 6 | Gent, C. | Reform UK | 88 | 4.6% | 9.1% | — | |
| 7 | Pearson, T. | Liberal Democrats | 65 | 3.4% | 6.7% | — | |
| 8 | Slater, P. | Liberal Democrats | 61 | 3.2% | 6.3% | — | |
| 9 | Sewell, R. | Green Party | 55 | 2.8% | 5.7% | — |
Belper South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,373
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kinsella, G. | Green Party | 826 | 30.1% | 60.2% | +26.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walls, J. | Green Party | 790 | 28.8% | 57.5% | +24.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Miller, B. | Conservative Party | 268 | 9.8% | 19.5% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, D. | Conservative Party | 218 | 7.9% | 15.9% | — | |
| 5 | Urquhart, L. | Labour Party | 207 | 7.5% | 15.1% | — | |
| 6 | Mountain, P. | Labour Party | 191 | 7.0% | 13.9% | — | |
| 7 | Ploughman, L. | BELPER IND | 121 | 4.4% | 8.8% | — | |
| 8 | Ploughman, N. | BELPER IND | 79 | 2.9% | 5.8% | — | |
| 9 | Brunelleschi, L. | Reform UK | 46 | 1.7% | 3.4% | — |
Alfreton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,499
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marshall-Clarke, S. | Labour Party | 828 | 18.4% | 55.2% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dolman, G. | Labour Party | 809 | 18.0% | 54.0% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wood, K. | Labour Party | 763 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Boyce, C. | Conservative Party | 443 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 5 | Cantrill, B. | Conservative Party | 403 | 9.0% | 26.9% | — | |
| 6 | Cantrill, F. | Conservative Party | 402 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 7 | Hubber, R. | Green Party | 157 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 8 | Bowles, B. | Reform UK | 143 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — | |
| 9 | Gent, H. | Reform UK | 131 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — | |
| 10 | Price, P. | Reform UK | 123 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — | |
| 11 | Miles, J. | Liberal Democrats | 104 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 12 | Gibbons, P. | Liberal Democrats | 100 | 2.2% | 6.7% | — | |
| 13 | Nilsen, J. | Liberal Democrats | 92 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — |
Duffield and Quarndon · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,436
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McDermott, A. | Green Party | 1,685 | 34.6% | 69.2% | +35.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Long, E. | Green Party | 1,580 | 32.4% | 64.9% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Knee, S. | Conservative Party | 684 | 14.0% | 28.1% | — | |
| 4 | Bettridge, M. | Conservative Party | 663 | 13.6% | 27.2% | — | |
| 5 | Spilsbury, M. | Labour Party | 168 | 3.4% | 6.9% | — | |
| 6 | Neville, M. | Labour Party | 91 | 1.9% | 3.7% | — |